MOTION FOR AN ORDER COMPELLING VERIZON TO COMPLY WITH A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE RECORDS
[CCP §2025.480(a)]
Date: 6/29/20 (10:00 a.m.)
Case: Jacobsen v. Southern California Edison Company, et al. (18STCV09319)
TENTATIVE RULING:
Plaintiff Michael Jacobsen’s Motion for An Order Compelling Verizon to Comply with a Subpoena to Produce Records is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Pursuant to CCP § 1985.3(b)(1), plaintiff is required to personally serve on third-party consumer Denny Benavides a copy of the subpoena for his records issued to Verizon, a copy of the proof of service of the subpoena on Verizon, and Notice to Consumer and Objection pursuant to CCP § 1985.3(c)(1). Plaintiff did not provide a proof of service indicating that such service occurred. Nor was Benavides served with this motion to compel production.
Hearing Date
June 29, 2020
Type
Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
MOTION FOR AN ORDER COMPELLING VERIZON TO COMPLY WITH A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE RECORDS
[CCP §2025.480(a)]
Date: 6/29/20 (10:00 a.m.)
Case: Jacobsen v. Southern California Edison Company, et al. (18STCV09319)
TENTATIVE RULING:
Plaintiff Michael Jacobsen’s Motion for An Order Compelling Verizon to Comply with a Subpoena to Produce Records is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Pursuant to CCP § 1985.3(b)(1), plaintiff is required to personally serve on third-party consumer Denny Benavides a copy of the subpoena for his records issued to Verizon, a copy of the proof of service of the subpoena on Verizon, and Notice to Consumer and Objection pursuant to CCP § 1985.3(c)(1). Plaintiff did not provide a proof of service indicating that such service occurred. Nor was Benavides served with this motion to compel production.