Search anything: case name, case number, motion type, judge, or party
Craig D. Karlan
(Subscribe to View)
July 24, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
BROCKMEIER JOHN - Attorney for Plaintiff
FROELICH MIKE - Defendant
JOHNSON NINA MARIE - Plaintiff
ML PROPERTY MANAGEMENT - Defendant
PATTON IAN - Defendant
TIJAM KRISTINE ANN - Attorney for Defendant
Saybrook Capital, Llc Vs Jonathan Rosenthal, Et Al.,
Maria Moreno Vs John Doe, Et Al.
National Commercial Recovery, Inc., A California Corporation Vs Danny Abrahami, Et Al.
Belkin International, Inc., A Delaware Corporation Vs Etech Galaxy, Llc, An Entity, Et Al.
Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. Vs Rhoads & Martin Real Estate, Llc, Et Al.
Eliel Bastida Vs Ori Zairi
Ms 212 Llc Et Al Vs Hirsch Andrew Et Al
Edward Czuker Vs Homayoun Larian
Sacha Farnsworth Vs Randi Pollock
Gaura Taneja Vs Superior Loan Servicing, An Entity Of Unknown Type, Et Al.
TENTATIVE RULING Defendants Ian S. Patton, M.F. Property Management, and Mike Froelich’s Demurrer to Plaintiff, Nina Marie Johnson’s, Complaint is SUSTAINED, without leave to amend, as to the second cause of action, and SUSTAINED, with twenty (20) days leave to amend, as to the third cause of action. Defendants Ian S. Patton, M.F. Property Management, and Mike Froelich’s Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff, Nina Marie Johnson’s, Complaint is GRANTED, with twenty (20) days leave to amend. Plaintiff may amend his or her complaint only as authorized by the court’s order and may not amend the complaint to add a new cause of action without having obtained permission to do so. (Harris v. Wachovia Mortgage, FSB (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1018, 1023.) Defendants Ian S. Patton, M.F. Property Management, and Mike Froelich to give notice. REASONING “[A] demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the allegations ........
You can see and manage all of your alerts under Settings -> Alerts
Please wait a moment while we gather your results.