arrow left
arrow right
  • SOUTHWEST LAW CENTER vs ACCIDENT CENTEROther Complaint: Unlimited document preview
  • SOUTHWEST LAW CENTER vs ACCIDENT CENTEROther Complaint: Unlimited document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS SOUTHWEST LAW CENTER VS. ~ ACCIDENT CENTER, ET AL. PLAINTIFF(S) DEFENDANT(S) NATURE OF HEARING: a) Defendant’s Demurrers to Second Amended Complaint; b) Defendant Advanced Pain Management Institute’s and Alamo Surgery Center’s Joinder in Demurrer of Defendant Daniel Powers, M D., Inc. to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. CASE: CV-20-000633 JUDGE: STACY P. SPEILLER Bailiff: J. Mendoza Date: 03/03/2021 Clerk: C. Cruz Reporter: None Modesto, California APPEARANCES: Appearing via Vcourt on behalf of Defendants/Cross—Complainants is ELIEZER COHEN, ESQ. This matter was regularly called for hearing. There being no request for a hearing, the Court confirmed its tentative ruling as follows: a) Defendant’s Demurrers to Second Amended Complaint — SUSTAINED, without leave to amend; b) Defendant Advanced Pain Management Institute’s and Alamo Surgery Center’s Joinder in Demurrer of Defendant Daniel Powers, M.D., Inc. to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint — GRANTED, and unopposed. On September 4, 2020, and again on December 2, 2020, this Court ruled on Defendants’ demurrer to the Plaintiff’s original and First Amended complaints finding Plaintiff is not entitled to deduct its own fees and costs from the settlement fund before interpleading the funds with the Court for adjudication of the competing interests thereto. While interpleader is an appropriate remedy to the disputes arising from the fact that the settlement was too small to pay all lienholders, much less to leave anything for the plaintiff in the underlying litigation, the entire fund must be interpleaded. (See e.g. Code of Civil Procedure section 386; see also Rutter’s Guide to Civil Procedure Before Trial, Ch. 2—F (2019) at 2:470.) Plaintiff has been granted several opportunities to amend its complaint to properly state a cause of action sounding in interpleader — including interpleading the entire amount of the fund in dispute - and has failed to do so. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint continues to attempt to state one cause of action for interpleader, but to interplead less than the entire amount of the settlement fund in dispute. Therefore, it appears Plaintiff is not willing or able to do what is required of it in this instance. Defendant Daniel Powers, MD Inc.’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED, without leave to amend. The Court also GRANTS Defendants Advanced Pain Management Institute and Alamo Surgery Center’s request for joinder in the demurrer. MINUTE ORDER