The Honorable Carol A. Greene

Riverside County Superior Court, Department 2

Biography

The Hon. Carol A. Greene is a judge for the Riverside County Superior Court in California. She was appointed to the bench by Governor Gavin Newsom in 2019. At the time, she filled the vacancy created by the retirement of the Hon. Sharon J. Waters (Ret.).

She is a registered Democrat.

Judge Greene received a bachelor’s degree from St. Ambrose University. She went on to earn a J.D. from the University of Iowa College of Law.

Prior to her judgeship, she served as a supervising deputy county counsel with the San Bernardino County Counsel’s Office for three years. Greene joined the County Counsel’s Office as a deputy county counsel in 1996 and held that position until being named supervisor in 2016.

Her legal career also includes practicing as an associate at the law firm of Thompson and Colegate LLP from 1989 to 1996.

While on the Superior Court, Judge Greene has held an assignment in the Civil Division.

Recent Rulings by Hon. Carol A. Greene

  • MILLER VS NEWPORT PACIFIC LAND COMPANY LLC NOTICE HEARING ON MOTION FOR DISMISSAL

    Feb 24, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Plaintiff filed this action on 9/4/2020 challenging the approval of the Legado Project in Menifee. Plaintiff failed to submit a Summons for issuance with the complaint. Plaintiff is representing herself and she is required to comply with the need to submit a summons for issuance by the court in order to co...

  • WASSMER VS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

    Feb 23, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The Motion to Compel Response to Request for Production of Documents is moot as Plaintiff has provided a supplemental response. Plaintiff’s opposition argues that the notice regarding attorney’s fees was defective because it fails to follow the requirements of Rules of Court, rule 2.30 and that the discove...

  • ROWDEN VS WAYPOINT HOMES

    Feb 18, 2021 |  Riverside County

    I. Motion for Leave to Amend “The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading.” (CCP §473(a).) Leave to amend is liberally granted. (Mabie v. Hyatt (1998) 61 Cal. App. 4th 581, 596.) However, leave to amend may be denied where inexcusable del...

  • QUIGLEY VS BIS CLUB & BAR, INC.

    Feb 16, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Notice of Withdrawal has been filed.

    ...

  • ARYAN VS CAMPANA

    Feb 11, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The Motion to File a Complaint in Intervention is granted. The City may file the Proposed Complaint in Intervention within 10 days of this order.

    ...

  • BANK OF AMERICA N.A. VS BITANA

    Feb 10, 2021 |  Riverside County

    This matter was continued to 4/8/2021 at 8:30 a.m. per minute order of 2/4/2021.

    ...

  • TELFER VS MOUNTAINSIDE RECOVERY CENTER, LLC

    Feb 09, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The Court has not received a proof of service for this motion indicating that the moving party served the client and the client was given notice of the appearance being via Webex with instructions on how to access the hearing.

    ...

  • MATTHEWS VS GENERAL MOTORS, LLC

    Feb 09, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Based upon the ruling on the demurrer, the motion to strike is moot.

    ...

  • TIGGS VS MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC

    Feb 08, 2021 |  Riverside County

    On the same basis that the demurrer is sustained without leave to amend, the motion to strike the entire complaint is granted.

    ...

  • ANNE D KARAYAN AND DAVID G DICKSON VS AGRI- EMPIRE INC

    Feb 05, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Defendants seek a stay under CCP §1281.4, which provides: “If a court of competent jurisdiction, whether in this State or not, has ordered arbitration of a controversy which is an issue involved in an action or proceeding pending before a court of this State, the court in which such action or proceeding is...

  • P-31 ENTERPRISES, INC. VS CORE TREE CARE, INC.

    Feb 04, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Having received no opposition, the Court finds that Plaintiff has shown good cause for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. The Plaintiff is authorized to file the Second Amended Complaint within 10 days of this hearing. Plaintiff is required to serve the Second Amended Complaint on all Defendants and...

  • GAVOLA VS NOVORR

    Feb 04, 2021 |  Riverside County

    On November 19, 2020, the court continued the hearing on the above- referenced motion for judgment on the pleadings to February 4, 2021 in light of matters pending before the bankruptcy court. On January 26, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a Status Report and supporting declaration (which also includes a declaratio...

  • ALBRECHT & ALBRECHT VS PARKER

    Feb 03, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The amounts listed in the Memorandum of Costs do not match the amounts listed in the application for renewal of judgment, nor is there any explanation as to when payments were made on the judgement such that the court can determine the appropriate interest. Further the court notes that each application was...

  • BH CENTRAL LLC VS CHICK- FIL-A INC

    Feb 02, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Factual / Procedural Context: On 1/6/20, Plaintiffs B.H. Central, LLC (BH Central) and B.H. 3640 Central Avenue, LLC (BH Avenue) filed this complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief. Plaintiff BH Central is the owner of real property at 3590, 3600, 3610 and 3630 Central Avenue in Riverside; Plaintiff...

  • SMALLWOOD VS SAN TIMOTEO COMPANY LP

    Feb 01, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Continued on Court’s own motion, to be heard with the Trial Setting Conference on 2/3/2021 at 8:30 a.m. in D-2.

    ...

  • SHAWN VS GENERAL MOTORS LLC

    Jan 29, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Factual / Procedural Context: Plaintiffs Ronnie Shawn and Bennett Shawn allege that on 10/30/14, they purchased a new 2014 Chevy Camaro that contains a transmission defect. The complaint, filed 6/1/20, asserts: (1) breach of implied warranty (Song-Beverly); (2) breach of express warranty (Song-Beverly); an...

  • NPG, INC. VS HOWSER

    Jan 28, 2021 |  Riverside County

    This matter was withdrawn by the moving party by Notice filed 1/21/2021. The Court is setting an order to show cause on 3/30/2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Dept 2, appearance via Webex as to why the matter should not be dismissed if a judgment has not been entered.

    ...

  • TYE VS BOWEN

    Jan 28, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Factual / Procedural Context: Plaintiff Matthew Tye alleges that his brother, defendant Justin Tye, entered into a business with defendants Christopher Bowen and Charles Chacon called GF Services (also a defendant), where they would purchase cheap properties with a mortgage from a traditional lender, then ...

  • CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY VS ANDERS

    Jan 27, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Factual / Procedural Context: This is an action for an injunction to abate a nuisance. Plaintiff City of Jurupa alleges that defendants Alex Anders and David Anders own property located at 5360 Camino Real in Jurupa Valley (the “Property”) and is conducting unpermitted business operations from the Property...

  • SMITH VS BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC

    Jan 26, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Factual / Procedural Context: Plaintiff Monica R. Smith (plaintiff or Smith) filed this action against defendants BMW of North America, LLC and Oremor of Riverside, LLC dba BMW of Riverside (defendants) under the Song- Beverly Warranty Act (Act) for her purchase on 11/30/15, of a used 2011 BMW 750 (subject...

  • ARANDA VS BE INVESTMENT INC

    Jan 26, 2021 |  Riverside County

    This motion was continued from 12/31/2020 and required Plaintiff’s counsel to file a proof of service showing that Plaintiff was served with the motion and declarations at her last known address. Plaintiff was also to submit a proposed order indicating the Plaintiff’s last known address and telephone numbe...

  • TELFER VS MOUNTAINSIDE RECOVERY CENTER, LLC

    Jan 26, 2021 |  Riverside County

    This motion is continued for 14 days to February 9, 2021 at 8:30 a.m., appearance is to be via Webex. Counsel seeking to be relieved as counsel shall provide a proof of service to the court that the client was served with Webex notice of the hearing date and the moving papers.

    ...

  • GONZALEZ VS HOME DEPOT USA INC

    Jan 25, 2021 |  Riverside County

    See above

    ...

  • GONZALEZ VS HOME DEPOT USA INC

    Jan 25, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Plaintiff Noel Gonzalez requested assistance from a Home Depot sales associate to obtain an item from one of the higher shelves in the store. Plaintiff was advised to use a yellow tilt-n-roll ladder that is available for customers to retrieve items located on higher shelves. While Plaintiff was using the l...

  • See More Results

Recent Rulings by Hon. Carol A. Greene

  • MILLER VS NEWPORT PACIFIC LAND COMPANY LLC NOTICE HEARING ON MOTION FOR DISMISSAL

    Feb 24, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Plaintiff filed this action on 9/4/2020 challenging the approval of the Legado Project in Menifee. Plaintiff failed to submit a Summons for issuance with the complaint. Plaintiff is representing herself and she is required to comply with the need to submit a summons for issuance by the court in order to co...

  • WASSMER VS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

    Feb 23, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The Motion to Compel Response to Request for Production of Documents is moot as Plaintiff has provided a supplemental response. Plaintiff’s opposition argues that the notice regarding attorney’s fees was defective because it fails to follow the requirements of Rules of Court, rule 2.30 and that the discove...

  • ROWDEN VS WAYPOINT HOMES

    Feb 18, 2021 |  Riverside County

    I. Motion for Leave to Amend “The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading.” (CCP §473(a).) Leave to amend is liberally granted. (Mabie v. Hyatt (1998) 61 Cal. App. 4th 581, 596.) However, leave to amend may be denied where inexcusable del...

  • QUIGLEY VS BIS CLUB & BAR, INC.

    Feb 16, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Notice of Withdrawal has been filed.

    ...

  • ARYAN VS CAMPANA

    Feb 11, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The Motion to File a Complaint in Intervention is granted. The City may file the Proposed Complaint in Intervention within 10 days of this order.

    ...

  • BANK OF AMERICA N.A. VS BITANA

    Feb 10, 2021 |  Riverside County

    This matter was continued to 4/8/2021 at 8:30 a.m. per minute order of 2/4/2021.

    ...

  • TELFER VS MOUNTAINSIDE RECOVERY CENTER, LLC

    Feb 09, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The Court has not received a proof of service for this motion indicating that the moving party served the client and the client was given notice of the appearance being via Webex with instructions on how to access the hearing.

    ...

  • MATTHEWS VS GENERAL MOTORS, LLC

    Feb 09, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Based upon the ruling on the demurrer, the motion to strike is moot.

    ...

  • TIGGS VS MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC

    Feb 08, 2021 |  Riverside County

    On the same basis that the demurrer is sustained without leave to amend, the motion to strike the entire complaint is granted.

    ...

  • ANNE D KARAYAN AND DAVID G DICKSON VS AGRI- EMPIRE INC

    Feb 05, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Defendants seek a stay under CCP §1281.4, which provides: “If a court of competent jurisdiction, whether in this State or not, has ordered arbitration of a controversy which is an issue involved in an action or proceeding pending before a court of this State, the court in which such action or proceeding is...

  • P-31 ENTERPRISES, INC. VS CORE TREE CARE, INC.

    Feb 04, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Having received no opposition, the Court finds that Plaintiff has shown good cause for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. The Plaintiff is authorized to file the Second Amended Complaint within 10 days of this hearing. Plaintiff is required to serve the Second Amended Complaint on all Defendants and...

  • GAVOLA VS NOVORR

    Feb 04, 2021 |  Riverside County

    On November 19, 2020, the court continued the hearing on the above- referenced motion for judgment on the pleadings to February 4, 2021 in light of matters pending before the bankruptcy court. On January 26, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a Status Report and supporting declaration (which also includes a declaratio...

  • ALBRECHT & ALBRECHT VS PARKER

    Feb 03, 2021 |  Riverside County

    The amounts listed in the Memorandum of Costs do not match the amounts listed in the application for renewal of judgment, nor is there any explanation as to when payments were made on the judgement such that the court can determine the appropriate interest. Further the court notes that each application was...

  • BH CENTRAL LLC VS CHICK- FIL-A INC

    Feb 02, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Factual / Procedural Context: On 1/6/20, Plaintiffs B.H. Central, LLC (BH Central) and B.H. 3640 Central Avenue, LLC (BH Avenue) filed this complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief. Plaintiff BH Central is the owner of real property at 3590, 3600, 3610 and 3630 Central Avenue in Riverside; Plaintiff...

  • SMALLWOOD VS SAN TIMOTEO COMPANY LP

    Feb 01, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Continued on Court’s own motion, to be heard with the Trial Setting Conference on 2/3/2021 at 8:30 a.m. in D-2.

    ...

  • SHAWN VS GENERAL MOTORS LLC

    Jan 29, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Factual / Procedural Context: Plaintiffs Ronnie Shawn and Bennett Shawn allege that on 10/30/14, they purchased a new 2014 Chevy Camaro that contains a transmission defect. The complaint, filed 6/1/20, asserts: (1) breach of implied warranty (Song-Beverly); (2) breach of express warranty (Song-Beverly); an...

  • NPG, INC. VS HOWSER

    Jan 28, 2021 |  Riverside County

    This matter was withdrawn by the moving party by Notice filed 1/21/2021. The Court is setting an order to show cause on 3/30/2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Dept 2, appearance via Webex as to why the matter should not be dismissed if a judgment has not been entered.

    ...

  • TYE VS BOWEN

    Jan 28, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Factual / Procedural Context: Plaintiff Matthew Tye alleges that his brother, defendant Justin Tye, entered into a business with defendants Christopher Bowen and Charles Chacon called GF Services (also a defendant), where they would purchase cheap properties with a mortgage from a traditional lender, then ...

  • CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY VS ANDERS

    Jan 27, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Factual / Procedural Context: This is an action for an injunction to abate a nuisance. Plaintiff City of Jurupa alleges that defendants Alex Anders and David Anders own property located at 5360 Camino Real in Jurupa Valley (the “Property”) and is conducting unpermitted business operations from the Property...

  • SMITH VS BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC

    Jan 26, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Factual / Procedural Context: Plaintiff Monica R. Smith (plaintiff or Smith) filed this action against defendants BMW of North America, LLC and Oremor of Riverside, LLC dba BMW of Riverside (defendants) under the Song- Beverly Warranty Act (Act) for her purchase on 11/30/15, of a used 2011 BMW 750 (subject...

  • ARANDA VS BE INVESTMENT INC

    Jan 26, 2021 |  Riverside County

    This motion was continued from 12/31/2020 and required Plaintiff’s counsel to file a proof of service showing that Plaintiff was served with the motion and declarations at her last known address. Plaintiff was also to submit a proposed order indicating the Plaintiff’s last known address and telephone numbe...

  • TELFER VS MOUNTAINSIDE RECOVERY CENTER, LLC

    Jan 26, 2021 |  Riverside County

    This motion is continued for 14 days to February 9, 2021 at 8:30 a.m., appearance is to be via Webex. Counsel seeking to be relieved as counsel shall provide a proof of service to the court that the client was served with Webex notice of the hearing date and the moving papers.

    ...

  • GONZALEZ VS HOME DEPOT USA INC

    Jan 25, 2021 |  Riverside County

    See above

    ...

  • GONZALEZ VS HOME DEPOT USA INC

    Jan 25, 2021 |  Riverside County

    Plaintiff Noel Gonzalez requested assistance from a Home Depot sales associate to obtain an item from one of the higher shelves in the store. Plaintiff was advised to use a yellow tilt-n-roll ladder that is available for customers to retrieve items located on higher shelves. While Plaintiff was using the l...

  • See More Results

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.