On January 17, 2019 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Vinocur, Laurence,
and
Columbia Two, Inc.,
Does 1-150, Inclusive,
for OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
OW ND BRON
VW VR YON TN UNS VR Se ae ea ee
Se AF ROS B RS. 6 lw. Qa aR Bb aS
Clifford ‘A: Chanler, State Bar No: 135534,
THE CHANLER GROUP:
2550 Ninth Street, Suite. 205
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone:-(510)-848-8880.
Facsimile:.-(510)'848-8118
Email: clifford@chanler.com
Kimberly. Gates Johnson, State Bar No. 282369
GATES JOHNSON LAW.
2822 Moiaga Street
San Francisco, CA 94122
Telephone: (629) 219-7750:
Email: kimberly@gatesjohnson.com -
Attorneys for Plaintiff :
LAURENCE VINOCUR.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY-OF SAN FRANCISCO"
: ~ UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
LAURENCE VINOCUR,
Plaintiff,
v. ~ . .
COLUMBIA TWO; INC.; etal,
Defendants.
_[BROROSED] ORDER APPROVING
San Francisco County Superior Court
DEC 05 2019
CLERK QE THE COURT:
Deputy Clerk
Case No. CGC-19-572935
PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND
CONSENT JUDGMENT
Date:." December‘5,-2019
Time: 9:30 am .
Dept.: 302...
Judge: Hon: Ethan P-Sebulman
Reservation No.: 010161205- 10
HAROLD 4
"> ORDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT
AHN-
NY YI NONO NUNN NOS Se BeOS a ee Be
RW WDA. A BR O8,N BOS OOO WD AB, WN Eo
Owe. QD HW BF wWoN
Plaintiff Laurence Vinocur and Defendant Columbia Two, Inc. have agreed to the terms of
the mutually executed settlement memorialized in the Consent Judgment attached. as Exhibit Ato
the Declaration of Kimberly Gates Johnson in Support of Motion to Approve Proposition 65
Settlement and Consent Judgment lodged herewith, and Plaintiff has moved this Court for an
Order approving the settlement.
Plaintiff Laurence Vinocur’s Motion to Approve Proposition 65 Settlement and.Consent
Judgment:with Defendant Columbia Two, Inc. is granted, No opposition filed, and-the settlement.
complies with the requirements. for Proposition 65 settlements éstablished by Health and:Safety -'
Code §:25249.7(6(4) in that: ,
1; The injunctive'relief required by the settlement complies with Proposition 65;
2.° The reimbursement of attorneys* fees provided by the settlement is redsonable
under California law; and
3,” The civil:penalty-amount provided by the settlement is reasonable.
Accordingly, the Motion for Approval of the Proposition '65 Settlement is GRANTED.
IT IS SOCORDERED.
Dated: ota Ish
“JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
HAROLD KAHN
ORDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT
Document Filed Date
December 05, 2019
Case Filing Date
January 17, 2019
Category
OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
OW ND BRON VW VR YON TN UNS VR Se ae ea ee Se AF ROS B RS. 6 lw. Qa aR Bb aS Clifford ‘A: Chanler, State Bar No: 135534, THE CHANLER GROUP: 2550 Ninth Street, Suite. 205 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone:-(510)-848-8880. Facsimile:.-(510)'848-8118 Email: clifford@chanler.com Kimberly. Gates Johnson, State Bar No. 282369 GATES JOHNSON LAW. 2822 Moiaga Street San Francisco, CA 94122 Telephone: (629) 219-7750: Email: kimberly@gatesjohnson.com - Attorneys for Plaintiff : LAURENCE VINOCUR. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE: STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY-OF SAN FRANCISCO" : ~ UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION LAURENCE VINOCUR, Plaintiff, v. ~ . . COLUMBIA TWO; INC.; etal, Defendants. _[BROROSED] ORDER APPROVING San Francisco County Superior Court DEC 05 2019 CLERK QE THE COURT: Deputy Clerk Case No. CGC-19-572935 PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT Date:." December‘5,-2019 Time: 9:30 am . Dept.: 302... Judge: Hon: Ethan P-Sebulman Reservation No.: 010161205- 10 HAROLD 4 "> ORDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT AHN- NY YI NONO NUNN NOS Se BeOS a ee Be RW WDA. A BR O8,N BOS OOO WD AB, WN Eo Owe. QD HW BF wWoN Plaintiff Laurence Vinocur and Defendant Columbia Two, Inc. have agreed to the terms of the mutually executed settlement memorialized in the Consent Judgment attached. as Exhibit Ato the Declaration of Kimberly Gates Johnson in Support of Motion to Approve Proposition 65 Settlement and Consent Judgment lodged herewith, and Plaintiff has moved this Court for an Order approving the settlement. Plaintiff Laurence Vinocur’s Motion to Approve Proposition 65 Settlement and.Consent Judgment:with Defendant Columbia Two, Inc. is granted, No opposition filed, and-the settlement. complies with the requirements. for Proposition 65 settlements éstablished by Health and:Safety -' Code §:25249.7(6(4) in that: , 1; The injunctive'relief required by the settlement complies with Proposition 65; 2.° The reimbursement of attorneys* fees provided by the settlement is redsonable under California law; and 3,” The civil:penalty-amount provided by the settlement is reasonable. Accordingly, the Motion for Approval of the Proposition '65 Settlement is GRANTED. IT IS SOCORDERED. Dated: ota Ish “JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT HAROLD KAHN ORDER APPROVING PROPOSITION 65 SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT JUDGMENT