Gerald Corn v. Los Angeles Unified School District, et al., 19STCP02426
Tentative decision on demurrer: sustained without leave to amend
Respondent United Teachers Los Angeles (“UTLA”), demurs to the Petition for writ of mandate filed by Petitioner Gerald Corn (“Corn”).
The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, and renders the following tentative decision.
A. Statement of the Case
Petitioner Corn, acting pro per, commenced this proceeding on June 21, 2019 against Respondents Los Angeles Unified School District (“LAUSD” or “District”) and UTLA, alleging causes of action for traditional and administrative mandamus. The operative pleading is the First Amended Petition (“FAP”) filed on October 21, 2019, which alleges in pertinent part as follows.
LAUSD and its agents UTLA continue to violate the Brown Act Open Meetings Law (“Brown Act”) as it relates to the Peer Assistance and Review Program (“PAR”). The agents of the PAR panel refuse to post agendas
Hearing Date
February 04, 2020
Type
Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Gerald Corn v. Los Angeles Unified School District, et al., 19STCP02426
Tentative decision on demurrer: sustained without leave to amend
Respondent United Teachers Los Angeles (“UTLA”), demurs to the Petition for writ of mandate filed by Petitioner Gerald Corn (“Corn”).
The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, and renders the following tentative decision.
A. Statement of the Case
Petitioner Corn, acting pro per, commenced this proceeding on June 21, 2019 against Respondents Los Angeles Unified School District (“LAUSD” or “District”) and UTLA, alleging causes of action for traditional and administrative mandamus. The operative pleading is the First Amended Petition (“FAP”) filed on October 21, 2019, which alleges in pertinent part as follows.
LAUSD and its agents UTLA continue to violate the Brown Act Open Meetings Law (“Brown Act”) as it relates to the Peer Assistance and Review Program (“PAR”). The agents of the PAR panel refuse to post agendas