The Honorable Jackson Lucky

Riverside County Superior Court, Department 10

Biography

The Hon. Jackson Lucky is a judge for the Riverside County Superior Court in California. He was appointed to the bench by former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2008. He filled the vacancy created by the retirement of the Hon. Dallas S. Holmes (Ret.).

Judge Lucky received his B.F.A. from DePaul University. He went on to earn his J.D. from Southwestern Law School, graduating magna cum laude.

While in law school, Lucky interned for the Riverside County District Attorney's Office. He was offered a full-time position there in 1994. During his fourteen-year tenure with the D.A.'s office, Lucky specialized in sexual assault, child abuse, and gang-related cases. He remained with the D.A.'s office until his appointment to the Superior Court.

Judge Lucky, who competed in mock trials in high school, has served as a judge for local and state mock trial competitions.

He received the Asian Pacific American Lawyers of the Inland Empire's inaugural Trailblazer Award in 2013.

Judge Lucky was born in Seoul, Korea. His mother is Korean and his father served in the United States Army Corps of Engineers. They moved to the United States when he was five years old. When he's not playing cards with his wife Deborah, Judge Lucky enjoys wood-working and running. His love of running inspired him to compete in several local marathons.

Recent Rulings by Hon. Jackson Lucky

  • BORDEN VS AMAZON.COM, INC

    Feb 24, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The court grants summary adjudication for the first, second, fifth, and sixth causes of action. For the fourth cause of action, the court grants Defendant Pandey’s motion for summary adjudication and denies Defendant Amazon’s. The court denies the motion as to all defendants for the twelfth cause of action...

  • VARELA VS TURNER

    Feb 24, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Hearing continued to March 2, 2021, 8:30 AM, Department 10. Defendant has not complied with 50 USC § 3932, subd. (b)(2). He has submitted no communication from his commanding officer stating that his current military duty prevents appearance and that military leave is not authorized for the Defendant at th...

  • CANETE VS DUNCAN

    Feb 23, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Hearing continued to March 11, 2021, 8:30 AM. In the alternative, the court grants the motion to strike with 30 days leave to amend. The court has read and considered the declaration of Brad J. Husen. The court’s previous tentative order that it would accept “no further briefing” was not intended to preven...

  • CARLSON D.O. VS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

    Feb 22, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion granted. No opposition filed. Court will sign proposed order at hearing.

    ...

  • DOE VS CORONA-NORCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

    Feb 22, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The court sustains the demurrer without leave to amend as to the sixth cause of action. The court sustains with 30 days leave to amend as to the fourth and seventh causes of action. For the sixth cause of action, discrimination under the Unruh Civil Rights Act, that statute does not apply public school dis...

  • G. VS CORONA-NORCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

    Feb 22, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Court sustains without leave to amend as to the third and sixth causes of action. Court overrules the demurrer to the first and fourth causes of action. For the third cause of action, Plaintiff argues that District is liable for its employees’ conduct under Government Code § 815.2. Government Code § 820(a)...

  • ABEYTA VS RECONCILED TERMITE AND PEST CONTROL INC ANTI-SLAAP MOTION (SPECIAL

    Feb 18, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Court denies the special motion to strike. The court grants Plaintiff’s request for judicial notice, except for the request for judicial notice of the amended cross complaint because there is no amended cross complaint filed with the court. Although the allegations in the cross complaint are unclear, Plain...

  • BARNETT VS JURUPA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

    Feb 18, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Demurrer sustained without leave to amend as to the second cause of action. Court finds no reasonable possibility that plaintiff can cure the defect. (Cabral v. Soares (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 1234, 1240.) Demurrer overruled as to the third cause of action. For the second cause of action, Defendant argues th...

  • DARNELL VS SMITH

    Feb 17, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Demurrer sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a cause of action. The court directs the clerk give notice. The court finds good cause to waive the requirement of a meet-and-confer effort because Plaintiff is incarcerated. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.41, subd. (d); see Complaint...

  • CARR VS AKMAKJIAN MD

    Feb 16, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion denied. Plaintiff gave defective notice. Plaintiff timely filed the motion on January 25, 2021. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (b)(2).) However, Plaintiff untimely served the motion by electronic mail on January 25, 2021, 14 court days before the hearing date of February 16, 2021. The law requi...

  • MOLANDER VS TESLA INC TESLA, INC'S MOTION TO STRIKE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

    Feb 11, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Court grants the motion to strike with 20 days leave to amend. Plaintiffs allege sufficient facts showing that Defendant placed the product on the market in conscious disregard of the safety of consumers and others, but Plaintiffs fail to allege sufficient facts showing that an officer, director, or managi...

  • UPHOUSE VS SILVERSCREEN HEALTHCARE, INC.

    Feb 11, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Continued to March 11, 2021, 8:30 AM, Department 10. Court continues the case management conference and motion to strike to the same date, time, and department. Demurring party to give notice. The court issues an order to show cause as to counsel for demurring party as to why sanctions of up to $1,500 shou...

  • PERRY VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP

    Feb 11, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion granted. Court will sign proposed order at hearing.

    ...

  • CITY OF CORONA VS SAMPSON AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC

    Feb 10, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion granted. No opposition filed. Court will sign proposed order at hearing.

    ...

  • LEIPZIGER VS THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

    Feb 10, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion denied. The court sustains Plaintiff’s evidentiary objections for lack of foundation and lack of personal knowledge as to paragraphs 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 of Nicole Young’s declaration and paragraphs 6, 8, and 9 of Heather Young’s declaration. Consequently, Defendants have failed to meet their init...

  • AYALA-HERNANDEZ VS ELSEA

    Feb 10, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The court continues the motion to March 11, 2021, 8:30 AM, Department 10. The court orders that Defendant and his counsel of record appear at that date and time and show cause as to why the court should not impose monetary sanctions of up to $1,500, terminating sanctions, issue sanctions, or evidentiary sa...

  • OZEAN MANAGEMENT INC VS MID-VALLEY SURGICENTER INC

    Feb 09, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Continue motion to a date and time convenient with counsel. Case will be assigned to a different department.

    ...

  • N.S. VS ALVORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

    Feb 08, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The court denies the motion. Based on the court’s evidentiary rulings on Plaintiff’s objections, Defendant fails to meet its initial burden that there is no triable issue of fact that Defendant lacked notice of . (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (c).) The court grants Defendant’s request for judicial notice...

  • QIAO VS XIANG

    Feb 03, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The court grants the motion for leave to amend. Plaintiff promptly sought leave to amend after discovering the facts supporting the request, showed good cause, and the court finds no prejudice. Plaintiff has substantially complied with the procedural requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 3.1324. ...

  • THOMASON VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS

    Feb 02, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion granted. Defendant must prepare and serve a code-compliant privilege log or complete answers and documents without any objection within ten calendar days after the hearing for Requests for Production (RPD) Nos. 9 and 13. The court orders that the parties must schedule an informal discovery conferenc...

  • LEWIS VS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTHPLAN INC

    Feb 01, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion granted. Court will sign proposed order and judgment at hearing. At hearing on November 30, 2020, the court granted Plaintiff’s request for continuance. Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition. There is no triable issue of fact. Defendants have presented undisputed evidence that they complied wit...

  • PEREZ VS STARTING OVER INC

    Feb 01, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion granted with 30 days leave to amend. Negligence, gross negligence, and recklessness are insufficient to support punitive damages, which require malice, oppression, or fraud. (Lackner v. North (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1188, 1210- 1211.) Plaintiffs’ claims for punitive damages rely on the Defendants’ kn...

  • ELDER VS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

    Feb 01, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Hearing continued to March 1, 2021, 8:30 AM, Department 10. The demurring party must satisfy its obligation to meet and confer under Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41, subdivision (a), and to file a declaration under section 430.41, subdivision (a), subsection (3). Defendant’s declaration in support o...

  • MOSS BROS. CJDR VS BENITEZ

    Jan 29, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Court deems this motion a motion for summary adjudication of the first cause of action for reformation and grants that motion. Plaintiff meets its initial burden by presenting evidence to demonstrate its entitlement to reformation: (1) the revised contract contained a computer-generated error for the date ...

  • See More Results

Recent Rulings by Hon. Jackson Lucky

  • BORDEN VS AMAZON.COM, INC

    Feb 24, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The court grants summary adjudication for the first, second, fifth, and sixth causes of action. For the fourth cause of action, the court grants Defendant Pandey’s motion for summary adjudication and denies Defendant Amazon’s. The court denies the motion as to all defendants for the twelfth cause of action...

  • VARELA VS TURNER

    Feb 24, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Hearing continued to March 2, 2021, 8:30 AM, Department 10. Defendant has not complied with 50 USC § 3932, subd. (b)(2). He has submitted no communication from his commanding officer stating that his current military duty prevents appearance and that military leave is not authorized for the Defendant at th...

  • CANETE VS DUNCAN

    Feb 23, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Hearing continued to March 11, 2021, 8:30 AM. In the alternative, the court grants the motion to strike with 30 days leave to amend. The court has read and considered the declaration of Brad J. Husen. The court’s previous tentative order that it would accept “no further briefing” was not intended to preven...

  • CARLSON D.O. VS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

    Feb 22, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion granted. No opposition filed. Court will sign proposed order at hearing.

    ...

  • DOE VS CORONA-NORCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

    Feb 22, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The court sustains the demurrer without leave to amend as to the sixth cause of action. The court sustains with 30 days leave to amend as to the fourth and seventh causes of action. For the sixth cause of action, discrimination under the Unruh Civil Rights Act, that statute does not apply public school dis...

  • G. VS CORONA-NORCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

    Feb 22, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Court sustains without leave to amend as to the third and sixth causes of action. Court overrules the demurrer to the first and fourth causes of action. For the third cause of action, Plaintiff argues that District is liable for its employees’ conduct under Government Code § 815.2. Government Code § 820(a)...

  • ABEYTA VS RECONCILED TERMITE AND PEST CONTROL INC ANTI-SLAAP MOTION (SPECIAL

    Feb 18, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Court denies the special motion to strike. The court grants Plaintiff’s request for judicial notice, except for the request for judicial notice of the amended cross complaint because there is no amended cross complaint filed with the court. Although the allegations in the cross complaint are unclear, Plain...

  • BARNETT VS JURUPA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

    Feb 18, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Demurrer sustained without leave to amend as to the second cause of action. Court finds no reasonable possibility that plaintiff can cure the defect. (Cabral v. Soares (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 1234, 1240.) Demurrer overruled as to the third cause of action. For the second cause of action, Defendant argues th...

  • DARNELL VS SMITH

    Feb 17, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Demurrer sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a cause of action. The court directs the clerk give notice. The court finds good cause to waive the requirement of a meet-and-confer effort because Plaintiff is incarcerated. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.41, subd. (d); see Complaint...

  • CARR VS AKMAKJIAN MD

    Feb 16, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion denied. Plaintiff gave defective notice. Plaintiff timely filed the motion on January 25, 2021. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (b)(2).) However, Plaintiff untimely served the motion by electronic mail on January 25, 2021, 14 court days before the hearing date of February 16, 2021. The law requi...

  • MOLANDER VS TESLA INC TESLA, INC'S MOTION TO STRIKE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

    Feb 11, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Court grants the motion to strike with 20 days leave to amend. Plaintiffs allege sufficient facts showing that Defendant placed the product on the market in conscious disregard of the safety of consumers and others, but Plaintiffs fail to allege sufficient facts showing that an officer, director, or managi...

  • UPHOUSE VS SILVERSCREEN HEALTHCARE, INC.

    Feb 11, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Continued to March 11, 2021, 8:30 AM, Department 10. Court continues the case management conference and motion to strike to the same date, time, and department. Demurring party to give notice. The court issues an order to show cause as to counsel for demurring party as to why sanctions of up to $1,500 shou...

  • PERRY VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP

    Feb 11, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion granted. Court will sign proposed order at hearing.

    ...

  • CITY OF CORONA VS SAMPSON AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC

    Feb 10, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion granted. No opposition filed. Court will sign proposed order at hearing.

    ...

  • LEIPZIGER VS THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

    Feb 10, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion denied. The court sustains Plaintiff’s evidentiary objections for lack of foundation and lack of personal knowledge as to paragraphs 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 of Nicole Young’s declaration and paragraphs 6, 8, and 9 of Heather Young’s declaration. Consequently, Defendants have failed to meet their init...

  • AYALA-HERNANDEZ VS ELSEA

    Feb 10, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The court continues the motion to March 11, 2021, 8:30 AM, Department 10. The court orders that Defendant and his counsel of record appear at that date and time and show cause as to why the court should not impose monetary sanctions of up to $1,500, terminating sanctions, issue sanctions, or evidentiary sa...

  • OZEAN MANAGEMENT INC VS MID-VALLEY SURGICENTER INC

    Feb 09, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Continue motion to a date and time convenient with counsel. Case will be assigned to a different department.

    ...

  • N.S. VS ALVORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

    Feb 08, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The court denies the motion. Based on the court’s evidentiary rulings on Plaintiff’s objections, Defendant fails to meet its initial burden that there is no triable issue of fact that Defendant lacked notice of . (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (c).) The court grants Defendant’s request for judicial notice...

  • QIAO VS XIANG

    Feb 03, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The court grants the motion for leave to amend. Plaintiff promptly sought leave to amend after discovering the facts supporting the request, showed good cause, and the court finds no prejudice. Plaintiff has substantially complied with the procedural requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 3.1324. ...

  • THOMASON VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS

    Feb 02, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion granted. Defendant must prepare and serve a code-compliant privilege log or complete answers and documents without any objection within ten calendar days after the hearing for Requests for Production (RPD) Nos. 9 and 13. The court orders that the parties must schedule an informal discovery conferenc...

  • LEWIS VS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTHPLAN INC

    Feb 01, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion granted. Court will sign proposed order and judgment at hearing. At hearing on November 30, 2020, the court granted Plaintiff’s request for continuance. Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition. There is no triable issue of fact. Defendants have presented undisputed evidence that they complied wit...

  • PEREZ VS STARTING OVER INC

    Feb 01, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Motion granted with 30 days leave to amend. Negligence, gross negligence, and recklessness are insufficient to support punitive damages, which require malice, oppression, or fraud. (Lackner v. North (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1188, 1210- 1211.) Plaintiffs’ claims for punitive damages rely on the Defendants’ kn...

  • ELDER VS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

    Feb 01, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Hearing continued to March 1, 2021, 8:30 AM, Department 10. The demurring party must satisfy its obligation to meet and confer under Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41, subdivision (a), and to file a declaration under section 430.41, subdivision (a), subsection (3). Defendant’s declaration in support o...

  • MOSS BROS. CJDR VS BENITEZ

    Jan 29, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Court deems this motion a motion for summary adjudication of the first cause of action for reformation and grants that motion. Plaintiff meets its initial burden by presenting evidence to demonstrate its entitlement to reformation: (1) the revised contract contained a computer-generated error for the date ...

  • See More Results

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.