arrow left
arrow right
  • KC FUNDING, LLC  vs.  BITA IMANI, et al(06) Limited Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • KC FUNDING, LLC  vs.  BITA IMANI, et al(06) Limited Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • KC FUNDING, LLC  vs.  BITA IMANI, et al(06) Limited Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • KC FUNDING, LLC  vs.  BITA IMANI, et al(06) Limited Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • KC FUNDING, LLC  vs.  BITA IMANI, et al(06) Limited Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • KC FUNDING, LLC  vs.  BITA IMANI, et al(06) Limited Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • KC FUNDING, LLC  vs.  BITA IMANI, et al(06) Limited Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
  • KC FUNDING, LLC  vs.  BITA IMANI, et al(06) Limited Breach of Contract/Warranty document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically JOHN W. HOWARD (SBN 80200) MICHELLE D. VOLK (SBN 217151) uperio st of Califorr ‘ounty of San Mateo JW Howard/Attorneys, Ltd. ON 2/23/2021 701 B Street Suite 1725 By /s/ Tanesha Gaines San Diego, California 92101 Deputy Clerk Telephone: (619) 234-2842 Telefax: (619 234-1716 Electronic Mail: johnh@jwhowardattorneys.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, KC Funding, LLC dba Kids Connection SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 10 i KC FUNDING, LLC dba KIDS Case No. 17CLJ00637 CONNECTION Complaint Filed: Feb. 14, 2017 12 13 Plaintiff, NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 14 Vv. TO AMEND JUDGMENT 15 BITA IMANI and DOES 1-5, inclusive, 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 TO THE DEFENDANT HEREIN: 20 Please take notice that the above-entitled Court entered an Order on Plaintiff's Motion to 21 22 Amend Judgment on February 17, 2021. 23 A true and correct copy of the Order is attached hereto as Exhibit “1.” 24 25 JW Howard/Attorneys, Ltd. 26 27 Date: February 23, 2021 Michelle D. Volk, Esq. Ue 28 Attorney for Plaintiff EXHIBIT “1” ~ ENDORSED FILED SAN MATEO COUNTY FEB 1 7 2021 Clerk of the Superior By___TaneshaGainCouesrt DEPUTY CLERK SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 11 12 KC FUNDING, LLC dba KIDS Case No. 17CLJ00637 13 CONNECTION 14 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER ON 15 V. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 16 AMEND JUDGMENT BITA IMANI 17 and DOES 1-5, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 Complaint Filed. Feb. 14, 2017 20 21 TO THE PARTIES HEREIN: 22 On January 19, 2021, the above-entitled Court ruled on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend 23 Judgment. 24 The Court, after considering the unopposed motion, and all supporting documents for 25 same, and finding good cause therefore, granted Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Judgment to include both names of Bita Imani and Bita Safari i 26 27 28 1 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT Since the Tentative Ruling was not contested, the Court confirmed the Tentative Ruling, which became the final ruling of the Court. A true and correct copy of the ruling is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff was ordered to give notice of the ruling and prepare a written order and judgment consistent with the Court’s Ruling for the Court’s signature. IT IS SO ORDERED: 10 il NANCY L. FINEMAN 12 FEB 11 2021 Dated: 13 Judge of the Superior Court 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT EXHIBIT “A” ™ ™ January 19, 2021 Law and Motion Calendar PAGE 3 Judge: HONORABLE NANCY L. FINEMAN, Department 04 2:00 LINE: 2 17-CLdI-00637 KC FUNDING, LLC VS. BITA IMANI, ET AL. KC FUNDING, LLC JOHN W. HOWARD BITA IMANI PRO/ PER MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT BY KC FUNDING, LLC TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff KC Funding, LLC’s unopposed Motion to Amend Judgment, filed 10-29-20, is uses GRANTED. Code Civ. Proc. § 187. There is no dispute here that Defendant Bita Imani also the name Bita Safari; they are the same person. See 10-29-20 Volk Decl. and Ex. A thereto. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request to amend the Judgment to reflect both names is GRANTED. counsel If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court. Thereafter, for Plaintiff shall prepare a written order and judgment consistent with the Court’s ruling for the Court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in the action, as required by law and the California Rules of Court. PROOF OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, do declare that I am employed in the county aforesaid, that I am over the age of [18] years and not a party to the within entitled action; and that I am executing this proof at the direction of the member of the bar of the above entitled Court. The business address is: JW Howard Attorneys LTD 701 B Street, Suite 1725 San Diego, California 92101 a MAIL. J am readily familiar with the business’ practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing via the United States Postal Service and that the correspondence would be deposited with the United States Postal Service for collections that same day. 10 oO OVERNIGHT. | am readily familiar with the business’ practice for collection and 11 processing of correspondence for overnight delivery/receipt next day via a major carrier such as UPS, FedEx, DHL or similar carrier, and same were deposited that same day. 12 oO PERSONAL. The below described documents were personally served that day. 13 o ELECTRONIC. I am readily familiar with the business’ practice for collection and 14 processing of documents via electronic system and said documents were successfully transmitted via email that same day via One Legal. 15 On the date indicated below, I served the within: 16 17 Notice of Entry of Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Judgment 18 in said action by placing a true copy thereof closed in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows 19 and placing same in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid to: 20 Michael E. Adams 21 Law Offices of Michael E, Adams 702 Marshall Street, Suite 300 22 Redwood City, CA 94063 23 I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the 24 foregoing is true and correct and was EXECUTED on February 23, 2021, at San Diego, CA. 25 26 27 Day ig 28