SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
STEPHEN HARRIS, Plaintiff(s), vs. JACK SWANK, ET AL., Defendant(s).
CASE NO: 18STCV01564
[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL IME; GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SUPPLEMENTAL INTERROGATORIES; GRANTING MOTION TO RE-OPEN DISCOVERY; DEEMING MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL MOOT; IMPOSING SANCTIONS
Dept. 31
1:30 p.m.
July 6, 2020
I. Background
Plaintiff, Stephen Harris filed this action against Defendant, Jack Swank for damages arising out of an automobile accident. Plaintiff filed the complaint on 10/19/18. At the time Defendant filed these motions, the original trial date of 4/17/20 remained on calendar.
II. Motion to Compel IME
On 10/24/19, Defendant propounded a notice of IME, setting Plaintiff’s examination for 2/25/20. Plaintiff did not object to the IME but did not appear. Thereafter, on 3/3/20, Defendant propounded a second notice of IME, setting Plaintiff’s exam
Hearing Date
July 06, 2020
Type
Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
STEPHEN HARRIS, Plaintiff(s), vs. JACK SWANK, ET AL., Defendant(s).
CASE NO: 18STCV01564
[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL IME; GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SUPPLEMENTAL INTERROGATORIES; GRANTING MOTION TO RE-OPEN DISCOVERY; DEEMING MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL MOOT; IMPOSING SANCTIONS
Dept. 31
1:30 p.m.
July 6, 2020
I. Background
Plaintiff, Stephen Harris filed this action against Defendant, Jack Swank for damages arising out of an automobile accident. Plaintiff filed the complaint on 10/19/18. At the time Defendant filed these motions, the original trial date of 4/17/20 remained on calendar.
II. Motion to Compel IME
On 10/24/19, Defendant propounded a notice of IME, setting Plaintiff’s examination for 2/25/20. Plaintiff did not object to the IME but did not appear. Thereafter, on 3/3/20, Defendant propounded a second notice of IME, setting Plaintiff’s exam