HEARING DATE: Monday, August 31, 2020
NOTICE: OK[1]
RE: Yang v. JTNA Enterprises, LLC (19PSCV01025)
______________________________________________________________________________
Defendant JTNA Enterprises, LLC’s MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEFAULT
Responding Party: Plaintiff, JTNA Enterprises, LLC
Tentative Ruling
Defendant JTNA Enterprises, LLC’s Motion for Relief from Default is GRANTED.
Background
Plaintiff Cheng Yang (“Plaintiff”) alleges as follows: On or about November 14, 2018, Plaintiff entered into a written lease with Defendant JTNA Enterprises, LLC (“Defendant”) to rent the commercial property located at Colima Rd., Rowland Heights, CA 18327 (“subject property”) from Defendant. Defendant, however, concealed that it would not be able to comply with its promise to comply with L.A. County building codes, applicable laws, covenants or restrictions of record, regulations and ordinances. Defendant also failed to provide accurate and current occupancy load with parking matrix
Type
Breach of Rental/Lease Contract (not unlawful detainer or wrongful eviction) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
HEARING DATE: Monday, August 31, 2020
NOTICE: OK[1]
RE: Yang v. JTNA Enterprises, LLC (19PSCV01025)
______________________________________________________________________________
Defendant JTNA Enterprises, LLC’s MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEFAULT
Responding Party: Plaintiff, JTNA Enterprises, LLC
Tentative Ruling
Defendant JTNA Enterprises, LLC’s Motion for Relief from Default is GRANTED.
Background
Plaintiff Cheng Yang (“Plaintiff”) alleges as follows: On or about November 14, 2018, Plaintiff entered into a written lease with Defendant JTNA Enterprises, LLC (“Defendant”) to rent the commercial property located at Colima Rd., Rowland Heights, CA 18327 (“subject property”) from Defendant. Defendant, however, concealed that it would not be able to comply with its promise to comply with L.A. County building codes, applicable laws, covenants or restrictions of record, regulations and ordinances. Defendant also failed to provide accurate and current occupancy load with parking matrix