arrow left
arrow right
  • WILKES, JESSICA vs GLIDEWELL, COREYAuto Tort: Unlimited  document preview
  • WILKES, JESSICA vs GLIDEWELL, COREYAuto Tort: Unlimited  document preview
  • WILKES, JESSICA vs GLIDEWELL, COREYAuto Tort: Unlimited  document preview
  • WILKES, JESSICA vs GLIDEWELL, COREYAuto Tort: Unlimited  document preview
  • WILKES, JESSICA vs GLIDEWELL, COREYAuto Tort: Unlimited  document preview
  • WILKES, JESSICA vs GLIDEWELL, COREYAuto Tort: Unlimited  document preview
  • WILKES, JESSICA vs GLIDEWELL, COREYAuto Tort: Unlimited  document preview
  • WILKES, JESSICA vs GLIDEWELL, COREYAuto Tort: Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Angelika Singh, Esq. SBN 236301 TIZA SERRANO THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES Electronically Filed 980 9th Street, Suite 2250 10/30/2020 11:18 AM Sacramento, CA 95814 Superior Court of California TELEPHONE NO.: (916) 561-2780 FAX NO. (Optional): (855) 886-5559 County of Stanislaus E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendants, Corey Glidewell and Matthew Glidewell Clerk of the Court SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS By: Lori Salazar, Deputy STREET ADDRESS: 801 10th Street 4TH FL. MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: Modesto, CA 95354 BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jessica Wilkes DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Corey Glidewell, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: CV-19-003964 (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: November 16, 2020 Time: 3:00 p.m. Dept.: 21 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Angelika Singh, Esq. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendants, Corey Glidewell and Matthew Glidewell b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Automobile accident Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Wilkes CASE NUMBER: CV-19-003964 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Glidewell. 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (If personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.) The nature and extent of Plaintiff's injuries, treatment and losses are being ascertained. Discovery is ongoing. (If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.) 5. Jury or nonjury trial The party or parties request a jury triaI a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party requesting a jury trial): 6. Trial date a. The trial has been set for (date): b. No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if not, explain): c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability): see attachment 7. Estimated length of trial The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one): a. days (specify number): 3-5 b. hours (short causes) (specify): 8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party) The party or parties will be represented at trial by the attorney or party listed in the caption by the following: a. Attorney: b. Firm: c. Address: d. Telephone number: f. Fax number: e. E-mail address: g. Party represented: Additional representation is described in Attachment 8. 9. Preference This case is entitled to preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for information about the processes available through the court and community programs in this case. (1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel has has not provided the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client. (2) For self-represented parties: Party has has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221. b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available). (1) This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the statutory limit. (2) Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11. (3) This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption): CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 2 of 5 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Wilkes CASE NUMBER: CV-19-003964 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Glidewell 10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information): The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes, participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties' ADR processes (check all that apply): stipulation): Mediation session not yet scheduled Mediation session scheduled for (date): (1) Mediation Agreed to complete mediation by (date): Mediation completed on (date): Settlement conference not yet scheduled (2) Settlement Settlement conference scheduled for (date): conference Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date) : Settlement conference completed on (date): Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date): (3) Neutral evaluation Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): Neutral evaluation completed on (date): Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled (4) Nonbinding judicial Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date): Judicial arbitration completed on (date): Private arbitration not yet scheduled (5) Binding private Private arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date): Private arbitration completed on (date): ADR session not yet scheduled (6) Other (specify): ADR session scheduled for (date): Agreed to complete ADR session by (date): ADR completed on (date): CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 3 of 5 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Wilkes CASE NUMBER:1 CV-19-003964 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT Glidewell 11. Insurance a. Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name): State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company b. Reservation of rights: Yes No c. Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain): 12. Jurisdiction Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status. Bankruptcy Other (specify): Status: 13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Name of case: (2) Name of court: (3) Case number: (4) Status: Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a. b. A motion to consolidate coordinate wiII be filed by (name party): 14. Bifurcation The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons): 15. Other motions The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues): 16. Discovery a. The party or parties have completed all discovery. b The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery): Party Description Date Defendant Written Discovery On-going Defendant Plaintiff Deposition completed Defendant Subpoena Medical Records On-going Defendant IME December 2020 Defendant Expert discovery Per code c. The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated (specify): CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 4 of 5 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Wilkes CASE NUMBER: CV-19-003964 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Glidewell 17. Economic litigation a. This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case. b. This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial should not apply to this case): 18. Other issues The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management conference (specify): Discovery to remain open based on trial date, not arbitration 19. Meet and confer a. The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court (if not, explain): b. After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following (specify): 20. Total number of pages attached (if any): 1 I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Date: October 30, 2020 Angelika Singh, Esq.  (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)  (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) Additional signatures are attached. CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 5 of 5 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com CM-110 Attachment DATE CASE COUNTY MSC 11/30 - 12/4/2020 Keating v. Ogg Placer 11/13/2020 CTC – 11/20/2020 2/8 – 12/2021 Hibbard v. Fisher Butte 1/31/2021 3/23 – 26/ 2021 Winter v. Ramage Stanislaus 3/8/2021 4/13 – 4/16/2021 Garcia v. McIntyre Stanislaus 3/22/2021 5/10 – 5/14/2021 Morgan v Zuniga Stanislaus 4/26/21 6/21 – 25/2021 Mahan v Golden San Joaquin 5/17/2021 8/2 – 6/2021 Soto v. Brierly San Joaquin 7/19/2021 7/12 – 7/16/2021 Berry v. Crane Placer 6/25/2021 CTC 7/2/2021 8/23 – 25/2021 Juarez v. Doyle San Joaquin 8/9/2021 9/13 – 16/2021 Tovar v. Siripannha San Joaquin 8/16/2021 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 5 of 5 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 Wilkes v. Glidewell, et al. 3 Stanislaus County Superior Court Case No. CV-19-003964 4 I, the undersigned, declare that I am a resident of the United States; employed in the City of Sacramento and County of Sacramento, State of California; over the age 5 of 18 years; not a party to the within entitled cause; and my business address is 980 9th Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. 6 7 On October 30, 2020, I served the within document(s), 8 DEFENDANTS’ CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 9 on the interested parties in this action as follows: 10 Attorney(s) for Plaintiff Jessica 11 Wilkes Mark Nelson 12 Law Offices of Mark S. Nelson 215 McHenry Avenue 13 Modesto, CA 95354 14 Email: mark@marksnelson.com 15 16 [ X ] ONLY BY ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION - Pursuant to the California Rules of Court, Appendix 1, Emergency Rule 12, approved by the Judicial Council, I served a true copy of the 17 aforementioned document(s) via electronic mail on the parties in said action by transmitting by e-mail to the e-mail addresses as set forth above on this date before 5:00 p.m. No electronic 18 message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful was received within a reasonable time after the submission. 19 20 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on October 30, 21 2020, at Sacramento, California. 22 23 24 Beverley Tomlin-Hill 25 26 27 28 -1- ____________________________________________ Proof of Service