HEARING DATE: Friday, November 13, 2020
NOTICE: OK
RE: Yang v. JTNA Enterprises, LLC (19PSCV01025)
______________________________________________________________________________
Defendant JTNA Enterprises, LLC’s DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Responding Party: Plaintiff, JTNA Enterprises, LLC
Tentative Ruling
Defendant JTNA Enterprises, LLC’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Complaint is SUSTAINED. The court will hear from counsel for Plaintiff as to whether leave to amend is requested, and as to which cause(s) of action, and will require an offer of proof if so.
Background
Plaintiff Cheng Yang (“Plaintiff”) alleges as follows: On or about November 14, 2018, Plaintiff entered into a written lease with Defendant JTNA Enterprises, LLC (“Defendant”) to rent the commercial property located at Colima Rd., Rowland Heights, CA 18327 (“subject property”) from Defendant. Defendant, however, concealed that it would not be able to comply with its promise to comply with L.A. County building cod
Type
Breach of Rental/Lease Contract (not unlawful detainer or wrongful eviction) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
HEARING DATE: Friday, November 13, 2020
NOTICE: OK
RE: Yang v. JTNA Enterprises, LLC (19PSCV01025)
______________________________________________________________________________
Defendant JTNA Enterprises, LLC’s DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Responding Party: Plaintiff, JTNA Enterprises, LLC
Tentative Ruling
Defendant JTNA Enterprises, LLC’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Complaint is SUSTAINED. The court will hear from counsel for Plaintiff as to whether leave to amend is requested, and as to which cause(s) of action, and will require an offer of proof if so.
Background
Plaintiff Cheng Yang (“Plaintiff”) alleges as follows: On or about November 14, 2018, Plaintiff entered into a written lease with Defendant JTNA Enterprises, LLC (“Defendant”) to rent the commercial property located at Colima Rd., Rowland Heights, CA 18327 (“subject property”) from Defendant. Defendant, however, concealed that it would not be able to comply with its promise to comply with L.A. County building cod