SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
CHATEAU LAKESIDE PARTNERS, LLC, etc., Plaintiff, vs. LAW OFFICE OF FREDERICK L. SPINRAD, etc., et al., Defendants.
CASE NO.: 19STCV04288
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEMURRERS TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; MOTION TO STRIKE
Date: November 22, 2019
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept. 56
MOVING PARTIES: Defendant James McCone (“McCone”); Defendant Frederick L. Spinrad (“Spinrad”)
OPPOSING PARTY: Plaintiff Chateau Lakeside Partners, LLC
The Court has considered the moving and opposition papers. No reply papers were filed with the Court and a courtesy copy of reply papers were not provided to the Court. Any reply papers were required to be filed and served by Friday, November 15, 2019 pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1005(b).
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed the operative Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) against Defendants alleging causes of action for: (1) legal malpractice; and (2) breach of
Hearing Date
November 22, 2019
Type
Legal Malpractice (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
CHATEAU LAKESIDE PARTNERS, LLC, etc., Plaintiff, vs. LAW OFFICE OF FREDERICK L. SPINRAD, etc., et al., Defendants.
CASE NO.: 19STCV04288
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEMURRERS TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; MOTION TO STRIKE
Date: November 22, 2019
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept. 56
MOVING PARTIES: Defendant James McCone (“McCone”); Defendant Frederick L. Spinrad (“Spinrad”)
OPPOSING PARTY: Plaintiff Chateau Lakeside Partners, LLC
The Court has considered the moving and opposition papers. No reply papers were filed with the Court and a courtesy copy of reply papers were not provided to the Court. Any reply papers were required to be filed and served by Friday, November 15, 2019 pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1005(b).
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed the operative Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) against Defendants alleging causes of action for: (1) legal malpractice; and (2) breach of