arrow left
arrow right
  • Deli Delicious Franchising, Inc. vs. Vahid Misaghi37 Unlimited - Other Contract document preview
  • Deli Delicious Franchising, Inc. vs. Vahid Misaghi37 Unlimited - Other Contract document preview
  • Deli Delicious Franchising, Inc. vs. Vahid Misaghi37 Unlimited - Other Contract document preview
  • Deli Delicious Franchising, Inc. vs. Vahid Misaghi37 Unlimited - Other Contract document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 David D. Schneider # 211498 Ross Coker #306670 2 FENNEMORE DOWLING AARON 8080 N Palm Avenue 3 Third Floor Fresno, California 93711 4 Tel: (559) 432-4500 / Fax: (559) 432-4590 dschneider@fennemorelaw.com 5 rcoker@fennemorelaw.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff RECEIVED DELI DELICIOUS FRANCHISING, INC. 3/24/2021 9:48 AM 7 FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: L Peterson, Deputy 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF FRESNO 11 12 DELI DELICIOUS FRANCHISING, INC., Case No. 21CECG00287 13 Plaintiff, EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 14 v. AND ORDER SHORTENING TIME RE HEARING ON MOTION FOR 15 VAHID MISAGHI and DOES 1 through 25, PROTECTIVE ORDER inclusive, 16 Defendant. Date: March 24, 2021 17 Time: 3:30 p.m. _____________________________________ Dept.: 503 18 AND ALL RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. Action filed: February 1, 2021 19 Hon. Kimberly Gaab 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 22 The hearing on Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant DELI DELICIOUS FRANCHISING, INC.’s 23 (“Deli Delicious”) Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order Shortening 24 Time Re Hearing on Motion for Protective Order (the “Application”) came ex parte for hearing at 25 3:30 p.m. on March 24, 2021 in Department 503 of the Fresno County Superior Court, the 26 Honorable Judge Kimberly Gaab presiding. Deli Delicious appeared by and through its counsel G. 27 Andrew Slater, Esq., of the law firm of Fennemore Dowling Aaron. Defendants appeared through 28 their counsel, H. Ty Kharazi, of the Yarra Law Group. FENNEMORE DOWLING AARON ATTORNEYS AT LAW FRESNO [PROPOSED] ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER SHORTENING TIME SPETERSEN/18264605.1/101080.0008 1 Based on the documents submitted in support of and in opposition to the Motion, the oral 2 argument of counsel at the time of the hearing, and good cause appearing therefore: 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 4 The Application is granted and Defendants are restrained from taking the deposition of Mr. 5 Arunjout Tour until Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order can be heard and adjudicated. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: 7 On _____________ at ____________ in Department ____ of Fresno County Superior 8 Court, Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order will be heard. 9 Plaintiff’s motion shall be filed and served no later than ____________. 10 Defendant’s opposition papers are due on _______________________. 11 Plaintiff’s reply papers are due on _____________________________. 12 13 Dated: ____________________ JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 14 15 16 TBOHLANDER/18255266.1/101080.0008 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FENNEMORE DOWLING AARON ATTORNEYS AT LAW -2- FRESNO [PROPOSED] ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER SHORTENING TIME SPETERSEN/18264605.1/101080.0008