The Honorable Irma Poole Asberry

Riverside County Superior Court, Department 5

Discover if Hon. Asberry is the right judge for your case based on their ruling history. Stop making 170.6 decisions blindly. See a report sample

Download Hon. Asberry Report

Biography

The Hon. Irma Poole Asberry is a judge for the Riverside County Superior Court in California. She was appointed to the bench by former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2007. She filled the vacancy created by the retirement of the Hon. Thomas Douglass, Jr. (Ret.). At the time of her appointment, Judge Asberry held the distinction of being the first African American female judge to serve in Riverside County.

She is a registered Democrat.

Judge Asberry received her B.S. from the University of California, Riverside in 1976. She went on to earn her J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law in 1979.

After law school, Asberry joined the law firm of Butterwick, Bright, Pettis & Cunnison, where she practiced bankruptcy law. At the time of her departure from the firm in 1988, Asberry was serving as a partner and had transitioned into the practice of family law. Asberry then opened her own firm, where she continued in the practice of bankruptcy and family law. She remained in that capacity until her appointment to the Superior Court in 2007.

While on the bench, Judge Asberry has presided over a civil calendar at the Historic Courthouse.

She has been an active member of the Riverside County Bar Association and also served as its past-president.

Recent Rulings by Hon. Irma Poole Asberry

  • WYNNE VS WYNNE

    Nov 25, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Denied. Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice is granted pursuant to Evidence Code §452(d). However, “although the existence of a document may be judicially noticeable, the truth of statements contained in the document and its proper interpretation are not subject to judicial notice if those matters are ...

  • RAYGOZA VS GENERAL MOTORS

    Nov 25, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Granted. Defendant failed to comply with the 5-2-19 order. Defendant is to pay Plaintiff sanctions in the amount of $2060, which amount the court finds reasonable. The 5-2-19 order provided that the further responses and production were to be served within 60 days of the order. Plaintiff filed this motion ...

  • HOOKS VS VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION

    Nov 22, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Granted. The proposed order is to include the date, time, department and nature of the upcoming court hearings. The order is effective upon filing of the proof of service of the signed order on the client.

    ...

  • AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY VS FIRST

    Nov 22, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Denied as to Nos. 10 & 11 in Set One, and as to No. 54 in Set Three; Granted as to all other items: AMERICAN is ordered to serve further responses that comply with CCP §2031.210, §2031.220, and/or CCP §2031.240. Any objections based on privilege are to be addressed in a privilege log that complies with CCP...

  • HAMANN VS ROCK

    Nov 21, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    The unopposed motion is granted. The matters set forth in the Request for Admissions are deemed admitted. Plaintiff is ordered to pay Defendant sanctions in the $460 (2 hrs. @ $200 plus $60 costs), which amount the court finds reasonable.

    ...

  • REYES-DUQUE VS MAYORA PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

    Nov 20, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Denied and the TRO is dissolved. Plaintiff has not, in the first instance, demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of his adverse possession claim because the facts alleged in the Complaint and repeated in the moving papers do not demonstrate possession hostile to Defendant’s title. The “hostili...

  • SORIA VS SORIA JR

    Nov 20, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Continued to 12-17-19 to allow Cross-Defendants an opportunity to satisfy the obligation to meet and confer in accordance with CCP § 430.41(a) and to file an appropriate declaration in accordance with CCP § 430.41(a)(3). While Cross-Defendants’ counsel indicates that he wrote an email to Cross-Complainants...

  • CIENFUEGOS VS FLOYD

    Nov 19, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    The unopposed motion is granted. The matters set forth in the Request for Admissions served on Plaintiff Selena Cienfuegos are deemed admitted. Plaintiff Selena Cienfuegos is to pay Defendant sanctions in the amount of $390 (2 hrs. @ $150 plus $90 costs), which amount the court finds reasonable.

    ...

  • TYE VS BOWEN

    Nov 19, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Denied. Request or Admissions 32-60: In lieu of admitting or denying the RFA, a party may respond by claiming inability (lack of sufficient information) to admit or deny the matter stated in the request. (CCP § 2033.220(c).) In this instance, Defendant has adequately responded to RFA 32-40, 56- 57 and 59-6...

  • GUTIERREZ VS EL TORO EXPRESS INC

    Nov 19, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    No tentative. Counsel to appear telephonically or in person to report on the following: 1. Whether Plaintiff is going to re-file her motion for class certification or is she going to proceed on an individual basis. 2. Whether the sought after discovery complies with requirements set forth in paragraph D. o...

  • See More Results

Recent Rulings by Hon. Irma Poole Asberry

  • WYNNE VS WYNNE

    Nov 25, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Denied. Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice is granted pursuant to Evidence Code §452(d). However, “although the existence of a document may be judicially noticeable, the truth of statements contained in the document and its proper interpretation are not subject to judicial notice if those matters are ...

  • RAYGOZA VS GENERAL MOTORS

    Nov 25, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Granted. Defendant failed to comply with the 5-2-19 order. Defendant is to pay Plaintiff sanctions in the amount of $2060, which amount the court finds reasonable. The 5-2-19 order provided that the further responses and production were to be served within 60 days of the order. Plaintiff filed this motion ...

  • HOOKS VS VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION

    Nov 22, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Granted. The proposed order is to include the date, time, department and nature of the upcoming court hearings. The order is effective upon filing of the proof of service of the signed order on the client.

    ...

  • AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY VS FIRST

    Nov 22, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Denied as to Nos. 10 & 11 in Set One, and as to No. 54 in Set Three; Granted as to all other items: AMERICAN is ordered to serve further responses that comply with CCP §2031.210, §2031.220, and/or CCP §2031.240. Any objections based on privilege are to be addressed in a privilege log that complies with CCP...

  • HAMANN VS ROCK

    Nov 21, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    The unopposed motion is granted. The matters set forth in the Request for Admissions are deemed admitted. Plaintiff is ordered to pay Defendant sanctions in the $460 (2 hrs. @ $200 plus $60 costs), which amount the court finds reasonable.

    ...

  • REYES-DUQUE VS MAYORA PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

    Nov 20, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Denied and the TRO is dissolved. Plaintiff has not, in the first instance, demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of his adverse possession claim because the facts alleged in the Complaint and repeated in the moving papers do not demonstrate possession hostile to Defendant’s title. The “hostili...

  • SORIA VS SORIA JR

    Nov 20, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Continued to 12-17-19 to allow Cross-Defendants an opportunity to satisfy the obligation to meet and confer in accordance with CCP § 430.41(a) and to file an appropriate declaration in accordance with CCP § 430.41(a)(3). While Cross-Defendants’ counsel indicates that he wrote an email to Cross-Complainants...

  • CIENFUEGOS VS FLOYD

    Nov 19, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    The unopposed motion is granted. The matters set forth in the Request for Admissions served on Plaintiff Selena Cienfuegos are deemed admitted. Plaintiff Selena Cienfuegos is to pay Defendant sanctions in the amount of $390 (2 hrs. @ $150 plus $90 costs), which amount the court finds reasonable.

    ...

  • TYE VS BOWEN

    Nov 19, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    Denied. Request or Admissions 32-60: In lieu of admitting or denying the RFA, a party may respond by claiming inability (lack of sufficient information) to admit or deny the matter stated in the request. (CCP § 2033.220(c).) In this instance, Defendant has adequately responded to RFA 32-40, 56- 57 and 59-6...

  • GUTIERREZ VS EL TORO EXPRESS INC

    Nov 19, 2019 |  Riverside County, CA

    No tentative. Counsel to appear telephonically or in person to report on the following: 1. Whether Plaintiff is going to re-file her motion for class certification or is she going to proceed on an individual basis. 2. Whether the sought after discovery complies with requirements set forth in paragraph D. o...

  • See More Results

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.