Moore et al. v. Hundai Motor America, Inc. et al.
Defendant Hyundai Motor America, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment against Plaintiffs Mia Moore and Betina Castello, filed on July 24, 2019, is GRANTED. Defendant has established it is entitled to judgment in its favor on the entire complaint based on the undisputed material facts asserted. Cal. Code of Civil Procedure § 437c(p)(2).
In the Complaint, Plaintiffs Betina Castello and Mia Moore purport to assert three causes of action against Defendants Hyundai Motor America, Inc. (“HMA”) and Universal City Nissan: strict products liability, negligence and breach of implied warranty.
On February 7, 2019, HMA served 26 Requests for Admission on each plaintiff. Neither party responded, and Hyundai moved for an order deeming the RFAs admitted. The Court granted the motion on June 13, 2019.
Thus, the following facts are deemed admitted:
Plaintiffs are not asserting a design defect claim against HMA and have no evidence, facts or documents
Hearing Date
October 09, 2019
Type
Product Liability (not asbestos or toxic/environmental) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Moore et al. v. Hundai Motor America, Inc. et al.
Defendant Hyundai Motor America, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment against Plaintiffs Mia Moore and Betina Castello, filed on July 24, 2019, is GRANTED. Defendant has established it is entitled to judgment in its favor on the entire complaint based on the undisputed material facts asserted. Cal. Code of Civil Procedure § 437c(p)(2).
In the Complaint, Plaintiffs Betina Castello and Mia Moore purport to assert three causes of action against Defendants Hyundai Motor America, Inc. (“HMA”) and Universal City Nissan: strict products liability, negligence and breach of implied warranty.
On February 7, 2019, HMA served 26 Requests for Admission on each plaintiff. Neither party responded, and Hyundai moved for an order deeming the RFAs admitted. The Court granted the motion on June 13, 2019.
Thus, the following facts are deemed admitted:
Plaintiffs are not asserting a design defect claim against HMA and have no evidence, facts or documents