Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 71
TENTATIVE RULING
ERIKA FLORES, et al., vs. FELIX CHEVROLET, LP, et al.
Case No.: 18STCV10050
Hearing Date: November 13, 2020
Plaintiffs’ motion to compel the deposition of Defendant’s PMK is granted. The motion is granted in part and denied in part as to the specific Categories of Testimony and Requests for Production set forth in Plaintiff’s Second Amended Notice of Deposition. Defendant shall serve a privilege log if any documents are withheld from production on the ground of privilege.
Plaintiffs Erika Flores and Jose Flores (collectively “Plaintiffs”) move for an order compelling Defendant General Motors LLC (“Defendant”) to produce its Person Most Knowledgeable (“PMK”) for deposition and to produce documents identified in the deposition notice. (Notice of Motion, pg. i.) Specifically, Plaintiffs seek an order compelling Defendant’s PMK to testify to Categories Nos. 1-24 and that Defendant produce documents re
Hearing Date
November 13, 2020
Type
Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 71
TENTATIVE RULING
ERIKA FLORES, et al., vs. FELIX CHEVROLET, LP, et al.
Case No.: 18STCV10050
Hearing Date: November 13, 2020
Plaintiffs’ motion to compel the deposition of Defendant’s PMK is granted. The motion is granted in part and denied in part as to the specific Categories of Testimony and Requests for Production set forth in Plaintiff’s Second Amended Notice of Deposition. Defendant shall serve a privilege log if any documents are withheld from production on the ground of privilege.
Plaintiffs Erika Flores and Jose Flores (collectively “Plaintiffs”) move for an order compelling Defendant General Motors LLC (“Defendant”) to produce its Person Most Knowledgeable (“PMK”) for deposition and to produce documents identified in the deposition notice. (Notice of Motion, pg. i.) Specifically, Plaintiffs seek an order compelling Defendant’s PMK to testify to Categories Nos. 1-24 and that Defendant produce documents re