On March 11, 2019 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Brown, Alison,
Rosen, Heather,
and
Monge, Carlos,
Monge, Samantha,
Rosema, Lila Marie,
for 23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited
in the District Court of Kern County.
Preview
Superior Court of California
County of Kern
Bakersfield Department 17
Hearing Date: 01/28/2021 Time: 8:30 AM - 12:00 PM
BROWN ET AL VS ROSEMA ET AL
BCV-19-100684
Honorable: Thomas S. Clark Clerk: Linda K. Hall
Court Reporter: . None Bailiff: Deputy Sheriff
Interpreter: Language Of:
Court Call
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO COMPEL
Hearing Start Time:8:56 AM
The above entitled cause came on regularly on this date and time with parties and/or counsel appearing as
reflected.
Counsel Abigail White appeared via court call on behalf of Plaintiff(s).
Counsel Indra Lahiri appeared on behalf of Defendant - Lila Marie Rosema.
No appearance by Defendant(s) - Samantha Monge & Carlos Monge.
Matter argued by counsel and submitted.
The Court makes the following findings and orders:
Defendant Lila Marie Rosema's Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One from Plaintiff
Heather Rosen & Defendant Lila Marie Rosema's Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production, set One:
Overruled.
Plaintiff's objections to the interrogatories are overruled and Plaintiff Heather Rosen is ordered to provide a
further verified response to Special Interrogatories, Set One, Nos. 1-15 propounded by Defendant Lila Marie
Rosema by 02/17/2021, except that with respect to Special Interrogatories, Set One, Nos. 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15, which
interrogatories ask Plaintiff to identify all documents and evidence upon which Plaintiff "will rely to prove" certain
allegations, the work product objection appears to have some merit even without further justification. Accordingly,
Plaintiff need not disclose evidence upon which Plaintiff intends to rely at trial at this time. Plaintiff's response
should merely identify the documents and evidence that support Plaintiff's allegations referenced in each of these
special interrogatories.
Defendant Lila Marie Rosema seeks further responses to Request for Production, Set One, Nos. 1-6 from Plaintiff
MINUTES
Page 1 of 2
BROWN ET AL VS ROSEMA ET AL BCV-19-100684
Heather Rosen. Plaintiff's objections are overruled, except that the privilege objections are preserved. Plaintiff
Heather Rosen shall provide a further verified response to Request for Production, Set One, Nos. 1-6 by
02/17/20217 and to the extent any document is withheld from production, a privilege log shall be concurrently
served. Defendant's request for monetary sanctions is denied as the privilege objections appear to have some
merit and the imposition of sanctions would be unjust. The court declines to award sanctions on either side.
Clerk's minutes will be the order of the court.
Further notice waived.
FUTURE HEARINGS:
October 08, 2021 9:00 AM Mandatory Settlement Conference
Schuett, Stephen D.
Sheriff, Deputy
Bakersfield Department 18
October 25, 2021 9:00 AM Court Trial
Clark, Thomas S.
Bakersfield Department 17
Sheriff, Deputy
MINUTES FINALIZED BY: LINDA HALL ON: 1/28/2021
MINUTES
Page 2 of 2
BROWN ET AL VS ROSEMA ET AL BCV-19-100684
Document Filed Date
January 28, 2021
Case Filing Date
March 11, 2019
Category
23-CV Other PI/PD/WD - Civil Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.