Plaintiff Esther Isaac alleges that she was retaliated against for complaining about safety violations occurring at Defendant’s facility in regards to the care of patients/clients. Both Plaintiffs[1] Isaac and Usman allege racial harassment and discrimination against them.
Defendant Cesar Gomez moves to strike, quash or dismiss Plaintiff’s amendment to the Complaint naming him as “Doe 1.”
Defendant Elwyn California moves separately for summary judgment or summary adjudication as to Plaintiffs Esther Isaac and Garba Usman.
TENTATIVE RULING
Defendant Cesar Gomez’s motion to quash the Doe 1 amendment is GRANTED.
Defendant Elwyn California’s motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff Esther Isaac is GRANTED.
Defendant Elwyn California’s motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff Garba Usman is DENIED. Defendant’s motion for summary adjudication as to Plaintiff Usman is DENIED as to Issues Nos. 1 and 2 re: the first cause of action and Issue No. 5 re: punitive damages, and GRANTED a
Hearing Date
August 11, 2020
Type
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Plaintiff Esther Isaac alleges that she was retaliated against for complaining about safety violations occurring at Defendant’s facility in regards to the care of patients/clients. Both Plaintiffs[1] Isaac and Usman allege racial harassment and discrimination against them.
Defendant Cesar Gomez moves to strike, quash or dismiss Plaintiff’s amendment to the Complaint naming him as “Doe 1.”
Defendant Elwyn California moves separately for summary judgment or summary adjudication as to Plaintiffs Esther Isaac and Garba Usman.
TENTATIVE RULING
Defendant Cesar Gomez’s motion to quash the Doe 1 amendment is GRANTED.
Defendant Elwyn California’s motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff Esther Isaac is GRANTED.
Defendant Elwyn California’s motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff Garba Usman is DENIED. Defendant’s motion for summary adjudication as to Plaintiff Usman is DENIED as to Issues Nos. 1 and 2 re: the first cause of action and Issue No. 5 re: punitive damages, and GRANTED a