arrow left
arrow right
  • UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY VS METCALF22-CL >10K <25K Auto - Civil Limited document preview
  • UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY VS METCALF22-CL >10K <25K Auto - Civil Limited document preview
  • UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY VS METCALF22-CL >10K <25K Auto - Civil Limited document preview
  • UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY VS METCALF22-CL >10K <25K Auto - Civil Limited document preview
						
                                

Preview

Superior Court of California County of Kern Bakersfield Department 12 Hearing Date: 02/03/2021 Time: 8:30 AM - 12:00 PM UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY VS METCALF BCL-20-011613 Honorable: Linda S. Etienne Clerk: Susan A. Posey Court Reporter: None (FTR) Bailiff: Deputy Sheriff Interpreter: Language Of: PARTIES: Present: UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY NIVINSKUS, MARK R Attorney, Present Plaintiff, Not Present Not Present: METCALF, SETH Defendant SMITH, JADE Defendant NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - CRC 3.110 Hearing Start Time:9:14 AM The above entitled cause came on regularly on this date and time with parties and/or counsel appearing as reflected above. Cause heard and submitted. The Court makes the following findings and orders: Cause continued to May 5, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 12. Further notice waived. To ensure the public has access to court proceedings; during the COVID-19 pandemic, this court will be audio live streaming all non-confidential matters. This alternative method for observing courtroom proceedings is strongly encouraged during this time for all non-parties to avoid attending court in-person where social distancing protocols and limited courtroom access applies. MINUTES Page 1 of 2 UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY VS METCALF BCL-20-011613 It is also available because Judicial Officers may have to limit, or impose other reasonable restrictions upon, public access to their courtrooms and adjacent hallways based on recommended social distancing requirements. Each judge retains the discretion and authority to refuse, limit or terminate audio live streaming of the proceedings, or portions thereof, pursuant to the factors and prohibitions articulated in California Rules of Court, rule 1.150, and in consideration of other statutory and constitutional provisions. By Court Order and California Rules of Court, rule 1.150, audio live streams may NOT be recorded, broadcasted or rebroadcasted without prior written permission from the Court. Witnesses who have been instructed not to discuss their testimony or court proceedings with others may not listen to the audio streaming of any portion of the trial. MINUTES FINALIZED BY: SUSAN POSEY ON: 2/3/2021 MINUTES Page 2 of 2 UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY VS METCALF BCL-20-011613