The Hon. Randall Stamen is a judge for the Riverside County Superior Court in California. He was appointed to the bench by former Governor Jerry Brown in 2017. He filled the vacancy created by the elevation of the Hon. Richard T. Fields to the Court of Appeal.
He is a registered Republican.
Judge Stamen received his B.A. from the University of California, Irvine. He went on to earn his J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law.
Prior to his appointment to the Superior Court, Stamen spent his entire legal career in private practice. He began as an associate at Reid and Hellyer, where he practiced from 1992 to 1994. Stamen then joined the Law Offices of Thomas L. Miller, where he also worked briefly as an associate before entering into solo practice. During his time as a sole practitioner, Stamen specialized in the unique field of tree-related litigation, where he handled cases involving damage done by trees as well as tree encroachment. His experience in this field led him to write a book on the subject of California statutes concerning trees. He was practicing at his own firm at the time of his appointment to the Superior Court in 2017.
While on the bench, Judge Stamen has presided over a civil calendar and trials assignment at the Riverside Historic Courthouse.
CAMP VS PLATINUM STORAGE GROUP
Jan 19, 2021 | Riverside County
Sustained. 30 days leave to amend. Moving party has satisfied the statutory meet and confer requirement. The unopposed demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint is sustained, on all asserted grounds.
...MADRIGAL VS MPS FINANCIAL, INC.
Jan 19, 2021 | Riverside County
Off Calendar based on settlement.
...MORSCHAUSER VS MONSON ASSIGNMENT OF SETTLEMENT
Jan 14, 2021 | Riverside County
The Hearing Re Settlement Terms, pursuant to the agreement of the parties and the Court’s order thereon (12/14/2020) is assigned to Judge Irma Asberry. A date, approximately 45 days from today’s date, shall be set by the Court after consultation with counsel.
...TERRELL-HILL VS HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA
Jan 14, 2021 | Riverside County
Overruled. 20 Days leave to answer. 2nd Cause of Action – Breach of Implied Warranty Demurrers for uncertainty will only be sustained where the defendant cannot reasonably determine what issues must be admitted or denied, or what claims are directed against him. (Khoury v. Maly’s of California, Inc. (1993)...
Jan 14, 2021 | Riverside County
Continued. The hearing on the demurrer is continued to allow Defendant an opportunity to satisfy the obligation to meet and confer in accordance with CCP§ 430.41(a) and to file appropriate declarations in accordance with CCP § 430.41(a)(3)). As set forth in the declaration filed in support of the demurrer,...
BOBST VS CORPORATE ALLIANCE STRATEGIES INC
Jan 14, 2021 | Riverside County
Granted. Plaintiff’s responses were untimely served. A party’s failure to serve a timely response waives all objections to an admission request, interrogatories, and to document demands, including an objection based on privilege or work product protection, unless the judge grants a motion relieving the res...
FINLEY VS HENLEY PACIFIC LA LLC
Jan 14, 2021 | Riverside County
Hearing off calendar. Plaintiff's Notice to Withdrawal filed 1/7/21.
...DIAZ VS CITYWIDE SELF STORAGE, LLC
Jan 13, 2021 | Riverside County
Continued, in part, to February 23, 2021, at 8:30. Sanctions Imposed. On 8/18/20, the court granted Plaintiff’s motion to compel Defendant DeGennaro’s deposition, as she failed to finish her deposition in November of 2019, without explanation. The court ordered the deposition to take place on 9/10/20 remot...
Jan 13, 2021 | Riverside County
Denied, without prejudice. A moving party is required to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1324, when seeking leave to amend. This rule requires that a separate declaration be submitted with the motion, addressing the effect of the amendment, why the amendment is necessary and proper, when the ...
Jan 12, 2021 | Riverside County
Denied. Defendant provides no authority for this motion. CCP §2017.010 merely discusses the scope of discovery, i.e. relevance. Defendant has not identified any authority that permits the court to force Plaintiff to sign an authorization for records. By statute, the records requested are confidential. (Une...
Jan 12, 2021 | Riverside County
Denied. The motion has been rendered moot by the withdrawal of the subpoenas.
...Jan 12, 2021 | Riverside County
Continued. It appears that Responding Party intended to file and serve an opposition to both motions, but instead filed a duplicate opposition to the motion to compel further responses to RFA, rather than an opposition to the motion to compel further responses to form interrogatories. The hearing is contin...
Jan 11, 2021 | Riverside County
Granted The motion is granted. The order will be effective upon filing of a proof of service demonstrating proper service of the order upon plaintiff. The Court has revised the proposed order to reflect the correct date and substance of the next hearing ; March 11, 2021, for a Trial Setting Conference.
...Jan 11, 2021 | Riverside County
No tentative ruling issued.
...Dec 24, 2020 | Riverside County
The Motion to Vacate Entry of Default is DENIED. Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b) provides that a such a motion must be filed within six months of entry of default. Default was entered on July 9, 2019. An attempt to file the first Motion to Vacate Entry of Default may have been made by moving defenda...
EJEYE VS OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC
Dec 24, 2020 | Riverside County
The unopposed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED. The Court will complete, file, and image for the Court’s website the proposed Order submitted to it. Moving defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing shall serve a conformed copy of the Order on all parties and file proof of service thereof.
...CITY OF BEAUMONT VS CITY OF BEAUMONT
Dec 23, 2020 | Riverside County
The motion is DENIED. Torcal, LLC, did not establish that the City of Beaumont failed to produce documents in compliance with CCP §2031.320. The 55,000 pages produced on 8/18/20 was responsive to RPD Nos. 1-8, 12, and 29-30. (Dec.Morgan ¶4.) Supplemental discovery produced on 8/31/20 was responsive to RDP ...
Dec 23, 2020 | Riverside County
The motion is GRANTED and Requests for Admission, Set One, are deemed admitted. Sanctions in the amount of $1,465.00 are imposed on defendant Justino Romero- Galvez (Defendant). They shall be paid to plaintiff Cassaundra Jackson (Plaintiff) within 30 days. Any issues with service of the summons on Defendan...
Dec 22, 2020 | Riverside County
The unopposed motion for attorney’s fees is GRANTED.
...Dec 22, 2020 | Riverside County
This motion was initially scheduled to be heard on 7/13/20. In conjunction with that hearing, the Court issued a Tentative Ruling. At the hearing on 7/13/20, plaintiff Matthew Tye indicated that he wished to file a Statement of Disqualification under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.3, seeking the disqu...
CRAIG MECHANICAL, INC. VS BINNQUIST DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED
Dec 22, 2020 | Riverside County
The Demurrer is OVERRULED AND DEFENDANT SHALL FILE AND SERVE AN ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT WITHIN 20 DAYS. Demurrer to Entire Complaint Defendant Laguna Hills contends the entire Complaint is uncertain. As to the first cause of action for breach of contract, Defendant Laguna Hills argues that the inclusion of...
Dec 21, 2020 | Riverside County
The Court continued the hearing of the motion to 8:30 am on January 20, 2021, in Department 7. The declarations submitted by defendant Total Quality Logistics from Yuliia Kadar, Marc Bostwick, and Brian Watts were executed outside of the State of California and do not include the required language “under t...
VSTYLES INC VS CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Dec 21, 2020 | Riverside County
The Demurrer of defendants Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. Insurance Brokers of California, Inc. (“Gallagher Co.”), Ronald Zappelli (“Zappelli”), Robert Gammill (“Gammill”) and Anthony Lopez (“Lopez”) (Gallagher, Zappelli, Gammill and Lopez are collectively referred to as, “Gallagher”) to the Complaint of plaint...
Dec 17, 2020 | Riverside County
The unopposed motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff Montgomery is Ordered to serve verified responses, without objections, to Form Interrogatories, Set One, within 30 days. Sanctions are imposed on plaintiff Montgomery in the amount of $710.00. The sanctions shall be paid to defendants Araisa and Banda (through the...
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
