On October 05, 2020 a
Order to Show Cause
was filed
involving a dispute between
Autovest, L.L.C.,,
and
Ferrier, Trevor James,
for 06-CL >10K <25K Breach of Contract/Warranty-Civil Limited
in the District Court of Kern County.
Preview
Superior Court of California
County of Kern
Bakersfield Department 12
Hearing Date: 02/04/2021 Time: 8:30 AM - 12:00 PM
AUTOVEST, L.L.C., VS FERRIER
BCL-20-014276
Honorable: Linda S. Etienne Clerk: Susan A. Posey
Court Reporter: None (FTR) Bailiff: Deputy Sheriff
Interpreter: Language Of:
PARTIES:
Not Present:
AUTOVEST, L.L.C., Plaintiff CHOW, RONNIE Attorney
FERRIER, TREVOR JAMES Defendant
AKA FERRIER, TREVOR
AKA FERRIER, TREVER
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - CRC 3.110
Hearing Start Time:9:36 AM
The above entitled cause came on regularly on this date and time with parties and/or counsel appearing as
reflected above.
No appearance by Counsel for Plaintiff.
The Court makes the following findings and orders:
Sanctions imposed on counsel for plaintiff in the amount of $250.00 for failing to comply with California Rules of
Court, Rule 3.110 to be stayed for 30 days, the order will be automatically vacated if there is compliance within
that time, otherwise the order will become immediately effective. Sanctions will become due and payable.
The Court sets this matter for a further Order to Show Cause Re: imposition of additional sanctions as to plaintiff's
counsel for failure to comply with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.110 and failure to appear at the Order to Show
Cause hearing heard on February 4, 2021.
Hearing set on April 8, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 12.
Notice to issue from the Court.
MINUTES
Page 1 of 2
AUTOVEST, L.L.C., VS FERRIER BCL-20-014276
To ensure the public has access to court proceedings; during the COVID-19 pandemic, this court will be audio live
streaming all non-confidential matters. This alternative method for observing courtroom proceedings is strongly
encouraged during this time for all non-parties to avoid attending court in-person where social distancing
protocols and limited courtroom access applies.
It is also available because Judicial Officers may have to limit, or impose other reasonable restrictions upon, public
access to their courtrooms and adjacent hallways based on recommended social distancing requirements.
Each judge retains the discretion and authority to refuse, limit or terminate audio live streaming of the
proceedings, or portions thereof, pursuant to the factors and prohibitions articulated in California Rules of Court,
rule 1.150, and in consideration of other statutory and constitutional provisions.
By Court Order and California Rules of Court, rule 1.150, audio live streams may NOT be recorded, broadcasted or
rebroadcasted without prior written permission from the Court. Witnesses who have been instructed not to
discuss their testimony or court proceedings with others may not listen to the audio streaming of any portion of
the trial.
MINUTES FINALIZED BY: SUSAN POSEY ON: 2/4/2021
MINUTES
Page 2 of 2
AUTOVEST, L.L.C., VS FERRIER BCL-20-014276
Document Filed Date
February 04, 2021
Case Filing Date
October 05, 2020
Category
06-CL >10K <25K Breach of Contract/Warranty-Civil Limited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.