Preview
CM-110
ATTORNEY ORPARTY WITHOUTATTORNEY (Name,
State Bar
number,
and address): FOR COURT USEONLY
Patrick K. O'Brien (CASBN: 167957) /Kathleen Miller (CASBN: 202216) ELECTRONICALLY FILED
O'BRIEN LAW, P.C. Superior Court of California,
755 Baywood Drive, Suite 185, Petaluma CA 94954 County of Placer
TELEPHONE NO.:707.789.6500 FAXNO.(Optional):
707.789.6520 7/24/2020
E-MAILADDRESS(Optiona):
kathleen@pobrienlaw.com By: Zachane hteCrary, Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEY FOR(Name):
Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF PLACER
STREET ADDRESS:10820 Justice Center Dr.
MAILING
ADDRESS:
CITYANDZIPCODE: Roseville, 95678
BRANCH NAME:
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tim Lester and Karen Lester
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Dal Pino Quality Pools, Inc., etal.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE L__] LIMITED CASE SCV0038444
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE isscheduled as follows:
Date: August 11, 2020 Time: 10:00 a.m. Dept.: 40 Div.: Room:
Address ofcourt (if different
from theaddress above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Kathleen C. Miller
. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement issubmitted by party (name): Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc.
b. [__] This statement issubmitted jointlyby parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be answered by plaintiffs
and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filedon (date):
b. The cross-complaint, if any,
was filedon (date): 02/08/2019
3. Service (tobe answered by plaintiffs
and cross-complainants only)
a. Allparties named inthe complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, orhave been dismissed.
b. L_] The.following partiesnamed inthe complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [-] have notbeen served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) L-_] have been served but have notappeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [] have had a defaultentered against them (specifynames):
c. L__] The followingadditionalparties may be added (specifynames, nature ofinvolvement incase, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type ofcase in complaint CL] cross-complaint (Describe, includingcauses ofaction):
Breach ofContract, Breach of Implied Warranty, Negligence, Strict Liability.
Cross-Actions for Indemnity and
Contribution causes of action.
Page1 of 5
FormAdopted
for Mandatory
Use Cal.
Rules
of Court,
Judicial
Council
of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720-3.730
CM-110[Rev,
July1, 2011] www.courts.
ca.gov
CM-110
CASE NUMBER:
| PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tim Lester and Karen Lester
SCV0038444
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Dal Pino Quality Pools, Inc., etal.
4. b. Provide a briefstatement ofthe case, includingany damages. (If personalinjurydamages are sought, specifythe injuryand
damages claimed, includingmedical expenses todate [indicatesource and amount], estimated futuremedical expenses, lost
earnings to date,and estimated futurelost earnings.If equitablereliefissought, describe the nature ofthe relief.)
Plaintiffshomeowners allege defective construction of the pool and surrounding landscaping inthe backyard of
theirhome.
[] (if morespace isneeded, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b. )
5. Jury or nonjury trial
The partyor partiesrequest a jurytrial Lola nonjury trial. (if morethan one party, provide the name ofeach party
requesting a jurytrial):
6. Trial date
a. L__] The trial
has been set for(date):
b. No trial
date has been set.This case willbe ready for trial
within12 months of the date ofthe filing
of thecomplaint (if
not, explain):
Please see attached trialcalendar.
c. Dates on which partiesor attorneys willnotbe available fortrial
(specify dates and explain reasons forunavailability):
7. Estimated length oftrial
The party or partiesestimate that thetrialwill
take (check one):
a. days (specify number): 10-14
b. [__] hours (short causes) (specify):
8. Trialrepresentation (fobe answered for each party)
The partyor partieswillbe represented attrial [y_] by the attorneyor party listedinthe caption [__] by the following:
a. Attorney:
b. Firm:
c. Address:
d. Telephone number: f. Fax number:
e. E-mail address: g. Party represented:
[1 Additional representation isdescribed in Attachment 8.
9. Preference /
[__] This case isentitledtopreference (specifycode section):
10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
a. ADR information package. Please notethat different
ADR processes are availableindifferentcourts and communities; read
the ADR information package provided by the court under rule3.221 forinformation about the processes availablethrough the
court and community programs inthiscase.
(1) For partiesrepresented by counsel: Counsel has L_] has not provided the ADR information package identified
inrule 3.221 tothe clientand reviewed ADR optionswith the client.
(2) For self-represented parties:Party [-] has [-_] has not reviewed the ADR information package identifiedinrule3.221.
b. Referral tojudicial arbitration orcivil action mediation (if available).
(1) [__] This matter is subjectto mandatory judicial
arbitrationunder Code ofCivilProcedure section 1141.11 or tocivil
action
mediation under Codeof CivilProcedure section1775.3 because the amount incontroversy does not exceed the
statutorylimit.
(2) [__] Plaintiff
elects toreferthis case tojudicialarbitration
and agrees tolimit recovery tothe amount specifiedin Code of
CivilProcedure section 1141.11.
(3) [__] This case is exempt from judicial
arbitrationunder rule 3.811 ofthe CaliforniaRules of Courtor from civil
action
mediation under Code ofCivilProcedure section 1775 etseq. (specifyexemption):
OM-110[Rev.
July4, 2041] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page?of8
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tim Lester and Karen Lester CASE NUMBER:
DEDEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Dal Pino Quality| Pools, Inc.,et al. scvo 038444
10. c. Indicate theADR process or processes thatthe partyor partiesare willingtoparticipate in,
have agreed to participatein,or
have already participatedin(check allthat apply and provide the specifiedinformation):
The partyor partiescompleting | If thepartyor partiescompleting thisform inthe case have agreed to
thisform are willing to participateinor have already completed an ADR process or processes,
participateinthe followingADR | indicatethe status ofthe processes (attacha copy ofthe parties'ADR
processes (check ailthatapply): |stipulation):
Mediation session notyet scheduled
suc
CW Mediation session scheduled for(date):
(1)Mediation
Agreed to complete mediation by (date):
Mediation completed on (date): 12/04/19
Settlement conference not yet scheduled
(2)Settlement Cd
NHUU;}OUUU)OUUU;UUOUU|UUU8|;
Settlement conference scheduled for(date):
conference Agreed tocomplete settlement conference by (date):
Settlement conference completed on (date):
Neutral evaluation notyet scheduled
(3)N | eval | Neutral evaluation scheduled for(date):
3) Neutral
evaluation
Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by(date):
Neutral evaluation completed on (date):
Judicialarbitrationnot yetscheduled
arbitration Agreed to complete judicialarbitration
by (date):
Judicialarbitrationcompleted on (date):
Private arbitration
not yet scheduled
(5) Binding private co Private arbitration
scheduled for(date):
arbitration Agreed to complete private arbitration
by (date):
Private arbitration
completed on (dafe):
ADR session notyet scheduled
cI ADR session scheduled for(date):
(6)Other (specify):
Agreed tocomplete ADR session by (date):
ADR completed on (date):
CM-110[Rev.
July
1, 2011] Page3 of 5
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tim Lester and Karen Lester CASE NUMBER:
SCV003844
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Dal Pino Quality Pools, Inc., etal. 0038444
11. Insurance
a. Insurance carrier,if any,
for partyfilingthisstatement (name): Colony Specialty
b. Reservation of rights: Yes [_] No
ce C_] Coverage issues willsignificantly
affectresolutionof thiscase (explain):
12. Jurisdiction
Indicateany matters thatmay affectthe court'sjurisdiction
or processing of thiscase and describe thestatus.
[_] Bankruptcy [__] Other (specify):.
Status:
13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
a. [__] There are companion, underlying, orrelated cases.
(1)Name ofcase:
(2)Name ofcourt:
(3)Case number:
(4)Status:
| Additionalcases are described in Attachment 13a.
b. L_]Amotionto [_] consolidate [—] coordinate willbe filedby (name party):
14. Bifurcation
L] The partyor partiesintend tofilea motion foran order bifurcating,severing, orcoordinating the followingissues or causes of
action (specifymoving party,type ofmotion, and reasons):
15. Other motions
The partyor partiesexpect to file
the following motions before trial
(specify moving party, type ofmotion, and issues):
Motions in Limine
16. Discovery
a. L_] The partyor partieshave completed all
discovery.
‘b. The following discovery willbe completed by the date specified(describe allanticipateddiscovery):
Party Description- Date
Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc. Written discovery per code
Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc. Depositions per code
Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc. Expert discovery per code
c. [__] The following discovery issues, includingissues regarding the discovery of electronically
stored information,are
anticipated(specify):
CM-110[Rev.
July
1, 2041]
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page4 of 5
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tim Lester and Karen Lester CASE NUMBER:
i SCV0038444
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Dal Pino Quality Pools, Inc.,et al.
17. Economic litigation
a. L__] Thisis a limitedcivil
case (i.e.,
the amount demanded is$25,000 or less)and theeconomic litigation
procedures in Code
of Civil
Procedure sections 90-98 willapply to thiscase.
b. L__] This is alimitedcivilcase and a motion towithdraw thecase from the economic litigation
procedures orforadditional
discoverywillbe filed(if checked,explain specifically
why economic litigation
procedures relatingtodiscovery or trial
should notapply to thiscase):
18. Other issues
L__] The party or partiesrequest thatthe followingadditional matters be considered or determined atthe case management
conference (specify):
19. Meet and confer
a. The party or partieshave met and conferred with allpartieson allsubjects required by rule3.724 of the CaliforniaRules
of Court (if not,
explain):
b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule3.724 of the CaliforniaRules of Court,the partiesagree on the following
(specify):
20. Total number ofpages attached (if any): 2
| am completely familiarwith thiscase and willbe fully
prepared todiscuss the status ofdiscovery and alternativedisputeresolution,
as well as otherissues raised by thisstatement, and willpossess the authorityto enterinto stipulations
on these issues atthe time of
the case management conference, including thewritten authorityof theparty where required.
Date: July 24, 2020 °
Kathleen C. Miller
' athlon (' Ini -—
(TYPEOR PRINT
NAME) (SIGNATUREOFPARTY ORATTORNEY)
(TYPEORPRINTNAME)
b (SIGNATUREOFPARTY ORATTORNEY)
[___] Additional signaturesare attached.
CM-110[Rev.
July
1, 2014] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page5 of
5
TRIAL DATES -updated 7/6/20
08/03/2020 Daniels v Rye STEVE
08/10/2020 Smith v Pella Corp, et al. KATHY
08/10/2020 Kamahele vAEZ Investment, Inc. KATHY
08/11/2020 Peterson v Thompson Brooks, Inc. KATHY
08/19/2020 Global v Panti, Cabrera STEVE
08/20/2020 Global Liberty Ins. v. Esther dba Coachella Valley Shuttle STEVE
08/24/2020 Global v Ogala, Zar Limo STEVE
08/27/2020 Hartley v EPR Properties, Inc. KATHY
08/31/2020 Pruitt v Lopez STEVE
09/04/2020 Global v Hernandez Camacho STEVE
09/08/2020 Reliant Leasing, Inc. v.Scudder Roofing Sun Energy Systems KATHY
09/14/2020 Franklin v Union and Polk Partners, L.P. KATHY
09/14/2020 Mairs v Morris STEVE
09/21/2020 Tarin v All Care Transportation, LLC STEVE
09/21/2020 Giant Development v.JH Fitzmaurice KATHY
09/28/2020 Valero v TriCounty STEVE
10/05/2020 Clausen v Oro Engineering Corp, et al. KATHY
10/19/2020 Meza v PacificEngineering and Construction, Inc. KATHY
10/20/2020 Madani v Uber USA, LLC STEVE
11/02/2020 Global V Sanchez STEVE
11/02/2020 Carcione v. Brion Smirl KATHY
11/03/2020 Delgado v LA City Cab, LLC; Tri-CityTransport STEVE
11/03/2020 Malin v Morse STEVE
11/05/2020 Amerisure v Omega Products STEVE
11/09/2020 Zaru v Ramach STEVE
11/13/2020 Weeks v Prime Time Shuttle STEVE
11/20/2020 Barlow v Espinosa STEVE
12/02/2020 Quinonez v Don Chente STEVE
12/11/2020 San Jose Construction v. Hacienda Motors, LTD KATHY
12/14/2020 lrivboje v TriCounty STEVE
01/07/2021 Gordon v Donecho, Creative Plumbing KATHY
01/08/2021 Arcos v Pete HillConstruction Company, Inc. STEVE
01/12/2021 Carter v Southland Transit Inc. STEVE
01/25/2021 Squaw Valley v Pelton KATHY
02/01/2021 Chaney v Dyt STEVE
02/05/2021 Papapietro v Papapietro PATRICK
02/09/2021 Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company, Osorio v. Portillo[limited] STEVE
02/11/2021 Lopez v Luxury Diamond Transportation, LLC; Mansour STEVE
02/22/2021 Ruano v County of San Francisco PATRICK
02/22/2021 Picchi v. Landlease (US) Construction, Inc. PATRICK
03/08/2021 Bineshpour v Essex Property Trust, Inc. KATHY
03/09/2021 Tovar v AECOM; Pacific Steel Group PATRICK
03/15/2021 Brav v SEL Construction KATHY
03/22/2021 Corcoran v Irvine Community Development Co. STEVE
03/23/2021 Emami v Azaturi STEVE
03/24/2021 Talasyan v Mkrtchyan STEVE
04/01/2021 Lower Rambla Pacifico Road Owners Assoc. v Koerbelin KATHY
04/02/2021 Goldenshtein v XS Limo Service, LLC STEVE
04/08/2021 Weitzman v Andrada, Lin Spier Construction KATHY
04/13/2021 Yoon v Maher STEVE
04/19/2021 Shalar v.Truong, Uber STEVE
04/26/2021 C.L. Knox, Inc.v S.C. Anderson, Inc. (TD 6/15/20) KATHY
09/30/2021 Gordon v Donecho, Creative Plumbing KATHY
Preview
CM-110 ATTORNEY ORPARTY WITHOUTATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USEONLY Patrick K. O'Brien (CASBN: 167957) /Kathleen Miller (CASBN: 202216) ELECTRONICALLY FILED O'BRIEN LAW, P.C. Superior Court of California, 755 Baywood Drive, Suite 185, Petaluma CA 94954 County of Placer TELEPHONE NO.:707.789.6500 FAXNO.(Optional): 707.789.6520 7/24/2020 E-MAILADDRESS(Optiona): kathleen@pobrienlaw.com By: Zachane hteCrary, Deputy Clerk ATTORNEY FOR(Name): Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF PLACER STREET ADDRESS:10820 Justice Center Dr. MAILING ADDRESS: CITYANDZIPCODE: Roseville, 95678 BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tim Lester and Karen Lester DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Dal Pino Quality Pools, Inc., etal. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE L__] LIMITED CASE SCV0038444 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE isscheduled as follows: Date: August 11, 2020 Time: 10:00 a.m. Dept.: 40 Div.: Room: Address ofcourt (if different from theaddress above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Kathleen C. Miller . INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement issubmitted by party (name): Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc. b. [__] This statement issubmitted jointlyby parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filedon (date): b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filedon (date): 02/08/2019 3. Service (tobe answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. Allparties named inthe complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, orhave been dismissed. b. L_] The.following partiesnamed inthe complaint or cross-complaint (1) [-] have notbeen served (specify names and explain why not): (2) L-_] have been served but have notappeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) [] have had a defaultentered against them (specifynames): c. L__] The followingadditionalparties may be added (specifynames, nature ofinvolvement incase, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type ofcase in complaint CL] cross-complaint (Describe, includingcauses ofaction): Breach ofContract, Breach of Implied Warranty, Negligence, Strict Liability. Cross-Actions for Indemnity and Contribution causes of action. Page1 of 5 FormAdopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720-3.730 CM-110[Rev, July1, 2011] www.courts. ca.gov CM-110 CASE NUMBER: | PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tim Lester and Karen Lester SCV0038444 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Dal Pino Quality Pools, Inc., etal. 4. b. Provide a briefstatement ofthe case, includingany damages. (If personalinjurydamages are sought, specifythe injuryand damages claimed, includingmedical expenses todate [indicatesource and amount], estimated futuremedical expenses, lost earnings to date,and estimated futurelost earnings.If equitablereliefissought, describe the nature ofthe relief.) Plaintiffshomeowners allege defective construction of the pool and surrounding landscaping inthe backyard of theirhome. [] (if morespace isneeded, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b. ) 5. Jury or nonjury trial The partyor partiesrequest a jurytrial Lola nonjury trial. (if morethan one party, provide the name ofeach party requesting a jurytrial): 6. Trial date a. L__] The trial has been set for(date): b. No trial date has been set.This case willbe ready for trial within12 months of the date ofthe filing of thecomplaint (if not, explain): Please see attached trialcalendar. c. Dates on which partiesor attorneys willnotbe available fortrial (specify dates and explain reasons forunavailability): 7. Estimated length oftrial The party or partiesestimate that thetrialwill take (check one): a. days (specify number): 10-14 b. [__] hours (short causes) (specify): 8. Trialrepresentation (fobe answered for each party) The partyor partieswillbe represented attrial [y_] by the attorneyor party listedinthe caption [__] by the following: a. Attorney: b. Firm: c. Address: d. Telephone number: f. Fax number: e. E-mail address: g. Party represented: [1 Additional representation isdescribed in Attachment 8. 9. Preference / [__] This case isentitledtopreference (specifycode section): 10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a. ADR information package. Please notethat different ADR processes are availableindifferentcourts and communities; read the ADR information package provided by the court under rule3.221 forinformation about the processes availablethrough the court and community programs inthiscase. (1) For partiesrepresented by counsel: Counsel has L_] has not provided the ADR information package identified inrule 3.221 tothe clientand reviewed ADR optionswith the client. (2) For self-represented parties:Party [-] has [-_] has not reviewed the ADR information package identifiedinrule3.221. b. Referral tojudicial arbitration orcivil action mediation (if available). (1) [__] This matter is subjectto mandatory judicial arbitrationunder Code ofCivilProcedure section 1141.11 or tocivil action mediation under Codeof CivilProcedure section1775.3 because the amount incontroversy does not exceed the statutorylimit. (2) [__] Plaintiff elects toreferthis case tojudicialarbitration and agrees tolimit recovery tothe amount specifiedin Code of CivilProcedure section 1141.11. (3) [__] This case is exempt from judicial arbitrationunder rule 3.811 ofthe CaliforniaRules of Courtor from civil action mediation under Code ofCivilProcedure section 1775 etseq. (specifyexemption): OM-110[Rev. July4, 2041] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page?of8 CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tim Lester and Karen Lester CASE NUMBER: DEDEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Dal Pino Quality| Pools, Inc.,et al. scvo 038444 10. c. Indicate theADR process or processes thatthe partyor partiesare willingtoparticipate in, have agreed to participatein,or have already participatedin(check allthat apply and provide the specifiedinformation): The partyor partiescompleting | If thepartyor partiescompleting thisform inthe case have agreed to thisform are willing to participateinor have already completed an ADR process or processes, participateinthe followingADR | indicatethe status ofthe processes (attacha copy ofthe parties'ADR processes (check ailthatapply): |stipulation): Mediation session notyet scheduled suc CW Mediation session scheduled for(date): (1)Mediation Agreed to complete mediation by (date): Mediation completed on (date): 12/04/19 Settlement conference not yet scheduled (2)Settlement Cd NHUU;}OUUU)OUUU;UUOUU|UUU8|; Settlement conference scheduled for(date): conference Agreed tocomplete settlement conference by (date): Settlement conference completed on (date): Neutral evaluation notyet scheduled (3)N | eval | Neutral evaluation scheduled for(date): 3) Neutral evaluation Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by(date): Neutral evaluation completed on (date): Judicialarbitrationnot yetscheduled arbitration Agreed to complete judicialarbitration by (date): Judicialarbitrationcompleted on (date): Private arbitration not yet scheduled (5) Binding private co Private arbitration scheduled for(date): arbitration Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): Private arbitration completed on (dafe): ADR session notyet scheduled cI ADR session scheduled for(date): (6)Other (specify): Agreed tocomplete ADR session by (date): ADR completed on (date): CM-110[Rev. July 1, 2011] Page3 of 5 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tim Lester and Karen Lester CASE NUMBER: SCV003844 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Dal Pino Quality Pools, Inc., etal. 0038444 11. Insurance a. Insurance carrier,if any, for partyfilingthisstatement (name): Colony Specialty b. Reservation of rights: Yes [_] No ce C_] Coverage issues willsignificantly affectresolutionof thiscase (explain): 12. Jurisdiction Indicateany matters thatmay affectthe court'sjurisdiction or processing of thiscase and describe thestatus. [_] Bankruptcy [__] Other (specify):. Status: 13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. [__] There are companion, underlying, orrelated cases. (1)Name ofcase: (2)Name ofcourt: (3)Case number: (4)Status: | Additionalcases are described in Attachment 13a. b. L_]Amotionto [_] consolidate [—] coordinate willbe filedby (name party): 14. Bifurcation L] The partyor partiesintend tofilea motion foran order bifurcating,severing, orcoordinating the followingissues or causes of action (specifymoving party,type ofmotion, and reasons): 15. Other motions The partyor partiesexpect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type ofmotion, and issues): Motions in Limine 16. Discovery a. L_] The partyor partieshave completed all discovery. ‘b. The following discovery willbe completed by the date specified(describe allanticipateddiscovery): Party Description- Date Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc. Written discovery per code Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc. Depositions per code Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc. Expert discovery per code c. [__] The following discovery issues, includingissues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information,are anticipated(specify): CM-110[Rev. July 1, 2041] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page4 of 5 CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Tim Lester and Karen Lester CASE NUMBER: i SCV0038444 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Dal Pino Quality Pools, Inc.,et al. 17. Economic litigation a. L__] Thisis a limitedcivil case (i.e., the amount demanded is$25,000 or less)and theeconomic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 willapply to thiscase. b. L__] This is alimitedcivilcase and a motion towithdraw thecase from the economic litigation procedures orforadditional discoverywillbe filed(if checked,explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relatingtodiscovery or trial should notapply to thiscase): 18. Other issues L__] The party or partiesrequest thatthe followingadditional matters be considered or determined atthe case management conference (specify): 19. Meet and confer a. The party or partieshave met and conferred with allpartieson allsubjects required by rule3.724 of the CaliforniaRules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule3.724 of the CaliforniaRules of Court,the partiesagree on the following (specify): 20. Total number ofpages attached (if any): 2 | am completely familiarwith thiscase and willbe fully prepared todiscuss the status ofdiscovery and alternativedisputeresolution, as well as otherissues raised by thisstatement, and willpossess the authorityto enterinto stipulations on these issues atthe time of the case management conference, including thewritten authorityof theparty where required. Date: July 24, 2020 ° Kathleen C. Miller ' athlon (' Ini -— (TYPEOR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATUREOFPARTY ORATTORNEY) (TYPEORPRINTNAME) b (SIGNATUREOFPARTY ORATTORNEY) [___] Additional signaturesare attached. CM-110[Rev. July 1, 2014] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page5 of 5 TRIAL DATES -updated 7/6/20 08/03/2020 Daniels v Rye STEVE 08/10/2020 Smith v Pella Corp, et al. KATHY 08/10/2020 Kamahele vAEZ Investment, Inc. KATHY 08/11/2020 Peterson v Thompson Brooks, Inc. KATHY 08/19/2020 Global v Panti, Cabrera STEVE 08/20/2020 Global Liberty Ins. v. Esther dba Coachella Valley Shuttle STEVE 08/24/2020 Global v Ogala, Zar Limo STEVE 08/27/2020 Hartley v EPR Properties, Inc. KATHY 08/31/2020 Pruitt v Lopez STEVE 09/04/2020 Global v Hernandez Camacho STEVE 09/08/2020 Reliant Leasing, Inc. v.Scudder Roofing Sun Energy Systems KATHY 09/14/2020 Franklin v Union and Polk Partners, L.P. KATHY 09/14/2020 Mairs v Morris STEVE 09/21/2020 Tarin v All Care Transportation, LLC STEVE 09/21/2020 Giant Development v.JH Fitzmaurice KATHY 09/28/2020 Valero v TriCounty STEVE 10/05/2020 Clausen v Oro Engineering Corp, et al. KATHY 10/19/2020 Meza v PacificEngineering and Construction, Inc. KATHY 10/20/2020 Madani v Uber USA, LLC STEVE 11/02/2020 Global V Sanchez STEVE 11/02/2020 Carcione v. Brion Smirl KATHY 11/03/2020 Delgado v LA City Cab, LLC; Tri-CityTransport STEVE 11/03/2020 Malin v Morse STEVE 11/05/2020 Amerisure v Omega Products STEVE 11/09/2020 Zaru v Ramach STEVE 11/13/2020 Weeks v Prime Time Shuttle STEVE 11/20/2020 Barlow v Espinosa STEVE 12/02/2020 Quinonez v Don Chente STEVE 12/11/2020 San Jose Construction v. Hacienda Motors, LTD KATHY 12/14/2020 lrivboje v TriCounty STEVE 01/07/2021 Gordon v Donecho, Creative Plumbing KATHY 01/08/2021 Arcos v Pete HillConstruction Company, Inc. STEVE 01/12/2021 Carter v Southland Transit Inc. STEVE 01/25/2021 Squaw Valley v Pelton KATHY 02/01/2021 Chaney v Dyt STEVE 02/05/2021 Papapietro v Papapietro PATRICK 02/09/2021 Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company, Osorio v. Portillo[limited] STEVE 02/11/2021 Lopez v Luxury Diamond Transportation, LLC; Mansour STEVE 02/22/2021 Ruano v County of San Francisco PATRICK 02/22/2021 Picchi v. Landlease (US) Construction, Inc. PATRICK 03/08/2021 Bineshpour v Essex Property Trust, Inc. KATHY 03/09/2021 Tovar v AECOM; Pacific Steel Group PATRICK 03/15/2021 Brav v SEL Construction KATHY 03/22/2021 Corcoran v Irvine Community Development Co. STEVE 03/23/2021 Emami v Azaturi STEVE 03/24/2021 Talasyan v Mkrtchyan STEVE 04/01/2021 Lower Rambla Pacifico Road Owners Assoc. v Koerbelin KATHY 04/02/2021 Goldenshtein v XS Limo Service, LLC STEVE 04/08/2021 Weitzman v Andrada, Lin Spier Construction KATHY 04/13/2021 Yoon v Maher STEVE 04/19/2021 Shalar v.Truong, Uber STEVE 04/26/2021 C.L. Knox, Inc.v S.C. Anderson, Inc. (TD 6/15/20) KATHY 09/30/2021 Gordon v Donecho, Creative Plumbing KATHY