arrow left
arrow right
  • LUCAS GASKINS VS. POSTMATES, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • LUCAS GASKINS VS. POSTMATES, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • LUCAS GASKINS VS. POSTMATES, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
  • LUCAS GASKINS VS. POSTMATES, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP THEANE EVANGELIS, SBN 243570 2 tevangelis@gibsondunn.com DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, SBN 254433 ELECTRONICALLY 3 dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com 333 South Grand Avenue F I L E D 4 Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco Telephone: 213.229.7000 5 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 04/09/2020 Clerk of the Court BY: EDNALEEN ALEGRE 6 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Deputy Clerk MICHELE L. MARYOTT, SBN 191993 7 mmaryott@gibsondunn.com 3161 Michelson Drive 8 Irvine, CA 92612-4412 Telephone: 949.451.3800 9 Facsimile: 949.451.4220 10 Attorneys for Defendant Postmates Inc. 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 13 14 LUCAS GASKINS, CASE NO. CGC-20-582781 15 Plaintiff, STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT BY 15 16 v. DAYS 17 POSTMATES INC., Bastian Lehmann, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 18 Action Filed: February 7, 2020 Defendants. Trial Date: None Set 19 20 21 Pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.110(d), Lucas Gaskins and Defendants Postmates Inc. 22 and Bastian Lehmann hereby stipulate and agree, by and through their undersigned counsel, as 23 follows: 24 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his complaint in the above-captioned matter on February 7, 2020; 25 WHEREAS, the parties agreed to service via Notice & Acknowledgment of Receipt, and 26 Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s Complaint is currently due on April 13, 2020; 27 WHEREAS, there have been no prior stipulations to extend Defendants’ deadline to respond 28 to Plaintiff’s Complaint; Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT 1 WHEREAS, the parties agree, pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.110(d), to extend 2 Defendants’ deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint by 15 days, or until April 28, 2020; 3 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Lucas Gaskins and Defendants 4 Postmates Inc. and Bastian Lehmann, through their respective counsel, that: 5 (1) Pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.110(d), the deadline for Defendant to respond 6 to Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be April 28, 2020. 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 8 9 DATED: April 6, 2020 By: /s/ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada ___________________________________ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada 10 Attorneys for Defendants POSTMATES INC. and 11 BASTIAN LEHMANN 12 13 14 DATED: March 22 __, 2020 By: ___________________________________ 15 Connor W. Olson 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff LUCAS GASKINS 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT