Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

Riverside County, California

County Name

Riverside County

Population

2,470,546

Area (sq mi)

7,208

County Seat

Riverside

Established Year

1893

Board of Supervisor

District 1 – Kevin Jeffries
District 2 – Karen Spiegel
District 3 – Chuck Washington
District 4 – V. Manuel Perez
District 5 – Jeff Hewitt

Form of Government

General Law

Administration Address

Lake Elsinore Office 16275 Grand Ave. Building D Lake Elsinore, CA 92530

Phone Number

(951) 471-4500

Meaning of Name

The city of Riverside, named for its location on the Santa Ana River.

Rulings

1-100 of 10000 results

URIBE VS YOUNG TIGERS INC

Denied (off-calendar) The entry of default terminates the right to appear in the action unless and until the default has been set aside or default judgment has been entered. Devlin v. Kearney Mesa AMC/Jeep/Renault Inc. (1984) 155 Cal.App3d. 381,385-386. The moving parties’ default was entered on July 9, 2019. The Court has denied two motions to set...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

GONZALEZ VS HOME DEPOT USA INC

See above...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

YOUNG VS SWANSON M.D.

Continued to 1-27-21 at 8:30 a.m. to allow further judicial review....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

CHEN VS UNIVERSITY CAMPUS HOTEL LLC

The defendant’s motion to compel the plaintiff to serve further responses to the requests for admissions is granted. Complete responses without objection shall be served not later than February 16, 2021. Sanctions are imposed on the plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel in the sum of $1,485. Analysis: As above....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

LUU VS TUAZON

1. GRANT the Motion to Compel further response to Special Interrogatory 61(Defendant references documents but fails to identify the name of the document, the date of creation/modification and purpose as requested by the interrogatory, and Defendant’s attempt to supplement the response in its separate statement is not a verified.); DENY the remainde...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

VU VS PORTER

Grant. Matter is set for an OCS Re: Dismissal and/ or Sanctions for Failure to file Default Judgment on 4-7-21, 8:30 am, D-4....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

LOZANO VS FCA US LLC

Continued. Supplemental responses have been provided. However, it appears that these responses were not verified and they did not contain documents. As such, the hearing is continued to March 3, 2021 at 8:30 in Department 7. The parties are ordered to meet and confer – by telephone - regarding the status and compliance of the supplemental responses...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

PETERS VS CITY OF BEAUMONT CALIFORNIA

Denied. The operative pleading is the Fourth Amended Complaint (TAC) filed on 9-2-20. Plaintiff applied for entry of the default of Defendant Alan Charles Kapanicas. Rather than using the correct name, the Request for Entry of Default included the name Charles Kapanicas instead. The clerk rejected the request to enter default. Defendant Alan Charle...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

RAMIREZ VS BROWN

Moot....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

FINLEY VS HENLEY PACIFIC LA LLC

Continued. CCP § 430.41 and CCP § 435.5 require the moving party to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading “in person or by telephone” for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer or motion to strike, at least 5 days before the responsive pleading is...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

SANFORD VS PREMIUM RETAIL SERVICES INC

Continue to March 4, 2021. Supplemental papers to be filed no later than February 18, 2021. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint and shall file the proposed First Amended Complaint within 10 days of this ruling. On the assumption that plaintiff will be filing a First Amended Complaint adding class claims, the Court is is...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

PLATT VS THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE

No tentative. This motion is set for hearing on February 11, 2021....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) N A VS ENTSUAH

Granted. The judgment is ordered set aside and the action is ordered dismissed without prejudice....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

BABAIE VS BABAIE

On the Court’s own motion, this matter is continued to January 26, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. here in this Department, appearance to be via WebEx absent further notice....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

SD PREMIERE PROPERTIES, LLC VS MAINSTREAM INVESTMENT, LLC

A tentative is not complete. The parties may appear to argue, if they wish. If the parties do not, then the court will issue its ruling likely by noon of January 25....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

GONZALEZ VS HOME DEPOT USA INC

Plaintiff Noel Gonzalez requested assistance from a Home Depot sales associate to obtain an item from one of the higher shelves in the store. Plaintiff was advised to use a yellow tilt-n-roll ladder that is available for customers to retrieve items located on higher shelves. While Plaintiff was using the ladder to look at kitchen exhaust/range hood...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

BOJORQUEZ VS GEOVEL INC NOTICE OF DEMURRER; DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Sustain without leave to amend. Defendants demurrer once again to the fourth cause of action for fraudulent inducement-concealment, arguing it is barred by the Economic Loss Rule and that it fails to plead facts supporting the cause of action with the requisite specificity. The facts pleaded in the First Amended Complaint do not address the defects...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

MENDOZA VS NISSAN NORTH AMERICA INC

The defendant’s unopposed motion to strike portions of the FAC will be granted without leave to amend if, no later than 8:15 A.M. on the morning of the hearing, the defendant submits an amended proof of service to the Court at [email protected] The defendant shall file and serve its answer to the balance of the FAC within 10 days. Anal...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

CHEN VS UNIVERSITY CAMPUS HOTEL LLC

The defendant’s motion to compel the plaintiff to serve further responses to the request to produce is granted. Complete responses without objection shall be served not later than February 16, 2021. Sanctions are imposed on the plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel in the sum of $1,485. Analysis: The opposition filed by the plaintiff is untimely, havin...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

BARRERA VS HELLING

The court continues this hearing until February 8, 2021, at 8:30 AM in Department 10. The court directs counsel to meet and confer on the scope of the remaining issues based on the court’s ruling on Defendant’s motion for relief from waiver. The court is available for an informal discovery conference to discuss issues with counsel....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

HERNANDEZ VS. WONDERFUL CITRUS PARKING LLC

No tentative ruling. Parties shall appear for argument. Moving party should come prepared to answer the following questions. Has the petition for coordination been submitted to the Chair of the Judicial Council and, if so, when? Has a coordination motion judge been assigned? Assuming the answer to these questions is yes, the court is inclined to de...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

MUNOZ VS MALLOCH MYLNE

Grant. OSC RE: Dismissal and/or Sanctions for Failure to file proof of service on Defendant set for 4-7-21, 8:30 am, D-4....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

VAN VS RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS INC

The special motion to strike is MOOT. GRANT $4,890 fees and costs in favor of Plaintiff. (12 hours at $400/hour plus $90 filing fee). The Special Motion to Strike Opposition and supporting Documents filed by Rancho Reprographics on November 30, 2020, which pertain to Catherine Cole, shall be stricken. The CMC is continued to March 2, 2021....

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

COLE VS RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS, INC

CONTINUE to March 2, 2021, for the parties to engage in further meet and confer. The moving party shall file a new M&C declaration by February 19, 2021. The declaration of defendants’ counsel, Katrina Anne Foley, filed on 10/6/20, does not comply with the statutory requirement – it simply states that a meet and confer was attempted by written corre...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

MELENDREZ VS KINDSTRAND

Deny. The supplemental responses provided by Defendant are sufficient. No sanctions....

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

OREGEL ESPARZA VS FCA US LLC

Granted On 12/8/20, the Court granted both motions as to Enrique Oregel Esparza, but continued the motions as to Rosa de los Angeles es Martines Morales (“Morales”) to determine what interest she had in the property and whether she had standing to pursue her claims. Plaintiffs content that a portion of Morales’ money was used to purchase the vehicl...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

RAMOS QUINTERO VS SUPER CENTER CONCEPTS INC

Deny. Defendant has met its initial burden to show Plaintiff cannot prove Defendant had any notice of a dangerous condition prior to the fall or that Defendant breached its duty of care, however, triable issues of material fact exist as to both causes of action. There is a triable issue of material fact as to whether any liquid was on the floor tha...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

ABEYTA VS RECONCILED TERMITE AND PEST CONTROL INC

Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Abeyta filed an Anti-SLAPP motion on December 29, 2020. By operation of law, discovery is stayed under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, subdivision (g). The court continues this hearing to February 18, 2021, 8:30 AM, Department 10....

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

GI EXCELLENCE INC VS PADDA, M.D. HEARING ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES FILED BY GI EXCELLENCE INC, MILAN S CHAKRABARTY, M.D., INDRANEEL CHAKRABARTY, M.D.

Motion denied. The court previously issued a tentative ruling that Plaintiffs were not entitled to attorneys’ fees based upon their obtaining judgments in their favor on their breach of Recruitment Agreement claims because the amount of their recovery was less than the jurisdictional amount for an unlimited jurisdiction action. (See CCP § 1033(a); ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

SOJO VS COSTELLO DEMURRER TO CROSS COMPLAINT

Sustained in part. First Cause of Action - Overruled An escrow holder is a fiduciary to the parties to the escrow. (Amen v. Merced County Title Co. (1962) 58 Cal.2d 528, 534. The escrow holder’s responsibility is to comply with the instructions of the parties. (See Rianda v. San Benito Title Guarantee Co. (1950) 35 Cal.2d 170, 173; see also Fin. Co...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

WRENCH VS ST. PIERRE

The Demurrer is SUSTAINED for failure to state sufficient facts with Leave to Amend of 10 days. A fraud claim based on affirmative misrepresentations requires (1) a misrepresentation of a material fact (consisting of a false representation, concealment or non-disclosure); (2) knowledge of the falsity (i.e., scienter); (3) intent to deceive and ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

HSIEH VS AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE

GRANT the motion. Plaintiffs are over 70 and have sufficiently established they have a substantial interest in the action, and that their health is such that preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing their interests. (Code Civ. Proc., § 36(a).)...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

TEJEDA VS GUTIERREZ

The Motion is DENIED. Before a referee for accounting may occur, the contract disputes must be resolved. CCP §639(a)(1) allows the appointment of a referee “because a trained accountant is generally better able to efficiently and inexpensively examine a ‘long account’ than a trial court judge is able to do through adversarial court proceedings....

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

CASTILLO VS CHAVEZ

The Court orders Plaintiff’s counsel to appear. There is no proof of service attached to the motion to be relieved to the client, only to defense counsel. Counsel should be prepared to address whether proper service has been made....

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

BRAVO VS SUNRISE FLOOR SYSTEMS,LLC

Continue to February 18, 2021. Supplemental papers to be filed by February 8, 2021. The CMO limits released parties to “defendants named in the complaint, together with their officers, directors, employees and agents.” The release still does not comply. The notice to class members states the settlement administration cost is $10,000 but the bid say...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

BANK OF AMERICA N A VS REED

The motion is DENIED without prejudice. No proof of service has been filed as required by Code of Civil Procedure sections 1005, 1005.5 and 1010....

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

  • Judge

    Candice Garcia-Rodrigo

  • County

    Riverside County, CA

KELLOGG VS SAN-VAL INC NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES FROM EDMUND KELLOGG TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

Deny. Moving party seeks to compel further responses to Request for Production of Documents (Set Four). Specifically, San-Val seeks additional records relating to Plaintiff Kellogg’s insurance clients, his cellular phone calls, and his business accounts. San-Val’s motion is not well taken. Kellogg’s responses are Code compliant and his objections v...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

MONTANO VS BARTOLINO HEARING RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY

Grant. Moving party Rivera seeks summary judgment on the sole cause of action alleged against her in the Cross-Complaint by NCEM, the fifth cause of action for negligence and misconduct by a notary. Rivera was the notary who notarized a Grant Deed, asserted in the underlying Complaint to be fraudulent. The Grant Deed purported to transfer property ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

WOLF VS WG TEMECULA, LP

Granted as between Plaintiff and Atria Park. Upon the petition/motion of a party to an agreement to arbitrate, the court must grant a petition to compel arbitration unless it finds: no written agreement to arbitrate exists; the right to compel arbitration has been waived; grounds exist for revocation of the agreement; or litigation is pending that ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

PERRY VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP

The hearing is continued for the moving parties to comply with Section E, subsection 10(a) of the Case Management Order. The Stipulated PAGA Settlement does not limit the binding effect of the settlement to the named plaintiff and the State of California. It states that the settlement will “bind all those who would be bound if the action had be...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

LOPEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC

Continued. The hearing in this matter is continued to February 11, 2021, at 8:30 am in Department 7. No further briefing will be permitted....

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

GARCIA VS MS FOODS LLC MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

Granted. Plaintiffs do not dispute that their claims are covered by the Arbitration Agreements. Rather, they deny that they executed the Arbitration Agreements. (See Declaration of Arlene Garcia (“Garcia Decl.”), ¶¶ 3-6; Declaration of Brandi Smith (“Smith Decl.”), ¶¶ 3-6.) In addition, Plaintiffs argue that the Defendants are not signatories to th...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) VS LEA

Granted The judgment is set aside and the action is dismissed without prejudice....

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

CAYWOOD VS PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC.

The Court grants Defendant’s motion to file under seal the unredacted copies of Exhibits 4-5, 7- 9, 12 and 16 in support of Defendant’s MSJ per CRC 2.550 and 2.551. CRC 2.550(d) provides that a Court may order a record filed under seal if it finds the following: 1. There exists an overriding interest that overcomes the right of public access to the...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

AYOUB SIDHUM & CO VS TUCCERI

Grant. Defendants to provide further responses within 30 days. Plaintiff served form RFA’s with a simple authentication request. Defendant’s responses are evasive, not tailored to the particular document referenced, and contain meritless objections. The responses are insufficient because the information sought should be readily available and access...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

CAVALRY VS ORTIZ

The unopposed motion is GRANTED. Monetary sanctions are imposed against Defendant in the amount of $260.00 for attorney’s fees and costs payable to Plaintiff forthwith. Proposed Order shall be signed....

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

  • Judge

    Candice Garcia-Rodrigo

  • County

    Riverside County, CA

FIRST TECHNOLOGY VS GROSS

Granted. All of Defendants’ evidentiary objections are overruled. Plaintiff has provided evidentiary support for all prima facie elements of its claim against Defendants. Defendants generalized factual declarations set forth little more than their alleged lack of memory of having entered into the contract which is the subject of this action. And as...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

STINGL VS AURORA SURGERY CENTER L.P

C.C.P. §1030 allows the defendant to apply to the court by noticed motion for an order requiring the plaintiff to file an undertaking if the plaintiff resides out of the state. The undertaking would secure an award of costs and attorney’s fees that might be awarded in the action. C.C.P. §1030(a); see Shannon v. Sims Service Center, Inc. (1985) 164 ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

VARELA VS GONZALEZ

Denied. As to a physical examination other than authorized under CCP §2032.220, or a mental examination, unless the parties enter a stipulation, a party must obtain leave of court to have such examinations conducted. (CCP §2032.310(a).) The motion must also submit an affidavit or declaration with facts showing a reasonable and good faith attempt to...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE & JAVIER MERCADO AND SALVADOR MERCADO

The unopposed motion is granted....

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

AYOUB SIDHUM & CO VS TUCCERI

Grant....

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

NASA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION VS SMITH

No tentative....

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

STEPPE VS RESPONSIBLE MEDICAL SOLUTIONS CORP

The Court has no tentative ruling because it is unclear whether the parties have resolved this discovery dispute. On 12-21-20, the plaintiff represented that further responses had been served by the defendant, and that plaintiff would take the motion off calendar once the plaintiff had received the documents responsive to those requests. Counsel sh...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

MOSS BROS. CJDR VS BENITEZ

After two continuances for Defendant to file an opposition, Defendant has failed to do so. Court deems this motion a motion for summary adjudication of the first cause of action for reformation of the contract and grants the motion. Plaintiff does not address the remaining causes of action. Plaintiff must prepare a proposed order and give notice....

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

INTEGRITY BUILDERS & ASSOCIATES INC VS ONSEN LLC NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO REMOVE MECHANICS LIEN

Grant. Plaintiff Integrity Builders has not shown that probable validity of the mechanics’ lien is at issue in this motion. (Civ. Code, § 8488; Lambert v. Superior Court (1991) 228 Cal.App.3d 383, 387 (“Lambert”.) Under Lambert, a mechanic’s lien may be released if a lien claimant fails to establish the “probable validity” of the claim underlying i...

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2021

GILLESPIE VS STATE OF CALIFORNIA

The plaintiffs’ motion to compel Parsons Transportation Group to serve a further response to request for production of documents, set 3, no. 30, is denied. Analysis: As the Court suggested at the IDC, the plaintiffs initially recognized the potentially significant distinction between unedited recordings of the plaintiffs (i.e., still or video image...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

WASSMER VS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

I.THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION: Harassment on the basis of disability in violation of FEHA. It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer because of physical disability or medical condition to harass an employee. (Gov. Code, §12940(j)(1).) Harassment involves various forms of verbal and physical conduct, sexual or nonsexual, that create a hostile ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

WELLS FARGO BANK VS LOPEZ

The unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Proposed Order shall be signed....

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  • Judge

    Candice Garcia-Rodrigo

  • County

    Riverside County, CA

A. VS AEROSPORTS TRAMPOLINE PARKS, LLC

The Motion and Sanctions are DENIED. This is a right of privacy concern. Defendants provided no particularized need or the direct relevance of Plaintiff’s school records. Defendants fail to show how any suspension or disciplinary records relate to the TBI, post-concussive syndrome, depression and anxiety he claims as a result of the injury. Whi...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

HOPKINS VS CORONA POST ACUTE LLC

GRANT in part. DENY in part. Deny the Motion for Summary Judgment. Grant the Motion for Summary Adjudication as to the 2nd and 4th causes of action (issues 1 and 2 in the separate statement). These causes of action are for elder abuse and professional negligence. Both require a breach of the applicable standard of care and causation. Welf. & Inst. ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

JOHNSON VS LAVINE

DENY the motion. Plaintiffs have failed to provide any memorandum of points and authorities in support of this Motion. Further, Plaintiffs have provided no legal basis to support their request to strike the bond motion in its entirety....

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

GARREN VS EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT

Sustained. 30 days leave to amend. The facts of Up-Right, Inc. v. Van Erickson (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 579, 582 (Up-Right) are very similar to the present case. In this case, EWMD filed a cross-complaint against MWD alleging (1) equitable indemnity; (2) apportionment and contribution; and (3) declaratory relief. The cross- complaint does not allege th...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

GIBSON VS AGRE DCP PALM SPRINGS LLC NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR AN ORDER COMPELLING THE PRODUCTION OF RECORDS OF

Motion granted. Moving party to prepare the order and give notice....

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

GIBSON VS AGRE DCP PALM SPRINGS LLC NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR AN ORDER COMPELLING THE PRODUCTION OF RECORDS OF

Motion granted. Moving party to prepare the order and give notice....

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

TIFFANY KAMMERMAN- KRETZMER D.O. VS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

The unopposed motion is granted. Defendant Kim has met his burden of proof, Plaintiff however on the shifting of the burden has not met her burden of showing there are triable issues of material fact. There is no direct evidence that shows Defendant Kim made any defamatory statements about Plaintiff. However, even if he did make the alleged stateme...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

ALLY FINANCIAL V SAHAKYAN

No tentative....

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

WYNNE VS WYNNE

Motion is granted to modify the subpoena include only payments made to or from Mark Wynne, Kim Wynne, the Tatum Family Trust, the Kubski Group or any other business entity owned by Mark Wynne, or any transactions involving the subject property. The motion is denied as to the requests for sanctions. The Estate’s request for sanctions is also denied....

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

BH CENTRAL LLC VS CHICK- FIL-A INC

Leave to amend will be granted on the eve of trial so long as the delay in seeking the amendment has not misled or prejudiced the other party. (Higgins v. Del Faro (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 558, 564-565.) Prejudice exists where the amendment would result in a delay of trial, along with loss of critical evidence, added costs of preparation, and increase...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

RAHIMIAN VS MERCEDES- BENZ USA LLC

CONTINUE to March 24, 2021. General Order 2020-15 applies. The parties are ordered to meet and confer concerning the necessity and reasonableness of the proposed depositions. The JT on 4/9/2021 is continued to July 23, 2021....

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

LEPE VS GARCIA

The Court orders the parties to be present. Francisco Lepe has moved to set aside a purported default taken on him to Cross-Complainant’s first amended cross-complaint, but the registry of actions shows that Lepe’s answer to the cross-complaint was filed on 11/16/20. It would appear that this motion is moot....

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

VANDERKALLEN VS GLEN IVY RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK OWNERS

The court grants the request for judicial notice. Motion granted without leave to amend. Court finds no reasonable possibility that plaintiff can cure the defect. (Ferrick v. Santa Clara University (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 1337, 1341.) The Unfair Competition Law (UCL) does not apply to a homeowners’ association (HOA) unless the HOA engages in commerc...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

MATTER OF ROBERT & VERDA DAWSON TRUST

The motion of Carrillo to bifurcate the trial is denied without prejudice to the Court exercising its discretion to regulate the order of proof at trial. When conducting the Issues Conference mandated by RSC Local Rule 3401, the parties shall discuss whether one or both of the issues that Carrillo wishes to try first are issues that can be resolved...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

CLIFFORD VS LESTER

Demurrer overruled. The complaint alleges on information and belief that: 1. Defendant consumed lots of alcohol shortly before he decided to drive. 2. Defendant knew that he was severely impaired from the alcohol, but chose to drive. 3. Defendant was substantially certain that other drivers would be on the road at that time and that his impairm...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

RATCLIFFE VS EASIA GOLF INVESTMENT LLC

Grant. The motion is granted. The status conference is continued to February 22, 2021, to allow plaintiff to file a proper and CMO-compliant request to dismiss class claims....

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

ANTWONE LOVEST ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL VS MAXWELL SECURITY SERVICES INC

Grant. The PAGA claim is dismissed without prejudice and the remaining claims are dismissed with prejudice. The clerk is directed to dispose of case and close file....

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

MORENO VS K HOVNANIAN'S FOUR SEASONS AT BEAUMONT

No Tentative. Appearances required....

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

MAROTTE VS FOUNDATION BUILDING MATERIALS, INC

Grant and stay the fifth cause of action for PAGA penalties. The party seeking to compel arbitration has the burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration agreement by a preponderance of the evidence. (Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto Group (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 836, 842.) Here, Defendant has provided a copy of the signed arbitration agreement and...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

KOGANTI VS URSATI

Denied. Evidentiary issues: The Court has not considered the declarations submitted by TQL from Julia Kander, Marc Bostwick, and Brian Watts. Declarations signed under penalty of perjury outside the State of California that do not satisfy CCP §2015.5 are inadmissible in summary judgment and other authorized proceedings. (Kulshrestha v. First Union ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

DISCOVER VS BRODIE

The unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Proposed Order shall be signed. Order effective upon filing of proof of service of Order....

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

  • Judge

    Candice Garcia-Rodrigo

  • County

    Riverside County, CA

MONTELEONE VS DAVILA

Grant. Court sets OSC Re: Contempt and Sanctions for 3-26-21, 8:30 am, D-4. Plaintiff to personally serve Defendant Davila with Notice of OSC....

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

GARZA VS RIVERSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT

The Motion to Quash the Plaintiff’s Summons is GRANTED. The Summons has not issued in this matter as the Plaintiff has failed to pay the initial filing fee and the fee waiver request was denied on 8/27/2020....

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

BARNETT VS JURUPA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Hearing continued to February 18, 2021, 8:30 AM, Department 10. The moving party must satisfy its obligation to meet and confer under Code of Civil Procedure section 435.5, subdivision (a), and to file a declaration under section 435.5, subdivision (a), subsection (3). Counsel for Defendant sent an email a week before filing the Demurrer. (Nazli, ¶...

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

CAMP VS PLATINUM STORAGE GROUP

Sustained. 30 days leave to amend. Moving party has satisfied the statutory meet and confer requirement. The unopposed demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint is sustained, on all asserted grounds....

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

PETERS VS CITY OF BEAUMONT CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DEMURRER FOR UNCERTAINTY TO ANSWER

Overruled. Plaintiff brings this demurrer to Kapanicas’ answer. He contends that the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh affirmative defenses are uncertain because they do not specifically identify the cause of action to which they apply. Additionally, he asserts that the first, second, third, and fourth affirmative defenses imp...

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY VS FIGUEROA

Grant motion and sign proposed order....

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

NELSON VS DOES 1 THROUGH 50 INCLUSIVE

This is a products liability matter. Plaintiff Duane Nelson (plaintiff or Nelson) alleges that defendants Does 1-50 designed, manufactured, sold, and/or distributed tires on a 2004 Mack Granite truck (subject vehicle) which were defectively designed and manufactured causing them to unexpectedly and violently explode while driving. Plaintiff alleges...

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

LEON VS WAL-MART

The unnoticed motion for approval of the proposed PAGA settlement is once again denied. Any further application shall be brought in the form of a noticed motion and shall fully comply with the CMO. Analysis: The declaration of plaintiff’s counsel does not comply with sections E.6. and E.7. of the case management order. The proposed release does not...

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

POST VS BRANDINI ENTERPRISES INC

Motion granted with 30 days leave to amend as to 7th cause of action. Plaintiff has not pled fraud nor malice or oppression with required specificity. While the underlying claims may be generally alleged, specific factual allegations are required to support a punitive claim. (Smith v. Sup.Ct. (Bucher)) (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 1033, 1041–1042; (Anschu...

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

LA CRESTA PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION VS JSB LA CRESTA GROUP

CONTINUE to March 24, 2021....

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

MANSOUR VS BUMBLE TRADING UNCONTESTED MOTION FOR

Deny without prejudice. The Court finds multiple failures to comply with the CMO. The motion is denied without prejudice. The status conference is continued to April 7, 2021. ANY REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT SHALL BE HEARD AT 9AM...

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

HILT VS PREMIER CONNECTIONS

Sustain as to the fifth and sixth causes of action. Otherwise overrule. Defendant’s request for judicial notice is denied. The demurrer is sustained without leave to amend as to the fifth cause of action on the grounds that there is no private right of action to bring a civil claim for an employer’s failure to pay wages timely in accordance with La...

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

CARTER VS SELMAN CHEVROLET COMPANY NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER TRANSFERRING THE ACTION TO THE PROPER

Motion denied. Sanctions denied. The burden rests on the party seeking change of venue to defeat plaintiff's presumptively correct choice of court. (Buran Equipment Co. v. Superior Court (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 1662, 1666.) Further, when the defendant is a corporation, it has the burden of negating all possible bases of venue articulated in CCP §...

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

RAMIREZ VS NELSON RESTAURANT GROUP, INC

GRANT....

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

LI VS BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC

CONTINUE to March 24, 2021....

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

VIVA CAPITAL FUNDING LLC VS REVIVE MEDICAL LLC

The unopposed motion of the judgment creditor is denied. Analysis: The moving party failed to give notice of the motion to the judgment debtors 16 court days plus two calendar days prior to the hearing date....

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS BAKER

Granted. The November 13, 2020 Order imposing sanctions is set aside....

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

MADRIGAL VS MPS FINANCIAL, INC.

Off Calendar based on settlement....

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

FUEL INJECTION TECHNOLOGY INC VS FARRELL

The Court denies the motion to strike. Defendants Farrell and Hyperfuel to file an answer within 20 days. FACTUAL / PROCEDURAL CONTEXT Plaintiff Fuel Injection Technology, Inc. (“FIT”) designs and distributes aftermarket auto parts that enable the owner of an older carburetor-fed engine to convert it to electronically- managed fuel injection. This ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

MARTINSON VS BANNING UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Continued to 2-25-21, 8:30 a.m., Department 5. There is no declaration indicating that moving party spoke with plaintiff telephonically or in person prior to filing the demurrer as such, moving party failed to comply with their meet and confer obligations under CCP § 430.41(a). Defendant is ordered to meet and confer with Plaintiff by phone or in p...

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

COLUMBIA ENTERPRISES, LLC VS T.M. COBB COMPANY

Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice is Granted. Motion is Granted, in part, and Denied, in part. Motion is Granted on causes of action for Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Negligent Misrepresentation, and Denied for causes of action for Breach of Contract and Fraudulent Concealment. On the Breach cause of action, Columbia did not seek immediate...

  • Hearing

    Jan 19, 2021

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 100     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.