Plaintiff Charles P. Garcia’s motion to quash is DENIED.
On December 27, 2018, Plaintiff Charles P. Garcia brought this employment suit against Defendants ALPFA Inc., ALPFA Foundation (collectively, “ALPFA”). Plaintiff also sues the current/former Board members of ALPFA Defendants Hector Perez, Yvonne Garcia, Daniel Villao, Gabriel Rodriguez Jr., Reynaldo Gonzalez, Damaris Schneider, Genaro Perez, and Marcela Aldaz-Matos (collectively the Board Defendants). Plaintiff brings this suit in his individual and in a derivative capacity under Corp. Code sections 5142, 5710, 7142, and 7710 on behalf of ALPFA against the Board of Directors of ALPFA. Plaintiff also asserts standing under the Private Attorney General Act of 2004 (PAGA).
The current First Amended Complaint alleges 18 causes of action for 1) wrongful termination; 2) retaliation; 3) breach of contract; 4) waiting time penalties; 5) intentional interference with contractual relations; 6) intentional interference with prospective ec
Hearing Date
November 05, 2019
Type
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Plaintiff Charles P. Garcia’s motion to quash is DENIED.
On December 27, 2018, Plaintiff Charles P. Garcia brought this employment suit against Defendants ALPFA Inc., ALPFA Foundation (collectively, “ALPFA”). Plaintiff also sues the current/former Board members of ALPFA Defendants Hector Perez, Yvonne Garcia, Daniel Villao, Gabriel Rodriguez Jr., Reynaldo Gonzalez, Damaris Schneider, Genaro Perez, and Marcela Aldaz-Matos (collectively the Board Defendants). Plaintiff brings this suit in his individual and in a derivative capacity under Corp. Code sections 5142, 5710, 7142, and 7710 on behalf of ALPFA against the Board of Directors of ALPFA. Plaintiff also asserts standing under the Private Attorney General Act of 2004 (PAGA).
The current First Amended Complaint alleges 18 causes of action for 1) wrongful termination; 2) retaliation; 3) breach of contract; 4) waiting time penalties; 5) intentional interference with contractual relations; 6) intentional interference with prospective ec