SUBJECT: Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena
Moving Party: Defendants Mayer Moizel and Mayer Moizel Revocable Trust
Resp. Party: Third-Party Knight Environmental Consulting, LLC
The motion to compel compliance with third-party subpoena to Knight Environmental Consulting is GRANTED.
Defendants’ request for sanctions is DENIED.
BACKGROUND:
On May 8, 2019, Plaintiff Amy DeZellar commenced this action against Defendants Krotona Apartments, Mayer Moizel, and Mayer Moizel Revocable Trust.
On May 10, 2019, Plaintiff filed the first amended complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants for (1) breach of warranty of habitability (Civil Code section 1941.1); (2) breach of warranty of habitability (Health and Safety Code section 17920.3); (3) premises liability and negligence per se; (4) negligence; (5) negligent infliction of emotional distress; (6) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (7) violation of the Rent Stabilization Ordinance; (8) breach of implied covenant of quiet enjoyme
Hearing Date
January 07, 2020
Type
Other Non-Personal Injury/Property Damage tort (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUBJECT: Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena
Moving Party: Defendants Mayer Moizel and Mayer Moizel Revocable Trust
Resp. Party: Third-Party Knight Environmental Consulting, LLC
The motion to compel compliance with third-party subpoena to Knight Environmental Consulting is GRANTED.
Defendants’ request for sanctions is DENIED.
BACKGROUND:
On May 8, 2019, Plaintiff Amy DeZellar commenced this action against Defendants Krotona Apartments, Mayer Moizel, and Mayer Moizel Revocable Trust.
On May 10, 2019, Plaintiff filed the first amended complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants for (1) breach of warranty of habitability (Civil Code section 1941.1); (2) breach of warranty of habitability (Health and Safety Code section 17920.3); (3) premises liability and negligence per se; (4) negligence; (5) negligent infliction of emotional distress; (6) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (7) violation of the Rent Stabilization Ordinance; (8) breach of implied covenant of quiet enjoyme