Plaintiff Krista Perez’s Motions to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories, General and Employment, Requests for Admission, and Requests for Production of Documents, are adjudicated as follows: GRANTED as to Form Interrogatories No. 15.1, 17.1, and 216.1. The motions are otherwise DENIED.
No sanctions are awarded.
MOTIONS TO COMPEL FURTHER
“Any party may obtain discovery . . . by propounding to any other party to the action written interrogatories to be answered under oath.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.010(a).) If a propounding party is not satisfied with the response served by a responding party, the former may move the court to compel further interrogatory responses. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.300; Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 403.) The propounding party must demonstrate that the responses were incomplete, inadequate or evasive, or that the responding party asserted objections that are either without merit o
Hearing Date
August 26, 2020
Type
Workplace Harassment (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Plaintiff Krista Perez’s Motions to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories, General and Employment, Requests for Admission, and Requests for Production of Documents, are adjudicated as follows: GRANTED as to Form Interrogatories No. 15.1, 17.1, and 216.1. The motions are otherwise DENIED.
No sanctions are awarded.
MOTIONS TO COMPEL FURTHER
“Any party may obtain discovery . . . by propounding to any other party to the action written interrogatories to be answered under oath.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.010(a).) If a propounding party is not satisfied with the response served by a responding party, the former may move the court to compel further interrogatory responses. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.300; Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 403.) The propounding party must demonstrate that the responses were incomplete, inadequate or evasive, or that the responding party asserted objections that are either without merit o