SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
HEATHER GRUENINGER, Plaintiff(s), vs. CENTURY CITY DENTAL GROUP, ET AL., Defendant(s).
CASE NO: 19STCV10611
[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
Dept. 31
8:30 a.m.
December 1, 2020
Plaintiff’s attorney of record, Heather Grueninger (“Counsel”), seeks to relieved as counsel, asserting Counsel is in the process of closing his law practice, and that Counsel has obtained employment at a different law firm that makes it impossible to represent Plaintiff’s interests. Further, Counsel contends there has been a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship, such that Counsel cannot effectively represent Plaintiff. Counsel declares it served the moving papers on his client via mail at the client’s last known address after confirming the address by conversation. Counsel has filed proof of service on his client and on Defendants.
The motion is unopposed, and there is otherwis
Hearing Date
December 01, 2020
Type
Medical Malpractice - Physicians & Surgeons (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
HEATHER GRUENINGER, Plaintiff(s), vs. CENTURY CITY DENTAL GROUP, ET AL., Defendant(s).
CASE NO: 19STCV10611
[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
Dept. 31
8:30 a.m.
December 1, 2020
Plaintiff’s attorney of record, Heather Grueninger (“Counsel”), seeks to relieved as counsel, asserting Counsel is in the process of closing his law practice, and that Counsel has obtained employment at a different law firm that makes it impossible to represent Plaintiff’s interests. Further, Counsel contends there has been a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship, such that Counsel cannot effectively represent Plaintiff. Counsel declares it served the moving papers on his client via mail at the client’s last known address after confirming the address by conversation. Counsel has filed proof of service on his client and on Defendants.
The motion is unopposed, and there is otherwis