arrow left
arrow right
  • Lopez, Breanna Marie vs Hague, Jaycee Brooke et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Lopez, Breanna Marie vs Hague, Jaycee Brooke et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Lopez, Breanna Marie vs Hague, Jaycee Brooke et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Lopez, Breanna Marie vs Hague, Jaycee Brooke et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Lopez, Breanna Marie vs Hague, Jaycee Brooke et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Lopez, Breanna Marie vs Hague, Jaycee Brooke et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Lopez, Breanna Marie vs Hague, Jaycee Brooke et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
  • Lopez, Breanna Marie vs Hague, Jaycee Brooke et al(22) Unlimited Auto document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-110 "ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) FOR COURT USE ONLY Mark L. Dawson, Esq. (SBN 166956) Shamika K. Bains, Esq. (SBN 277450) INORTON & MELNIK, APC 500 La Gonda Way, Suite 295, Danville, CA 94526 F Superior Court of California F TELEPHONE No: (925) 718-1040 County of Butte FAX NO. (Optional): (925) 743-1148 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): Mdawson@nortonmelnik.com, sbains@nortonmelnik.com | ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendants, Jaycee Brooke Hague and Crystal Hutchison L 11/10/2020 L SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTTE street appress: 1775 CONCORD AVENUE MAILING ADDRESS: Kimberty/Flener, Clerk D CITY AND ZIP CODE: CHICO, CA 95928 By Deputy Electronically FILED BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Breanna Marie Lopez DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jayce Brooke Hague, Crystal Hutchison CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE [1] uitep case 19CV01872 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: December 2, 2020 Time: 10:30 a.m. Dept.: 10 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Mark L. Dawson, Esq. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specifi d information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendants, Jaycee Brooke Hague and Crystal Hutchison b. [_] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): 6/21/20 b. [-_] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [J The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) [have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) [shave had a default entered against them (specify names): c. Co The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): Description of case a Type of case in complaint [1 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Negligence; Negligence Per Se Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California rules 3.720-3.730, (CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Breanna Marie Lopez CASE NUMBER: 19CV01872 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jayce Brooke Hague, Crystal Hutchison 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (/f personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.) Plaintiffs allege personal injuries related to a January 10, 2018 motor vehicle accident. [] (if more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request C5) a jury trial a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a jury trial): Trial date a. [1 The trial has been set for (date): b. No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if not, explain): c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): Please see attached trial calendar for Mark L. Dawson, Esq. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a days (specify number): 5-7 Days b. [) hours (short causes) (specify): Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial by the attorney or party listed in the caption [J by the following: a Attorney: b. Firm: ©. Address: d. Telephone number: f. Fax number: e. E-mail address: g. Party represented: [1 Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. Preference [1] This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for information about the processes available through the court and community programs in this case. (1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel has L_] has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client. (2) For self-represented parties: Party [J has [1] has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221. b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available). @) CO This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action ¢ mediation under ode of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. @ CO Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11. 8) CO This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Courtor from civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption): ‘CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2017] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 20f5 CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Breanna Marie Lopez [CASE NUMBER: 19CV01872 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jayce Brooke Hague, Crystal Hutchison 10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information): The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes, participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties' ADR processes (check all that apply): stipulation): Mediation session not yet scheduled Mediation session scheduled for (date): (1) Mediation Agreed to complete mediation by (date): Mediation completed on (date): Settlement conference not yet scheduled (2) Settlement Settlement conference scheduled for (date): conference Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date): Settlement conference completed on (date): Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date): (3) Neutral evaluation Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): Neutral evaluation completed on (date): Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled (4) Nonbinding judicial Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date): Judicial arbitration completed on (date): Private arbitration not yet scheduled (5) Binding private Private arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): Private arbitration completed on (date): ADR session not yet scheduled ADR session scheduled for (date): (6) Other (specify): Agreed to complete ADR session by (date): ADR completed on (date): (CM-110 [Rev. July1, 2011] Page 3 ofS CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Breanna Marie Lopez CASE NUMBER: | 19CV01872 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jayce Brooke Hague, Crystal Hutchison 11. Insurance Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name): IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company Reservation of rights: [7 Yes No [1 Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 12. Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status. [1] Bankruptcy [_] Other (specify): Status: 13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. [There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status: [) Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a. b. [1 A motion to [1 consolidate [) coordinate will be filed by (name party): 14. Bifurcation [-) The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons): 15. Other motions The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): Various Motions in Limine Prior to Trial 16. Discovery a. [_] The party or parties have completed all discovery. The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery): Party Descriptio! Date Defendants Written Discovery TBD Defendants Oral Deposition of Plaintiff TBD Defendants Oral Depositions of Parties/Witnesses TBD Defendants Expert Discovery Per Code c. [__] The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated (specify): (CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 4 of 5 CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Breanna Marie Lopez CASE NUMBER: L 19CV01872 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Jayce Brooke Hague, Crystal Hutchison 17. Economic litigation a. [__] This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case. b. [] This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not apply to this case): 18. Other issues [1 The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): 19 Meet and confer a. [7] The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (specify): 20. Total number of pages attached (if any): 1 lam completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Date: November 10, 2020 Mark L. Dawson, Esq. (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) » (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) » (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) [) Additional signatures are attached. (CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 5 of 5 TRIAL CALENDAR MARK L. DAWSON, ESQ. (Updated 11/4/2020) MATTER NAME COUNTY MSC Date TRIAL CALL | TRIAL DATE PAAKKARI v Shuffitt Contra Costa 11/04/2020 11/04/2020 12/14/2020 WESCO v. Bedmart Shasta - 01/20/2021 HENDRICKX v. Perez Silva Sonoma - 01/22/2021 CASTILLO v Smith Fresno 01/20/2021 02/05/2021 02/08/2021 ANCHETA v Gutierrez San Francisco - 03/22/2021 TRAVELERS v Phollies, Inc. San Francisco 03/29/2021 RUIZ v New Perspectives Monterey 03/05/2021 04/05/2021 HERRERA v Rodriguez San Francisco 05/10/2021 RUIZ v Truck Driver/DR3 San Joaquin 05/03/2021 06/01/2021 Mark L. Dawson, Trial Attorney, Unavailable Unavailable 6/20/21 through 7/11/21 6/20/21- 7/11/21 UNITED FINANCIAL v Pristupa Sonoma 07/16/2021 WOLFF v The Stable San Francisco 07/19/2021 CANTU v Hudson San Francisco 07/26/2021 KEELER v Tognoli Shasta 05/24/2021 - 08/10/2021 TRAN v Peng Alameda 07/14/2021 08/09/2021 08/16/2021 KATEN v Jucy (Cross-Complaint) San Francisco - 08/23/2021 SYED v. Sciutto Alameda 08/13/2021 08/30/2021 KRZOS v Morfin Sonoma - 09/17/2021 MAC EWYN (SKB with GPN case) 09/20/2021 LOPEZ v Mendoza San Joaquin 08/09/2021 09/27/2021 SAINOS v Temple Sonoma 10/15/2021 KATEN v Jucy (Complaint) San Francisco 12/06/2021 THOMPSON v Bayside Alameda 03/07/2022 TRIAL CALENDAR MARK L. DAWSON, ESQ. DAVIS v Giannecchini Alameda 04/25/2022 PROOF OF SERVICE I am employed in the County of Contra Costa, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 500 La Gonda Way, Suite 295, Danville, California, 94526. On the date set for the below, I served e DEFENDANTS JAYCEE BROOKE HAGUE AND CRYSTAL HUTCHISON’S CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT on the parties to said action by emailing a copy of the document to the email address set forth below: 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff 11 Bobby Saadian, Esq. 12 Wilshire Law Firm 3055 Wilshire Blvd., 12 Floor. 13 Los Angeles, CA 90010 T: (213) 381-9988 14 F: (213) 381-9989 bobby@ wilshirelawfirm.com 15 16 LE] (BY MAIL) | am readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing 17 correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the United States Postal Service on that same day with first class postage thereon fully prepaid at Danville, 18 California, in the ordinary course of business. 19 (ONLY BE ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION) Only by e-mailing the document(s) 20 I to the persons at the e-mail address(es) listed above, that durin the Coronavirus (C ovid-19) pandemic, Norton & Melnik will be working remotely, not ab! e to send physical mail as usual, and are therefore using only electronic mail. No electronic message or other indication that the 21 transmission was unsuccessful was received within a reasonable time after the transmission. 22 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at 23 Danville, California on November 10, 2020. 24 25 /s/ Catherine Hamze 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE