Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

Santa Clara County, California

County Name

Santa Clara County

Population

1,927,852

Area (sq mi)

1,291

County Seat

San Jose

Established Year

1850

Board of Supervisor

District 1 – Mike Wasserman
District 2 – Cindy Chavez
District 3 – Dave Cortese
District 4 – Susan Ellenberg
District 5 – Joe Simitian

Form of Government

Charter

Administration Address

70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110

Phone Number

(408) 299-5105

Meaning of Name

City of Santa Clara, from Mission Santa Clara de Asís, named for Saint Clare of Assisi(Spanish for Saint Clare).

Rulings

1-100 of 1939 results

JOSE CARRILLO V. NEW BALANCE ATHLETICS, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of defendant New Balance Athletics, Inc. alleging overtime and wage statement violations. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court (Judge Walsh) preliminarily approved in an order filed on September 17, 2020. The factual and procedural backgro...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

LANCE DUTCHER V. GOOGLE LLC, D/B/A YOUTUBE, ET AL.

This is a putative class action arising from the automatic renewal of subscriptions for digital content offered by Defendants Google LLC, d/b/a YouTube and YouTube, LLC (“Defendants” or “YouTube”). Defendants demur to each cause of action in the operative Complaint for failure to state a claim (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (e)), and Plaintiff o...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

LATANYA SIMMONS, ET AL. V. APPLE INC., ET AL.

This is a putative consumer class action challenging Defendant Apple, Inc.’s actions in connection with marketing, advertising, and selling allegedly defective Powerbeats 2 and Powerbeats 3 headphones. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court (Judge Walsh) preliminarily approved in an order filed on August 7, 2020. The factual and procedur...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

AFSHAR V. SAHER, ET AL.

Defendant Orchard School District (the “District” or “Defendant”) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed by plaintiff Reza Afshar (“Plaintiff”). I. Background A. Factual This action arises out of sexual abuse purported suffered by Plaintiff when he was a child by his school teacher. According to the allegations of the FAC, ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING

& Sewer Service, Inc. According to the allegations of the complaint, plaintiff South Bay Piping Industry Labor Management Trust (“Plaintiff”) is a joint labor-management committee established pursuant to the federal Labor Management Cooperation Act of 1978 (Section 175a of Title 29 of the United States Code). (See complaint, ¶ 4.) Plaintiff, th...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

BELCHER, ET AL. V. DAKOTA NOTE LLC, ET AL.

According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (“TAC”), in May 2015, plaintiffs Gregory Belcher (“Belcher”) and Vilasni Ganesh (“Ganesh”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), met defendant Derald Kenoyer (“Kenoyer”), who introduced himself as a licensed home loan mortgage broker with defendant California Home Loans aka Capital Funding (“CHL”)...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL.

-3 According to the allegations of the cross- complaint (“XC”), cross-complainant and defendant GenapSys, Inc. (“Genapsys”) developed industry disruptive DNA sequencing technology, investing over a hundred million dollars and over a decade in developing that technology. (See XC, ¶¶ 19-22.) In May 2017, cross-defendants Foresite Capital Manageme...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. BELLA VISTA APARTMENTS

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. 18CV340085 Maryam Gholamirad v. Bella Vista Apartments, et al. DATE: 21 January 2021 TIME: 9:...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. NORTHBOUND LLCDATE JANUARY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 17CV314755 Subohip Mukherjee v. Northbound LLC DATE: 21 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. KAMAL KAPADIA

Kamal Kapadia, Perviz Kapadia, et al DATE: 21 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 8 This matter will be heard by the Honorable Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian in Department 20 in the Old Courthouse, 2nd Floor, 161 North First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing pa...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. MORTGAGE LENDER SERVICES

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 20CV369368 Rabindra Chakraborty, Ruma Chakraborty v. Mortgage Lender Services, Inc. DATE...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. RABINDRA N CHAKRABORTY

Rabindra N. Chakraborty, IOTIED, Inc. et al. DATE: 21 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 1 This matter will be heard by the Honorable Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian in Department 20 in the Old Courthouse, 2nd Floor, 161 North First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opp...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

CITY PARK AT SUNNYVALE OWNERS' ASSOCIATION V. TOLL BROS., INC., ET AL.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 CITY PARK AT SUNNYVALE OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual 13 benefit corporation, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY 14 Plaintiff, JUDGMENT/ADJUDICATION; MOTION FOR SUMMARY 15 vs. ADJUDICATION 16 TOLL BROS., INC., a Pennsylvania corporation; TOLL CA VII, L.P., a California limited 17 partn...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

ORR V. PETVET CARE CENTERS (CALIFORNIA), INC., ET AL.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 AMY ROYSE ORR, an individual, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 16 INC., a Delaware corporation; PETVET CARE CENTERS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability 17 company; PETVET CARE CENTERS, INC., a ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

IN RE MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION

This putative class action arises from alleged misrepresentations and omissions in the Offering Materials governing the October 2017 transaction by which Defendant Maxar Technologies, Inc.,9 a satellite manufacturer, acquired and merged with DigitalGlobe, Inc., a satellite imagery company (the “Merger”). Before the Court is a demurrer by Maxar and ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

RAUL ACEVES, ET AL. V. LEGACY PARTNERS, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of Defendant Legacy Partners, Inc. (“LP”). Plaintiffs allege wage and hour violations arising from LP’s “On-Call Policy.” Before the Court is LP’s petition to compel arbitration, which Plaintiffs oppose. As discussed below, the Court DENIES LP’s petition. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual As...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

YOUNG, ET AL. V. TSAI, ET AL.

This is an action for legal malpractice. In 2019, plaintiff Kevin Young (“Young”), the owner of plaintiff corporation ABC Wholesale, Inc. (“ABC”) (collectively with Young, “Plaintiffs”), contacted defendants Judy Chi-Dee-Tsai and the Law Office of Judy Tsai (collectively, “Defendants”), the attorney for ABC, regarding the sale of ABC. (See complain...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

AUDYCKI V. STANFORD HEALTH CARE

20CV365879) This is an action involving the consolidation of three putative class actions for wage and hour claims. On May 1, 2019, plaintiff Lillian Audycki (“Audycki”) filed a class action complaint against defendant Stanford Health Care (“SHC” or “Defendant”), asserting a single cause of action for violation of Labor Code section 226, allegi...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

JERKOVICH V. AZZARELLO, ET AL.

Defendant/cross-complainant Donna Kinsella (“Kinsella”) moves for summary adjudication in her favor on claims asserted in the complaint (“Complaint”) filed by plaintiff/cross-defendant Patricia Jerkovich (“Jerkovich”). I. Background A. Factual This action arises out of a dispute between the owners of commercial properties in San Jose. A...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. BPR PROPERTIES PETALUMA

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 19CV345239 HM Construction, Inc. vs BPR Properties Petaluma, LLC DATE: 14 January 2021 T...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS ETC

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 20PR188917 In the Matter of Aubree Rullamas DATE: 14 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUM...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

HTTP://WWW.SCSCOURT.ORG

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 20CV366593 Tsuyoshi Salsbery v. Michael Brando DATE: 14 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 6 This matter will b...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

(FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY)

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org () CASE NO.: 20CV367468 Morgan Lewis-Pastor vs Diane Schneider DATE: 14 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 8 This ma...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. SU NGUYENDATE JANUARY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 19CV356354 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. vs Su Nguyen DATE: 14 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. SICMOUNTAIN BAY PLAZA

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 20CV372914 Pure Storage, Inc. et al vs Sic-Mountain Bay Plaza, LLC et al DATE: 14 Januar...

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

BIGGS V. LYFT, INC.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 DAVID BIGGS, an individual, on behalf of the State of California, as a private attorney general, 13 and on behalf of all aggrieved employees, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION TO COMPEL INDIVIDUAL 14 Plaintiff, ARBITRATION AND STAY 15 vs. 16 LYFT, INC., a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business i...

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

PERELTSVAIG V. CARTUS CORPORATION

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ASYA PERELTSVAIG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 16 Corporation, 17 Defendant. 22 I. INTRODUCTION 23 This is a putative class action and representative action arising out of vari...

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

FLEMING V. OLIPHANT FINANCIAL, LLC

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 BRUNO FLEMING, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION Plaintiff, TO COMPEL INDIVIDUAL 14 ARBITRATION AND DISMISS vs. PLAINTIFF’S CLASS ACTION 15 CLAIMS OLIPHANT FINANCIAL, LLC, a Florida 16 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action alleging wage statement violations against Defendant Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation. Before the Court is Northrop Grumman’s motion for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication, which Plaintiff opposes. As explained below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s mo...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

CYNTHIA GAMINO V. TRADESY, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of defendants Tradesy, Inc. and Tradesy Services, Inc., 1 alleging wage and hour violations. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of defendant Abacus Business Corporation Group, Inc. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. As discussed below, the Court requires further information to rule on Plaintiff’s motion. I. B...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

JESSECA BIEGER V. HOUZZ, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Before the Court is a motion for preliminary approval of a settlement of this action and related claims asserted by another employee in arbitration, which is unop...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

JOSE SALGADO-LOPEZ V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL.

This is a lemon law suit. In the original and still operative Complaint (“for violation of statutory obligations”) filed May 6, 2019 Plaintiff Jose Salgado-Lopez (“Plaintiff”) states claims for: 1) Violation of Civ. Code §1793.2(d); 2) Violation of Civ. Code §1793.2(b); 3) Violation of Civ. Code §1793.2(a)(3); 4) Breach of Express Warranty; 5) Brea...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

SILICON VALLEY REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC., ET AL. V. HAN, ET AL.

According to the allegations of the complaint, defendants Hyung Ki Han (“Young”) and Mi Ok Han (“Mina”), individually and as trustees of the Young Ki Han and Mina Han Revocable Living Trust dated July 12, 2017 (“Trust”) (collectively, “the Hans”) were the owners of the property at 14231 Douglass Lane in Saratoga. (See complaint, ¶¶ 5, 14.) On Febru...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

CORNET V. BRAR

In this motion, cross-defendants Arlette Gauze and Remy Sanouillet (“Sanouillets”) seek an order amending their judgment against Kaddu, Inc. a California Corporation (“Kaddu”) to add defendant Sujit Brar (“Brar”), the sole shareholder of Kaddu, Inc., as a judgment creditor. I. Factual Background This case has a long and protracted history. ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. INTERREC BV IRELAND LTDDATE JANUARY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE

Interrec B.V. Ireland Ltd. DATE: 7 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 8 This matter will be heard by the Honorable Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian in Department 20 in the Old Courthouse, 2nd Floor, 161 North First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no late...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

(FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY)

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org () CASE NO.: 17CV317017 CBA Collection Bureau of America, Ltd. vs Christina Garcia et al DATE: 7 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. QUANERGY SYSTEMS

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 19CV347220 Akram Benmbarek vs Quanergy Systems, Inc. DATE: 7 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. JAIME ARMENTADATE JANUARY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 19CV354713 Wheels Financial Group, LLC vs Jaime Armenta DATE: 7 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

(FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY)

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org () CASE NO.: 19CV353464 Irene Basistei vs Eric Malek DATE: 7 January 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 6 This matter will b...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

SUPERIOR COURT VS. SILVIA ACEVEDODATE JANUARY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 19CV346092 JH Portfolio Debt Equities, LLC vs Silvia Acevedo DATE: 7 January 2021 TIME: ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

FLORES V. ACCO ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 VICTOR FLORES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: Plaintiff, DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED 14 COMPLAINT; MOTION TO STRIKE vs. PORTIONS OF FIRST AMENDED 15 COMPLAINT ACCO ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC.; and 16 DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 17 Defendant. The above-...

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

MOLL V. JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 BRITTNAY MOLL, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND 14 Plaintiff, STAY PROCEEDINGS 15 vs. 16 JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, The above-entitled actio...

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

RONALD CHINITZ V. APPLE INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class action on behalf of purchasers of Defendant’s iPad device who upgraded the device’s operating system to iOS 11 during the class period. Before the Court is the parties’ request for dismissal of the putative class claims. As explained below, the Court DENIES the request without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND As alleged in ...

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2020

JESSICA MCCALL V. ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC., ET AL.

This is an action to enforce shareholder inspection rights. Before the Court is Defendant’s demurrer to the Amended Complaint on the grounds that this Court lacks jurisdiction over an inspection demand pursuant to title 8, section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law Code (“Section 220”) and Plaintiff has failed to plead facts stating a cred...

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2020

CAITLIN GEENEN V. HOUZZ, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action alleging wage and hour violations by Defendant Houzz, Inc. Before the Court is Houzz’s demurrer on the ground that there is another action pending between the same parties (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (c)), which Plaintiff opposes. As explained below, the Court OVERRULE...

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2020

KAMRAN KHAN V. RK MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of defendant RK Management Group LLC, alleging a number of wage and hour violations. Before the Court is Defendant’s petition to compel arbitration, which Plaintiff opposes. As explained below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s petition. I. BACKGROUND ...

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2020

KOCHAR V. BERKALIEVA, ET AL.

-4 According to the allegations of the complaint, plaintiff Stuti Kochhar (“Plaintiff”) is a tutor for students at Stanford University, and in 2017, Plaintiff began to tutor defendant Mikaela Berkeley (“Mikaela”) at a rate of $105 per hour from April-December 31, 2017 and at a rate of $135 per hour from January 1, 2019 until June 20, 2020. (See...

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2020

JIN V. LI

-9 On July 16, 2020, the Court granted defendant and cross-complainant Fuzu Li’s (“Fuzu”) motion to compel further responses to requests for production of documents nos. (“RPDs”) 1-5, special interrogatories nos. (“SIs”) 2, 3, 7-10 as to plaintiff and cross-defendant Jigang Jin (“Jin”), and Fuzu’s motion to compel further responses to RPDs 1, 2...

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2020

PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 KERN PENG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 16 TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE, a corporate trust, 22 I. INTRODUCTION 23 This is a putative class action arising out of variou...

  • Hearing

    Dec 16, 2020

SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO QUASH 14 vs. 15 XINGKE ELECTRONICS (DONGGUAN) CO., LTD.; XINGKE ELECTRONICS (HONG 16 KONG) CO., LTD.; SINCO ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED; JINLONG 17 MACHINERY & ELECTRONICS CO., LTD; LIEW YEW SOON aka MARK LIEW;...

  • Hearing

    Dec 16, 2020

MARTINEZ V. FRITO-LAY, INC., ET AL.

8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 11 MICHAEL J. MARTINEZ, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 15 ROLLING FRITO-LAY SALES, LP, a Delaware limited partnership; and DOES 1 through 50, 16 inclusive, 17 Defendants. 22 I. INTRO...

  • Hearing

    Dec 16, 2020

LANDA V. CHRISTOPHER RANCH, LLC, ET AL.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 Plaintiff AURELIO LANDA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 vs. 16 Corporation, B & A INTERNATIONAL FARM LABOR SERVICES, INC. and DOES 1 through 17 20, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 23 I. INTRODUCTION 24 T...

  • Hearing

    Dec 16, 2020

RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL.

These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which Plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. Cross-Defendant Ageless Plastering Company moves for summary judgment on the ground that it did not create, manage, or control a dangerous condition on the subject premises, and there is no evidence it caused Plaintiff‘s accident. Age...

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

EDWARD RAZO MORALES V. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class action alleging unlawful debt collection practices by Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. (“MCM”) in connection with consumer credit accounts. Before the Court is Defendant’s petition to compel arbitration, which is unopposed. As explained below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s petition. I. BACKGROUND According t...

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

PREXXIE PASCUAL, ET AL. V. SATELLITE HEALTHCARE, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of Satellite Healthcare, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court (Judge Walsh) preliminarily approved in an order filed on July 17, 2020. The factual and procedural background of the action and the Cou...

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

THOMPSON LY V. SAGE INTACCT, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of defendant Sage Intacct, Inc., alleging misclassification of certain employees and resulting wage and hour violations. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court (Judge Walsh) preliminarily approved in an order filed on August 7, 2020. The factual and procedural background of the actio...

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

DORSA V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL.

Defendant City of San Jose (the “City”) demurs to the complaint (“Complaint”) filed by plaintiff Alaetra Dorsa (“Plaintiff”). I. Background A. Factual This is an action for negligence and personal injuries arising out of an incident involving a carousel animal ride. According to the allegations of the Complaint, on September 7, 2019, Pl...

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

YOUNG JAE SHIN ET AL VS YOON J. HUH ET AL

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org Young Jae Shin, et al. v. Yoon J. Huh, et al. CASE NO. 20CV361404 DATE: 10 December 2020 TIME: 9:00 am...

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

SUPERIOR COURT VS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 19CV360642 Jennifer Bartolo, et al. v. State of California Department of Transportation, DAT...

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

SUPERIOR COURT VS. SUPERIOR COURT

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 20PR188568 In Re Angel Gutierrez, Noel Amir Gutierrez, Adalynn Jimenez DATE: 10 December...

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

SUPERIOR COURT VS. KAMAL KAPADIA

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO.: 2015-1-CV-278288 Roda Hiramanek v. Kamal Kapadia, Perviz Kapadia DATE: 10 December 2020 ...

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

SUPERIOR COURT VS. JIHAD JABER ET ALDATE DECEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE

Jihad Jaber et al. DATE: 10 December 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 1 This matter will be heard by the Honorable Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian in Department 20 in the Old Courthouse, 2nd Floor, 161 North First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than...

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

RIVERA V. TALAMO FOOD SERVICES, INC.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 PORFIRIO RIVERA and ANDRES HARO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly 13 situated and aggrieved, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 Plaintiffs, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. 16 TALAMO FOOD SERVICE, INC., a California corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 22 I....

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2020

SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL.

8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 11 SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD, 12 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO QUASH; DEMURRER AND 13 vs. MOTION TO STRIKE; MOTION TO QUASH; MOTION TO STAY ORDER 14 XINGKE ELECTRONICS (DONGGUAN) CO., LTD.; XINGKE ELECTRONICS (HONG 15 KONG) CO., LTD.; SINCO ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED; JINLONG 16 MACH...

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2020

IGNELZI V. DA DEFENSE LOGISTICS HQ, LLC

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 MARCELO A. IGNELZI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL 14 vs. 16 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 22 I. INTRODUCTION 23 Plaintiff Marcelo A. Ignelzi (“Plaintiff”) brings this putative c...

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2020

MAIRE TECNIMONT S.P.A, ET AL. V. SILURIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 MAIRE TECNIMONT S.p.A., an Italian company; and MET GAS PROCESSING 13 TECHNOLOGIES S.p.A., and Italian limited TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION company, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND 14 STAY CASE Plaintiffs, 17 MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Panama corporation; SILURIA (ASSIGNMENT 18 FOR THE BENEFIT OF CRED...

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2020

ARTURO REYES V. IVARY MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of defendant Ivary Management Co. dba Renaissance Stone Care & Waterproofing, alleging a number of wage and hour violations. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court (Judge Walsh) preliminarily approved in an order filed on July 14, 2020. The ...

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

ROBERT W. AHLSTROM V. DHI MORTGAGE COMPANY GP, INC., ET AL.

This is a Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action alleging wage and hour violations by defendants DHI Mortgage Company GP, Inc., D.R. Horton, Inc., and DHI Mortgage Company, LTD, L.P. 1 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay these proceedings pending the resolution of an appeal in a related federal action and the arbitration of Plaint...

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

DANIEL CORTAZZO V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA

Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant City of Santa Clara (“Defendant”) to the first amended complaint (“FAC”) of plaintiff Daniel Cortazzo (“Plaintiff”). Factual and Procedural Background This action concerns Plaintiff’s entitlement to back pay and additional pension compensation as a result of pay increases that were agr...

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

AGNEWS SANTA CLARA DEVELOPMENT, LLC V. REBELLO

Defendant Marlene Rebello (“Defendant”) demurs to the complaint (“Complaint”) filed by plaintiff Agnews Santa Clara Development, LLC (“Agnews” or “Defendant”). V. Background C. Factual This is an action for specific performance, among other things, arising out of a contract for the purchase of property in Santa Clara. According to the a...

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

KIM V. PETS RX, INC., ET AL.

Defendants Pets Rx, Inc. dba VCA Vets & Pets Animal Hospital (“VCA”) and Tiffany Sung, DVM (“Dr. Sung”) (collectively, “Defendants”) demur to the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) filed by plaintiff Jean Kim (“Plaintiff”) and move to strike portions contained therein. I. Background A. Factual This action arises out of care rendered by Dr...

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

VARIOUS, INC. VS DOES 1 - 50 ET AL

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org Various, Inc. v. Natasha McGarry, et al. CASE NO. 19CV350788 DATE: 3 December 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE ...

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

TYLER V. WESTERN MANAGEMENT, LLC

8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 13 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 21 I. INTRODUCTION 22 This is a putative class action arising out of all...

  • Hearing

    Dec 02, 2020

SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL.

10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 13 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 15 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 17 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, individually and in his official capacity; 18 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and...

  • Hearing

    Dec 02, 2020

HOPSTEIN V. HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY, ET AL.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 KELLIE HOPSTEIN, on behalf of herself and other class members, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 16 COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, ENTERPRISE SERVICES LLC, a Delaware 17 Limited Liability Company, and DOES 3 through 10, inclusive, 23 I....

  • Hearing

    Dec 02, 2020

BLACKBERRY CORPORATION, ET AL. V. SENTINEL LABS, INC., ET AL.

Plaintiffs BlackBerry Corporation and its subsidiary Cylance, Inc. bring this action for trade secret misappropriation and unfair competition against a competing security software provider, Sentinel Labs, Inc. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to file under seal their trade secret identification pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2019...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

ALFRED LAX V. ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY, ET AL.

This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of defendant Roto-Rooter Services Company, alleging a range of wage and hour violations. Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. I. Background As alleged in the operative complaint, defendant operates throughout the United Sta...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS AND MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION INC., ET AL.

See confidential tentative ruling previously sent to the parties....

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

JIMY JUAREZ V. CREATIVE MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL.

This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Creative Manufacturing Solutions, Inc. (“CMS”), alleging meal period, rest period, and overtime violations. Plaintiff Jimy Juarez also brings individual claims for harassment, wrongful termination, and related causes of action against Defe...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL.

This is an action for trade secret misappropriation and related claims. Before the Court is a motion by defendants Acer America Corporation and Acer Inc. for leave to file a cross- complaint, which plaintiff Intellisoft, Ltd. opposes. I. Background This action was recently remanded from federal court, following its removal from this Court o...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

SBH CAMDEN PROPERTIES, L.P. V. MIRASSOU, ET AL.

This is a dispute among owners and possessors of adjoining land over competing rights of first refusal. According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (“SAC”), plaintiff SBH Camden Properties, L.P. (“SBH”) owns one parcel (parcel 5) in a shopping center at 5415 Camden Avenue, while members of the Mirassou family own the neighboring pa...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EX REL. CITY ATTORNEY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET

al. v. Citizens for Free Speech and Equal Justice, LLC, et al. Defendants Citizens for Free Speech and Equal Justice, LLC (“Citizens”), GTL Enterprises, LLC (“GTL”), Lotus Class, Inc. (“Lotus Class”), Atour Amirkhas, Grace Amirkhas and Lotus Shin (“Shin”) (collectively, “Defendants”) demur to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed by plainti...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

LIU V. FAN, ET AL.

After full consideration of the evidence, the separate statements submitted by the parties, and the authorities submitted by each party, the court makes the following rulings: According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (“FAC”), on August 11, 2017, plaintiff Jie Liu (“Liu”) entered into an agreement to purchase a condominium at ...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

SUPERIOR COURT VS. JAZMIN GONZALEZ AKA JAZMIN HERRERA

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org CASE NO.: 19CV357576 Unifund CCR, LLC v. Jazmin Gonzalez aka Jazmin Herrera v. DATE: 19 November 2020 ...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

SUPERIOR COURT VS. JEFFREY WHALENDATE NOVEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE

Jeffrey Whalen DATE: 19 November 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 9 This matter will be heard by the Honorable Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian in Department 20 in the Old Courthouse, 2nd Floor, 161 North First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:0...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

YOUNG JAE SHIN ET AL VS YOON J. HUH ET AL

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org Young Jae Shin, et al. v. Yoon J. Huh, et al. CASE NO. 20CV361404 DATE: 19 November 2020 TIME: 9:00 am...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

SUPERIOR COURT VS. RABINDRA N CHAKRABORTY

Rabindra N. Chakraborty, IOTIED, Inc. et al. DATE: 19 November 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 1 This matter will be heard by the Honorable Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian in Department 20 in the Old Courthouse, 2nd Floor, 161 North First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the op...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

SUPERIOR COURT VS. TESLA

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org CASE NO.: 17CV313795 Select Industries Corporation v. Tesla, Inc. DATE: 19 November 2020 TIME: 9:00 am...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

MARYAM GHOLAMIRAD VS. BELLA VISTA APARTMENTS

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org Maryam Gholamirad v. Bella Vista Apartments, et al. CASE NO. 18CV340085 DATE: 19 November 2020 TIME: 9...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

SUPERIOR COURT VS. BETTER CARE

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT 20 161 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 408.882.2320 · 408.882.2296 (fax) [email protected] (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org CASE NO.: 19CV359811 Siham Yamout v. Better Care, Inc., dba The Redwoods Post-Acute, et al. DATE: 19 N...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2020

ABREGO V. STERICYCLE, INC.

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 SAMUEL ABREGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE 14 vs. 16 inclusive, 17 Defendants. on November 18, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. The court now issues its tentative ruling as 20 follows: (“Plaintif...

  • Hearing

    Nov 18, 2020

TYLER V. WESTERN MANAGEMENT, LLC

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 16 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 22 I. INTRODUCTION 23 This is a putative class action arising out of all...

  • Hearing

    Nov 18, 2020

VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. 18CV327382]

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO SECOND AMENDED 14 vs. COMPLAINT 15 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 23 I. INTRODUCTION 24 According to the allegations of the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), filed on June 25 12,...

  • Hearing

    Nov 18, 2020

STROJNIK V. SASHI GROUP LLC, ET AL.

On July 24, 2020, in propria persona plaintiff Peter Strojnik (“Plaintiff”) filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) against defendants DeAnza Family, L.P. dba The Nest Palo Alto (“DeAnza”), Palmetto Hospitality of Palo Alto, LLC dba Hilton Garden Inn (“Palmetto”), SHR Palo Alto, LLC dba Four Seasons (“SHR”), and International Hotel Associates No. 3...

  • Hearing

    Nov 12, 2020

VIRK, ET AL. V. ANAND, ET AL.

According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (“TAC”), plaintiffs Amar Virk (“Amar”) and Taproop Virk (“Taproop”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are married. (See TAC, ¶ 1.) While defendant Taresh Anand (“Taresh”) and Amar worked for EBAS, Taresh asked Amar to work for a new company that Taresh would start, as an equal partner. (See TAC...

  • Hearing

    Nov 12, 2020

HONGXIA LIU VS JASON CULLEN, ET AL.

The following motion came on regularly for hearing on November 12, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 20, Honorable William J. Monahan presiding. The matters having been submitted, good cause appearing, it is ordered: Defendant Jason Cullen (“Defendant”)’s demurrer to causes of action five through twelve of the complaint is deemed MOOT by the fil...

  • Hearing

    Nov 12, 2020

UNIFUND CCR. LLC VS LIEN TRAN, ET AL.

The following motion(s) came on regularly for hearing on November 12, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 20, Honorable William J. Monahan presiding. The matters having been submitted, good cause appearing, it is ordered: Plaintiff Unifund CCR, LLC (“Plaintiff”)’s Amended Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Request for Judicial Notice are UNO...

  • Hearing

    Nov 12, 2020

PUMP REPAIR SERVICE CO. ET AL. VS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC.,

et al. The following motion(s) came on regularly for hearing on November 12, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 20, Honorable William J. Monahan presiding. The matters having been submitted, good cause appearing, it is ordered: Plaintiff Pump Repair Service Co. (“Plaintiff”)’s Motion to Compel defendant Construction Management Group (“Defenda...

  • Hearing

    Nov 12, 2020

IN RE HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION

This consolidated putative class action arises from alleged misrepresentations and omissions in the Offering Materials issued in connection with the April 2017 transaction by which defendant Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (“HPE”)’s Enterprise Services business segment was spun off and merged with Computer Sciences Corporation, Inc. (“CSC”) to f...

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 20     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.