Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Christian M. Gonzalez’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees is GRANTED in the amount of $15,816.01.
Gonzalez asks for $15,816.01 in fees in connection with his anti-SLAPP motion. (Motion at p. 12.)
Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16, subd. (c)(1) states that “a prevailing defendant on a special motion to strike shall be entitled to recover his or her attorney's fees and costs.” “The party prevailing on a special motion to strike may seek an attorney fee award through three different avenues: simultaneously with litigating the special motion to strike; by a subsequent noticed motion, . . . or as part of a cost memorandum.” (Carpenter v. Jack In The Box Corp. (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 454, 461.) “[T]he fact that he or she has prevailed on some claims but not on others is a factor to be considered in determining the amount of the fee awarded.” (ComputerXpress, Inc. v. Jackson (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 993, 1019.)
This court only partially granted Gonzalez’s anti-SLAPP motio
Hearing Date
July 31, 2019
Type
Civil Rights/Discrimination (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Christian M. Gonzalez’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees is GRANTED in the amount of $15,816.01.
Gonzalez asks for $15,816.01 in fees in connection with his anti-SLAPP motion. (Motion at p. 12.)
Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16, subd. (c)(1) states that “a prevailing defendant on a special motion to strike shall be entitled to recover his or her attorney's fees and costs.” “The party prevailing on a special motion to strike may seek an attorney fee award through three different avenues: simultaneously with litigating the special motion to strike; by a subsequent noticed motion, . . . or as part of a cost memorandum.” (Carpenter v. Jack In The Box Corp. (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 454, 461.) “[T]he fact that he or she has prevailed on some claims but not on others is a factor to be considered in determining the amount of the fee awarded.” (ComputerXpress, Inc. v. Jackson (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 993, 1019.)
This court only partially granted Gonzalez’s anti-SLAPP motio