arrow left
arrow right
  • MARK FARRELL FOR DISTRICT 2 SUPERVISOR 2010 VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE TO COMPEL RESPONDENTS AND DEFENDANTS TO VACATE FORFEITURE DEMAND;COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF) document preview
  • MARK FARRELL FOR DISTRICT 2 SUPERVISOR 2010 VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE TO COMPEL RESPONDENTS AND DEFENDANTS TO VACATE FORFEITURE DEMAND;COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF) document preview
  • MARK FARRELL FOR DISTRICT 2 SUPERVISOR 2010 VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE TO COMPEL RESPONDENTS AND DEFENDANTS TO VACATE FORFEITURE DEMAND;COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF) document preview
  • MARK FARRELL FOR DISTRICT 2 SUPERVISOR 2010 VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE TO COMPEL RESPONDENTS AND DEFENDANTS TO VACATE FORFEITURE DEMAND;COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF) document preview
  • MARK FARRELL FOR DISTRICT 2 SUPERVISOR 2010 VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE TO COMPEL RESPONDENTS AND DEFENDANTS TO VACATE FORFEITURE DEMAND;COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF) document preview
  • MARK FARRELL FOR DISTRICT 2 SUPERVISOR 2010 VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE TO COMPEL RESPONDENTS AND DEFENDANTS TO VACATE FORFEITURE DEMAND;COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF) document preview
  • MARK FARRELL FOR DISTRICT 2 SUPERVISOR 2010 VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE TO COMPEL RESPONDENTS AND DEFENDANTS TO VACATE FORFEITURE DEMAND;COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF) document preview
  • MARK FARRELL FOR DISTRICT 2 SUPERVISOR 2010 VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE TO COMPEL RESPONDENTS AND DEFENDANTS TO VACATE FORFEITURE DEMAND;COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF) document preview
						
                                

Preview

= Com rndt nun FF WN DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney YVONNE R. MERE, State Bar #173594 Chief of Complex & Affirmative Litigation SARA J. EISENBERG, State Bar #269303 Deputy City Attorney 1390 Market Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3800 Facsimile: (415) 437-4644 E-Mail: yvonne.meré @sfgov.org E-Mail: sara.eisenberg @sfgov.org Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco 07/29/2016 Clerk of the Court BY-EDNALEEN ALEGRE Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION MARK FARRELL FOR DISTRICT 2 SUPERVISOR 2010 and MARK FARRELL, Petitioners and. Plaintiffs, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCISCO ETHICS COMMISSION; CITY AND COUNTY OF Case No. CGC-16-551745 DECLARATION OF ANDREW SHEN IN SUPPORT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO’S OPPOSITION TO CROSS-DEFENDANT MARK FARRELL’S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO’S CROSS-COMPLAINT SAN FRANCISCO TREASURER AND TAX | Judge: Hon. Harold E. Kahn COLLECTOR; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, | Date: August 11, 2016 Time: 9:30am Respondents and Defendants. Dep’t: 302 Date Action Filed: April 29, 2016 Trial Date: Not set CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Cross-complainant, vs. MARK FARRELL, an individual; and ROES 1 to 25, inclusive, Cross-defendants. _ Shen Decl. ISO Opp. to Special Motion to Strike; Case No. CGC-16-551745 cattchmnt\pldg opp to anti- slapp_shen decl.docxaI Dn WwW L Andrew Shen, declare as follows: 1. Tam an attorney admitted to practice law in the State of California. I am employed by the City and County of San Francisco as a Deputy City Attorney. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated in this declaration. If called as a witness, I could and would competently testify to the facts set forth below. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the signed stipulation between the Fair Political Practices Commission (“FPPC”), Chris Lee, and “Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor.” I obtained this document via a Public Records Act Request to the FPPC. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B are true and correct copies of Common Sense Voters’ campaign finance reports (FPPC Form 460s) for 2010 and 2011, which I obtained from the San Francisco Ethics Commission (“SFEC”). Page numbers have been added to aid in citation to the documents. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the meeting minutes of the SFEC’s March 23, 2015 meeting, which were printed from the SFEC website at http://www.sfethics.org/ethics/2015/04/minutes-march-23-2015.html on July 27, 2016. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the meeting minutes of the SFEC’s June 5, 2015 meeting, which were printed from the SFEC website at http://www.sfethics.org/ethics/2015/06/minutes-june-5-2015 html on July 27, 2016. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the meeting minutes of the SFEC’s March 24, 2008 meeting, which were printed from the SFEC website at http://sfgov3.org/ftp/ethics_archive/sfarchive.org/index3dcb.html ?dept=268 1 &sub=&dtype=279 1 &ye ar= on July 28, 2016. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 28th day of July, 2016, in San Francisco, California. ANDREW SHEN 1 Shen Decl. ISO Opp. to Special Motion to Strike; Case No. CGC-16-551745 c’\attchmntipldg opp to anti- slapp_shen decl.docxEXHIBIT ACO wm AY ADH RB wH = GARY S. WINUK Chief of Enforcement GALENA WEST Commission Counsel TV FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION 428 J Street, Suite 620 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 322-5660 Attorneys for Complainant BEFORE THE FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Tn the Matter of FPPC No. 10/973 ) ) STIPULATION, DECISION and COMMON SENSE VOTERS, SF 2010; VOTE ) ORDER FOR MARK FARRELL FOR DISTRICT2 +) SUPERVISOR AND CHRIS LEE ) ) ) ) Respondents. Complainant Fair Political Practices Commission and Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor committee and Chris Lee agree that this Stipulation will be submitted for consideration by the Fair Political Practices Commission at its next regularly scheduled meeting. The parties agree to enter into this Stipulation to resolve all factual and legal issues raised in this matter and to reach a final disposition without the necessity of holding an administrative hearing to determine the liability of Respondents, pursuant to Section 83116 of the Government Code. ~ Respondents understand, and hereby knowingly and voluntarily waive, any and all procedural rights set forth in Sections 83115.5, 11503 and 11523 of the Government Code, and in Sections 18361.1 through 18361.9 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations. This includes, but is not limited to, the right to personally appear at any administrative hearing held in this matter, to be represented by an STIPULATION, DECISION AND ORDER FPPC NO. 10/973Cm IY AH BR WBN RP oNMN NY NR RNY NN KY SF Se Be Se Be ee Be ee oI AA BBN = SCH ADA HA BP wWwNKH = SO attorney at Respondents’ own expense, to confront and cross-examine all witnesses testifying at the hearing, to subpoena witnesses to testify at the hearing, to have an impartial administrative law judge preside over the hearing as a hearing officer, and to have the matter judicially reviewed. It is further stipulated and agreed that Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor committee and Chris Lee violated the Political Reform Act by failing to file an amended statement of organization within 10 days to disclose that Respondent Committee was controlled by a candidate, in violation of Sections 84102, subdivisions (e) and (g), and 84103, subdivision (a), of the Government Code (1 count) and failing to use proper sender identification on mass mailers sent in support of Mark Farrell for District-2 Supervisor and against his opponent, Janet Reilly, which failed to display the name of the candidate controlling the committee, in violation of Section 84305 (4 counts). All counts are described in Exhibit 1, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Exhibit 1 is a true and accurate summary of the facts in this matter. Respondents agree to the issuance of the Decision and Order, which is attached hereto. Respondents also agree to the Commission imposing upon them an administrative penalty in the amount of Fourteen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($14,500). A cashier’s check from Respondents in said amount, made payable to the “General Fund of the State of California,” is submitted with this Stipulation as full payment of the administrative penalty, to be held by the State of California until the Commission issues its decision and order regarding this matter. The parties agree that in the event the Commission refuses to accept this Stipulation, it shall become null and void, and within fifteen (15) business days after the Commission meeting at which the Stipulation is rejected, all payments tendered by Respondents in connection with this Stipulation shall be reimbursed to Respondents. Respondents further stipulate and agree that in the event the Commission rejects the Stipulation, and a full evidentiary) hearing before the Commission becomes necessary, neither any member of the Commission, nor the Executive Director, shall be disqualified because of prior consideration of this Stipulation. 2 STIPULATION, DECISION AND ORDER, FPPC NO. 10/973Dated: HL Wit / Gary Winuk, Enforcement Chief, on behalf of the olitical Practices Commission Ue ris Lee, Respondent Individually and on beKalf of Common Sense Voters, ark SF 2010; Vote for Farrell for District 2 Supervisor DECISION AND ORDER The foregoing Stipulation of the parties “In the Matter of Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010: Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor and Chris Lee,” FPPC No. 10/973, including all attached exhibits, is hereby accepted as the final decision and order of the Fair Political Practices Commission, effective upon execution below by the Chairman. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: // [nfo One Kan be Joafin Remke, Chair / Ffir Political Practices Commission 3 STIPULATION, DECISION AND ORDER FPPC NO. 10/973EXHIBIT 1 INTRODUCTION In November 2010, the City and County of San Francisco held a ranked-choice voting election to elect the representative for District 2 of the Board of Supervisors. Respondent Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor (“Respondent CSV”) qualified as a primarily formed committee on October 1, 2010, and registered on October 13, 2010. At all relevant times, Respondent Stacy Owens (“Respondent Owens”) was the treasurer of the Respondent CSV and Henry C. Levy, was assistant treasurer. The principal officer for Respondent CSV was Jack Helfand (“Principal Officer Helfand”). In August 2009, Mark Farrell created a campaign committee for the November 2010 Supervisor race named the Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor 2010 committee (“Farrell Committee”). At all relevant times, Respondent Owens was the treasurer of the Respondent. CSV and Henry C. Levy, was assistant treasurer. Respondent CSV’s Principal Officer, Principal Officer Helfand, was a member of the fundraising subcommittee for the Farrell Committee for the November 2010 election campaign before leaving to form Respondent CSV. During this campaign, the Farrell Committee retained Chris Lee of Townsquare Consulting (“Respondent Lee”), as its campaign consultant. In September 2010, incumbent Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier was informed by the California courts that she was unable to run for reelection for her District 2 Supervisor seat. She then chose Mark Farrell, a candidate for District 2 Supervisor, to endorse as her replacement. She and her staff worked with Mark Farrell and his campaign consultant, Respondent Lee, during the course of the campaign to offer her endorsement and appear at events in support of Mark Farrell. In addition to this interaction with Mark Farrell and his staff, Supervisor Alioto-Pier was also in charge of the fundraising activities for Respondent CSV. Supervisor Alioto-Pier raised 86% of the contributions received by Respondent CSV. While Respondent Lee was a campaign consultant for the Farrell Committee, he also coordinated with Respondent CSV, Principal Officer Helfand and the campaign consultant for Respondent CSV, MSHC Partners, regarding the setup, fundraising, and initial campaign planning of Respondent CSV. Respondent Lee reached out to Principal Officer Helfand, who had previously volunteered for the Farrell Committee, to assist Principal Officer Helfand with the formation of Respondent CSV. In addition, Respondent Lee also had contacts with another mail house used by Respondent CSV to produce a door hanger. The door hanger was being produced as a Farrell support piece containing an endorsement letter written by Supervisor Alioto-Pier. Respondent Lee’s interactions with Respondent CSV and its staff caused Respondent CSV to become a controlled committee of Mark Farrell, instead of a committee primarily formed for his election, The evidence supports the finding that Mark Farrell did not authorize Respondent Lee, as an agent of the Farrell Committee, to coordinate with Respondent CSV. 1 EXHIBIT | IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION, DECISION AND ORDER FPPC NO. 10/973Under the Political Reform Act! (the “Act”), any person who violates any provision of this title, who purposely or negligently causes any other person to violate any provision of this title, or who aids and abets any other person in the violation of any provision of this title, shall be liable under the provisions of this chapter. As a result, Respondents were required to amend the statement of organization to reflect being a controlled committee and have all mailers identify the Farrell Committee as the sender of the mailer. For the purposes of this Stipulation, Respondents’ violations of the Act are stated as follows: COUNT 1: COUNT 2: COUNT 3: Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor failed to file an amended statement of organization within 10 days to disclose that Respondent Committee was a controlled committee and failed to add the name of the controlling candidate to the committee name. Respondent Chris Lee purposely or negligently caused this violation (within the meaning of Section 83116.5) through his role of campaign consultant for the Farrell Committee and his coordination with Respondent CSV, Principal Officer Helfand and the campaign consultant for Respondent CSV, MSHC Partners, regarding CSV’s setup, fundraising, and initial campaign planning. In this way, Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor and Chris Lee violated Government Code Sections 84102, subdivisions (e) and (g), and 84103, subdivision (a). Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor failed to use proper sender identification on a mass mailer sent on or about October 17, 2010, sent in support of Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor and against his opponent, Janet Reilly, which failed to display the name of the candidate controlling the committee. Respondent Chris Lee purposely or negligently caused this violation (within the meaning of Section 83116.5) through his role of campaign consultant for the Farrell Committee and his coordination with Respondent CSV, Principal Officer Helfand and the campaign consultant for Respondent CSV, MSHC Partners, regarding CSV’s setup, fundraising, and initial campaign planning. In this way, Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor and Chris Lee violated Government Code Section 84305. Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District : 2 Supervisor failed to use proper sender identification on a mass mailer sent on or about October 19, 2010, sent in support of Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor and against his opponent, Janet Reilly, which failed to display the name of the "The Political Reform Act is contained in Government Code Sections 81000 through 91014. All statutory references are to the Government Code as it was in effect at the time of the violations, unless otherwise indicated. The regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission are contained in Sections 18110 through 18997 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations. All regulatory references are to Title 2, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations as in effect at the time of the violations, unless otherwise indicated. 2 EXHIBIT | IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION, DECISION AND ORDER FPPC NO. 10/973COUNT 4: COUNT 5: candidate controlling the committee. Respondent Chris Lee purposely or negligently caused this violation (within the meaning of Section 83116.5) through his role of campaign consultant for the Farrell Committee and his coordination with Respondent CSV, Principal Officer Helfand and the campaign consultant for Respondent CSV, MSHC Partners, regarding CSV’s setup, fundraising, and initial campaign planning. In this way, Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor and Chris Lee violated Government Code Section 84305. Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor failed to use proper sender identification on two mass mailers sent on or about October 20, 2010, sent in support of Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor and against his opponent, Janet Reilly, which failed to display the name of the candidate controlling the committee. Respondent Chris Lee purposely or negligently caused this violation (within the meaning of Section 83116.5) through his role of campaign consultant for the Farrell Committee and his coordination with Respondent CSV, Principal Officer Helfand and the campaign consultant for Respondent CSV, MSHC Partners, regarding CSV’s setup, fundraising, and initial campaign planning. In this way, Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor and Chris Lee violated Government Code Section 84305. Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor failed to use proper sender identification on a mass mailer sent on or about October 25, 2010, sent in support of Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor and against his opponent, Janet Reilly, which failed to display the name of the candidate controlling the committee. Respondent Chris Lee purposely or negligently caused this violation (within the meaning of Section 83116.5) through his role of campaign consultant for the Farrell Committee and his coordination "with Respondent CSV, Principal Officer Helfand and the campaign consultant for Respondent CSV, MSHC Partners, regarding CSV’s setup, fundraising, and initial campaign planning. In this way, Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor and Chris Lee violated Government Code Section 84305. SUMMARY OF THE LAW When the Political Reform Act was enacted, the people of the state of California found and declared that previous laws regulating political practices suffered from inadequate enforcement by state and local authorities. (Section 81001, subd. (h).) To that end, Section 81003 requires that the Act be liberally construed to achieve its purposes. A committee includes any person or combination of persons who receive contributions totaling $1,000 or more in a calendar year. (Section 82013, subd. (a).) This type of committee commonly is referred to as a recipient committee. Section 82047.5 defines a primarily formed 3 EXHIBIT | IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION, DECISION AND ORDER FPPC NO. 10/973committee, in relevant part, as a committee which is formed or exists primarily to support or Oppose a single candidate, a single measure, a group of specific candidates being voted upon in the same city, county, or multicounty election, or two or more measures being voted upon in the same city, county, multicounty, or state election. By contrast, a controlled committee is one that is controlled directly or indirectly by a candidate or that acts jointly with a candidate in connection with the making of expenditures. (Section 82016.) A candidate controls a committee if the candidate, the candidate's agent, or any other committee-controlled by the candidate has a significant influence on the actions or decisions of the committee. Section 84102, subdivision (g), requires any other information shall be required by Commission regulations that are consistent with the purposes and provisions of this chapter. To further the well-established state interest in the integrity of its election processes, the Act imposes certain restrictions on candidates for elective offices, chiefly in the form of contribution limits and disclosure requirements. To insure that candidates and their supporters do not evade the Act’s contribution limits and disclosure requirements, these restrictions are extended to include the activities of persons who coordinate campaign spending with the candidates themselves, or with the candidates’ committees and agents. Duty to Amend Statement of Organization Section 84101 requires every recipient committee to file a statement of organization with the Secretary of State. Section 84102, subdivision (a), states that the statement of | organization shall include the committee’s name, street address and telephone number, if any. The statement of organization shall also include the full name, street address and telephone number, if any, of the treasurer and other principal officers of the committee. (Section 84102, subd. (c).) Section 84102, subdivision (e), states that the statement of organization shall include a statement of whether the committee is independent or controlled, and if controlled, the name of each candidate or state measure proponent by which it is controlled, or the name of any controlled committee with which it acts jointly. Regulation 18402, subdivision (c), requires that whenever identification of a committee is required by law, the identification shall include the full name of the committee as required in the statement of organization including the last name of each candidate that controls the committee. Section 84103, subdivision (a), requires that whenever there is a change in any of the information contained in a statement of organization, an amendment shall be filed within 10 days to reflect the change. Duty to Disclose Proper Sender Identification Section 84305, subdivision (a), requires candidates and committees to properly identify themselves when sending a mass mailing. Specifically, the statute provides that no candidate or committee shall send a mass mailing unless the name, street address, and city of the candidate or committee are shown on the outside of each piece of mail in the mass mailing. If the sender of the mass mailing is a controlled committee, Section 84305, subdivision (c), requires that the 4 EXHIBIT 1 IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION, DECISION AND ORDER FPPC NO. 10/973name of the candidate, as well as the name of the committee, be included on the mass mailing. Section 82041.5 defines a “mass mailing” as over two hundred substantially similar pieces of mail, but does not include a form letter or other mail which is sent in response to an unsolicited request, letter or other inquiry. Regulation 18435, subdivision (a), clarifies this section, and further defines a mass mailing as over two hundred substantially similar pieces of mail sent in a calendar month. Joint and Several Liability for Causing Another to Violate the Act Recognizing that the law should hold accountable not only those persons who directly commit violations, but also those persons who encourage or assist in the commission of violations, the Act extends liability for a violation to include anyone who causes, either intentionally or negligently, or aids and abets in the violation of the Act. Section 83116.5 imposes liability for violating the Act on those who: (i) violate the Act; (ii) purposely or negligently cause another to violate the Act; or (iii) aid and abet another in violating the Act. When two or more persons are responsible for a violation of the Act, they are jointly and severally liable. (Section 91006.) SUMMARY OF THE FACTS In November 2010, the City and County of San Francisco held a ranked-choice voting election to elect the representative for District 2 of the Board of Supervisors. Respondent CSV qualified as a primarily formed committee on October 1, 2010, and registered on October 13, 2010. As discussed above, while Respondent Lee was a campaign consultant for the Farrell Committee, he also coordinated with Respondent CSV, Principal Officer Helfand and the campaign consultant for Respondent CSV, MSHC Partners, regarding the setup, fundraising and initial campaign planning of Respondent CSV. Respondent Lee’s interactions with Respondent ’ CSV and its staff caused Respondent CSV to become a controlled committee of Mark Farrell, instead of a committee primarily formed for his election. As such, under the Act, Respondents were required to amend the statement of organization to reflect being a controlled committee and have all mailers identify the Farrell Committee as the sender of the mailer. COUNT1 Failure to Amend Statement of Organization Respondent CSV qualified as a primarily formed committee on October 1, 2010, and filed a statement of organization reflected that information on October 13, 2010. Respondent CSV disclosed that it was formed to support candidate Mark Farrell for County Supervisor of the City and County of San Francisco for District 2. As mentioned above, Mark Farrell had a campaign committee for this election, the Farrell Committee. While Respondent Lee was a campaign consultant for the Farrell Committee, he coordinated with Respondent CSV, Principal Officer Helfand and the campaign consultant for Respondent CSV, MSHC Partners, regarding its setup, fundraising and initial campaign planning. In addition, Respondent Lee also had contacts with another mail house used by Respondent CSV to produce a door hanger. The door hanger 5 EXHIBIT | IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION, DECISION AND ORDER FPPC NO. 10/973was being produced as a Farrell support piece containing an endorsement letter written by Supervisor Alioto-Pier. Through these interactions, Respondent Lee, an agent of the Farrell Committee, thereby had significant influence on the Respondent CSV and thus caused Respondent CSV to become a controlled committee of Mark Farrell. As a candidate controlled committee, Respondents were required to include in the name of the candidate controlling the committee in the name of Respondent Committee. Respondents failed to provide this required information in the name of Respondent CSV and failed to amend the statement of organization. Thus, Respondent CSV failed to file an amended statement of organization within 10 days to disclose that Respondent Committee was a controlled committee and failed to add the name of the controlling candidate to the committee name. Respondent Chris Lee caused this violation (within the meaning of Section 83116.5) through his role of campaign consultant for the Farrell Committee and his coordination with Respondent CSV, Principal Officer Helfand and the campaign consultant for Respondent CSV, MSHC Partners, regarding its setup, fundraising and initial campaign planning. In this way, Respondents CSV and Chris Lee violated Government Code Sections 84102, subdivisions (e) and (g), and 84103, subdivision (a). COUNTS 2-5 Failure to Disclose the Controlling Candidate in Mass Mailings Section 82041.5 and Regulation 18435 define a “mass mailing” as over 200 substantially similar pieces of mail sent in a calendar month, which are not sent in response to an unsolicited request. Section 84305, subdivision (a), requires candidates and committees to properly identify themselves when sending a mass mailing. Pursuant to Section 84305, subdivision (b), ifa candidate or committee sends a mass mailing, the name, street address, and city of the candidate or committee must be shown on the outside of each piece of mail sent as part of the mass mailing, in no less than 6-point type, which shall be in a color or print which contrasts with the background, so as to easily legible. Furthermore, if the sender of a mass mailing is a controlled committee, the name of the person controlling the committee must also be included in each piece of mail. (Section 84305, subd. (c).) Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor failed to use proper sender identification on mass mailers sent on or about October 17, 2010, through October 25, 2010, sent in support of Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor and against his opponent, Janet Reilly, which failed to display the name of the candidate controlling the committee. Respondent Chris Lee caused this violation (within the meaning of Section 83116.5) through his role of campaign consultant for the Farrell Committee and his coordination with Respondent CSV, Principal Officer Helfand and the campaign consultant for Respondent CSV, MSHC Partners, regarding its setup, fundraising and initial campaign planning. The mailers are detailed below: 6 EXHIBIT | IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION, DECISION AND ORDER FPPC NO. 10/973Mailer Title Date Quantity (approx.) The Man Behind the Curtain 10/17/10 12,248 Captain Mysterious Mail Piece 10/19/10 20,239 CMV1003: Proposition H 10/20/10 40,478 Negative/CMV 1005: Comparative 11757 Farrell Doorhanger 03 10/25/10 25,000 Thus, Respondents Common Sense Voters, SF 2010; Vote for Mark Farrell for District 2 Supervisor and Chris Lee violated Government Code Section 84305 four times. CONCLUSION This matter consists of five counts of violating the Act, which carries a maximum administrative penalty of five thousand dollars ($5,000) per count. In determining the appropriate penalty for a particular violation of the Act, the Enforcement Division considers the typical treatment of a violation in the overall statutory scheme of the Act, with an emphasis on serving the purposes and intent of the Act. The Enforcement Division also considers the facts and circumstances of the violation in context of the factors set forth in Regulation 18361.5, subdivision (d)(1)-(6), which include: the seriousness of the violations; the presence or lack of intent to deceive the voting public; whether the violation was deliberate, negligent, or inadvertent; whether the Respondent demonstrated good faith in consulting with Commission staff; whether there was a pattern of violations; and whether upon learning of the violation the Respondent voluntarily filed amendment to provide full disclosure. Additionally, liability under the Act is governed in significant part by the provisions of Section 91001, subdivision (c), which requires the Commission to consider whether or not a violation is inadvertent, negligent or deliberate, and the presence or absence of good faith, in applying remedies and sanctions, Statement of Organization: Respondents had a duty to file an amendment to the statement of organization to disclose it was no longer a primarily formed committee but a controlled committee after the actions of Respondent Lee caused this status change. The amendment was needed to include in the name of the candidate controlling the committee in the name of Respondent CSV. Respondents failed to provide this required information in the name of Respondent CSV and failed to amend the statement of organization. The failure to amend the statement of organization concealed from the public the true nature of the Respondent CSV’s activity. In aggravation, these actions coordinating the committees gave an unlawful advantage to one side in an election which was decided by only the slimmest of margins. In mitigation, Respondents filed other campaign information correctly and the name of the committee disclosed its support of Mark Farrell. Other cases regarding the failure to amend a statement of organization recently approved by the Commission include: 7 EXHIBIT | IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION, DECISION AND ORDER FPPC NO. 10/973In the Matter of Put California Back to Work, Sponsored by the Civil Justice Association of California and J. Richard Eichman, FPPC No. 10/504. Respondents formed as a state general purpose committee and failed to amend the statement of organization when the committee became primarily formed. The committee was aware of the requirement, having been told by the treasurer, and chose not to timely amend the statement. A $3,500 stipulated settlement was approved for this violation by the Commission on March 15, 2012. In the Matter of Californians for SAFE Food, a coalition of public health and food safety experts, labor unions, consumers, family farmers, and veterinarians. No on Proposition 2, FPPC No. 08/515. This case involved one count of failing to name a sponsor on the statement of organization and one count of failing to amend the statement of organization to include a sponsor. A $2,500 penalty for the each count was approved by the Commission on April 8, 2010. In this matter, Respondent CSV’s actions were serious as Respondent CSV coordinated with the candidate’s campaign consultant. However, in mitigation, Principal Officer Helfand had little campaign experience and neither of the Respondents have a history of violating the Act. Therefore, imposition of an administrative penalty in the amount of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) is recommended. Sender Identification: As a candidate controlled committee, Respondents had a duty to display on the mass mailing the name of the controlling candidate. The failure to provide proper disclosure in a mass mailing deprives the public of important information by making them believe that the mailing is independent of a candidate. In aggravation, Respondent CSV was able to send out hit pieces on opponents without disclosing its association with the candidate. Also, without the statement of organization’s amendment, the public would not have been able to trace the association back to the candidate. Further, Respondent CSV was involved in multiple advertisements, all of which failed to provide proper disclosure. In mitigation, the name of Respondent CSV clearly presented its support of candidate Mark Farrell and Respondents have cooperated with the investigation and assert that the contacts and coordination were the actions of only one individual who believed that he was acting within the law. Other similar cases regarding failing to properly include the required disclosure statements on mailers recently approved by the Commission include: In the Matter of Alan Frank, Alan Frank for City Council 2012, and Jeff Buchanan, FPPC No. 12/890. Staff: Commission Counsel Zachary Norton and Special Investigator Paul Rasey. Respondent, Alan Frank, was an unsuccessful candidate for Placentia City Council in the November 6, 2012 election. Alan Frank for City Council 2012 was Respondent Frank’s candidate controlled committee, and Respondent Jeff Buchanan was the Treasurer of the committee. Prior to the election, Respondents paid for and caused to be sent two mass mailers which failed to identify Respondents as the senders of the mailers in violation of Government Code Section 84305, subdivision (a) (1 count). A stipulated settlement of $2,500 was approved by the Commission on September 19, 2013. 8 EXHIBIT 1 IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION, DECISION AND ORDER FPPC NO. 10/973In the Matter of Protect Burlingame and Kevin Osborne, FPPC No. 09/804. This case involved two mailers in a local election campaign, each sent to approximately 7,000 households, which lacked sender identification. Respondent in this matter did not have an Enforcement history. A $2,500 penalty was approved by the Commission on April 11, 2011. In this matter, Respondents failed to provide proper disclosure statements as a result of failing to properly file as a candidate controlled committee and concealing the connection between the candidate-controlled committee and the committee which was supposed to be independent of it. Taking into consideration the factors above, imposition of an administrative penalty of three thousand dollars ($3,000) is recommended for each of the four counts. PROPOSED PENALTY After consideration of the factors of Regulation 18361.5, as well as consideration of penalties in prior enforcement actions, the imposition of a penalty of Fourteen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($14,500) is recommended. 9 EXHIBIT 1 IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION, DECISION AND ORDER. FPPC NO. 10/973EXHIBIT BBIWOWED JO AS (Cece-auz19p8) Odds-MSV/898 sound Coss-0L Daas (go/Arenuer) ogy u04 Sdd4 qUsuoddld aNSPON GIES Ag ed ‘UO peynoexS }2UOdO ld GUNRBON OFS ‘HBDIDURD ePIOURONC BuO4U0D Jo ETUBUOES fa 280 uo penoerg 080d 16 J201U0 ejcyeuodeey 30 jueLodald auNeweY eS “BIEPPUED ‘JeprOYeCWO Bugoguo[ jo euraUGIS fa onc uo peynosxy a fa are erat €£$ prong “panos pue any S| BujoBaioj ayy yeu) eLWOMI2D JO B}exG 94} 40 SMe] aU} JapUN Ainfied jo Ayeued Jepun Aygo | ‘@j9/dwoo pue ony 8] seinpayos peypeye ou) ul pue Uleley PaujeyUCD UORELOJU eYy eBpEynoUy Aw jo jseq eUp O} pUE jUsWE}E]s SIL BuMa|Aad pu Buedaud u| eoueBy!p ejqeuosees |e pesn eneY | UOHeIYWEA “7 SSBYCCY TWW-3 | XV3_“TWNOILdO WOD | yeuDeareOADSUSSTOUMOD SS3UGY TWW-3 / XV “WNOLLdO 000T-2s9 (OTS) BT9F6 w ‘PueTyeo BNOHe/3009 WSuV 3009 diz BiWLs ALO BNOHd/3000 VEN 3009 diz 3iv1S ALD SS3uddY ONTIVN X08 ‘O'd YO 133N1S CNV “ON (LN3¥333/0 3!) SSSuddV ONNIVN Ansy “) AqusH “AW VIST-898 (059 290%6 Ww SPTBPOOM ANY di H3UNSVSYL INVISISSY JO 3WVN 3NOHd/3G00 VauV. 3009 diz 3lvis ALID- O00T-2S9 (OTS) B19b6 Ww PUeTHEO BNOHafaG0D VauV g09 diz__alvis ALIg (x08 ‘Od ON) SsaaGy 13zMIs SS3Yd0V ONIIVN susno AS635 SH zostazedns @ 3FAISFA AOZ TlerzzegT YIeW TOF 990A !OTOZ As ‘s81870A Ssuag UOMMIOD U3YUNSVSYL JO SAWN (S3.LLINWO9 ON 4! SWWN S.31VCIGNVS 40) SWWN SSLLINWOD 6T6ZEET “ (sMeunsees MBEAN “ol uoeUUOjUL eeyIWWOD “¢ (arc evdueg cary) SOHIWWOD jeNUED/ALEd |eOAIOd CD ‘BEPC JaPjOYSoO @aHIWUWOD JO;NGL|UOD JES C) fayepipued pauuios Awewd C] Paosuods Q (mojaq ujeidxa) wauipueury [] ict ony SeyjMoD esoding jeleuam [] 6h UNO YORHY - JUBLUBIEIS: (uopeuual Oy WO B a1. osty) SUD eyoqdweg yoppajaaig |ejuewaiddng (] quowayms uopeujueL (] eames - ce oa yoday se@,-ppo jepads [] quewsyas jenuue-weg C] eapWOD SoTIUWOD LORIE! eeppUED ae1g CE queweyas Aueeno C) quawayes uopoajeais [] ainseey jojleg pauuo AME [X] — @BYILULOD ParfoUOD eJep|pueD YepyoysoWO [] squeulezEg Jo odAL ‘Z “y pus '¢ 2 “L eed melduiog ~ seeHiuMOD IY :@e}JUIOD JueIdIDey Jo edAL “| ot0e7e0/7TT ot0e/st/oT uBnosuyy 3SUSAIY NO SNOILONULSNI 33S Alu 987 feI01HO 404 wo OT0z/T0/TO 710 ebeg (ee, ‘Keg “yjUoW) ane tejqeaydde 4 uopoeje jo eyeq| —poysed seAoo yuowazE)S (S'9L28-00Z%8 SUOIOeg epoD yUEWWEAED) abeg J2A05 [or] id Pre Tae quawiaje}g uBjeduie ) duis seq squy up qupd so ed AL @@PIWUWOD JUaIdIDay ©“aro © | ‘Byusogyed 40 (Z22£-912/998) Odd-+MSVI99R :OUIGIOH 61+1101 Odd a (aorhrenuer) opy utios oddt Auesseoeu 4 Sjo0ys uopenupuos YoERY BNOHd/3009 V34V 3009 diz Bivis ALIO {x08 ‘O'd ON) SSIUGGV L3SNLS SS3uCOV S3LLUAWOD asoddo 4uoddns [] on] sx 0 3H YO LHONOS 391540 ALVOIONWD YO YACTOHIOISIO JO SWWN {SALLIWWOD GSTIONLNOD waUNSWauL 4O SN asoddo 1] tuodans 11 | ara yo sHonos a0iss0 HIVGIONVD HO YACTOH3O144O 40 3WYN heer Tisai tunel asoddo 1] 4uoaans () 13H YO LHONOS 3d!4IO BLVGIGNVD HO H3CTOH3OII4O 40 3WYN aNOHa/adoo Vauy 3000 diz aiwis ALIO asoddo [] tuodans T1] qiau wo uHenos Z01s40| __IVaION¥O HO YaGTOHSOIIIO 4O WYN bxoe Oe ON) SSaod¥ 13Su18 SSSN0OV 33 LUNWOD oO sa 0 ‘pauuos Ajseussd s} BeyyWIUIO? S/LR Y>1YM 403 (s)ezepjpUeD JO (s)sepfoyer4yO 2 aALLIWWOO G3TIONLNOD UBUNSWSUL JO 3WWN 40 soweu sr] BayIWWOD Jepjoysd1yO/ayepIpueD PeuUoy Ajueudd “L USEWNN ‘OT SWVN SALLUINWOO -fowpipueo snok jo jjey2q Uo seimypuadxe eyeu! 410 suopNGInUOD 2Ajoreu 0} paullos Aewid aue 40 Nod Aq poyjonuod ase yeIp IUOWIE}E}S S]LB UJ PopNjaU! JOU Seayyuwo? Aue IST] :JUBWBJE}S S|Y} U] PEPNIDU| JON SAEeVIWWOD payejay ANY i ‘ON LOSI @3H YO LHONOS 391530 AN3NOdOUd HO 'SLVGIONVO ‘Y3QIOHAOIIIO JO SNVN ‘hue }] Queuodoud einseow 6723s 10 ‘eyepipues “Aepjoyesjyo Buyjjo.yu0s ey Ayjuep) IZ Alvis, ALD (Wa3uLS ONV ON) SSIYCGY SSINISNSMIVILNAGISSY asoddo [] 4uodans L] NowWolasiunr ¥13L1374O ‘ON LOTIVE (@1avordav JI YSSWAN LORILSIO ONY NOLW907 SGNTOND 13H YO LHONOS 391340 AUNSV3SW LOTIVE JO SWWN AILWGIGNW9 YO ¥3010H39IS40 40 SYN SayIWIWIOD aINsea; jO}}eq Pawo AjueWig 9 BAYIWWOD pa|jojuOg ayepipuey Jo 4apjoyer1yO “¢ Z Hed — abeg J9A09 ce} 1 La yuawie}e}g uBjedwieg Nite ah ee) BaYIWIWOD Jaldioay @ LYWd~ 39d YSA09 uy uy jupd 40 edAL,(ZLL€-922/998) Odd4-MSV/998 OulIdeH Ge14-101 Ddd4 ‘siqeq Bulpueysino “6L (so/Arenuer) ogy wos Sd 000s eaoge g ULUNjOD UI g BUT + Z OUT] PY * aoe ‘esrenal vo suogonysu} 68S ~ squajeainby Yyseo ‘gL “(Aue ¥) 6 pue ‘2 ‘z sau] toe s}qeq Bujpueysyno pue sjuejeainb3 yseo Aus Aquo “te0k sepusyen sip 10, | 0070S Z wee ‘a ampaues GHAIOSY SIaLNVUVND NVOT'Z1 paly Bujaq yodau ysuy ayy 81 SIMI J “sJUNOWE pouad “alez 0g Jsnu 9} aur] quoWa}E}S UOHeUIUUA} e S! SIU) J) snojneid woy pepeqgns aq pinoys yeu seznBy | O5-o05 "ors 9b eur] PeAgNS UeY) ‘bt + EL + 2b S8UTT PPY “*""" FON IVE HSW9 ONIGNA ‘S| es 29 Bu _ aa apne anoge g eur] "y uLIn}OD “" syueWAed YSBD ‘S| “gUWN}O9 Ul peyodas ‘K - 7 7 7 sjUNoUre Woy jueLaYIp aq A2w UONDAS s|ip Ul s|UNOWLY, ena ae S pndaaiion 00708 » BUT] ‘} aInpEYDS Yseg 0} Saseajou| snoaueljeosiw ‘pL BY} O} y ULUN}OD Uy sunowe | 00° 00S*OEs enoge € Bury ‘y Uuin}oD * sydisdeu Ysed “EL pe ‘g uUNjoD ayeIng}B9 OL 30708 91 Our] ‘eB Aleuuing snojAaid, eourjeg yseo Bujuulbeg ‘Zz, $ T T JUBLUB}E}S YSED JUsLIND $ T T a $ WTF ob +6+8 Sur ppy HOV SSYNLIGNAdXS TWLOL “bb (AAyppyuiu) 00°08 00°0$ © 8ur7 ‘9 sinpayas queujsnipy AueysuowUON ‘OL 818C 9} [e}0L woROa|3 J0 BEC 00°08 d0°08 # eur] 4 einpeyos pledun) sesuedxy penooy ‘6 (aur eunipuedea Ammon ov29fang st 000s $ 00708 2+9 SeurT pPy SLNSWAVd HSVOTVLOLENS 8 s8PRW Sesny|puedxy eaneinuNy “zz 0008 30°08 © @ur7 'H ainpayos “"epeiN SUBO] “2 ‘sejyepipueg 00°08 $ do-0s y eur] "2 einpsyos “@pew sjuewked “g 93235 103 Aueuiuing yw] eanj|puedx3 apew seunjipuedxy See ‘epew 00° 00s ’oe$ $ b0-00s ‘oes 7 +E seUrt PRY ~~ * G3AIZD3Y SNOILNSIMLNOO WLOL 'S seimypuedxa “1Z o0-08 oF © 8urT ‘9 eImpayos “SuORNgUyUOD AleJeuOWUON ‘y 7 7 suopnainuos “oz 00°00S‘0E$ $ Qo-o05 oes @+ 4 sour ppy ” SNOLLNEINLNOD HSVOWWLOLENS “€ * € 8urT ‘g sinpeYyos: “* PBAIBIBY SUBO 7 VE OF L/L of/9 YBnouMy L/L ee a ee te 00087088 $ So-008 708s eou'y 1S * suoRNguyuoD AleyeuoW “| suonoa/y [esauad pue Aiewilid 33235 ay) Yog ul Bujuuny Svaravenawo! ee sajyep|pued Jo} Arewuing sea, sepugyeg quuinjoo yuuwnjoo Penjedey SUOHNGLIUOD eee zostazedns Z 4OTAISTA AOF Tleizea yTeW ZOF BI0A ‘OTOZ AS ‘82890, Ssuasg UOWMIOD SEWN ‘OT ual 40 3WYN 7— jo —~— obey STORTST/OT uBnosuy ‘BSUBATY NO SNOLLONULSNI 33S ~~ Ohh 4 eenrene Vd ANVWANS Ppoyed sieA09 yuewE;e}S at0z/t0/T0 uloay *sie{Jop e]0yM 0} pepunoi oq Kew syunowy ‘quy uy gud 40 edAy O e6eg Auewuns juaulejejs ainsojosig uBjedweg(222€-$22/958) Odd 5-SV/998 :UIIdIOH 6854-1101 Idd (so/Arenuer) o9 wood Dddd (Aqua ssausng (09S 10 Ald ueUI Jey0) sanMUUiog wa\dDey— WOO d0- 005 Oe $ WLOL™ 00" 00S OES $ O O ("| aur] ‘y uunjog ‘eBeg Arewuing ay} uo pue aay Jajug *Z pue | Saul] ppy) “pouiad Siu} panjaoad suo}NqUyUOS ALejeUOW [BIOL “E * 001g UeY} ssa] Jo suONgUJUOS ANeyeuOW paziWayUN — pouiad sil} paalede, JUNOWY *Z (‘sjeqojgns y ainpayps |]2 epnjoul) “suoyNqujuoo Aueyeuow peziwey! — pouad siyj paajaoes juNoWly “| lenpwipul— NI s@pog so;nquUED, Aiewiuins vy einpeyog “00S '0E$ $1vLoLans oosO 5 TH oosyouers ues NaO BTTb6 WO ¥F Teardea oTsTOed prepuers| or 00°000'TS oTD|00"000'TS 00" 000‘TS zebeuey ssautsng ani] uesereyuen fey] OT07/80/0T sos) oa BZO0OT AN %TOR MON ort rescore testes aya] HOLT 00°000'STS OTH}00 "000 ‘STS 100" 000 ‘STS ZOsyTApy JuewySseAUT Trapeqybow uemmey| 0T02/Z0/0T STTb6 WO OOBTOUPIa UPS seqepoossy eaozez| oo 00°000'sS otp|00"000's$ (00 000'S$ qeXteuy| oni] unosTen “x xe] 0T0Z/80/0T sos ETIbE VO OosToOURTa UES AidG] quowebeuey Teytdep staz¥| oo 00°000'z$ oro|o0" 000 ‘zs joo" 000'zs azebeuey ssoutsng| ani] puowey praeg| OT0z/z0/0T soos] oostouera weg AldO) STTb6 WO Ti aA OTT ‘Teatdep Avg uopuor| ee 00°00S'LS OtS/00"00S ‘L$ joo" 00s‘ zs O89] ani) sXkazyduny «mM wes| 0T0Z/80/0T (aauinoay 3) (‘030-1 'Nvn) aon a (Ga4IND3U “oad - ad NWN UaING OBAOTANIT3S = 3000 i 1 GaAI3034 aLvgOL VBA BVONaTWO SIHL G3AI3038 W3AO IAW GNV NOLWdNI0- (uaQNNN-O1NBINIOSTY'33LUINMOD 4) —_ NOLLO33 Mad IVC OLSALWINWNS “ANNOY UL “TVNGIAIGNI NV 2 HOANEIELNOD | YoLNGNNOD 4O 309 diz ONY SSSHAAv L3AU1S 'BWYN TINS ereceeT aostarsdng Z 3OTIISTd 7OJ T127Teg AIEH TOJ aI0A /OTOZ aS ‘S70I0A esas LOUMIOD YasNNN ‘OT 431d 30 SWVN ASUBAIY NO SNOLLONYLSNI 33S 5 10 Bed Dtoz/st/oT _ YBnosyy ‘Ot0z/T0/10 wos tt) 8) 174 eran Vv SINGSHOS: poyed s1enoo jueweyers “SIE|IOP EJOYM OF pepunos eq Aow syunowy “uy uy upd 40 edAL panlasay SuCHNqUIUOD AueyeuOW VanpeyasBIWOHIED Jo HENS (7228-922/988) Odds-MSV/998 :UlIdIEH eet1OL Idd (a0/Arenuer) os% wos Sd 70 uo peynoex3 ona ‘uo peynoexg 20 pueuodaid aInsaaiy | 0 euyUbiS od ‘a uo peynoexg Jenene | urry 0 unewe pe WBUOIS ea BUM AOEIS fa Troe/te/t0 uo penoex ‘Ayjueo | “a}9;duoo pue any 5] sainpayos payee oly Ul pu Uja/8y PAUjE|OD UORBUUOJUT aL aBpE;MoLDy AU Jo 1Saq oUy 0} PUE jUOWEHEIs SK BuMelAes pue Buyedeid ul eoUeByp eqeuosess jje psn aney | “pauoo pue anuj sj BujoBavoy ayy Jey} BIWO;}ED JO BeIg BU} JO.MB| ey] JepUN Ainiad jo. Ayjeued Japun UORROYHOA "y SSANOOY WW / X¥4_“TWNOLLdO Woo” T FeubosxoqoASsUeSUOULIOD SS3udgy TWW3 / X¥3_“TWNOLLdO O00T-e59 (OTS) BTavE w PHETHEO SNOHd/a009 vay 3009 diz Biwis ALO SNOHd/3009 WSaHv 3009 diz Bivis ALID ssauddy ONTIVW X08 ‘O'd YO 1331S GNV ‘ON (LN3N344I0 4) SSSUOGV ONITIVN, AasT “D AiweH “iW WIST-898 (059) 79006 wo ‘SPTSpOomM ANY JI "YSYNSVSUL LNVISISSY JO SNVN SNOHd/3000 WayV 3009 diz BuWis ALID O00T-E59 (OTS) Brave w PIETXEO SNOHd/3009 Way 3009 diz Svs ALD (x08 ‘O'd ON) SSSYOOY 135uLS SS3YGOV ONITIV Bteno Aoeas si zosfazedns Z% AOPTISFa JO¥ [Terres ATEN TOF BION ‘OTOZ AS 'BIEI0A asus LOUMOD yaUNSVIYL JO _SNVN (Q3LLINWOD ON JI SN S.3ivOIGNVD HO) SWYN S3LLIWWOD GI6ZEET “ (shounseouy, ee UOPeUUOJU] BeRJWWOD “¢ (zed enctu0g ospy) saRIUUOD jeNUag/AYeY [eO1N10d CO BaYIUILUOD JapIOYeOWIO @ayWUIOD JOINAURUOD eS C) fevepjpueg pauuos Awewtd C] paiosuods © (mojeq Weidxg) uewpuauy [7] seayJUWOD esoding jeaues [] jowsey (ms 409 0679) S$6y UL YORHY - AWIO}EIS (uopeumual OLy uu e aly Osty) pauosuods © (6 eq ayorduion osty) uoppajeaid jeyuawiaddng [] quawieyeig uopeuua! [] payoquey O e994 OQ wodey seA-ppo jepeds [] quawayag jenuue-was [) SayILILIOD |ayIWWUOD UoRDeIa BEPIPUED BIS C) quaweras AuauenD (] quoursyeis uopejealg [E] aunseay joWeg PaUUOs AeWd [X] aayIULLIOD PayjoNuD eyepipued ‘epjoysoyO [] sjuewejzeys jo edAy “Zz “y pur ‘¢ 'Z ‘b Suey eyeduOD ~ seeHIUWOD IY :BOTIUILUOD JUBICJIey Jo OdAL *} ‘Ot0e/e0/tt Oroe/te/et yBhosuy SWATY NO SNOILONELSNI 33S ‘Au 887 [e!0MYO 404 wod otOz/LT/OT =~ — > oles wee, ‘heq “yjuoyy) iv se1qeoidde y) uoROe]e yo eyeq Poped sieA0d jUEWEE}S . (s'91Z¥8-00Zb8 suOnoes epoD yuawUeAdD) eBeg 12A09 rt] 3] sr ote juauiezeyg uBjeduieg V7 (oF Eh 2) dumg cea “quy uy quyd 40 ed Ay +" 3ovd' ©BjuoeD 40 oS (Z220-922/998) Sdd-+MSV/998 ‘OUNIdIEH CSIFHIOL Odd (a0/Asenuer) ogy wi04 Odd Auessooeu 4 s}904s uopENnuRUOD YoEnY BNOHd/3009 Wau 3009 diz Buvis ALIO (x08 ‘0d ON) SSBYCCV L33uLS ‘SS3YCCY 33LLINWOD asoddo 1] iuoddns [) oO sa O Q13H YO LHONOS 301440 SLVOIONV9 YO Y3C10H301340 JO SWWN ¢3LLINWOD GaTIONLNOD MaYNSWSuL JO WN asoddo 1) teoddns [) | si uo snonos 301330 BIVGIGNVD YO Y3GTOH3OISIO JO SWWN ua8WNN ‘Cl BIN ZALLINWOO asoddo 1] iuodans [) 13H YO LHONOS 301440 BIVGIGNYD YO Y3TOHIOISIO JO 3WYN BNOHd/3009 vauv 3009 diz_alvis ALIO 3soddo [) twodans 11} gis wo inonos 291440] _SIVGIGNVO YO W3GTOHaOIsO 40 3NWN {x08 Od ON) SS3UOV.133UAS. SSSUCOW SBLNOD on) sx 1 POULOY AyreWLA sj ay;UIUOD IYI Y>IYM 404 (s)asep/pUed 40 (s)ep]OYyeL4O U33LLINNOD G3TIONLNOD UAUNSVaUL JO SVN Jo SOWEUIST] BAYIWIWOD Jepjoyer14O/e}ep|pueg peuuoy AjseUd *L YSSWNN ‘OT BINVN 33.LLINNOD, “Aoepipues snod so yeyeq uo sainypuedxe eyeu! 40 suopnqiqucs ‘enjeoas of pounioy Ayseupd ase 10 NOA Aq pojjanuod exe jey3 juSWAIeS SYA UJ PEPNjIU] JOU seanuuod AUE IST] UBWIAYEIS SY} U} PAPN}IU] JON SBB_IWWOD pajEjey ANV SION LORiLSIC 13H YO LHONOS 391430 AN3NOdOUd HO ‘ALVGIGNYD 'H3GIOH391440 40 SAWN *hue 4 ‘jueuodosd esnseoul 04S 40 ‘eyepjpued ‘“sopjoyedyjo Buyjjosju0s ey; AyUepL diz amis ALIO__U33U1S GNVON)_SS3NGGY SSSNISNA/IWULNaGISSY asoddo 1] 4uoaans [] Nolwoiastane ¥ALLSTNO'ON LOTIVa (GISVON dav JI YASWAN LONLSIC GNW NOLW9O7 SGNIONI) G7SH YO LHONOS 39I4IO BuNSWaW LOTIVa 40 WN BUVOIGNVD YO HAGIOHSOISIO JO IWYN aapjUWOD einseey jolleg peuo, AjuewLig “9 BO}IWWUOD Pa|fosjUOD ayepIpued 40 JapjoYyes1yo ‘s Z He” — aed 12A09 1) ce] 74 paler juawayeys ubledwe9 SUN er nL A) BayIWWOD Juadioay Z.LUvd-3Ovd YIAOD quy uy jupd 40 od AL(2z20-922/998) Ddds-MSV/998 :OUNdoH 844-10, Odd sygeq Bulpueysing “6, (so/Auenuer) ogy wos Sad4 00°08 snoge g UUINIOD Uy 6 SUIT + Z BUTT PPY 00-08 essenal Uo SuopoNysU) eas syuejeainba yseg ‘g) “(Aue epee 'zseur we s}qaq Buipuej}sjno pue sjuajeainby yseo jowe ay} 4aA0 Aveo Auo se0k wepuaeD si) soy | 0070S 2 ued 'g enpayos ’ GSAIZOSY SSALNVYVND NVOT “2b paly Bujaq podss ysuy ayy Phelahe ay pepe ‘alez 9q Jsnwi 9} aur] ‘WaWe}E}s UopeUJULIA} & S} SIYR J ‘aq pinoys yey) sainBy. ge-sze'as Sb eur] BAIS YOY ‘pL + EL + ZL SOUT PPY 3ONW1V8 HSV ONIGNA ‘91 oy eroun euing niet ST LL ETS onoge @ SUIT "y uunIoD *syuewiked YSeO ‘SL “q uuunjog uy payodal 1 4 7 squnowze wow jualeyip-24q Bw UoVj2e8 sip U SJUNOLLRY, Se reae hig 00708 » eur ‘} aInpeyoS: Ysed 0} Sasealou] SnosuEl|eosiW ‘yL ayy 0} y UUNjoD Ul sjunoWe | Go-000'TeTS enoge ¢ oUrT ‘y uuNjOD sydjeoey yseg ‘¢} pe ‘g UUNjoD ayZINg]e9 OL 300087088 91 our] ‘eBeg Asewwing snojnaig * souejeg yseo Buluulbeg ‘z) $ T T jUueWa}e}S Ysed JUeLIND $ T t ST wel etes $ ST HLL EES OF + 6 + @ SOUT PPI SQVW S3YN.LIGNAdXAWLOL “bh (AAyppyus) 000s 00°0s € eurT ‘9 @inpayas * * quauujsnipy AJe}eUOWWUON ‘O} ae pres ee 00-08 0070S e eurT 4s emnpeyas"~ ““(siilg pledun) sesuedx3 penooy “6 (usr eumgpusdra Kimunton 0) 20fan a) ST VLE ELZS $ St wLe eres £+9 Sour] ppy * SLNSWAVd HSWOTWLOLENS “8 PEW Seunypuedxy eapeinUND ‘Zz : . 07 0F 00°08 8UrT 'H ainpayos "pe SUBO] “2 soqyepipueg | stoi.‘ etzs $ Stee ETZs § 8urT ‘3 eINpEyOS “@peW SjueWAed “9 93e3g 10} Arewiuing yw eanjipuedxy ape seunjpusdxy $ $ ape 0000S ‘tzzs $ d0-000'tets Wee SOUT ERY “ GAAIZO3Y SNOLLNEINLNODWLOL “S seinypuedxa “LZ 00-08 0-08 © 8urT 'D einpeyos “suoyNqujuCg AlejeuOWUON ‘y 7 : a oz 00° 00S ‘tzzs $ G0-000'tets @+ + Sour] ppY “" SNOLLNSINLNOD HSVOTWLOLENS “€ 00°08 00°08 € eurT ‘g enpeyos “" DEAIBIBY SUBO] ‘Z BEG 9} LiL o¢i9 UBnoM L/L 00-008 tees $ G0-000't6ts © @urT ‘y einpeuos “ suonngujuog AlejauoW “| suonoefy [es0ue5 pue Auewyd 2389S o43 YOR U! BuruuNy ance ema soyepipueg 40} Arewuing sea, sepuajeg quunjoo yuuinjoo Peajesey SUCHNqIUOD 6T6ZEET MSQWNN ‘OT Zostazedns Z OTIISTA A0z Tlezzed ATEN TOF 830A ‘OTOe AS ‘S7970A asuAaS UOWMOD Yad 4O SVN aT 10 —=— Bea it) .S) 174 SIeerinne BOvd ANWANINS: oroz/te7et _ UBnoayy Ot0e/2t70T wou Poyed sieaod jueWEIEIS “SueyJOp e]OyM 0} pepunos eq Aew syunowy “yuy uy ud so edAL © ‘SSUBATY NO SNOWLON