On February 01, 2021 a
Court Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Deli Delicious Franchising, Inc.,
and
Misaghi, Vahid,
for 37 Unlimited - Other Contract
in the District Court of Fresno County.
Preview
1 David D. Schneider # 211498
Ross Coker #306670
2 FENNEMORE DOWLING AARON
8080 N Palm Avenue
3 Third Floor
Fresno, California 93711
4 Tel: (559) 432-4500 / Fax: (559) 432-4590
dschneider@fennemorelaw.com
5 rcoker@fennemorelaw.com
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff RECEIVED
DELI DELICIOUS FRANCHISING, INC. 3/24/2021 9:48 AM
7 FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
By: L Peterson, Deputy
8
9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10 COUNTY OF FRESNO
11
12 DELI DELICIOUS FRANCHISING, INC., Case No. 21CECG00287
13 Plaintiff, EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
14 v. AND ORDER SHORTENING TIME RE
HEARING ON MOTION FOR
15 VAHID MISAGHI and DOES 1 through 25, PROTECTIVE ORDER
inclusive,
16
Defendant. Date: March 24, 2021
17 Time: 3:30 p.m.
_____________________________________ Dept.: 503
18 AND ALL RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS.
Action filed: February 1, 2021
19 Hon. Kimberly Gaab
20
21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
22 The hearing on Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant DELI DELICIOUS FRANCHISING, INC.’s
23 (“Deli Delicious”) Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order Shortening
24 Time Re Hearing on Motion for Protective Order (the “Application”) came ex parte for hearing at
25 3:30 p.m. on March 24, 2021 in Department 503 of the Fresno County Superior Court, the
26 Honorable Judge Kimberly Gaab presiding. Deli Delicious appeared by and through its counsel G.
27 Andrew Slater, Esq., of the law firm of Fennemore Dowling Aaron. Defendants appeared through
28 their counsel, H. Ty Kharazi, of the Yarra Law Group.
FENNEMORE
DOWLING AARON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
FRESNO
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND
ORDER SHORTENING TIME
SPETERSEN/18264605.1/101080.0008
1 Based on the documents submitted in support of and in opposition to the Motion, the oral
2 argument of counsel at the time of the hearing, and good cause appearing therefore:
3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
4 The Application is granted and Defendants are restrained from taking the deposition of Mr.
5 Arunjout Tour until Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order can be heard and adjudicated.
6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:
7 On _____________ at ____________ in Department ____ of Fresno County Superior
8 Court, Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order will be heard.
9 Plaintiff’s motion shall be filed and served no later than ____________.
10 Defendant’s opposition papers are due on _______________________.
11 Plaintiff’s reply papers are due on _____________________________.
12
13 Dated: ____________________
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
14
15
16 TBOHLANDER/18255266.1/101080.0008
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FENNEMORE
DOWLING AARON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
-2-
FRESNO
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND
ORDER SHORTENING TIME
SPETERSEN/18264605.1/101080.0008
Document Filed Date
March 24, 2021
Case Filing Date
February 01, 2021
Category
37 Unlimited - Other Contract
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.