Plaintiff Westlake Services, LLC’s Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions, and Demand for Production of Documents is CONTINUED to December 10, 2020.
The moving papers for Plaintiff’s motions were originally filed on March 6, 2020 and served on Defendant Hassan Abdellatiff’s then counsel of record.
On July 8, 2020, the Court granted attorney of record for Defendant, Alfred Manuel Freitas’ Motion to Be Relieved. The Court stated that counsel would not be relieved as attorney of record until a proof of service was filed with the Court evidencing that the Order granting the motion to be relieved was served on Defendant and all parties. The Court further ordered that counsel give notice of the scheduled hearing for Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery.
To date, no Proof of Service of the Order has been filed and there is no indication Defendant himself has been served with the moving papers that were originally served on cou
Hearing Date
October 26, 2020
Type
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Plaintiff Westlake Services, LLC’s Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions, and Demand for Production of Documents is CONTINUED to December 10, 2020.
The moving papers for Plaintiff’s motions were originally filed on March 6, 2020 and served on Defendant Hassan Abdellatiff’s then counsel of record.
On July 8, 2020, the Court granted attorney of record for Defendant, Alfred Manuel Freitas’ Motion to Be Relieved. The Court stated that counsel would not be relieved as attorney of record until a proof of service was filed with the Court evidencing that the Order granting the motion to be relieved was served on Defendant and all parties. The Court further ordered that counsel give notice of the scheduled hearing for Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery.
To date, no Proof of Service of the Order has been filed and there is no indication Defendant himself has been served with the moving papers that were originally served on cou