tentative ruling
DEMURRER
[CCP §430.10 et. seq.]
Calendar: 5
Date: 11/8/19
Case No: 19 GDCV00891 Trial Date: None Set
Case Name: Roter v. Tinsley
Moving Party: Defendant Jeffrey Tinsley .
Responding Party: Plaintiff Sam Roter
Meet and Confer? Ok
RELIEF REQUESTED:
Sustain demurrer to Complaint
CAUSES OF ACTION: from Complaint
1) Defamation
2) Invasion of Privacy
3) Violation of Civil Code § 1798.1 et seq.
4) Violation of UCL
5) Breach of Good Faith
SUMMARY OF FACTS:
Plaintiff Sam Roter alleges that defendant Jeffrey Tinsley is the founder, chairperson and CEO of MyLife.com, Inc. and can be held personally liable for the conduct of MyLife, Inc. based on an agency theory. Plaintiff alleges that Tinsely through his business MyLife.com caused plaintiff’s name and personal information allegedly gathered from both legitimate and illegitimate sources, to be published on the company website. Plaintiff alleges that many of the remarks appearing on the website are untrue, illeg
Hearing Date
November 08, 2019
Type
Other Commercial Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
tentative ruling
DEMURRER
[CCP §430.10 et. seq.]
Calendar: 5
Date: 11/8/19
Case No: 19 GDCV00891 Trial Date: None Set
Case Name: Roter v. Tinsley
Moving Party: Defendant Jeffrey Tinsley .
Responding Party: Plaintiff Sam Roter
Meet and Confer? Ok
RELIEF REQUESTED:
Sustain demurrer to Complaint
CAUSES OF ACTION: from Complaint
1) Defamation
2) Invasion of Privacy
3) Violation of Civil Code § 1798.1 et seq.
4) Violation of UCL
5) Breach of Good Faith
SUMMARY OF FACTS:
Plaintiff Sam Roter alleges that defendant Jeffrey Tinsley is the founder, chairperson and CEO of MyLife.com, Inc. and can be held personally liable for the conduct of MyLife, Inc. based on an agency theory. Plaintiff alleges that Tinsely through his business MyLife.com caused plaintiff’s name and personal information allegedly gathered from both legitimate and illegitimate sources, to be published on the company website. Plaintiff alleges that many of the remarks appearing on the website are untrue, illeg