“A motion in limine is a motion preliminary to trial, and advisory until finally determined at trial, to preclude the introduction of prejudicial matters to the jury.” (See Christian v. Gray (2003) 65 P.3d 591, 610 n.22.)
“A motion in limine is a motion preliminary to trial to prevent introduction of prejudicial matters, and an order ruling on such motion is advisory until finally determined at trial.” (See Twyman v. GHK Corp. (2004) 93 P.3d 51, 61.)
“A pretrial motion in limine excluding evidence does not conclusively decide an issue of admissibility because the issue must be raised during a subsequent trial.” (See Andrew v. Elisa DePani-Sparkes, D.O. (2017) 396 P.3d 210, 224 n.55.)
“The ruling on a motion in limine is advisory only, and an incorrect ruling is not reversible error. In fact, no error occurs until the matter arises during trial, an objection is entered, and, at that time, the trial court incorrectly permits or prohibits it.” (See Davis v. State (1983) 665 P.2d 1186, 1197.)
“Trial court decisions concerning admission of evidence are reviewed on appeal pursuant to an abuse of discretion standard.” (See Chesapeake Operating Inc. v. Kast Trust Farms (2013) 352 P.3d 1231, 1236.)
“An abuse of discretion has been defined as a clearly erroneous conclusion and judgment, one that is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts presented.” (See Marshall v. State (2010) 232 P.3d 467, 474.)
“The trial court's decision whether to admit or exclude evidence will not be reversed absent a finding of a clear abuse of discretion.” (See Material Serv. Corp. v. Rogers Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs (2011) OK Civ. App. 17)
It is well settled that “this Court has held that a ruling on a motion in limine is merely advisory and not conclusive, and that to properly preserve objections to the introduction of evidence that is the subject of the motion in limine, a timely objection must be made when the evidence is sought to be introduced.” (See Luna v. State (1992) 829 P.2d 69, 71.)
It is also well settled that “in limine rulings are preliminary and advisory in nature until point in trial at which evidence would have been admitted but for the motion. Consequently, liminal rulings are not appealable.” (See Clark v. Turner (2004) 99 P.3d 736, 741.)
191 pages
@ @ mop ANIA ORLANOMA Cor COURT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY jay , STATE OF OKLAHOMA 16 2023 BIG CHIEF PLANT SERVICES, LLC OSH WARRE . 5 37 RT CLE N Plaintiff, Te Case No. CJ-2023-36 ™ v. The Honorable Sheila Stinson REP PROCESSING, LLC, Defendant. REP PROCESSING, LLC’S OPPOSITION TO BIG CHIEF PLANT SERVICES, LLC’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND TEMPORARY INJUNCTION RESTRAINING VURDEK ANG eore—eeeEeey———e_—er' REP Processing, LLC submits its Opposition to Big Chief P
Jan 04, 2023
5 pages
UOC *1053164476% IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ) Plaintiff, } vs. ; No.cm2on.0104 = - Rigr Be MICHAEL DAVID RANDOLPH, Judge Miller AUG 2 6 2029 Defendant. } Sr EAE ca Sion MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE Michael Randolph, by and through undersigned counsel, moves this Court to exclude the following evidence at trial: (1) Drug Recognition Expert testimony from Tulsa Police Officers St. John and Lum, (2) character evidence against
4 pages
OA re T0498 OTS 69% GARFIELD COUNTY, OKLA IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GARFIELD COUNTY SEP 0 2 2021 STATE OF OKLAHOMA JANGLLE fl). SHARP STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ) cere Plaintiff, ) COURT CLERK ) v. ) Case No. CF-2020-441 ) ASHLYNN HARRIS, ) Defendant. ) STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE COMES NOW the State of Oklahoma, by and through Assistant District Attorney Amanda Lilley, and moves this Honorable Court to order the defendant and her attorney to refrain from entering, or attempting to e
9 pages
FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Grady County, Oklahoma IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GRADY COUNTY MAR 26 2021 STATE OF OKLAHOMA LISAHANNAH, Cou Clerk By Deputy GUY HUGGINS, Plaintiff, vy. Case No. CJ-2018-89 CASUALTY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. an Oklahoma Corporation, Defendant. eee Se Se SS SS DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE Defendant Casualty Corporation of America, Inc. (“CCA”) hereby submits its Response to Plaintiff's First Set of Motions in Limine. For ease o
12 pages
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR LINCOLN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA FILED AUG 0 3 2029 CINDY. KiRBy, LINCOLN Conk COURT CLERK. INTY, OKLAHOM, . ‘A WESTERN FARMERS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., a Corporation, Plaintiff, Case No. CS-17-84 Vv. MATTIE SUE KINNETT, as Trustee of The Mattie Sue Kinnett Living Trust dated February 28, 2014; SHANE KINNETT, as tenant; and KATHY SHERMAN, in her capacity as TREASURER OF LINCOLN COUNTY, Oklahoma, and THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LINCOLN COUNTY, Okl
Lincoln County, OK
Aug 03, 2020
ASHWOOD, CYNTHIA FERRELL
8 pages
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF GARVIN COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA VERONICA PANDO, Individually, and as GARVIN COUNTY t 88. Parent and next friend of TONJA LEVELLE FILED PANDO, deceased; and VERONICA AR 15 2019 PANDO, as next of kin to BABY PANDO, the deceased unborn child of TONJA A se a LEVELLE PANDO, wo Pura Plaintiff, v. Case No.: CJ-2015-33 WAL-MART STORES, INC., D/B/A WAL- MART SUPERCENTER, STORE #1043, Defendant. Judge Leah Edwards DEFENDANT WALMART STORES, INC.’S OBJECTION AND RESPONSE TO
6 pages
DE FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF POTTAWATOMIE COUNTAYE DISTRIC. STATE OF OKLAHOMA T COURT NOV 05 2017 CLEDA BYRUM, as Surviving Daughter ) POTTAWATOm And Next of Kin of LELA BYRUM, deceased, ) VALGRE W. ELT Ze count (oe ) . ERK Plaintiff, ) orpury ) v. ) Case No. CJ-2015-196 ) SHAWNEE CARE CENTER, LLC d/b/a ) SHAWNEE CARE CENTER; ) ) Defendants. ) DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFE’S SECOND MOTIONS IN LIMINE COMES NOW the Defendant, Shawnee Care Center, LLC d/b/a Shawnee Care Center, by a
Ottawa County, OK
Nov 06, 2017
23 pages
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR PITTSBURG COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA ROBERT MURPHY and TONYA WHITE, Individually, and as Co-Special Administrators of the Estate of STACY DAWN MURPHY, Deceased, Plaintiffs, Case No. CJ-2012-265 vs. Judge James D. Bland RECEIVED AND FILED IN DISTRICT COURT PITTSBURG COUNTY. GKLA Oklahoma Corporation, d/b/a NARCONON ARROWHEAD; NARCONON INTERNATIONAL, a Foreign Corporation; ASSOCIATION FOR BETTER LIVING APR 10 2017 AND EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL, a Foreign Corpora
Pittsburg County, OK
Apr 10, 2017
BLAND, JAMES D.
9 pages
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR PITTSBURG COUNTY s STATE OF OKLAHOMA Re CE lve Pirie ped {Hee oun ROBERT MURPHY and TONYA WHITE, individually, and as Natural Parents and Next of Kin of STACY DAWN MURPHY, Deceased, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. CJ-2012-265 ) Honorable Judge James D. Bland NARCONON OF OKLAHOMA, INC., an) Oklahoma Corporation, d/b/a NARCONON ) ARROWHEAD; NARCONON ) INTERNATIONAL, a Foreign Corporation; ) ASSOCIATION FOR BETTER LIVING ) AND EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL, a _
Pittsburg County, OK
Apr 10, 2017
BLAND, JAMES D.
10 pages
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR PITTSBURG COUNTY S STATE OF OKLAHOMA ) ROBERT MURPHY and TONYA WHITE, ) individually, and as Natural Parents and Next) of Kin of STACY DAWN MURPHY, ) Deceased, by. Py Plaintiffs, v. Case No. CJ-2012-265 Honorable Judge James D. Bland Oklahoma Corporation, d/b/a NARCONON ARROWHEAD; NARCONON INTERNATIONAL, a Foreign Corporation; ASSOCIATION FOR BETTER LIVING AND EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL, a ATTORNEY LIEN CLAIMED ) ) ) ) NARCONON OF OKLAHOMA, INC., an _) ) ) ) J
Pittsburg County, OK
Apr 10, 2017
BLAND, JAMES D.
5 pages
iE DISTRICT COURT FLEA NES Co. OKLAHOMA SEP 2826 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF MAYES COUNTY RAKSON COURT CLERK Rt D STATE OF OKLAHOMA DEPUTY, KAMO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., a MAYES CO. CASE # CV-09-78 Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation APPEAL # DF-114940 and K-POWERNET, LLC, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company, Appellant, VS. CURTIS L. NICHOLS and LORI D. NICHOLS, JUDGE: HONORABLE J. DWAYNE STEIDLEY husband and wife, Appellee, NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF RECORD FOR APPEALS F
Mayes County, OK
Sep 26, 2016
STEIDLEY, HONORABLE J DWAYNE
12 pages
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA KAMO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., a Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation and K- POWERNET, LLC, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company, Supreme Court Case No. 114940 Mayes County Case No. CV-09-78 Plaintiffs/Appellants, Judge J. Dwayne Steidley vs. CURTIS L. NICHOLS and LORI D. NICHOLS, husband and wife, 2016 ogre LERK ee Se Se Se Sr SES ewe Defendants/Appellees. AMENDED DESIGNATION OF RECORD FOR APPEAL FROM DISTRICT COURT ___ Design
Mayes County, OK
May 17, 2016
STEIDLEY, HONORABLE J DWAYNE
11 pages
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAH KAMO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., a Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation and K- POWERNET, LLC, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company, Supreme Court Case No. 114940 Mayes County Case No. CV-09-78 Plaintiffs/Appellants, Judge J. Dwayne Steidley vs. CURTIS L. NICHOLS and LORI D. NICHOLS, husband and wife, wee SS SSS Se SS ES SD Defendants/Appellees. DESIGNATION OF RECORD FOR APPEAL FROM DISTRICT COURT __X_ Designation of Record ____ Coun
Mayes County, OK
Apr 29, 2016
STEIDLEY, HONORABLE J DWAYNE
9 pages
A STATE * O32 E TS SS CLEVELAND COUNTY J*""" FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CLEVELAND COUNTY 9cT 06 2015 STATE OF OKLAHOM TYLER VINCENT GULLEDGE, In The Office of the } Court Cierk RHONDA HALL Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. CJ-2013-031 “ } DISTRICT JUDGE TRACY ) SCHUMACHER MARY JO RAINS, ) ) Defendant. J PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT COMES NOW the Plaintiff and for his response to Defendant’s Motions in Limine and states as follows: Plaintiff has no objec
19 pages
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA CARL JORDAN, an individual, Plaintiff, Case No. CJ-2013-4500 v. The Honorable Rebecca Nightingale JEFF HECKENKEMPER, an individual, and PERFORMANCE REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC., d/b/a JEFF HECKENKEMPER RENOVATIONS, DISTRICT COURT FILED DEC 16 2014 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants/ ) ) ARE BOG ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Third-Party Plaintiffs vs. 1ST CALL ELECTRIC, LLC, an Oklahoma Corporation; STEVE MOORE, an individual; SNOWDEN ENGINE
Tulsa County, OK
Dec 16, 2014
Civil Docket A
18 pages
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA CARL JORDAN, an individual, Plaintiff, Case No. CJ-2013-4500 v. The Honorable Rebecca Nightingale JEFF HECKENKEMPER, an individual, vs. and PERFORMANCE REAL ESTATE DISTRICT COURT SERVICES, INC., d/b/a JEFF LED HECKENKEMPER RENOVATIONS, DEC 16 2014 Defendants/ Third-Party Plaintiffs SAA OWE SITY COURT G ERK 1ST CALL ELECTRIC, LLC, an Oklahoma Corporation; STEVE MOORE, an individual; SNOWDEN ENGINEERING, INC., an Oklahoma Corporation;
Tulsa County, OK
Dec 16, 2014
Civil Docket A
2 pages
Deep, FILE CANapiaY COU, « IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CANADIAN COUNTY Dee, ONTY ok STATE OF OKLAHOMA 07 2095 A ay JUSTIN LEWIS DAVIS, Plaintiff, vs Case No. CJ-2005-204 MARTHA DEANE HAMILTON, Defendant. MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT COMES NOW Plaintiff and moves the Court to issue an order in limine to prohibit defendant from introducing evidence at trial on the defendant's opinion on whether or not the plaintiff was injured at the scene. INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF FACTS This ca
Apr 06, 2005
Canadian County, OK
Dec 07, 2005
Cunningham, Edward C.
2 pages
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEFLORE COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA 4 Bz DENNIS COVEY, for ) ae ABBI COVEY, a Minor ) Qe Plaintiff, ) Bx zB vs. ) > ew ) Case No. CJ-2018-248 Ra © MCCS, INC., d/b/a ) of 8 LEFLORE COUNTY ) Case No. CJ-2019-1795. AAO LIVESTOCK AUCTION, ) 38 and ) Judge Jonathan Sullivan SR CLINT SMITH ) 3 an individual ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON SPECIFIC MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOW on this Z S aay of / Myeed , 2021, comes before the Court the matters of Plaintiffs Motion in Limine and Defendants
(No Case Name Available)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
Your content views addon has successfully been added.
No Worries!
Adding your team is easy
in the "Manage Company Users" tab
