Discover if Hon. Abdallah is the right judge for your case based on their ruling history. Stop making 170.6 decisions blindly. See a report sample
View Judge DashboardThe Hon. George J. Abdallah, Jr. is a judge for the San Joaquin County Superior Court in California. He was originally appointed to serve on the San Joaquin County Municipal Court in 1995 and was subsequently elevated to the Superior Court in 1998.
Judge Abdallah received his B.A. from the University of California. He went on to earn his J.D. from Humphreys University Drivon School of Law.
Prior to his appointment to the Municipal Court, Abdallah had served as a court commissioner for both the San Joaquin County Municipal and Superior Courts since 1987.
While on the bench, Judge Abdallah served as a Presiding Judge of the Court and a Presiding Judge of the Appellate Division. Judge Abdallah also served as a supervisor of the civil and criminal grand juries.
He was appointed by the California Supreme Court in 2009 to serve as a member of the Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions (CJEO). While a member, Judge Abdallah served as a chair of the CJEO's education and planning committee.
Judge Abdallah also served on the Commission on Judicial Performance's Supreme Court Advisory Committee on the Code of Judicial Ethics.
Some of his memberships have included the Manteca District Ambulance, the Rotary International, the San Joaquin County Immunization Program Committee, and the Manteca CAPS.
He has taught as an adjunct professor at his alma mater the Humphreys University Drivon School of Law and as an instructor for the Center for Judicial Education and Research.
JOSEPH SZKODZINSKI VS TEDS WELDING & FABRICATION SHOP ET AL.
Apr 06, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered counsel for plaintiff’s motion to be relieved as counsel filed February 24, 2021 and good cause appearing, counsel’s motion is GRANTED. The court order shall become effective upon service on plaintiff.
Hon. George J. Abdallah Jr.
Judge of th Superior Cour...
SANDRLIA AL GEORES ET AL. VS CENTRAL VALLEY AG GRINDING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL.
Apr 06, 2021 | San Joaquin County
DEFENDANTS’ DEMURRER AND MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION
On June 30, 2020, Sandrlia Al Georges, Bella M. Yokhanna, N.Y. (a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem, Sandrlia Al Geores), and P.Y. (a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem, Sandrlia Al Geores) (collectively “Plaint...
JOBANY RODRIGUEZ VS J-M MANUFACTURING CO., INC. DBA JM EAGLE
Apr 06, 2021 | San Joaquin County
MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL
The court having read and considered plaintiff’s motion for final approval of class action settlement filed March 15, 2021 rules as follows. The court finds the proposed class action settlement to be adequate, fair and reasonable. Therefore, plaintiff’s unopposed motion for f...
NIKKI FULLER VS TOTAL NEW TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Apr 05, 2021 | San Joaquin County
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
The court having read and considered defendants’ unopposed motion for protective order filed February 1, 2021, supporting points and authorities and declaration rules as follows. The court having assessed the case complexity pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2019...
SHEILA GIANELLI ET AL. VS KILOWATT SYSTEMS, LLC ET AL.
Apr 01, 2021 | San Joaquin County
TENTATIVE RULING
Shiela Gianelli, Eric Cover v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al.
Case No.xxx2021-0000330
April 2, 2021
The court has read and considered defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company’s (Nationwide) March 4, 2021 demur to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint f...
FOUR HUNDRED MAIN STREET LLC VS. THE CITY OF STOCKTON
Mar 22, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered the unopposed motion to substitute receiver filed February 19, 2021 and could cause appearing, the motion is GRANTED.
Hon. George J. Abdallah Jr
Judge of the Superior Court
NANCY MORENO ET AL. VS WINCO FOODS FOUNDATION, INC
Mar 22, 2021 | San Joaquin County
Appearance required regarding payment of state bar fee pursuant to CRC 9.40(e).
Hearing will be held remotely. To attend remote hearing: Call into (209) 992-5590; then follow the prompts as follows:
Dept. 10A: Bridge # 6938; Pin # 3784
Hon. George J. Abdallah Jr.
Judge of the S...
VISION QUEST CAREER PATHWAYS, INC. VS MANUEL CASILLAS ET AL.
Mar 22, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered the unopposed motion of counsel for defendants to be relieved as counsel filed February 18, 2021 and good cause appearing, defendant’s counsel’s motion to be relieved is GRANTED. The court’s order shall become effective upon service of the court’s order upon defendants...
DIANE S MORALES VS MARY IDA VAN VRANKEN
Mar 22, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered the unopposed motion to be relieved as counsel filed by counsel for plaintiff on February 10, 2021 and good cause appearing, the motion of counsel, Robert Anaya, is GRANTED. The court’s order shall become effective upon service of the order on plaintiff Diane Morales.<...
LINCOLN UNIFIED TEACHERS ASSOCIATION VS LINCOLN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Mar 19, 2021 | San Joaquin County
On the Court's own motion the Demurrer set for March 26, 2021 is continued to June 24, 2021 at 9 AM in Department 10A.
Hon, George J. Abdallah, Jr.,
Judge of the Superior Court
CALIFORNIA MOBILE HOME PARK INVESTORS, L.L.C. ET AL. VS COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN ET AL.
Mar 10, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered plaintiff’s motion to strike or tax fees and costs filed February 11, 2021, defendant’s opposition filed March 3, 2021 and supporting declarations as to the motion and opposition rules as follows. The court finds that the fees sought by defendant for court call( $248.00...
CARLOS SALAZAR VS FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. ET AL.
Mar 10, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered defendant, FedEx’s unopposed motions filed February 9, 2021: motion for order deeming admitted responses to request for admissions, Motion for an order compelling plaintiff to appear for a deposition and motion for order to compel responses by plaintiff’s form interrog...
Mar 09, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees filed herein on November 20, 2020, defendant’s answer and Plaintiff’s reply rules as follows. Plaintiff seeks $23,000 in attorney fees for having appeared in a bankruptcy matter filed by and later dismissed by defendant. Plaintiff, w...
SAUL TAMAYO DIAZ VS ANTONINI BROS., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Mar 09, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered defendant’s motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement filed February 1, 2021 and good cause appearing rules as follows. The court finds the proposed class action settlement to be reasonable, adequate and fair. Therefore, defendant’s motion for prelimina...
Mar 05, 2021 | San Joaquin County
On the Court's own motion, the Demurrer set for March 19, 2021 is continued to June 3, 2021 at 9 AM in Department 10A.
Hon. George J. Abdallah, Jr.,
Judge of the Superior Court
JOSE CHAVEZ-GUTIERREZ ET AL. VS SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ET AL.
Mar 05, 2021 | San Joaquin County
On the Court's own motion the Demurrer and Motion to Strike set for March 19, 2021 is continued to May 21, 2021 at 9 AM in Department 10A.
Hon. George J. Abdallah, Jr.,
Judge of the Superior Court
KBR INC. DBA RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES VS JOSHUA HUGHES
Mar 03, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered defendant’s motion to set aside default filed December 31, 2020, plaintiff’s opposition and counsels’ supporting declarations rules as follows. The court finds defendant’s failure to file a response to plaintiff’s complaint was the result of “excusable neglect “ CCP473....
RUDY SANDOVAL VS US FOODS, INC. DBA US FOODSERVICE, INC
Mar 03, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered the parties’ unopposed motion for preliminary approval of the class action settlement filed herein on January 29, 2021 and good cause appearing rules as follows. The court finds the proposed class action settlement to be fair, reasonable and adequate. Therefore, the par...
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC VS BEATRIZ RAMIREZ
Mar 03, 2021 | San Joaquin County
Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for order that matters in request for admission of truth of facts be admitted filed January 21, 2021 is GRANTED.
Hon. George J. Abdallah Jr.
Judge of the Superior Court
LUIS NESTA VS SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT
Mar 03, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered defendant ‘s unopposed motion to compel responses to interrogatories and request for production of documents and to have matters deemed admitted filed February 4, 2021 and good cause appearing, defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
Hon. George J. Abdallah Jr.
Judg...
DAVID PENA, ("PAGA") ET AL VS SEACA PACKAGING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Mar 02, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered plaintiff’s counsel‘s motion to be relieved filed January 29, 2021 and good cause appearing rules as follows. Plaintiff’s counsel‘s motion to be relieved is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s counsel, Douglas Han, is relieved upon service of notice of the court’s order upon plaintif...
NICOLE LESHANE ET AL. VS TRACY VW, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL.
Mar 01, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court has read and considered defendants’ petition to compel arbitration filed October 9, 2020, plaintiff’s opposition, defendant’s reply and rules as follows.
Defendants seek an order of the court compelling arbitration of plaintiff’s First Amended Representative Action Complaint for PAGA Pena...
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC VS IMAD ALFANATSAH
Feb 26, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered plaintiff’s unopposed motion for order that matters in request for admission of truth and facts be admitted filed herein on January 19, 2021 and good cause appearing, plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED.
Hon. George J. Abdallah
Judge of the Superior Court
NANCY MORENO ET AL. VS WINCO FOODS FOUNDATION, INC
Feb 24, 2021 | San Joaquin County
The court having read and considered the petition of Michael C. Bird for admission to appear as counsel pro hac vice herein rules as follows. Pursuant to California rule of court 9.40(c)(1) the State Bar must be served with a copy of the application and an applicable fee must be paid to the State Bar CRC ...
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
