California ex rel. 25th District Agricultural Association
Napa Valley Exposition, et al.
[1] MOTION TO LIMIT SCOPE OF RECORD
Tentative Ruling: Petitioner’s Motion to Limit the Scope of the Administrative Record is DENIED. If the Petition for Writ of Mandate in this matter was challenging only a past action or decision, then the Court would agree that the administrative record should be limited to the evidence in existence at the time the petition was filed. This petition, however, also seeks an injunction barring future actions/decisions. On that basis, the Court believes the later evidence is relevant and properly included and the motion to limit the scope is, therefore, DENIED. That being said, the Court does not believe a granting of the motion would have had any impact on its decision on the underlying petition.
[2] PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Tentative Ruling: Petitioner’s Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Mandate is DENIED.
The court discloses, pu
Hearing Date
August 21, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
California ex rel. 25th District Agricultural Association
Napa Valley Exposition, et al.
[1] MOTION TO LIMIT SCOPE OF RECORD
Tentative Ruling: Petitioner’s Motion to Limit the Scope of the Administrative Record is DENIED. If the Petition for Writ of Mandate in this matter was challenging only a past action or decision, then the Court would agree that the administrative record should be limited to the evidence in existence at the time the petition was filed. This petition, however, also seeks an injunction barring future actions/decisions. On that basis, the Court believes the later evidence is relevant and properly included and the motion to limit the scope is, therefore, DENIED. That being said, the Court does not believe a granting of the motion would have had any impact on its decision on the underlying petition.
[2] PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Tentative Ruling: Petitioner’s Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Mandate is DENIED.
The court discloses, pu