Discover if Hon. Culhane is the right judge for your case based on their ruling history. Stop making 170.6 decisions blindly. See a report sample
Download Hon. Culhane ReportThe Hon. Kevin R. Culhane is a judge for the Sacramento County Superior Court in California. He was elected to the bench in 2008.
Judge Culhane received his bachelor's degree from California State University, San Bernardino. He would earn his J.D. with high honors from the University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law in 1976 and his LL.M from Stanford University in 1977. While in law school, Culhane served as the editor-in-chief for the Law Review.
After graduating with his master's degree, Culhane began teaching as an adjunct professor at his alma mater, McGeorge School of Law.
Prior to being elected to the Superior Court, Culhane worked in private practice, where he specialized in business and professional liability, real estate and lender liability, as well as insurance, corporate, and personal injury matters.
He also served as a judge pro tem for the Superior Court.
While on the bench, Judge Culhane has served as an assistant presiding judge and a presiding judge. His assignments have included complex civil and criminal cases. He has also served as a criminal law and motion judge as well as a family law judge.
Some of his many memberships have included the Judicial Council of California, the State Bar Committee on Professional Liability Insurance, the Commission on the Future of the Legal Profession, and the Presiding Judges Civil Advisory Committee. He also served on the State Bar Board of Governors, where he helped form the State Bar Court and was also instrumental in the creation of the Legal Malpractice Insurance program.
Culhane was named Judge of the Year in 2012 by the American Board of Trial Advocates, in 2013 by the Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association, and in 2017 by the Sacramento County Bar Association.
CDWR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CASES
Jan 09, 2020 | Sacramento County
Please see the Consolidate Tentative ruling posted under North Delta Water Agency's Motion for Attorney's Fees
...CDWR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CASES
Jan 09, 2020 | Sacramento County
Consolidated Tentative Ruling: Motion for Attorney's Fees (filed by multiple parties) The parties to a number of actions coordinated in this proceeding have moved for attorney fees and requested costs under Code of Civil Procedure sections 1021.5 and 1032. (1)The parties base their motions and requests on ...
CDWR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CASES
Jan 09, 2020 | Sacramento County
Please see the Consolidate Tentative ruling posted under North Delta Water Agency's Motion for Attorney's Fees
...RICHARD J. CANACARI VS. JEENIE J. CANACARI
Jan 07, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff in Pro Per is required. Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...CASEY WOODBURY VS. ALAN GRUENEFELDT MD
Jan 07, 2020 | Sacramento County
No appearance is required under the following conditions:
Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program continued to 04/09/2020 at 08:30 in this department.
New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Loc...
GEORGE IVANOV VS. JAMES DONALD SANDISON
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required. Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...PAUL DORITY VS. MICHELLE MORGAN
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required. Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required. Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...RICHARD J. CANACARI VS. JEENIE J. CANACARI
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
No appearance is required under the following conditions:
The Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program is scheduled for 02/13/2020 at 08:30 AM in Department 23.
An Attorney Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to hearing. New Case Man...
LILLENE JAMES BERRY VS. SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per and Attorney for Cross Complaint or Cross Complaint In Pro Per is required.
Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...CHRISTOPHER JAEGER VS. CHRISTOPHER RYAN
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
No appearance is required under the following conditions:
Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program continued to 02/27/2020 at 08:30 in this department.
An Attorney Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to hearing. New Case Management S...
HYEON DO SEO VS. ELK HALL INVESTORS INC
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney's for Cross-Complainants Elk Hall Investors Inc and Phuong Ngoc Nguyen is required.
Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...MICHAEL BALASA VS. ULLA ELENA NORLIE
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
No appearance is required under the following conditions:
The Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program is scheduled for 02/13/2020 at 08:30 AM in Department 23.
An Attorney Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to hearing. New Case Man...
JACQUELINE NOBLE VS. MICHAEL SARENTE
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required.
Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...STEPHEN A LLAMAS VS. BEYOND ICE CREAM LLC
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
No appearance is required under the following conditions:
This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon trial and settlement conference dates. Availabl...
AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS. ROBERT E GERKIN
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required. Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...YVONNE KEYLON VS. JCM PARTNERS, LLC
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required.
Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...CASEY WOODBURY VS. ALAN GRUENEFELDT MD
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required. Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...JANE DOE VS. RUSSELL FUGETT FAMILY TRUST
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required. Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...JOYCE SMITH VS. ESTATE OF BONNIE BUECHNER
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required. Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...GEOFF SCOTT VS. TRACK 7 BREWING COMPANY LLC
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
No appearance is required under the following conditions:
This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon trial and settlement conference dates. Availabl...
GEORGE KEENELARSEN VS. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required. Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...JOEL LEDESMA VS. MARIA NADA HAIDARI
Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required. Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...Jan 06, 2020 | Sacramento County
Mandatory appearance of Attorney for Plaintiff or Plaintiff In Pro Per is required. Absent an appearance for any matter on the Order to Show Cause Re: Non Compliance could result in dismissal without prejudice.
...
Please wait a moment while we gather your results.
