Riverside County
2,470,546
7,208
Riverside
1893
District 1 – Kevin Jeffries
District 2 – Karen Spiegel
District 3 – Chuck Washington
District 4 – V. Manuel Perez
District 5 – Jeff Hewitt
General Law
Lake Elsinore Office 16275 Grand Ave. Building D Lake Elsinore, CA 92530
The city of Riverside, named for its location on the Santa Ana River.
Plaintiff Michael Zawicki (“Plaintiff”) filed the form complaint in this action on September 20, 2020 and the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) on March 17, 2021 against defendants Faustino Garcia Ochoa (“Ochoa”), Declan Joseph Kenny (“Kenny”), California Highway Patrol (“CHP”) and California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection (“Cal F...
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Continue the hearing as the meet and confer is insufficient. Plaintiff is ordered to further meet and confer with Defendant in good faith. At least 10 days prior to the continued hearing date, Plaintiff shall file a declaration regarding the further meet and confer efforts and any discovery issues still remaining between the parties....
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The motion is moot because after the motion was filed, plaintiff served supplemental responses. The court awards sanctions against plaintiff and her counsel in the reduced, reasonable amount of $1,185.00 because plaintiff’s assertion of many boilerplate, meritless objections to the discovery necessitated the present motion....
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Deny as Moot. Court has signed the Stipulation of 5-27-21, staying the action as to Defendant Jose A. Hidalgo....
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Continue to 7/15 to permit parties to hold a meaningful effort to meet and confer regarding outstanding issues. Parties to file a joint statement on or before 7/8 confirming that they have met and conferred and what, if any, remaining issues there are....
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Denied. MBUSA has provided code-compliant responses. “The party to whom requests for admission have been directed shall respond in writing under oath separately to each request.” (CCP §2033.210(a).) “Each answer in a response to requests for admission shall be as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding...
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The Court notes that a 170.3 challenge is pending. All hearings on this case are continued to August 25, 2021 at 8:30 in Department 2. The hearing is scheduled to take place telephonically via Webex....
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
On May 27, 2021, the Court denied without prejudice the application of Westley Harold Hunter II to be appointed guardian ad litem for Susan Richey. No renewed or different application for the appointment of a guardian ad litem has been received....
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Motion granted. Verified responses to be served within 20 days. Reasonable attorney fees and costs awarded to moving party in the amount of $225.00. No opposition filed or received....
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Denied. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC (MBUSA) is not a signator on the California Motor Vehicle Lease Agreement (Lease Agreement). The doctrine of equitable estoppel does not apply. MBUSA has not demonstrated that it was an intended third party beneficiary under the lease agreement. Facts and Procedural Background: On 7-3-18, Plaintiff leased a new 2018 Me...
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Granted and Plaintiff is ordered to pay Defendant Walter Jones, III monetary sanctions in the reduced but reasonable amount of $880 ($350 hr. X 2 attorney fee + filing fees ($60 X 3) $180). Facts: Defendant moves for sanctions in response to a now off-calendar motions to compel responses to form interrogatories, and deem admissions. Defendant serve...
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Grant....
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
In light of the Court’s tentative ruling on the demurrer, the motion to strike is denied as moot....
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Granted as to Nos. 42 and 45 and denied as to the remainder, since MBUSA has provided code-compliant responses. It is noted that Plaintiff, in his Reply, states that MBUSA has provided code-compliant further responses to Nos. 1, 2, 25, 26, and 40. See Tentative Ruling No. 6. above for description of applicable law....
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Motion granted. Verified answers to be served within 20 days. Reasonable attorney fees and costs awarded to moving party in the amount of $225.00. No opposition filed or received....
Jun 08, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Granted The original complaint was filed when Lan Zhao was in pro per. She attempted to get counsel to amend this pleading when she hired counsel. However, he would not. She hired new counsel and approximately two months after he was retained, he filed this motion. The amended cross- complaint seeks to assert causes of action based on Lan Zhao’s as...
Jun 07, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The unopposed motion is granted. Cross-Complainant Steve Romberg (Romberg) is provide his responses to the Form Interrogatories (Set One) and the Special Interrogatories (Set One) within 10 days of this order. Romberg and his attorney are to pay monetary sanctions to Cross-Defendant WACREB, LLC, in the amount of $486 (attorney fees of $213 X 2 hrs....
Jun 07, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Off Calendar per 5/27/2021 Order...
Jun 07, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Continued to 6-30-21 at 8:30 a.m., Department 5, in light of the agreement made at the 4-23-21 hearing that the vehicle would be inspected on either 6-15-21 or 6-21-21. If the inspection occurs, moving party is to file a declaration that the inspection occurred or a notice of withdrawal of the motion. No further brief is permitted. As to the opposi...
Jun 07, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Motion granted. Further verified answers to be served within 20 days. Reasonable attorney fees and costs awarded against responding party and counsel in the amount of $995.00 payable within 20 days. Defendant/Cross-Complainant/Cross-Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc. seeks an order compelling Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant PNMAC Capital Management...
Jun 07, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Grant. Cross Complainant failed to show any prejudicial delay in the amendment....
Jun 07, 2021
Raquel A. Marquez
Riverside County, CA
Sustained with 30 days’ leave to amend for the reasons described above in Tentative No. 4....
Jun 07, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Hearing required....
Jun 07, 2021
Raquel A. Marquez
Riverside County, CA
Grant. The Court rejects responding party’s contention that the discovery at issue was propounded without authority. The discovery feel within the scope of counsel’s limited representation and Plaintiff was obligated to respond. Furthermore, it is undisputed that counsel for Defendant is no longer operating under a limited scope representation and ...
Jun 04, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Vacated....
Jun 04, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Off calendar....
Jun 04, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Motion is granted. The truth of the matters specified in the motion and other moving papers are deemed admitted and true. Court reserves granting of fees and costs to a later date....
Jun 04, 2021
Candice Garcia-Rodrigo
Riverside County, CA
Grant. The Court rejects responding party’s contention that the discovery at issue was propounded without authority. The discovery feel within the scope of counsel’s limited representation and Plaintiff was obligated to respond. Furthermore, it is undisputed that counsel for Defendant is no longer operating under a limited scope representation and ...
Jun 04, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Grant with 30 days leave to amend. Code of Civil Procedure section 436, subdivision (a), provides that a court may “[s]trike out any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading.” In ruling on a motion to strike, the allegations in the complaint are considered in context and presumed to be true. (Clauson v. Superior Court (1998) 6...
Jun 03, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Court declines to consider the new evidence submitted with the reply, as untimely and irrelevant. The motion is denied. Defendant’s objections based on relevance and undue burden have merit. New Evidence with the Reply: Plaintiffs submitted additional evidence and arguments in the Reply, including the supplemental declaration of counsel and request...
Jun 03, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The Court grants Defendant/Cross-Defendant Trautwein Construction’s motion to set aside the entry of default per CCP § 473(b) and (d). The Court orders that Trautwein file its proposed answer to the City’s cross-complaint, attached as Exhibit A to the motion, as a separate document within 10 days of today’s hearing....
Jun 03, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Due to a shortage of staff this week, this hearing is continued to June 28, 2021, at 8:30 A.M. in Department 1....
Jun 03, 2021
Riverside County, CA
ANY REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT SHALL BE HEARD AT 9AM Plaintiff has complied with the CMO Section I, subdivision (3), and Section I, subdivision (11), as instructed by the Court, but has failed to comply with Section I, subdivision (15). The Amended Proposed Order & Judgment still does not describe the text of the notice of entry of judgment to be gi...
Jun 03, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Denied as to Form Interrogatory No. 17.1 and otherwise denied. Plaintiff to provide further responses without objection within 30 days of this order. The request for sanctions is denied. A party may file a motion compelling further answers to interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admissions if it finds that the response is inad...
Jun 03, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Denied. The motion is not served in conformity with Code of Civil Procedure section 1005. The notice given was to attorney Parkin, whom moving party knows to be deceased. There is no evidence before the Court that moving party has attempted to give notice to Plaintiff Romero by any other means....
Jun 03, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Matter continued on court’s own motion to June 11, 2021 to be heard in conjunction with the motion filed by Goldenvoice....
Jun 03, 2021
Riverside County, CA
ANY REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT SHALL BE HEARD AT 9AM The unopposed Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED as to the existence of the records but, not the truth of the contents. The motion to abate or stay the Lopez action is DENIED, but GRANTED as to the motion to consolidate the two actions....
Jun 03, 2021
Riverside County, CA
See 4 above....
Jun 03, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The Motion for Summary Adjudication is granted as to the second cause of action and denied as to the first and third causes of action. Plaintiff’s Evidentiary Objections: 1. Sustain 2. Sustain 3. Sustain 4. Overrule 5. Sustain 6. Sustain 7. Sustain FACTUAL / PROCEDURAL CONTEXT This is a wage and hour employment case. In March 2017, Plaintiff Timoth...
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The unopposed motion is granted....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Continued Continued to June 22, 2021, at 8:30 am in Department 7....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
This matter is continued to June 23, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Dept.2. The parties are ordered to meet and confer regarding this matter and to file a joint statement as to the status of the discovery no later than June 16, 2021....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
On the Court’s own motion, this matter is continued to June 25, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in this Department. On or before June 11, 2021 Defendants are ordered to file with the Court and serve on Plaintiff by the most expeditious means possible a privilege log detailing all materials responsive to the requests at issue in this motion that Defendants claims...
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Grant; plaintiff ordered to provide full and complete responses, without objection, within 15 days....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
ANY REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT SHALL BE HEARD AT 9AM Hearing is vacated....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment was filed late. While it was served on May 19, 2021, it was not filed with the Court until May 24, 2021.This did not give the Court sufficient time to review the Motion and Opposition. As such, the Court continues the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment to June 16, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. ...
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
granted. Judgment is to enter in the amount of $3,230.45....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The Court regrets that, because of a shortage of staff this week, this matter has been continued to June 23, 2021, at 8:30 A.M. in Department 1....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The Court regrets that, because of a shortage of staff this week, this matter has been continued to June 22, 2021, at 8:30 A.M. in Department 1....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Appearance required. Plaintiff to be prepared to address any authority in California why this court can consider the declaration of Ozier in that it fails to be in accordance with CCP Section 2015.5 as not being sworn in or under the laws of California....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
If responses served, motion is moot and sanctions denied. If responses not served parties are to appear....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Granted. Judgment is to enter in the amount of $6,673.90....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Sustained. 30 Days leave to amend Standing Ruiz argues that Plaintiffs (Lazaro heirs) lack standing to challenge any determination made by the insurer concerning the workers’ compensation death benefits claimed by Ruiz on behalf of the Marcial heirs. The rule is that plaintiff must be the real party in interest as to the claim sued on “except a...
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The Motion is GRANTED....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Motion granted. Further verified responses to be served within 20 days. Reasonable attorney fees awarded to moving party in the amount of $1,444.30 payable within 20 days jointly and severally against cross-defendant and their counsel. Defendant/Cross-Complainant CitiMortgage, Inc. moves the court for an order compelling Cross- Defendant Pennym...
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The Court regrets that, because of a shortage of staff this week, this matter has been continued to June 23, 2021, at 8:30 A.M. in Department 1....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The unopposed motion is granted to award plaintiff attorney fees and costs of $77,806.86 (attorney fees of $47,339 plus lodestar enhancement of 0.5 $23,669.50 plus costs of $6,798.36). Moving party is to submit a proposed order....
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
ANY REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT SHALL BE HEARD AT 9AM The Motion is CONTINUED to July 1, 2021 at 9am to allow Plaintiff to comply with CMO H (3)(a)(ii)(C) and 3(e)(i)(B). Plaintiffs should also address the suggested revisions discussed below: The introductory paragraph of the Proposed Order should also indicate that the court, for purposes of the ord...
Jun 02, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Denied. Existence of an Arbitration Agreement Moving Defendants, Hospital and KHO, assert that Plaintiffs entered into a valid arbitration agreement to resolve all disputes relating to the care provided to Decedent while she stayed in the Hospital. They assert that she entered into the agreement by way of her son, Anthony, who signed all the admiss...
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Granted. Plaintiff is granted 20 days leave of court to file its Amended Complaint.....
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Deny. The supplemental response is Code compliant. Sanctions were not requested....
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Motion granted. No opposition filed or received. OSC set for 7-30-2021 why sanctions not to exceed $1,500.00 or Plaintiff’s complaint should not be dismissed for failure to file proof of service on all named defendants. Plaintiff to give notice....
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Motion denied. Defendant failed to show new or different facts, circumstances, or law under CCP § 1008 warranting reconsideration and failed to provide any explanation why the evidence presented now was not presented prior to the hearing on the underlying motion. Nor has Defendant shown circumstances warranting discretionary relief under CCP § 473(...
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Grant. The motion is unopposed. The Court will sign the proposed order lodged at the time the motion was filed....
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Granted. Judgment is to enter in the amount of $2,675.00....
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The Motion is GRANTED. Counsel will be relieved once notice is given and proof is returned to the court. The matter remains stayed pending bankruptcy....
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Due to a shortage of staff, the hearing on this motion is continued to June 9, 2021, at 8:30 A.M. in Department 1....
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The Motion for Joinder of the uninsured motorist claim is granted....
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
DENY without prejudice. The motion is not proper. CCP §473(b)....
Jun 01, 2021
Raquel A. Marquez
Riverside County, CA
Grant. Plaintiff to provide verified responses to Defense counsel, without objections, on or before 7-7-21. Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel to pay sanctions to Defense counsel in the sum of $560, payable within 30 days....
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
This motion was continued on 4-28-21 to allow moving party to give notice to the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office and all remaining parties of record as required by California Rule of Court, Rule 9.40(c) and to provide proof of payment of the State Bar fee. It does not appear that notice was given nor proof of payment of the Stat...
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
General demurrer sustained for the first, third, and the fourth causes of action with leave to amend within 30 days. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1320(g).) Special demurrer for uncertainty is overruled. This is an action filed by a buyer of a real property for the sellers’ alleged misrepresentations, seeking cancellation of the purchase agreeme...
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
See Tentative Ruling No. 2 above....
Jun 01, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Moot....
Jun 01, 2021
Raquel A. Marquez
Riverside County, CA
ANY REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT SHALL BE HEARD AT 9AM The Motion is CONTINUED to June 24, 2021 at 9am to allow the parties to comply with CMO ¶¶ H.3.d, H.3.e, H.3.i, H.3.k, H.3.l, H.5.a, H.5.b H.5.c, H.5.e, and H.9. (Please Note: The Compliance Chart is incomplete and does not appear to be tailored to the 2/21/20 CMO.)...
May 28, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Motion granted. See tentative 5-18-2021. Failing to respond within the time limit waives most objections to the interrogatories, including claims of privilege and “work product” protection. (CCP § 2030.290(a); see Leach v. Sup.Ct. (Markum) (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 902, 905-906.) The court has statutory power to grant relief from such waiver. (...
May 28, 2021
Riverside County, CA
On the Court’s own motion, this matter is continued to June 25, 2021. Moving party is ordered to submit to the Court within 15 days a proposed protective order specific to this case and narrowly tailored to the issues described in this motion. The proposed order must be consistent with Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551, and may not call for fil...
May 28, 2021
Riverside County, CA
On the Court’s own motion, this matter is continued to June 11, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. Moving party is ordered to file with this Court within 5 days a legible copy of Exhibit B to the Motion (portions of Plaintiff’s deposition transcript); the document filed with the Court contains digital “highlighting” that has effectively redacted cited portions of t...
May 28, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Demurrer sustained without leave to amend as to the 1st , 3rd , 4th and 5th causes of action. No opposition filed or received....
May 28, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Grant. Defendant is ordered to produce its PMK for deposition within 30 days. The court declines to rule on the objections to the PMK categories and/or requests for production as premature. If Defendant’s PMK fails to respond at the deposition, Plaintiff may move for an order compelling responses and production under CCP Section 2025.480. Defendant...
May 27, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Granted in part. The unopposed motion is granted. Plaintiff is ordered to provide supplemental verified responses, without objection, within 30 Days. The request for sanctions is granted in the reduced, reasonable amount of $2860 (8 x $350 + $60)...
May 27, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Continued to 7-19-21 at 8:30 a.m., Department 5 to allow meet and confer as required by CCP § 430.41(a). CCP § 430.41(a) requires that before filing a demurrer, the moving party must meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to the demurrer. The moving party is required to file a declaration wit...
May 27, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The defendants’ unopposed request for judicial notice is granted. The defendants’ evidentiary objections are not ruled upon. The Court construes the motion of defendants Rice and Baker to be a motion for judgment on the pleadings, which is granted without leave to amend. The proposed order and proposed judgment are signed. Analysis: The defendants ...
May 27, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Grant on Motion to Compel attendance, Deny as premature on Motion to Compel Production, until such time as the deposition takes place. If the parties wish to put the time and date of the deposition on the record, Parties are instructed to request a hearing on this Motion with the Courtroom Assistant....
May 27, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Sustain the Demurrer to the Second and Third causes of action without leave to amend. The Second cause of action for Premises Liability and the Third cause of action for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress are duplicative of the First cause of action for Negligence. Sustain the Demurrer to the Fourth cause of action for Breach of the Implied...
May 27, 2021
Riverside County, CA
ANY REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT SHALL BE HEARD AT 9AM The Motion and Status Conference are CONTINUED to June 24, 2021 at 9am for moving party to address the following: • The release needs to be limited to defendants named in the complaint together with their officers, directors, employees and agents. Currently, the release also includes Defendant’s p...
May 27, 2021
Riverside County, CA
On its own motion, the Court shall continue this hearing to June 7, 2021 at 8:30 am in Dept 3, to be heard telephonically. The Court is in receipt of Defendant’s motion to quash, filed on 4/30/21, and Defendant’s reply to Plaintiff’s opposition filed on 5/20/21, but not the opposition itself. The parties already have a CMC/OSC set on June 7, 2021, ...
May 27, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The Court grants Lab Corp.’s motion for summary judgment on Broan’s cross-complaint. Factual / Procedural Context: Defendant/Cross-Defendant, Lab Corp. moves for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication of issues, on the Cross-Complaint filed by Defendant/Cross-Complainant, Broan-Nutone. (“Broan”). The Cross-Complaint relates t...
May 27, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The Motion as to Marvin Atchison is DENIED. The Motion as to Gisele Atchison is GRANTED. As to Gisele Atchison, Plaintiff did not establish compliance with CCP section 425.20(c) and B&P Section 17538.5. The court is not persuaded on the issue of excusable neglect. Defendants assert that they mistakenly failed to respond to the Complaint because...
May 27, 2021
Riverside County, CA
ANY REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT SHALL BE HEARD AT 9AM The Motion is GRANTED....
May 26, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The plaintiff’s motion for relief from his inadvertent dismissal of the doe defendants is denied. Analysis: An application for relief “shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).) Here, the dismissal occurred on 9-12-19, ...
May 26, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The Motion is DENIED. RFP No. 6: Breach of the “management services” portion of the Agreement is not at issue in this action. Rather, the parties dispute the terms of the “option” in the Agreement. Gas Plus does not allege anywhere in the Complaint that GMWC breached the Agreement by operating the gas station as a franchise gas station as oppos...
May 26, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Deny. Summary judgment is granted when a moving party establishes the right to entry of judgment as a matter of law. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 437c(c).) A defendant moving for summary judgment bears the initial burden of proving that there is no merit to a cause of action by showing that one or more elements of the cause of action cannot be establ...
May 26, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Deny. Deny Sanctions. A notice to compel must be served within 45 days after verified responses, or any verified supplemental responses, were served unless the parties agree in writing to extend the time. CCP Section 2030.300(c). Delaying the motion beyond the 45-day limit waives the right to compel a further response to the interrogatories. CCP Se...
May 26, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The unopposed motion is granted....
May 26, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Motion granted. Further response to be served within 20 days. Sanctions denied. Defendants object on the grounds the discovery sought is not relevant, that responses would require disclosure of confidential/proprietary information and information protected by third-party privacy rights and is burdensome. None of these objections are sustainable...
May 26, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Denied since MBUSA has provided code-compliant responses. “The party to whom requests for admission have been directed shall respond in writing under oath separately to each request.” (Code Civ. Proc., §2033.210(a).) “Each answer in a response to requests for admission shall be as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available...
May 26, 2021
Riverside County, CA
The hearing is ordered off calendar. Defendant failed to file proof of service of the motion upon counsel for Plaintiff....
May 26, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Denied. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC (MBUSA) is not a signator on the California Motor Vehicle Lease Agreement (Lease Agreement). The doctrine of equitable estoppel does not apply. MBUSA has not demonstrated that it was an intended third party beneficiary under the lease agreement. Facts and Procedural Background: On 7-3-18, Plaintiff leased a new 2018 Me...
May 26, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Granted as to Nos. 42 and 45 and denied as to the remainder, since MBUSA has provided code-compliant responses. It is noted that Plaintiff, in his Reply, states that MBUSA has provided code-compliant further responses to Nos. 1, 2, 25, 26, and 40. See Tentative Ruling No. 4. Above for description of applicable law....
May 26, 2021
Riverside County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
