3. XPO GF AMERICA, INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET THREE, PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,112.50
TENTATIVE RULING:
The motion is granted as to category 65. Although this category encompasses Category 29, it is broader. The documents are relevant to the subject matter of the cross-complaint. As to documents that might be proprietary to Plaintiff’s employer, the Court finds that the Protective Order in this matter does not justify requiring Plaintiff to produce those documents. Still, however, Plaintiff must identify all documents that are withheld under that objection. (Code of Civ. Proc. sect. 2031.240.)
The motion is granted as to categories 66 and 67. Solorio contends that Category 66 is duplicative of Category 33, which sought “DOCUMENTS RELATING TO ASUS USA since YOU became employed at JAS Worldwide.” Plaintiff objected to Category 33 and did not state that he would comply. Therefo