Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues
Brian C. Walsh
(Subscribe to View)
Track Rulings In Case
October 25, 2019
Santa Clara County, CA
In Re Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. Shareholder Litigation
Eileen A. Staats V. City Of Palo Alto
Nicholas Robinson V. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc., Et Al.
Ruben Mendoza V. City Sports Club, Et Al.
Mohammad Valikhani V. Cep America-California, Et Al.
Donald Markham V. Quik Stop Markets, Inc., Et Al.
Adam Holt V. Blue Bottle Coffee, Inc., Et Al.
Melbert Magpugay V. Harbor Electronics, Inc., Et Al.
Alysha Jaramillo V. Marriott International, Inc., Et Al.
Hector Luna V. Triple Canopy, Inc., Et Al.
This action arises from Prager University’s allegations that YouTube, LLC and its parent company Google LLC have unlawfully restricted content created by Prager on YouTube, defendants’ social media and video sharing platform. Before the Court are defendants’ demurrer to the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) and Prager’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Both motions are opposed. I. Factual and Procedural Background As alleged in the FAC, Prager is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) tax exempt, educational organization that promotes discussion on historical, religious, and current events by disseminating educational videos intended for younger, student-based audiences between the ages of 13 and 35. (FAC, ¶ 10.) The videos depict scholars, sources, and other prominent speakers who often espouse viewpoints in the mainstream of conservative thought. (Ibid.) Defendants operate YouTube as the largest and most profitable mechanism for monetizing........
Your alert tracking was succesfully added. We will email you
when new changes related to are available.
You can see and mange all your Tracking alerts under Alert Settings
Add to your subscription and access more dockets and more documents!
Your subscription was successfully upgraded
Please wait a moment while we load this page.