On September 20, 2017 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
County Of Fresno, A Political Subdivision Of The State Of California,
and
Centurylink Communications, Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company,
Fresno Irrigation District,
Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District,
Kazarian, Isabel,
Level 3 Communications, Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company,
Malaga County Water District,
Pacific Gas And Electric Company, A California Corporation,
R.K. Ltd., A California Limited Partnership,
Sprint Communications Company, L.P., A Delaware Limited Partnership,
Wiltel Communications, Llc, A Delaware Limited Lability Company,
for 14 Unlimited - Eminent Domain/Inverse Condemnation
in the District Court of Fresno County.
Preview
E-FILED
4/24/2018 5:01 PM
Lauren D. Layne #273 627 FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
BAKER MANOCK & JENSEN, PC
5260 North Palm Avenue, Fourth Floor
By: K. Daves, Deputy
Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: 559.432.5400
Facsimile: 559.432.5620
Attorneys for Defendant FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT
[Exempt From Filing Fees Pursuant t0 Govt. Code § 61 03]
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
\OOONQ
COUNTY OF FRESNO
10 COUNTY OF FRESNO, a political CASE No. 17CECG03254
subdivision 0f the State of California,
11 DISCLAIMER BY DEFENDANT FRESNO
Plaintiff, METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL
12 DISTRICT
v.
13 (Code CiV. Proc. § 1250.325)
R.K. LTD., a California Limited Pafinership;
14 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Judge: Hon. Mark W. Snauffer
COMPAN Y, a CalifOrnia Corporation; Action Filed: September 26, 2017
15 ISABEL KAZARIAN, an Individual;
FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRICT;
16 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT; MALAGA COUNTY
17 WATER DISTRICT; CENTURYLFNK
COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware
18 Limited Liability Company; SPRINT
COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., a
19 Delaware Limited Partnership; LEVEL 3
COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware
20 Limited Liability Company; WILTEL
COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware
21 Limited Liability Company; ALL PERSONS
UNKNOWN CLAIMING AN INTEREST IN
22 THE PROPERTY; and DOES 1 through 25,
inclusive,
23
Defendants.
24
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
2 1 3726 lvl /4496.4000
DISCLAIMER BY DEFENDANT FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
Defendant FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT hereby
disclaims any interest in just compensation to be paid for the subject property, reserving its rights
t0 assess and collect drainage fees pursuant to applicable drainage fee ordinances.
BAKER MANOCK & JENSEN, PC
UI-bLfiN
DATED: April 20, 201 8.
By:
fl Laur D. Layne
Attorneys for Defendant FRESNO
METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT
E, 2018.
%
10 DATED: April FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT
11
12
13
14
Alan Hofmann, General
WWW Manager
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
213726lv] /4496.4000
2
DISCLAIMER BY DEFENDANT FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY 0F FRESNO
At the time of service, I was over l8 years 0f age and not a party t0 this action. I am
employed in the County of Fresno, State of California. My business address is 5260 North Palm
Avenue, Fourth Floor, Fresno, CA 93 704.
On AprilZ $4201 8, I served true copies ofthe following document(s) described as
DISCLAIMER O '
DEFENDANT FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL
DISTRICT T0 COMPLAINT IN EMINENT DOMAIN on the interested parties in this action
as follows:
Wflo
KYLE R. ROBERSON
DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSEL
OFFICE OF THE FRESNO COUNTY COUNSEL
O 2220 TULARE ST
STE 500
10 FRESNO CA 93721
11 ,
BY MAIL: I enclosed the document(s) in a sealed envelope 0r package addressed
t0 the persons at the addresses listed in the Service List and placed the envelope for collection and
12 mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with Baker Manock &
Jensen, PC's practice for collecting and processing conespondence for mailing. On the same day
13 that the correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course
of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.
14
Ideclare under penalty ofperjury under the laws 0f the State of California that the
15 foregoing is true and correct.
16 Executed 0n Apr" ,2018, at Fresno, California.
17
18
SUSAN D. GRECO
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2137261v1 /4496,4000
3
DISCLAIMER BY DEFENDANT FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
Document Filed Date
April 24, 2018
Case Filing Date
September 20, 2017
Category
14 Unlimited - Eminent Domain/Inverse Condemnation
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.