Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues
James DI CESARE
(Subscribe to View)
Track Rulings In Case
July 19, 2019
Orange County, CA
Worrel Vs Estrella
Edwards – Name Change
In Re: Nava
Tremblay Vs. Centaurus Financial, Inc.
In Re: Phillips
Associated Brokers Orange County Two, Inc. Vs Srs Properties Llc
Morton Vs Z&C Construction, Inc
Hospitality Marketing Concepts, Llc Vs Real Hotels And Resorts, Inc.
Claim Of Guyett
In Re: 1001 W. Stevens Avenue #220, Santa Ana
Motion for New Trial Plaintiff Kimes is renewing a Motion for New Trial. A similar motion was denied by the Court on or about April 26, 2019. Plaintiff’s renewed Motion for New trial is Denied. Judicial notice has been taken of the records of the case (see Evidence Code § 452(d); Dillard v. McKnight (1949) 34 Cal.2d 209, 218 (“a trial court is bound to take judicial notice of its own records in the same action”); Nichols v. Hast (1965) 62 Cal.2d 598, 600 (court may take judicial notice of its own records in assessing motion for new trial); Nichols v. Hast (1965) 62 Cal.2d 598, 600 (judicial notice is proper of the minute orders); Gulf Ins. Co. v. TIG Ins. Co. (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 422, 438 (judicial notice taken of the dates of court filings and dates of events recorded therein).) The Court lacks jurisdiction to grant a new trial. A motion seeking a new trial is subject to strict time limits. (Cal. Code Civil Proced. § 659, 660.) The time limits are “jurisdictional”........
You can see and manage all of your alerts under Settings -> Alerts
Add to your subscription and access more dockets and more documents!
Your subscription was successfully upgraded
Please wait a moment while we load this page.