The Honorable Daniel P. Maguire

Yolo County Superior Court, Department 3

Thumbnail of judge report

Discover if Hon. Maguire is the right judge for your case based on their ruling history. Stop making 170.6 decisions blindly. See a report sample

Download Hon. Maguire Report

Biography

The Hon. Daniel P. Maguire is a judge for the Yolo County Superior Court in California. He was appointed to the bench by former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2010. He filled the vacancy created by the retirement of the Hon. Thomas E. Warriner (Ret.).

He is a registered Republican.

Judge Maguire received his B.A. from Stanford University. He went on to earn his J.D. from Harvard Law School.

Prior to his appointment to the Superior Court, Maguire had served as a deputy legal affairs secretary for former Governor Schwarzenegger since 2005.

Before joining the Office of the Governor, Maguire had been a sole practitioner for four years. He also practiced as an associate at the law firms of Holme, Roberts, and Owen from 1993 to 1997 and with Orrick, Herrington, and Sutcliffe LLP from 1997 to 2000. Maguire began his legal career as a clerk for the Hon. Andrew Kleinfeld with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

During his time on the bench, Judge Maguire was elected to serve as the Assistant Presiding Judge of the Court in 2019. He has also presided over the Family Law Division.

Recent Rulings by Hon. Daniel P. Maguire

  • CAVALRY SPV I, LLC V. FRANCOIS

    Aug 08, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Defendant Richard W. Francois’s unopposed motion for leave to file an amended answer is DENIED. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324.) Defendant has not submitted a declaration that contains the information required by California Rule of Court 3.1324(a)(2) and (a)(3), and states the information required by su...

  • FLIPPO V. GARDNER

    Aug 08, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Cross-defendant Ford Motor Company has mis-designated the Court’s address in its notice of motion. The Court is located at 1000 Main Street in Woodland.
    Cross-defendant’s motion to compel further responses to requests for admission and requests for production is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2031.310, ...

  • ORTIZ V. SHELOMENSEFF

    Aug 08, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Specially appearing Nickita Shelomenseff’s motion to quash service of summons and complaint is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 418.10.) The proof of service filed with the Court on June 11, 2018, does not state that plaintiff caused Mr. Shelomenseff to be personally served with process. Item 3 does not identi...

  • GONZALES V. SANDENO

    Aug 08, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Defendant and cross-defendant Kanit and Kate, Inc.’s (“defendant”) demurrer to cross-complaint by defendant and cross-complainant Zackary Sandeno (“cross-complainant”): Defendant’s request for judicial notice as to items 1 through 3 is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).) The request is DENIED, as to i...

  • BURTON V. DKD OF DAVIS, INC.

    Jul 19, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Defendant DKD of Davis, Inc.’s petition to compel arbitration is GRANTED, as to plaintiff Lyn
    Burton’s first through fifth and seventh causes of action, and to the extent that she seeks relief on
    behalf of herself only. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.4.) The Court is required to submit injunctive
    ...

  • DHAKAL V. FULLER

    Jul 19, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Plaintiff Anand Dhakal’s motion to disqualify defense counsel is DENIED. Plaintiff establishes
    no factual basis for disqualification. (California Rule of Professional Conduct 5-210.) Even if
    counsel’s testimony were relevant, it would relate to an uncontested matter as defendants have
    offere...

  • SONNIK V. ALLSTATE INS. CO.

    Jul 19, 2018 |  Yolo County

    The Court does not consider plaintiff Ruvim Sonnik’s untimely filed opposition. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1005.)
    The 85 individual defendants’ (listed in the notice of motion) request for judicial notice is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).)
    Defendants’ unopposed special motion to strike is GRANT...

  • LEVY V. SHERMAN

    Jul 19, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Cross-defendant Stan Wilson Plastering, Inc.’s demurrer to the cross-complaint filed by cross-
    complainant Sherman Construction, Inc. is DROPPED FROM CALENDAR. Moving party
    failed to meet and confer prior to filing the demurrer. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.41.)

    ...

  • ROGERSON BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. V. APC HOLDING & MANAGEMENT, INC.

    Jul 12, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Cross-complainant Andrew Cody’s motion to amend his cross-complaint is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a)(1); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324.) The declaration of David S. Barrett, filed in support of the motion, fails to state the effect of the amendment, why the amendment is necessary and proper...

  • WALKER V. VANN

    Jul 12, 2018 |  Yolo County

    The Court declines to consider plaintiff Cheryl Lynette Walker’s untimely reply filed on July 9, 2018. Plaintiff’s reply should have been filed with the Court no later than July 5, 2018. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1005, subd. (b).)
    Defendants Garnett Vann and Cherri Vann’s request for judicial notice is GRAN...

  • KHAN V. JOHNSTON’S TRADING POST, INC.

    Jul 12, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Intervenor Insurance Company of the West’s motion to consolidate this case with Case No. CV
    PO 17-1297 is DENIED. A notice of the instant motion was not filed in Case No. CV PO 17-
    1297. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.350(a)(1)(C).)
    If no hearing is requested, this tentative ruling is effectiv...

  • CONAWAY PRESERVATION GROUP V. COUNTY OF YOLO

    May 24, 2017 |  Yolo County

    Defendant County of Yolo’s motion to tax is:
    1. DENIED, as to the travel costs incurred by plaintiff for depositions. Travel costs are expressly allowed by statute and Yolo fails to show that these costs were unreasonable or unnecessary. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5, subd. (a)(3)(C).)
    2. GRANTED, a...

  • BONILLA V. CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

    May 10, 2017 |  Yolo County

    This case was transferred to Department Three upon the recusal by Judge McAdam. Judge
    White has reviewed the pertinent pleadings and filings de novo, and issues the following
    tentative ruling:
    Plaintiff Guillermo Bonilla-Chirinos’s request for judicial notice is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, §
    ...

  • WALLIS V. PHL ASSOCIATES, INC.

    Apr 07, 2017 |  Yolo County

    Defendant PHL Associates, Inc.’s request for judicial notice of Exhibits 2-3 and 5-22 is
    GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).) Defendant’s request for judicial notice of Exhibit 4
    is DENIED. Defendant fails to provide any legal authority which authorizes the Court to take
    judicial notice ...

  • WALLIS V. PHL ASSOCIATES, INC.

    Mar 17, 2017 |  Yolo County

    The requests for judicial notice are GRANTED. (Evid. Code, §452, subd. (d).)
    Defendant PHL Associates Inc.’s motion to bifurcate the issues of equitable entitlement and
    equitable relief is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 598, 1048, subd. (b); Grappo v. Coventry
    Financial Corp. (1991) 235 Cal.A...

  • SEBAHIA V. KANE

    Feb 28, 2017 |  Yolo County

    Defendants John Kane and Rosalie Kane’s demurrer is CONTINUED on the Court’s own
    motion to March 13, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3, to be heard together with plaintiffs
    Jihad Ben Sebahia and Eric W. Giannini’s motion to deem related, reclassify, and
    consolidate.

    ...

  • NORTON V. YOLO HOSPICE, INC.

    Dec 01, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Motion to compel further responses to special interrogatories:
    Defendants Yolo Hospice, Inc., Craig Dresang, Tom Frankel, and Emily Murdock’s motion to
    compel further responses to the following special interrogatories is GRANTED, as follows:
    1. Special Interrogatory Nos. 424-429, from pl...

  • NORTON V. YOLO HOSPICE, INC.

    Nov 18, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Plaintiffs Jody Norton and Piper Berge’s motion for leave to amend and plaintiffs’ motions to
    compel are CONTINUED on the Court’s own motion to be heard on December 1, 2016, at 8:30
    a.m. in Department 10.

    ...

  • THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. HOWARD S. WRIGHT

    Nov 18, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Construction Co.
    Cross-defendant McClone Construction Company’s unopposed motion for determination of
    good faith settlement is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 877.6.)
    If no hearing is requested, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order
    pursuant to Cali...

  • THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. HOWARD S. WRIGHT

    Oct 21, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Construction Co.
    Defendant Howard S. Wright Construction Co.’s (“HSW”) request for judicial notice is
    GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).)
    The Court declines to rule on objections directed to statements made in each parties’ separate
    statements of undisputed facts. (H...

  • THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. HOWARD S. WRIGHT

    Oct 13, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Construction Co.
    Due to an ongoing trial in Department Ten, the hearing on the motions for summary judgment, or
    in the alternative, summary adjudication are CONTINUED on the Court’s own motion to
    October 21, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Department Ten.
    Defendant Howard S. Wrigh...

  • WALLIS V. PHL ASSOCIATES, INC.

    Sep 22, 2016 |  Yolo County

    The Court declines to consider any evidence or legal authority not previously provided to the
    discovery referee for his consideration in preparing his report and recommended ruling on
    defendant PHL Associates, Inc.’s motion for a protective order.
    Plaintiff Dale M. Wallis’s request for judic...

  • WALLIS V. PHL ASSOCIATES, INC.

    Sep 08, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Plaintiff Dale Wallis’s and defendants PHL Associates, Inc., Jeffrey Wichmann, and Mary
    Holmes’s ex parte applications for an order allowing page extensions are both GRANTED. So
    the Court may more thoroughly consider the parties’ papers, the hearing on plaintiff’s objection
    to the referee’s ...

  • RICHMOND-LUWISCH V. RICHMOND

    Aug 18, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Respondent Pamela Richmond’s motion for attorneys’ fees is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., §
    527.6, subd. (s).) Petitioner Scott Richmond Luwisch does not dispute any specific entries or
    show that any of the entries are erroneous, excessive, or unreasonable. His references to
    counsel’s work as “s...

  • See More Results

Recent Rulings by Hon. Daniel P. Maguire

  • CAVALRY SPV I, LLC V. FRANCOIS

    Aug 08, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Defendant Richard W. Francois’s unopposed motion for leave to file an amended answer is DENIED. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324.) Defendant has not submitted a declaration that contains the information required by California Rule of Court 3.1324(a)(2) and (a)(3), and states the information required by su...

  • FLIPPO V. GARDNER

    Aug 08, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Cross-defendant Ford Motor Company has mis-designated the Court’s address in its notice of motion. The Court is located at 1000 Main Street in Woodland.
    Cross-defendant’s motion to compel further responses to requests for admission and requests for production is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2031.310, ...

  • ORTIZ V. SHELOMENSEFF

    Aug 08, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Specially appearing Nickita Shelomenseff’s motion to quash service of summons and complaint is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 418.10.) The proof of service filed with the Court on June 11, 2018, does not state that plaintiff caused Mr. Shelomenseff to be personally served with process. Item 3 does not identi...

  • GONZALES V. SANDENO

    Aug 08, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Defendant and cross-defendant Kanit and Kate, Inc.’s (“defendant”) demurrer to cross-complaint by defendant and cross-complainant Zackary Sandeno (“cross-complainant”): Defendant’s request for judicial notice as to items 1 through 3 is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).) The request is DENIED, as to i...

  • BURTON V. DKD OF DAVIS, INC.

    Jul 19, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Defendant DKD of Davis, Inc.’s petition to compel arbitration is GRANTED, as to plaintiff Lyn
    Burton’s first through fifth and seventh causes of action, and to the extent that she seeks relief on
    behalf of herself only. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.4.) The Court is required to submit injunctive
    ...

  • DHAKAL V. FULLER

    Jul 19, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Plaintiff Anand Dhakal’s motion to disqualify defense counsel is DENIED. Plaintiff establishes
    no factual basis for disqualification. (California Rule of Professional Conduct 5-210.) Even if
    counsel’s testimony were relevant, it would relate to an uncontested matter as defendants have
    offere...

  • SONNIK V. ALLSTATE INS. CO.

    Jul 19, 2018 |  Yolo County

    The Court does not consider plaintiff Ruvim Sonnik’s untimely filed opposition. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1005.)
    The 85 individual defendants’ (listed in the notice of motion) request for judicial notice is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).)
    Defendants’ unopposed special motion to strike is GRANT...

  • LEVY V. SHERMAN

    Jul 19, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Cross-defendant Stan Wilson Plastering, Inc.’s demurrer to the cross-complaint filed by cross-
    complainant Sherman Construction, Inc. is DROPPED FROM CALENDAR. Moving party
    failed to meet and confer prior to filing the demurrer. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.41.)

    ...

  • ROGERSON BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. V. APC HOLDING & MANAGEMENT, INC.

    Jul 12, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Cross-complainant Andrew Cody’s motion to amend his cross-complaint is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a)(1); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324.) The declaration of David S. Barrett, filed in support of the motion, fails to state the effect of the amendment, why the amendment is necessary and proper...

  • WALKER V. VANN

    Jul 12, 2018 |  Yolo County

    The Court declines to consider plaintiff Cheryl Lynette Walker’s untimely reply filed on July 9, 2018. Plaintiff’s reply should have been filed with the Court no later than July 5, 2018. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1005, subd. (b).)
    Defendants Garnett Vann and Cherri Vann’s request for judicial notice is GRAN...

  • KHAN V. JOHNSTON’S TRADING POST, INC.

    Jul 12, 2018 |  Yolo County

    Intervenor Insurance Company of the West’s motion to consolidate this case with Case No. CV
    PO 17-1297 is DENIED. A notice of the instant motion was not filed in Case No. CV PO 17-
    1297. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.350(a)(1)(C).)
    If no hearing is requested, this tentative ruling is effectiv...

  • CONAWAY PRESERVATION GROUP V. COUNTY OF YOLO

    May 24, 2017 |  Yolo County

    Defendant County of Yolo’s motion to tax is:
    1. DENIED, as to the travel costs incurred by plaintiff for depositions. Travel costs are expressly allowed by statute and Yolo fails to show that these costs were unreasonable or unnecessary. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5, subd. (a)(3)(C).)
    2. GRANTED, a...

  • BONILLA V. CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

    May 10, 2017 |  Yolo County

    This case was transferred to Department Three upon the recusal by Judge McAdam. Judge
    White has reviewed the pertinent pleadings and filings de novo, and issues the following
    tentative ruling:
    Plaintiff Guillermo Bonilla-Chirinos’s request for judicial notice is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, §
    ...

  • WALLIS V. PHL ASSOCIATES, INC.

    Apr 07, 2017 |  Yolo County

    Defendant PHL Associates, Inc.’s request for judicial notice of Exhibits 2-3 and 5-22 is
    GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).) Defendant’s request for judicial notice of Exhibit 4
    is DENIED. Defendant fails to provide any legal authority which authorizes the Court to take
    judicial notice ...

  • WALLIS V. PHL ASSOCIATES, INC.

    Mar 17, 2017 |  Yolo County

    The requests for judicial notice are GRANTED. (Evid. Code, §452, subd. (d).)
    Defendant PHL Associates Inc.’s motion to bifurcate the issues of equitable entitlement and
    equitable relief is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 598, 1048, subd. (b); Grappo v. Coventry
    Financial Corp. (1991) 235 Cal.A...

  • SEBAHIA V. KANE

    Feb 28, 2017 |  Yolo County

    Defendants John Kane and Rosalie Kane’s demurrer is CONTINUED on the Court’s own
    motion to March 13, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3, to be heard together with plaintiffs
    Jihad Ben Sebahia and Eric W. Giannini’s motion to deem related, reclassify, and
    consolidate.

    ...

  • NORTON V. YOLO HOSPICE, INC.

    Dec 01, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Motion to compel further responses to special interrogatories:
    Defendants Yolo Hospice, Inc., Craig Dresang, Tom Frankel, and Emily Murdock’s motion to
    compel further responses to the following special interrogatories is GRANTED, as follows:
    1. Special Interrogatory Nos. 424-429, from pl...

  • NORTON V. YOLO HOSPICE, INC.

    Nov 18, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Plaintiffs Jody Norton and Piper Berge’s motion for leave to amend and plaintiffs’ motions to
    compel are CONTINUED on the Court’s own motion to be heard on December 1, 2016, at 8:30
    a.m. in Department 10.

    ...

  • THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. HOWARD S. WRIGHT

    Nov 18, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Construction Co.
    Cross-defendant McClone Construction Company’s unopposed motion for determination of
    good faith settlement is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 877.6.)
    If no hearing is requested, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order
    pursuant to Cali...

  • THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. HOWARD S. WRIGHT

    Oct 21, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Construction Co.
    Defendant Howard S. Wright Construction Co.’s (“HSW”) request for judicial notice is
    GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).)
    The Court declines to rule on objections directed to statements made in each parties’ separate
    statements of undisputed facts. (H...

  • THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. HOWARD S. WRIGHT

    Oct 13, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Construction Co.
    Due to an ongoing trial in Department Ten, the hearing on the motions for summary judgment, or
    in the alternative, summary adjudication are CONTINUED on the Court’s own motion to
    October 21, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Department Ten.
    Defendant Howard S. Wrigh...

  • WALLIS V. PHL ASSOCIATES, INC.

    Sep 22, 2016 |  Yolo County

    The Court declines to consider any evidence or legal authority not previously provided to the
    discovery referee for his consideration in preparing his report and recommended ruling on
    defendant PHL Associates, Inc.’s motion for a protective order.
    Plaintiff Dale M. Wallis’s request for judic...

  • WALLIS V. PHL ASSOCIATES, INC.

    Sep 08, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Plaintiff Dale Wallis’s and defendants PHL Associates, Inc., Jeffrey Wichmann, and Mary
    Holmes’s ex parte applications for an order allowing page extensions are both GRANTED. So
    the Court may more thoroughly consider the parties’ papers, the hearing on plaintiff’s objection
    to the referee’s ...

  • RICHMOND-LUWISCH V. RICHMOND

    Aug 18, 2016 |  Yolo County

    Respondent Pamela Richmond’s motion for attorneys’ fees is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., §
    527.6, subd. (s).) Petitioner Scott Richmond Luwisch does not dispute any specific entries or
    show that any of the entries are erroneous, excessive, or unreasonable. His references to
    counsel’s work as “s...

  • See More Results

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.