GUADALUPE J. SOLIS, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO MELENDEZ, Defendant.
Case No.: 19STCV00924
Hearing Date: March 16, 2020
[TENTATIVE] order RE:
plaintiff’s MOTION for a nunc pro tunc order
NOTICE
Department #32 will be dark for motions on Monday, March 16, 2020. Each party is ordered to email the Court’s clerk at SSCDept32@lacourt.org before 1:30 p.m. that day to inform the clerk whether you are submitting on the Court’s tentative or whether you are requesting a hearing. If any party requests a hearing, one will be scheduled. If you do not request a hearing or fail to email the Court’s clerk before 1:30 p.m. on the date of the hearing, you will waive the right to be heard and shall submit to this tentative order, which shall issue.
TENTATIVE ORDER
Plaintiff Guadalupe J. Solis (“Plaintiff”) seeks an order deeming this case as having been filed on January 2, 2019. However, Plaintiff has not yet served Defendant Francisco Melendez (“Defendant”). The Court will not consider the motion wi
Hearing Date
March 16, 2020
Type
Motor Vehicle - Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
GUADALUPE J. SOLIS, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO MELENDEZ, Defendant.
Case No.: 19STCV00924
Hearing Date: March 16, 2020
[TENTATIVE] order RE:
plaintiff’s MOTION for a nunc pro tunc order
NOTICE
Department #32 will be dark for motions on Monday, March 16, 2020. Each party is ordered to email the Court’s clerk at SSCDept32@lacourt.org before 1:30 p.m. that day to inform the clerk whether you are submitting on the Court’s tentative or whether you are requesting a hearing. If any party requests a hearing, one will be scheduled. If you do not request a hearing or fail to email the Court’s clerk before 1:30 p.m. on the date of the hearing, you will waive the right to be heard and shall submit to this tentative order, which shall issue.
TENTATIVE ORDER
Plaintiff Guadalupe J. Solis (“Plaintiff”) seeks an order deeming this case as having been filed on January 2, 2019. However, Plaintiff has not yet served Defendant Francisco Melendez (“Defendant”). The Court will not consider the motion wi