Discover if Hon. Maguire is the right judge for your case based on their ruling history. Stop making 170.6 decisions blindly. See a report sample
View Judge DashboardThe Hon. Daniel P. Maguire is a judge for the Yolo County Superior Court in California. He was appointed to the bench by former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2010. He filled the vacancy created by the retirement of the Hon. Thomas E. Warriner (Ret.).
He is a registered Republican.
Judge Maguire received his B.A. from Stanford University. He went on to earn his J.D. from Harvard Law School.
Prior to his appointment to the Superior Court, Maguire had served as a deputy legal affairs secretary for former Governor Schwarzenegger since 2005.
Before joining the Office of the Governor, Maguire had been a sole practitioner for four years. He also practiced as an associate at the law firms of Holme, Roberts, and Owen from 1993 to 1997 and with Orrick, Herrington, and Sutcliffe LLP from 1997 to 2000. Maguire began his legal career as a clerk for the Hon. Andrew Kleinfeld with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
During his time on the bench, Judge Maguire was elected to serve as the Assistant Presiding Judge of the Court in 2019. He has also presided over the Family Law Division.
CAVALRY SPV I, LLC V. FRANCOIS
Aug 08, 2018 | Yolo County
Defendant Richard W. Francois’s unopposed motion for leave to file an amended answer is DENIED. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324.) Defendant has not submitted a declaration that contains the information required by California Rule of Court 3.1324(a)(2) and (a)(3), and states the information required by su...
Aug 08, 2018 | Yolo County
Cross-defendant Ford Motor Company has mis-designated the Court’s address in its notice of motion. The Court is located at 1000 Main Street in Woodland.
Cross-defendant’s motion to compel further responses to requests for admission and requests for production is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2031.310, ...
Aug 08, 2018 | Yolo County
Specially appearing Nickita Shelomenseff’s motion to quash service of summons and complaint is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 418.10.) The proof of service filed with the Court on June 11, 2018, does not state that plaintiff caused Mr. Shelomenseff to be personally served with process. Item 3 does not identi...
Aug 08, 2018 | Yolo County
Defendant and cross-defendant Kanit and Kate, Inc.’s (“defendant”) demurrer to cross-complaint by defendant and cross-complainant Zackary Sandeno (“cross-complainant”): Defendant’s request for judicial notice as to items 1 through 3 is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).) The request is DENIED, as to i...
Jul 19, 2018 | Yolo County
Defendant DKD of Davis, Inc.’s petition to compel arbitration is GRANTED, as to plaintiff Lyn
Burton’s first through fifth and seventh causes of action, and to the extent that she seeks relief on
behalf of herself only. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.4.) The Court is required to submit injunctive
...
Jul 19, 2018 | Yolo County
Plaintiff Anand Dhakal’s motion to disqualify defense counsel is DENIED. Plaintiff establishes
no factual basis for disqualification. (California Rule of Professional Conduct 5-210.) Even if
counsel’s testimony were relevant, it would relate to an uncontested matter as defendants have
offere...
Jul 19, 2018 | Yolo County
The Court does not consider plaintiff Ruvim Sonnik’s untimely filed opposition. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1005.)
The 85 individual defendants’ (listed in the notice of motion) request for judicial notice is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).)
Defendants’ unopposed special motion to strike is GRANT...
Jul 19, 2018 | Yolo County
Cross-defendant Stan Wilson Plastering, Inc.’s demurrer to the cross-complaint filed by cross-
complainant Sherman Construction, Inc. is DROPPED FROM CALENDAR. Moving party
failed to meet and confer prior to filing the demurrer. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.41.)
ROGERSON BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. V. APC HOLDING & MANAGEMENT, INC.
Jul 12, 2018 | Yolo County
Cross-complainant Andrew Cody’s motion to amend his cross-complaint is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a)(1); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324.) The declaration of David S. Barrett, filed in support of the motion, fails to state the effect of the amendment, why the amendment is necessary and proper...
Jul 12, 2018 | Yolo County
The Court declines to consider plaintiff Cheryl Lynette Walker’s untimely reply filed on July 9, 2018. Plaintiff’s reply should have been filed with the Court no later than July 5, 2018. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1005, subd. (b).)
Defendants Garnett Vann and Cherri Vann’s request for judicial notice is GRAN...
KHAN V. JOHNSTON’S TRADING POST, INC.
Jul 12, 2018 | Yolo County
Intervenor Insurance Company of the West’s motion to consolidate this case with Case No. CV
PO 17-1297 is DENIED. A notice of the instant motion was not filed in Case No. CV PO 17-
1297. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.350(a)(1)(C).)
If no hearing is requested, this tentative ruling is effectiv...
CONAWAY PRESERVATION GROUP V. COUNTY OF YOLO
May 24, 2017 | Yolo County
Defendant County of Yolo’s motion to tax is:
1. DENIED, as to the travel costs incurred by plaintiff for depositions. Travel costs are expressly allowed by statute and Yolo fails to show that these costs were unreasonable or unnecessary. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5, subd. (a)(3)(C).)
2. GRANTED, a...
BONILLA V. CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
May 10, 2017 | Yolo County
This case was transferred to Department Three upon the recusal by Judge McAdam. Judge
White has reviewed the pertinent pleadings and filings de novo, and issues the following
tentative ruling:
Plaintiff Guillermo Bonilla-Chirinos’s request for judicial notice is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, §
...
WALLIS V. PHL ASSOCIATES, INC.
Apr 07, 2017 | Yolo County
Defendant PHL Associates, Inc.’s request for judicial notice of Exhibits 2-3 and 5-22 is
GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).) Defendant’s request for judicial notice of Exhibit 4
is DENIED. Defendant fails to provide any legal authority which authorizes the Court to take
judicial notice ...
WALLIS V. PHL ASSOCIATES, INC.
Mar 17, 2017 | Yolo County
The requests for judicial notice are GRANTED. (Evid. Code, §452, subd. (d).)
Defendant PHL Associates Inc.’s motion to bifurcate the issues of equitable entitlement and
equitable relief is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 598, 1048, subd. (b); Grappo v. Coventry
Financial Corp. (1991) 235 Cal.A...
Feb 28, 2017 | Yolo County
Defendants John Kane and Rosalie Kane’s demurrer is CONTINUED on the Court’s own
motion to March 13, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3, to be heard together with plaintiffs
Jihad Ben Sebahia and Eric W. Giannini’s motion to deem related, reclassify, and
consolidate.
Dec 01, 2016 | Yolo County
Motion to compel further responses to special interrogatories:
Defendants Yolo Hospice, Inc., Craig Dresang, Tom Frankel, and Emily Murdock’s motion to
compel further responses to the following special interrogatories is GRANTED, as follows:
1. Special Interrogatory Nos. 424-429, from pl...
Nov 18, 2016 | Yolo County
Plaintiffs Jody Norton and Piper Berge’s motion for leave to amend and plaintiffs’ motions to
compel are CONTINUED on the Court’s own motion to be heard on December 1, 2016, at 8:30
a.m. in Department 10.
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. HOWARD S. WRIGHT
Nov 18, 2016 | Yolo County
Construction Co.
Cross-defendant McClone Construction Company’s unopposed motion for determination of
good faith settlement is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 877.6.)
If no hearing is requested, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order
pursuant to Cali...
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. HOWARD S. WRIGHT
Oct 21, 2016 | Yolo County
Construction Co.
Defendant Howard S. Wright Construction Co.’s (“HSW”) request for judicial notice is
GRANTED. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).)
The Court declines to rule on objections directed to statements made in each parties’ separate
statements of undisputed facts. (H...
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA V. HOWARD S. WRIGHT
Oct 13, 2016 | Yolo County
Construction Co.
Due to an ongoing trial in Department Ten, the hearing on the motions for summary judgment, or
in the alternative, summary adjudication are CONTINUED on the Court’s own motion to
October 21, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Department Ten.
Defendant Howard S. Wrigh...
WALLIS V. PHL ASSOCIATES, INC.
Sep 22, 2016 | Yolo County
The Court declines to consider any evidence or legal authority not previously provided to the
discovery referee for his consideration in preparing his report and recommended ruling on
defendant PHL Associates, Inc.’s motion for a protective order.
Plaintiff Dale M. Wallis’s request for judic...
WALLIS V. PHL ASSOCIATES, INC.
Sep 08, 2016 | Yolo County
Plaintiff Dale Wallis’s and defendants PHL Associates, Inc., Jeffrey Wichmann, and Mary
Holmes’s ex parte applications for an order allowing page extensions are both GRANTED. So
the Court may more thoroughly consider the parties’ papers, the hearing on plaintiff’s objection
to the referee’s ...
Aug 18, 2016 | Yolo County
Respondent Pamela Richmond’s motion for attorneys’ fees is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., §
527.6, subd. (s).) Petitioner Scott Richmond Luwisch does not dispute any specific entries or
show that any of the entries are erroneous, excessive, or unreasonable. His references to
counsel’s work as “s...
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
