REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT (TRANSACTION ID # 61894780) FILED BY PETITIONER SANGER, PRIYA SANGER, MICHAEL

Case: PRIYA SANGER et al VS. LEAH AHN    

Case Overview

A Petition Re: Arbitration case was filed by Sanger, Michael, and Sanger, Priya, against Ahn, Leah 851 Lombard St San Francisco, Ca 94133, in the jurisdiction of San Francisco County.

						

Preview

Utrecht & Lenvin, LLP 10 WW 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PAUL F. UTRECHT (SBN 118658) BLIZABETH L. HURWITZ (SBN 278846) UTRECHT & LENVIN, LLP ELECTRONICALLY 109 Stevenson Street, 5" Floor FILED San Francisco, CA 94105 Superior Court of California, Telephone: (415) 357-0600 ee ee Fax: (415) 354-3485 04/09/2018 Clerk of the Court BY: VANESSA WU Attorneys for Petitioners PRIYA SANGER Deputy Clerk and MICHAEL SANGER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO — UNLIMITED JURISDICTION PRIYA SANGER, MICHAEL SANGER, Case No. CPF-11-511985 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT Petitioners, vs. LEAH AHN, Date: April 16, 2018 Time: 9:30am. Dept: 302 Respondent. Reservation No. 03130416-14 Petitioners Priya Sanger and Michael Sanger (the “Sangers”) submit this Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of their Motion to Amend the Judgment (the “Motion”). LEGAL ARGUMENT In the sixth year of her fight to avoid paying her share of a joint mortgage or the judgment entered against her, Respondent Leah Ahn’s (“Respondent”) opposition to the Motion (“Opposition”) is a parade of recycled arguments which have already been rejected by cither this Court, the Bankruptcy Court, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit (“BAP”), or an arbitrator. The decision of the BAP and the award by the first arbitrator, confirmed into a judgment by this Court in 2...