On March 27, 2019, H. Gale Kyle, Inc. dba Kyle Company Roofing (Plaintiff) filed this limited civil action against Ryan Perron (Defendant), alleging one cause of action for breach of contract. Plaintiff alleges that the parties entered into a contract whereby Plaintiff agreed to install roofing on a new residential building in exchange for payment from Defendant. (Compl., ¶ 3.) Plaintiff alleges it performed, but that Defendant failed to pay an invoice in the amount of $8,298. (Compl., ¶¶ 4-6.) On April 26, 2019, Defendant filed an answer, denying Plaintiff’s allegations.
Now, before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to deem the truth of the matters specified in Plaintiff’s requests for admission (RFAs) to Defendant admitted, and for sanctions in the amount of $1,175. No opposition is on file from Defendant.
On June 7, 2019, Plaintiff served its first set of RFAs on Defendant. (Ex. 1.) To date, Defendant has not responded to the RFAs. Thus, Plaintiff moves for an order deeming the truth
Hearing Date
November 27, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
On March 27, 2019, H. Gale Kyle, Inc. dba Kyle Company Roofing (Plaintiff) filed this limited civil action against Ryan Perron (Defendant), alleging one cause of action for breach of contract. Plaintiff alleges that the parties entered into a contract whereby Plaintiff agreed to install roofing on a new residential building in exchange for payment from Defendant. (Compl., ¶ 3.) Plaintiff alleges it performed, but that Defendant failed to pay an invoice in the amount of $8,298. (Compl., ¶¶ 4-6.) On April 26, 2019, Defendant filed an answer, denying Plaintiff’s allegations.
Now, before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to deem the truth of the matters specified in Plaintiff’s requests for admission (RFAs) to Defendant admitted, and for sanctions in the amount of $1,175. No opposition is on file from Defendant.
On June 7, 2019, Plaintiff served its first set of RFAs on Defendant. (Ex. 1.) To date, Defendant has not responded to the RFAs. Thus, Plaintiff moves for an order deeming the truth