Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

Santa Clara County, California

County Name

Santa Clara County

Population

1,927,852

Area (sq mi)

1,291

County Seat

San Jose

Established Year

1850

Board of Supervisors

District 1 – Mike Wasserman
District 2 – Cindy Chavez
District 3 – Dave Cortese
District 4 – Susan Ellenberg
District 5 – Joe Simitian

Form of Government

Charter

Administration Address

70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110

Phone Number

(408) 299-5105

Meaning of Name

City of Santa Clara, from Mission Santa Clara de Asís, named for Saint Clare of Assisi(Spanish for Saint Clare).

Rulings

1-100 of 2029 results

ELIZABETH MERRITT V. HOUZZ INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of defendant Houzz Inc., alleging a number of wage and hour violations. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court (Judge Walsh) preliminarily approved in an order filed on July 24, 2020. The factual and procedural background of the action and the Court’s analysis of the settlement and s...

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2021

ALICIA ROSALES V. LOOMIS ARMORED US, LLC, ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of defendant Loomis Armored US, LLC. Plaintiff alleges wage and hour violations as well as failures to provide compliant disclosure and authorization forms for background checks. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of a sett...

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2021

ALFRED LAX V. ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY, ET AL.

This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of defendant Roto-Rooter Services Company, alleging a range of wage and hour violations. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on November 23, 2020. The factual and procedural background of the action and the Court’s analysis of the settlemen...

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2021

ARTURO PEREZ V. AIRCOM MECHANICAL, ET AL.

This is a putative wage and hour class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of defendant AirCom Mechanical. Plaintiff also brings an individual claim for wrongful termination. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for leave to file an amended answer, which Plaintiff opposes. As discussed below, the Court GRANT...

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2021

DEWAYNE CASSEL V. GOOGLE LLC, ET AL.

This is an action under the Labor Code, the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”), the Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), and other statutes. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants Google LLC, Google Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.’s (collectively, “Google”) recruit diverse candidates by misrepresenting the nature of the job they will perform if they are hired; ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2021

K. NGUYEN VS. P. TRAN

Case name: K. Nguyen vs. P. Tran Before the Court is Defendant KITTY KIT YEE SO’s (hereinafter SO) Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Defendant's Deposition and Request for Monetary Sanctions against Plaintiff Kevin Khahn Nguyen (hereinafter Nguyen). The dispute arises out of a personal injury lawsuit involving allegations of driving u...

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2021

BARKER, ET AL. V. L & D CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., ET AL.

-3 According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (“SAC”), plaintiffs Antoinette Barker and Rose Arnaudo (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) own property with addresses at both 16195 Keith Way and 16190 Monterey Road in Morgan Hill. (See SAC, ¶ 1.) The neighboring property to the south of Plaintiff’s property, 16170 and 16180 Monterey Ro...

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2021

XE TRAN, ET AL. V. MARCO SANCHEZ, ET AL.

This case arises from a motor vehicle accident on March 18, 2019 in which Decedent Tuyen Vu (“Decedent”), a pedestrian, was struck and killed while in a crosswalk by a vehicle driven by Defendant Marco Sanchez (“Sanchez”) and owned by Defendant Villara Corporation dba Villara Building Systems (“Villara,” collectively “Defendants”). The original...

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2021

WILLIAM EICHEN, ET AL. V. OMNISCIENCE CORP., ET AL.

This limited civil matter arises from a contract dispute. The original and still operative Complaint filed July 2, 2020 by self-represented Plaintiff William Eichen as “Managing Partner, Gimmel Entrepreneurs Group,” states claims for: 1) Breach of Contract; 2) “Hostile Work Environment,” and; 3) “Religious Discrimination and Sexual Harassment.” Bas...

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 20CV368472 Tesla, Inc. v. Rivian Automotive, Inc., et al. DATE: 23 February 2021 TIME: 9:00 ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. CIRCUITRONICS

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 19CV352224 Above Board Electronics, Inc., et al. v. Circuitronics, LLC, Wattera, LLC DAT...

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. MEHRAN HAFEZISEMNANIDATE FEBRUARY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org CASE NO.: 19CV354474 Jacqueline Balachandran v. Mehran Hafezi-Semnani DATE: 25 February 2021 TIME: 9:0...

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2021

VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. RESPONSES EVA MARCELO PASCUAL

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY 14 vs. RESPONSES 15 EVA MARCELO PASCUAL, 16 Defendant. 18 herself and all others similarly situated, 19 Cross-Complainant, 20 vs. 21 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability com...

  • Hearing

    Feb 24, 2021

VS. PROC

, County of Santa Clara, 28 (“Williamson”). 1 II. PETITION FOR COORDINATION 2 A. Legal Standard 3 When civil actions sharing a common question of fact or law are pending in different courts, a petition for coordination may be submitted to the Chairperson 4 of the Judicial Council, by the presiding judge of any such court, or by an...

  • Hearing

    Feb 24, 2021

CAMP V. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 DELMER CAMP, et al., 13 Plaintiffs, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 vs. 15 HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., et al., 16 Defendants. 21 I. INTRODUCTION 22 This is a putative class action in which plaintiffs Delmer Camp (“Camp”) and Adriana 23 Correa (“Correa”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) all...

  • Hearing

    Feb 24, 2021

HOUR

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. 5141 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION 14 ROVNER CONSTRUCTION WAGE AND FOR COORDINATION CASES on February 24, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. The court now issues its tentative ruling as 19 follows: coordi...

  • Hearing

    Feb 24, 2021

THUNDER TOKEN INC. V. AMSDEN

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 THUNDER TOKEN INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: Plaintiff, DEMURRER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT 14 vs. 16 inclusive, 17 Defendant. 23 I. INTRODUCTION 24 Plaintiff Thunder Token Inc. (“Thunder Token”) brings this lawsuit for breach of 25 employment contract against defendant Zachary Amsde...

  • Hearing

    Feb 24, 2021

VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC V. CANUL

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY 14 vs. RESPONSES 15 MARIA ANTONIA CANUL, 16 Defendant. 18 and all others similarly situated, 19 Cross-Complainant, 20 vs. 21 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company; an...

  • Hearing

    Feb 24, 2021

ORALIA GONZALEZ TALAMANTES, ET AL. V. MI RANCHO SUPERMARKET (SAN JOSE) INC.,

et al. This is a putative class and PAGA action by employees of supermarkets allegedly operated by a group of corporate entity and individual defendants. Plaintiffs allege a range of wage and hour violations. Before the Court is the corporate defendants’ motion7 for relief from waiver of their objections to Plaintiffs’ first set of discover...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

ORALIA GONZALEZ TALAMANTES, ET AL. V. MI RANCHO SUPERMARKET (SAN JOSE) INC.,

et al. Rescheduled to October 14, 2021 at 1:30 p.m....

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

ALYSHA JARAMILLO V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL.

This is an action under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) on behalf of hotel employees, alleging failure to provide suitable seating. Before the Court is defendant SJMEC, Inc.’s demurrer to the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on the ground that Plaintiff failed to timely exhaust her PAGA claims as to SJMEC. Plaintiff opposes the ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

ALYSHA JARAMILLO V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL.

This is an action under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) on behalf of hotel employees, alleging failure to provide suitable seating. Before the Court is defendant SJMEC, Inc.’s demurrer to the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on the ground that Plaintiff failed to timely exhaust her PAGA claims as to SJMEC. Plaintiff opposes the ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

of San Jose, et al. This is a putative class action challenging the alleged nondisclosure of an Evaluation and Management Services Fee (EMS Fee) charged to emergency care patients by Defendant San Jose Healthcare System LP, dba Regional Medical Center of San Jose (Regional Medical Center or Hospital). Defendant demurs to and moves to strike the...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

ELIAZER CRUZ VS ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ ZAMUDIO, ET AL.

Hearing: motion for leave to amend complaint to add fictitiously named parties The following motion(s) came on regularly for hearing on February 18, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 19, Honorable William J. Monahan presiding. The matters having been submitted, good cause appearing, it is ordered: Motion for leave to amend complaint to add f...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

ZEIDMAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. VS JAMES MCMANIS ET AL.

Hearing : Motion to Compel and Monetary Sanctions The following motion(s) came on regularly for hearing on February 18, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 19, Honorable William J. Monahan presiding. The matters having been submitted, good cause appearing, it is ordered: Motion to compel answers to form and special interrogatories, responses t...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC., ET AL VS. KENROY FISHER

Case name: Credit Corp Solutions Inc., et al vs. Kenroy Fisher Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant Fisher’s Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One. On receipt of a response to an interrogatory, the propounding party may move for an order compelling a further response if the propounding party deems that (a...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

SHELDON DAVIDSON V. NEW YORK STYLE SAUSAGE COMPANY

Hearing: Demurrer to First Amended Complaint by Defendant New York Sausage Company The following demurrer to first amended complaint came on regularly for hearing on February 18, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 19, Honorable William J. Monahan presiding. The matters having been submitted, it is ordered: This is an action primarily for wron...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC VS CO NGUYEN ET AL.

Motion: Deemed Admissions The following motion(s) came on regularly for hearing on February 18, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 19, Honorable William J. Monahan presiding. The matters having been submitted, good cause appearing, it is ordered: Plaintiff Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. (“Plaintiff”)’s motion for deemed admissions that m...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

FINANCIAL PACIFIC LEASING, INC, ET AL, VS PHUNG NGUYEN

Hearing: Motion to Strike The following motion(s) came on regularly for hearing on February 18, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 19, Honorable William J. Monahan presiding. The matters having been submitted, good cause appearing, it is ordered: Motion to strike defendant Phung Nguyen aka Phung Kim Nguyen, an individual dba Senter Dentistry ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

ANDREA MELGOZA VS JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY

Hearing: Motion to Compel and Monetary Sanctions OFF CALENDAR. No Amended Notice of Motion nor proof of service of Amended Notice of Motion [of hearing date after it was assigned.] See fn. 1 to Notice of Motion filed 11/18/2020. Note: The proof of service of the deposition subpoena on Los Angeles Valley College submitted with the supporting...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

HOANG V. TRAN, ET AL.

According to the allegations of the fourth amended complaint (“4AC”), in 2016, defendant Trung Nhat Tran (“Trung”) approached plaintiff Vinh Q. Hoang (“Plaintiff”) with an offer to invest in real estate; later that year, Trung and defendant Nam Nhat Tran (“Nam”) offered to find Plaintiff profitable real estate for investment, making oral promises t...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC., ET AL VS. KENROY FISHER

Case name: Credit Corp Solutions Inc., et al vs. Kenroy Fisher Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Response to Defendant’s Responses to Requests for Admissions 1-33 A responding party must provide non-evasive answers to requests for admission that are “as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably availa...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

KONDA V. MARKOVIC, ET AL.

According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (“TAC”), in January 2009, plaintiff Venkat Konda (“Plaintiff”) was introduced to defendant Dejan Markovic (“Markovic”), a professor at UCLA with a focus of circuits and embedded systems. (See TAC, ¶ 50.) When an oral offer to fund Plaintiff’s company, Konda Tech, was rescinded, Markovic co...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

NGUYEN, ET AL. V. PRITCHETT, ET AL.

and 3 Defendants Daniel Pritchett and Margaret Pritchett (collectively, “Defendants” or the “Pritchetts”) move for summary judgment, or in the alternative summary adjudication in their favor and against plaintiffs James Nguyen and Hien Nguyen (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or the “Nguyens”). The Nguyens also move for summary judgment, or in the al...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

KISSINGER VS KISSINGER

On August 4, 2020, the Court granted defendant’s motion to transfer venue to El Dorado County Superior Court. On the same day, the clerk of court served the order on plaintiff by mail. Upon nonpayment of court fees and costs for transfer, on September 16, 2020, defendant served plaintiff with the present motion for dismissal. On December 28, 2020, ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

ALLIED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY VS MARK TSUEI, ET AL.

Motion: Set aside default/judgment The following motion(s) came on regularly for hearing on February 18, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 19, Honorable William J. Monahan presiding. The matters having been submitted, good cause appearing, it is ordered: Defendant Mark Tsuei (“Defendant”)’s motion to set aside the default entered against Def...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

APPLE INC. VS GERARD WILLIAMS, III

Hearing: Motion for appointment of discovery referee The following motion(s) came on regularly for hearing on February 18, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 19, Honorable William J. Monahan presiding. The matters having been submitted, it is ordered: Motion for appointment of discovery referee by defendant Gerard Williams, III. is DENIED WIT...

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2021

360 RESIDENCES, L.P. V. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC., ET AL.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 360 RESIDENCES, L.P., a California limited partnership, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: Plaintiff, APPLICATIONS TO APPEAR PRO 14 HAC VICE vs. 16 corporation; LENDLEASE (US) CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation; 17 SOLOMON CORDWELL BUENZ & ASSOCIATES, INC., an Illinois corporation; 18 WSP FLACK + K...

  • Hearing

    Feb 17, 2021

ARROYO ROCHA V. CERNX MN, LLC, ET AL.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 TALIA ARROYO ROCHA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and on behalf of 13 the general public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 CERNX MN, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Corporation; GOOGLE INC., a Delaware 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 throug...

  • Hearing

    Feb 17, 2021

CHARLES, ET AL. V. VARSITY TUTORS, LLC

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO SEQUENCE DISCOVERY; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. RESPONSES AND FOR MONETARY 15 SANCTIONS VARSITY TUTORS LLC, The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 19 on August...

  • Hearing

    Feb 17, 2021

GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE AMENDED COMPLAINT 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 16 Defendant. 21 I. INTRODUCTION 22 According to the Amended Complaint (“FAC”), filed on October 14, 2020, this case 23 arises out of defendant Keysight Tec...

  • Hearing

    Feb 17, 2021

SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ARACELI SANCHEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND 14 STAY ACTION vs. 16 DIEGO, LLC; EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, LLC; 17 and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 23 I. INTR...

  • Hearing

    Feb 17, 2021

ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action alleging wage statement violations against Defendant Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation. In an order filed on January 11, 2020 (Order), the Court denied Northrop Grumman’s motion for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Pursuant to Code of Civil Pr...

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

RICARDO RIVERA VS. YONG GU

Before the Court is Defendant Gu’s Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set Two and Request for Production of Documents, Set Two, and Request for Sanctions. Proof of service provided. Plaintiff provided no substantive opposition to Defendant’s Motion on the Merits. Plaintiff’s Counsel filed a nominal opposition asking the Court to...

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

ONVIEW INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL VS KEITH LANGSKOV

Case name: Onview Integrated Solutions, a California Corporation et al vs Keith Langskov Case number: 20CV369808 On August 21, 2020, plaintiff Onview Integrated Soulutions (“OIS”) filed the complaint in this case alleging eight causes of action against defendant Keith William Langskov (“Langskov”). Langskov filed the present motion to compel ar...

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

RAMIREZ V. LIN

This is a dispute over a water bill and the condition of a rented property. According to the allegations of the complaint, on July 26, 2010, plaintiff Gerardo Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Mong Fong Lin (“Defendant”) entered into a lease agreement for the rental of 99 Cleveland Avenue in San Jose. (See complaint, ¶¶ 1-2, 8.) Defendant also ow...

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

JONATHAN NEIL & ASSOCIATES, INC. VS ALMO INC., ET AL

Case name: Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. vs Almo Inc., et al In February 2017, plaintiff and defendants entered into a stipulation for entry of judgment (“stipulation”); each party was represented by legal counsel. The stipulation provides for a settlement amount of $200,000 which was higher than the principal amount sought in the complaint....

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

GREET WELL, INC. V. VARGHESE

Defendant/cross-complainant Joe Varghese d/b/a SLV Refrigeration Co. (“Varghese” or “Defendant”) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed by plaintiff/cross- defendant Greet Well, Inc. d/b/a X’Pressions (“Greet Well” or “Plaintiff”). I. Background A. Factual This is an action for breach of contract and negligence arising out ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

KEITH STUART, M.D., ET AL. V. CORDEVALLE, LP

This is a personal injury action brought by Plaintiff Kevin Stuart, M.D. and his wife Pamela Stuart (“Plaintiffs”) against Defendant Cordevalle, LP (“Defendant”) and various does. The original and still operative Complaint filed February 13, 2019 alleges that Dr. Stuart injured himself on October 14, 2018 while riding a bike when he hit a pothole o...

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

GLORIA ESTILLORE VS QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION ET AL

Case name: Gloria Estillore vs Quality Loan Service Corporation et al Plaintiff alleges in her Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) that she acquired title to the subject real property on Shanji Court, San Jose, CA by quitclaim deed. The property was subject to deed of trust that was in foreclosure. Quality was substituted as trustee of the deed of ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

DAVID SETO ET AL VS RENEE KWAN ET A

Case name: David Seto et al vs Renee Kwan et a There are several actions involving the disputes between the parties in connection with a development on Winchester Plaza on the Row, including two consolidated actions7 and the present action. Pertinent to the present motion is a ruling issued by the Court on December 15, 2020 in the consolidated ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. BASS PRO OUTDOOR WORLD

Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC DATE: 11 February 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 7 This matter will be heard by the Honorable Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian in Department 20 in the Old Courthouse, 2nd Floor, 161 North First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no l...

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. MATTHEW ENTERPRISES

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 20CV370471 Carlos Jimenez v. Matthew Enterprises, Inc., et al. DATE: 11 February 2021 TIME: ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. THE IRVINE COMPANY

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 18CV336827 Michelle Kaiser v. The Irvine Company, LLC, Chrisp Company, et al. DATE: 11 F...

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. THOMAS MISICH

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 20CV366093 Elizabeth Henin Misich v. Thomas Misich, et al. DATE: 11 February 2021 TIME: 9:00...

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

BARAJAS V. IMAGE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928)

10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 13 VIOLETA BARAJAS, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated, 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 15 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 17 Arizona limited liability company; COMMERCIAL SERVICE SOLUTIONS, LLC, 18 an Arizona limited liability company; and DOES 1 throug...

  • Hearing

    Feb 10, 2021

BROKAW SAN JOSE, LLC VS. PACIFIC BAY RECYCLING CENTER, INC.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BROKAW SAN JOSE, LLC, a California 12 Limited Liability Company, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFF’S 13 Plaintiff, MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT TO ADD NONPARTY ALTER EGO AS 14 JUDGMENT DEBTOR v. INC., a California Corporation, and MINDY 17 NGO, 18 Defendants. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing be...

  • Hearing

    Feb 10, 2021

DAYTON V. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC

8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 11 JANICE ASHLEY DAYTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 13 MOTION TO SEAL vs. 15 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 21 I. INTRODUCTION 22 This is a putative consumer class ac...

  • Hearing

    Feb 10, 2021

DAYTON V. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 JANICE ASHLEY DAYTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO SEAL vs. 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 22 I. INTRODUCTION 23 This is a putative consumer class ac...

  • Hearing

    Feb 10, 2021

OLMOS, ET AL. V. DOYLE'S WORK COMPANY, INC.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 JUAN OLMOS, an individual; and ALDOLFO OLMOS, an individual, on behalf of themselves 13 and others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 14 Plaintiffs, 15 vs. 16 DOYLE’S WORK COMPANY, INC., a California corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, 17 inclusive, 18 Defendant. ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 10, 2021

OLGA ORTMANN V. ADECCO USA, INC., ET AL.

This is an action under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”), alleging wage and hour violations by Defendants Adecco USA, Inc., Google LLC (sued as “Google North America Inc.”), Waymo, LLC, and Waymo Auto, LLC (collectively with Waymo, LLC, “Waymo”). Before the Court is Google and Adecco’s demurrer to the operative First Amended Complaint...

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

IN RE ALPHABET, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

These consolidated shareholder derivative actions arise from allegations that officers and directors of Alphabet, Inc., the parent company of Google LLC, breached their fiduciary duties and committed other misconduct in connection with multi-million-dollar severance awards to male executives accused of assaulting female employees, amid a broader cu...

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

JEFF BAKER V. DAVID BAKER

This is a lawsuit between two brothers, Plaintiff Jeff Baker (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant David Baker (“Defendant”) originally arising from a dispute over the running of a business, Power Breaker LLC, that Plaintiff and Defendant allegedly co-owned. Plaintiff alleges that on January 6, 2016 Defendant informed Plaintiff that he was terminating him fr...

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

CREDIT CORP. SOLUTIONS, INC. V GONZALEZ

and line 3 Plaintiff/cross-defendant Credit Corp. Solutions, Inc. (“CCS”) moves for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication, in its favor and against defendant/cross- complainant Liliana Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) on CCS’s complaint (“Complaint”) and Gonzalez’s First Amended Cross-Complaint (“FACC”). Gonzalez moves for summary ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

LORIE WILLIAMS ET AL VS. DAVID KRAFT

Case name: Lorie Williams et al vs. David Kraft Before the Court is Defendant and Cross Complaint Kraft’s (hereinafter Kraft) Motion to Compel Plaintiff and Cross Defendant Williams (hereinafter Williams) to obey the Court's prior Orders of September 15, 2019 and August 10, 2020 and Request for Sanctions, and Order Striking William's' Amended C...

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS. BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL

Case name: Sangeeta Bhargava vs. Bank of America, NA et al Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Supplemental Response to Request for Production of Documents No. 47 Set 3. After reviewing the papers and the entire record, the Court makes the following tentative rulings: Defendant BANA’s Supplemental Response to Plaintiff’...

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

LORIE WILLIAMS ET AL VS. DAVID KRAFT

Case name: Lorie Williams et al vs. David Kraft Before the Court is Defendant and Cross Complaint Kraft’s (hereinafter Kraft) Motion to Compel Plaintiff and Cross Defendant Williams (hereinafter Williams) to further respond to Form Interrogatories; Requests for Admissions and Request for Monetary Sanctions, and Orders Striking William's' Amende...

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

DOYLE-JONES, ET AL. V. BERRYESSA UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL.

Defendants Berryessa Union School District (the “District”), Virginia Pender (“Pender”) and Sara Beltran (“Beltran”) (collectively, “Defendants”) demur to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed by plaintiffs Brenda Doyle-Jones (“Doyle-Jones”), Asiman Babayev (“Babayev”) and Brenda Doyle-Jones, as guardian ad litem on behalf of Aygulina Asiman Ba...

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. BELLA VISTA APARTMENTS

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. 18CV340085 Maryam Gholamirad v. Bella Vista Apartments, et al. DATE: 4 February 2021 TIME: 9:...

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

COLEMAN V. INTERSTATE CLEANING CORPORATION (INCLUDED IN INTERSTATE WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5149; ALAMEDA COUNTY)

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 TEJERO COLEMAN, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and the general public, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO INTERVENE 14 vs. 16 California Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive 22 I. INTRODUCTION 23 This is a case for recovery of penalties under the California ...

  • Hearing

    Feb 03, 2021

VS. LAW OFFICE OF CANTRELL

, County of Santa Clara, California, County of Santa Clara, 1 Amended Complaint ( 2 the court, Arriaga, Inc. alleges that defendants Jason Lara and Jose Segura were employees of 3 Arriaga, Inc. (FAC, ¶¶ 3 and 7.) 3 On July 1, 2016, Lara and Segura contacted Arriaga, Inc.’s 4 biggest customer, Dave & Busters, to speak about replacing Arriaga...

  • Hearing

    Feb 03, 2021

RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL.

These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which Plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. Cross-defendant Jesmar Mechanical, Inc. moves for summary judgment or adjudication on the cross-complaint filed by Defendants and Cross-Complainants Dollinger Properties, Exstra-Arques LLC, DP Ventures, LLC, and DPM Property Manag...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

GUADALUPE SOSA, ET AL. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative wage and hour class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of defendants Marriott International, Inc. (“MII”) and Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. (“MHS”).8 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plain...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

MARTIN Z. JADAN V. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of Costco Wholesale Corporation, alleging a number of wage and hour violations. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court (Judge Walsh) preliminarily approved in an order filed on July 17, 2020. The factual and procedural background of the acti...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

MELBERT MAGPUGAY V. HARBOR ELECTRONICS, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of defendant Harbor Electronics, Inc., alleging wage statement violations. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court (Judge Walsh) preliminarily approved in an order filed on October 22, 2020. The factual and procedural background of the action...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

DANIEL ARAIZA V. HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY, ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of (1) Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and its current or former subsidiaries (“HPE”) and (2) HP Inc.—successor to Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”)—and its current or former subsidiaries (“HPI”). Plaintiff alleges that Defendants committed a number of...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

FLORES V. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST, ET AL.

Defendants PHH Mortgage Corporation, successor by merger to Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-AR18, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2005-AR18’s (collectively, “Defendants”) demur to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed by plaintiff Sonny Flores (“P...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

SIDHU, ET AL. V. SIDHU, ET AL.

Defendants Jagdeep Kaur and Parmjeet Kaur (collectively, “Defendants”) move to strike portions of the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) filed by plaintiffs Ranjit Sidhu and Gurdip Singh (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). I. Background A. Factual This is an action for fraud and breach of contract, among other things, arising out of agreement be...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

LI GONG VS. KATHY DESOTO

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Quash Plaintiff’s subpoena of Defendant’s medical records and Request for Monetary Sanctions. The Court has reviewed the moving and opposing papers. There is no evidence that Defendant’s medical condition is claimed to be a contributing factor in the occurrence of the accident giving rise to Plaintiff’s...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

KRAVCHUK, ET AL. V. TAYLOR MORRISON OF CAL., LLC

According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (“SAC”), on March 9, 2017, plaintiff Mariia Kravchuk (“Plaintiff”) entered into a contract with defendant Taylor Morrison of California, LLC (“TM”) for the purchase of Lot 104 at 73 Montecito Vista Drive, Unit No. 1 in San Jose (“subject property”) for $669,745.00, and deposited $20,093.2...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DIST

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 20CV369688 Charlene Lee v. Fremont Union High School Dist., et al. DATE: 28 January 2021 TIM...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. KAMAL KAPADIA

Kamal Kapadia, Perviz Kapadia, et al DATE: 28 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 6 This matter will be heard by the Honorable Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian in Department 20 in the Old Courthouse, 2nd Floor, 161 North First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing pa...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. CSI ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk’s Use Only) CASE NO.: 19CV352165 SASCO v. CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. et al. DATE: 28 January 2021 TIME: ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. LA RINCONADA COUNTRY CLUB

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. 18CV337741 Erik Swanson, et al. v. La Rinconada Country Club, Inc., et al. DATE: 28 January 2...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. JANICE DEL CASTILLODATE JANUARY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE

Janice Del Castillo DATE: 28 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 5 This matter will be heard by the Honorable Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian in Department 20 in the Old Courthouse, 2nd Floor, 161 North First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than...

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 IZAYA JOHNSON, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION Plaintiff, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 vs. 16 California corporation; and DOES 1 – 50, inclusive, 22 I. INTRODUCTION 23 This is a putative class and representative action arising out of various alleged...

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA]

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 In re MILGARD WAGE AND HOUR CASES Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 5056 13 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (C.R.C. Rule 3.550) TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION 14 FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA Included Actions: SETTLEMENT; MOTION FOR FEES 15 AND COSTS Sydney T. Stewart v. Milgard Manufacturing, 16 ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

CHO, ET AL. V. KIM, ET AL. [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. 18CV340037]

10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 13 HOWARD CHO, an individual; STEVE LACOMBE, an individual; Derivatively on 14 Behalf of NEWCO MATERIALS TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., TO DISMISS SHAREHOLDER 15 DERIVATIVE ACTION Plaintiffs, 18 KUMKANG QUARTZ CO., LTD.; QUARTZ MATERIALS CO., LTD; and DOES 1-20 19 inclusive, 20 Defendants,...

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

OLMOS, ET AL. V. DOYLE'S WORK COMPANY, INC.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 JUAN OLMOS, an individual; and ALDOLFO OLMOS, an individual, on behalf of themselves 13 and others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 14 Plaintiffs, 15 vs. 16 DOYLE’S WORK COMPANY, INC., a California corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, 17 inclusive, 18 Defendant. ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

VANCLEAVE V. ABBOTT LABORATORIES

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ELIZABETH J. VANCLEAVE, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated 13 individuals, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 14 Plaintiff, VICE 15 vs. 16 ABBOTT LABORATORIES; and DOES 1 through 5, 22 I. INTRODUCTION 23 Defendant Abbott Laboratories moves for an order permi...

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

JOSE CARRILLO V. NEW BALANCE ATHLETICS, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of defendant New Balance Athletics, Inc. alleging overtime and wage statement violations. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court (Judge Walsh) preliminarily approved in an order filed on September 17, 2020. The factual and procedural backgro...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

LANCE DUTCHER V. GOOGLE LLC, D/B/A YOUTUBE, ET AL.

This is a putative class action arising from the automatic renewal of subscriptions for digital content offered by Defendants Google LLC, d/b/a YouTube and YouTube, LLC (“Defendants” or “YouTube”). Defendants demur to each cause of action in the operative Complaint for failure to state a claim (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (e)), and Plaintiff o...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

LATANYA SIMMONS, ET AL. V. APPLE INC., ET AL.

This is a putative consumer class action challenging Defendant Apple, Inc.’s actions in connection with marketing, advertising, and selling allegedly defective Powerbeats 2 and Powerbeats 3 headphones. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court (Judge Walsh) preliminarily approved in an order filed on August 7, 2020. The factual and procedur...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING

& Sewer Service, Inc. According to the allegations of the complaint, plaintiff South Bay Piping Industry Labor Management Trust (“Plaintiff”) is a joint labor-management committee established pursuant to the federal Labor Management Cooperation Act of 1978 (Section 175a of Title 29 of the United States Code). (See complaint, ¶ 4.) Plaintiff, th...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

AFSHAR V. SAHER, ET AL.

Defendant Orchard School District (the “District” or “Defendant”) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed by plaintiff Reza Afshar (“Plaintiff”). I. Background A. Factual This action arises out of sexual abuse purported suffered by Plaintiff when he was a child by his school teacher. According to the allegations of the FAC, ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

BELCHER, ET AL. V. DAKOTA NOTE LLC, ET AL.

According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (“TAC”), in May 2015, plaintiffs Gregory Belcher (“Belcher”) and Vilasni Ganesh (“Ganesh”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), met defendant Derald Kenoyer (“Kenoyer”), who introduced himself as a licensed home loan mortgage broker with defendant California Home Loans aka Capital Funding (“CHL”)...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL.

-3 According to the allegations of the cross- complaint (“XC”), cross-complainant and defendant GenapSys, Inc. (“Genapsys”) developed industry disruptive DNA sequencing technology, investing over a hundred million dollars and over a decade in developing that technology. (See XC, ¶¶ 19-22.) In May 2017, cross-defendants Foresite Capital Manageme...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. BELLA VISTA APARTMENTS

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. 18CV340085 Maryam Gholamirad v. Bella Vista Apartments, et al. DATE: 21 January 2021 TIME: 9:...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. NORTHBOUND LLCDATE JANUARY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 17CV314755 Subohip Mukherjee v. Northbound LLC DATE: 21 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. KAMAL KAPADIA

Kamal Kapadia, Perviz Kapadia, et al DATE: 21 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 8 This matter will be heard by the Honorable Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian in Department 20 in the Old Courthouse, 2nd Floor, 161 North First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing pa...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 21     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.