UNIFIRST CORPORATION v. METAL SUPPLY, INC.
CASE NO.: 19NWCV00454
HEARING: 2/11/20
Calendar Matter#3
TENTATIVE ORDER
Plaintiff Unifirst Corporation’s unopposed application for right to attach order is GRANTED. The amount of the writ is $38,164.00, and an undertaking of $10,000 is ordered as provided for by statute. (CCP § 489.220.)
Moving Party to give NOTICE.
Plaintiff Unifirst Corporation applies for a writ of attachment in the sum of $38,164.55.
At the hearing, the court shall consider the showing made by the parties appearing and shall issue a right to attach order, which shall state the amount to be secured by the attachment determined by the court in accordance with Section 483.015 or 483.020, if it finds all of the following:
1. The claim upon which the attachment is based is one upon which an attachment may be issued
2. The plaintiff has established the probable validity of the claim upon which the attachment is based
3. The attachment is not sought for a purpose othe
Hearing Date
February 11, 2020
Type
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
UNIFIRST CORPORATION v. METAL SUPPLY, INC.
CASE NO.: 19NWCV00454
HEARING: 2/11/20
Calendar Matter#3
TENTATIVE ORDER
Plaintiff Unifirst Corporation’s unopposed application for right to attach order is GRANTED. The amount of the writ is $38,164.00, and an undertaking of $10,000 is ordered as provided for by statute. (CCP § 489.220.)
Moving Party to give NOTICE.
Plaintiff Unifirst Corporation applies for a writ of attachment in the sum of $38,164.55.
At the hearing, the court shall consider the showing made by the parties appearing and shall issue a right to attach order, which shall state the amount to be secured by the attachment determined by the court in accordance with Section 483.015 or 483.020, if it finds all of the following:
1. The claim upon which the attachment is based is one upon which an attachment may be issued
2. The plaintiff has established the probable validity of the claim upon which the attachment is based
3. The attachment is not sought for a purpose othe