Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

Orange County, California

County Name

Orange County

Population

3,175,692

Area (sq mi)

948

County Seat

Santa Ana

Established Year

1889

Board of Supervisor

District 1 – Andrew Do
District 2 – Michelle Steel
District 3 – Donald Wagner
District 4 – Doug Chaffee
District 5 – Lisa Bartlett

Form of Government

Charter

Administration Address

Hall of Administration 333 W. Santa Ana Blvd. Santa Ana, CA 92701

Phone Number

(855) 886-5400

Meaning of Name

Oranges, to illustrate a perception of a region with a semi-tropical atmosphere to those from the eastern parts of the United States.

Rulings

1-100 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Provided that the City will stipulate to a preliminary injunction with respect to the provisions of Ordinance No. 6374 relating to immediate warrantless access to the short-term rental (STR) units, the Court DENIES the application for a preliminary injunction in all other respects, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ...

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

On March 1, 2019 the Court issued its ruling regarding the interpretation of Section 13.2(f) of the parties’ lease agreement. At the conclusion of oral argument relating to that issue, the Court allowed the parties the opportunity to brief two additional questions: (1) whether under the terms of the lease Defendant SARVS is entitled to be compensat...

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

1)Defendant Saddleback Corp's Motion for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication Against Plaintiffs 2)Defendant California Sheet Metal Works, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Adjudication 3)Defendants University Mechanical & Engineering Contractors, Inc.; Division 8, Inc.; and Wirtz Tile & Stone Inc.'s Motion for Summary Adjudication 4)De...

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

6-20-2019 at 1:30 PM Draft Proposed Judgment Duarte’s proposed judgment and writ (with the accompanying strike-through permit) go beyond what the Court ordered. The Court did not determine that the NEL requirements were improper, only that Respondents failed to comply with the CWC § 13241 in adopting the NEL requirements. See Decision at 10:9-1...

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Plaintiff Francisco Velazquez’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Kim D. Stephens, Gregory F. Coleman, Paul C. Peel, Jason T. Dennett and Adam A. Edwards The pro hac vice applications of Adam A. Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason T. Dennett, Kim D. Stephens, and Paul C. Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the ...

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

MALIN VS AMBRY GENETICS CORPORATION

Continued to 7-19-2019...

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

SAYER VS LUCERO

Off Calendar...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

CAHP CREDIT UNION VS REICH

Plaintiff CAHP Credit Union’s (“Plaintiff”) application for writ of possession as against defendants Aaron Reich and Steve Reich is DENIED without prejudice. As for defendant Aaron Reich the case is stayed. As for defendant Steve Reich, default was entered on 10/7/2020 (ROA 27). Because defendant Steve Reich is in default, he is barred from takin...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

LEE VS THE ARK OF LOVE COMMUNITY CHURCH, INC.

Plaintiffs’ respective Motions for protective orders are denied. “If the responding party seeks a protective order on the ground that the number of specially prepared interrogatories is unwarranted, the propounding party shall have the burden of justifying the number of these interrogatories.” (CCP 2030.040.) A greater number of interrogatories...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

NACHTRIEB VS. COUNTY OF ORANGE

Continued to March 08, 2021....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

LOPRESTI VS. SIMMONS

The Motion to be Relieved as Counsel of Record, filed by attorney Don Burns on 12/15/20 and again on 12/17/20 is DENIED without prejudice. An attorney moving to withdraw must meet the requirements of C.R.C. 3.1362, including C.R.C. 3.1362(c) [motion “must be” accompanied by a declaration on form MC-052]. The Motion as filed instead contains a dra...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

GRAHAM VS. WAKIM

The Motion to Strike filed by Plaintiff Lorcan Graham, as to the Defendant’s Verified Answer, etc., is GRANTED IN PART, with 10 days leave to amend. The Motion is evidently directed to a Verified Answer for Defendants Emile P. Wakim, M.D. and Mile Square Surgery Center, Inc. (“Defendants”) to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (the “SAC”), date...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

ECKARD V. TALON EXECUTIVE SERVICES, INC.

1) Motion for Protective Order 2) Motion to Compel Arbitration The Court grants the Motion by Defendants Talon Executive Services, Inc., Ron Williams, Manny Alcarez, and Justin Leonardo to Compel Arbitration of Plaintiff Michael Eckard’s Complaint, and stays this case pending conclusion of the arbitration. The accompanying Motion for Stay and Pro...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

LARSON VS. FREEDLINE

1. Demurrer to Cross-Complaint 2. Motion to Strike 3. Special Motion to Strike (SLAPP) Moving Party: Cross-Defendants Gregory Larson and Handy Randy Responding Party: None (would be Cross-Complainants Gary Freedline, Kyle Freedline-Scovis, and Justin Freedline through GAL Gary Freedline. Ruling Motion 1) Cross-Defendants’ Demurrer to the Cross-...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

SEGURA VS. SWAIN SIGN INC.

Motion to Strike or Tax Costs Moving Party: Defendants Swain Sign, Inc., and Eduardo Delgado Responding Party: Plaintiff Joshua Segura Ruling: Defendants’ Motion to Strike or Tax Costs is denied in part and granted in part. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1032, 1033.5.) The prevailing party is entitled to costs as a matter of right in any action or proc...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

BALBOA CAPITAL CORPORATION VS. SCULPT MEDICAL LLC

Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Moving Party: Defendant Julian Orenstein, M.D. Responding Party: Plaintiff Balboa Capital Corporation Ruling: Defendant Julian Orenstein, M.D.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED with fifteen (15) days leave to amend. Defendant’s Objection to Declaration is SUSTAINED. Only the pleading and ju...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

GARCIA VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC.

Plaintiff Felipe M. Garcia’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs (“Motion”) is GRANTED. As Plaintiff is the prevailing party on these lemon law actions, he is entitled to recover attorney fees. Civ. Code §§ 1780 and 1794(d)-(e). “The starting point of every fee award, once it is recognized that the court's role in equity is to provid...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

EZH INC. VS DASHTSEVEG

It appears that the parties were unsuccessful in pursuing informal resolution efforts. [See Status Report filed by Plaintiff, 1/13/21.] The Court adopts the ruling that is set forth in the minute order of 10/19/2020. “[T]here is ample evidence here that the current ‘parties to the pending litigation stipulate[d], in a writing signed by the pa...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

KARAME VS CHAYA

Currently before the Court are the following three motions: (1) The Demurrer filed by Defendants Leila Chaya (“Leila”) and Wagih Chaya (“Wagih”) (collectively the “Chayas”) on 11/17/20, as to the Second Amended Complaint (the “SAC”) filed by Plaintiffs Marwan Karame (“Karame”) and Mediterranean Maison, Inc. (“MMI”) on 10/28/20; (2) The Demurrer f...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. V. ROULUND

Motion to Vacate - DENIED The Motion by Plaintiff Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. for an order setting aside the dismissal entered in this action on 4/16/18 and for entry of judgment against defendant Paul Roulund in the amount of $20, 436.38 is denied. Plaintiff’s motion was not filed within six months of the dismissal as required by Section 473 ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

FAYLOR V. GLASSER

1) Demurrer to Cross-Complaint 2) Demurrer to Cross-Complaint CONTINUED TO 3/15/2021 AT 1:30 P.M....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

CARDENAS VS. GHOST GUNNER INC.

Motion to Permit Filing of Petition for Coordination Moving Party: Defendants Ghost Firearms, LLC, Thunder Guns, LLC, Ryan Beezley, Bob Beezley and MFY Technical Solutions, LLC Responding Party: All other parties Ruling: Defendant’s Motion to Permit Filing of Petition for Coordination of this action with McFadyen v. Ghost Gunner, San Bernardino...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

WEISS VS. OTHMAN

Off-Calendar....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

STARBOARD MACARTHUR SQUARE LP VS. HONARKAR

Motion for Sanctions and Protective Order Moving Party: Defendant/Cross-Complainant Mohammad Honarkar. Responding Party: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Starboard MacArthur Square, LP. Ruling: Defendant/Cross-Complainant Mohammad Honarkar’s Motion for Discovery Sanctions and Protective Order is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. (Code Civ. Proc., §§...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

BALBOA CAPITAL CORPORATION VS. DULLES URGENT CARE CENTER, LLC

Tentative pending....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

MURPHY VS. ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF ORANGE

Parties are to appear at the 01/25/21 hearing to discuss continuing the hearing on Defendant Roman Catholic Bishop of Orange’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Deem Requests for Admission as Admitted (“Motion”). Plaintiff Jeannie A. Murphy (“Plaintiff”) late filed and served her opposition. CCP § 1005. Defendant has requested the Court disregard the oppos...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

GO-STAFF, INC. VS. CRANE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

O/C...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

KARGMAN VS. WOODMEISTER MASTER BUILDERS, INC.

The Court has received and reviewed the unopposed, Verified Application of attorney Mark D. Cahill to Appear Pro Hac Vice for defendant/cross-complainant Woodmeister Master Builders, Inc.Essex Portfolio, L.P. (“Woodmeister”). Attorney Cahill’s application to appear pro hac vice as counsel for Woodmeister is GRANTED, as follows. (Cal. Rule of Court ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

IRVING VS. CASA BELLA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

Off-Calendar....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS. CUMMINGS

Plaintiff American Express National Bank’s unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment against defendant Sean Cummings aka Sean P. Cummings is GRANTED. Plaintiff has met its burden on summary judgment. It has offered admissible evidence entitling it to judgment. CCP §437(p)(1) The Court enters judgment in the amount of $77,373.15. It awards no costs at t...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

TRAN V. DOU

1) Motion to Vacate 2) Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal 3) Status Conference The Motion by Plaintiffs Man Tran and Phuong Tran to vacate the voluntary dismissal of Defendant Cheng Dou on 12/5/19 is denied. Code Civ. Proc. § 473(b) permits a court to grant relief from a judgment, dismissal, order or other proceeding taken against a party on...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

CITTELL VS. SOUTH COAST PLAZA

1. Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories 2. Motion to Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories 3. Motion to Compel Production 4. Motion to Compel Production Ruling: Defendant’s unopposed motions to compel are granted. Responses to interrogatories and inspection demands are due 30 days after service (plus appropriate time for metho...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

STRATEGIC FUNDING SOURCE, INC. VS. CYBER INSURANCE GROUP CORP

Demurrer to Complaint Moving Party: Defendant Aaron Bridges, in pro per Responding Party: Plaintiff Strategic Funding Source, Inc. Ruling: Defendant Aaron Bridges’ Demurrer to the Complaint is overruled. Defendant shall file an answer within 15 days of service of notice of ruling. To the extent, Defendant seeks sanctions against Plaintiff, Defe...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

SMITH VS. AMERICOR FUNDING, INC.

Motion to Strike Cross-Complaint Moving Party: Cross-Defendant Renauld Smith Responding Party: Cross-Complainant Americor Funding, Inc. Ruling: The Motion to Strike brought by Cross-Defendant Renauld Smith is DENIED. Within this Motion, Cross-Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of Complainant’s claim under Penal Code §496(a). Instead...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

GUPTA VS. SINGH

Motion for Entry of Judgment Moving Party (MP): Defendants Gurdwara Singh Sabha Buena Park Inc., Satinder Singh, and Gurudev Singh. Responding Party (RP): None (would be Plaintiff Sushant Gupta). Ruling: Defendants’ motion for entry of judgment is DENIED as unripe. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438.) The court’s August 24, 2020 Minute Order is hereby...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

KIVIAT V. MARRIOTT

1) Motion to Quash 2) Order to Show Cause re: Monetary Sanctions – party subject to sanctions shall appear 3) Status Conference -- continued to 3/15/2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. C32 4) Trial Setting Conference – continued to 3/15/2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. C32 The Motion by specially-appearing defendant David Daniel Marriott to Quash Service ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

AZTEC FORECLOSURE CORPORATION VS. ROBERTS

The unopposed motion of attorneys Robert E. Quintilone, II and Jeffrey T. Green of Quintilone & Associates (“Counsel”) to be relieved as counsel for defendants Keefe Roberts and Keefe Roberts & Associates PLC (collectively, “Defendants”) is DENIED, as follows. (Cal. Rule of Court 3.1362.) First, Counsel’s motion appears to be directed to “Keefe R...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

CASTELLANOS VS MONZON

Continued to 3/8/2021...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

BROWN VS FCA US LLC

No Tentative Ruling...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

KORTMAN VS GONZALEZ

Defendant Julian Gonzalez’s Motion to Set Aside the request for entry of default is GRANTED CONDITIONALLY. Initially, the record shows that there are two people named Julian Gonzalez residing at the address where personal service was purported to have been made, a Gonzalez Jr. and a Gonzales Sr. There is no evidence that both of these individuals...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

KABBOUT VS. ST. JOSEPH HEALTH

1. Demurrer to Amended Complaint 2. Motion to Strike OFF CALENDAR NOTICE TO WITHDRAW MOTION FILED 1/7/21...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

RAHBARI V. CHONG, MD

Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication OFF CALENDAR – Case dismissed 01/06/2021...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

ROSSI V. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC.

1) Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories 2) Motion to Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories 3) Motion to Compel Production ALL OFF CALENDAR – per request of moving party....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

OLD REPUBLIC GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION VS. ACCESSORIE AIR COMPRESSOR SYSTEMS, INC.

Off-Calendar....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

CITY OF COSTA MESA VS. PACIFIC SHORES RECOVERY, LLC

The Motion for Attorney’s Fees after Judgment, filed by Plaintiffs City of Costa Mesa and the People of the State of California (here collectively “City”), is GRANTED. Under Gov. Code §38773.5(b), a city may provide for the recovery of attorneys' fees in a nuisance abatement action. Here, City’s Municipal Code at §20-26(b) provides, with regard t...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

FLORES VS. CITY OF WESTMINSTER

The City’s opposition is accurate in stating that the Plaintiff’s papers would not likely meet the standards for granting a mandatory continuance under CCP 437c(h). As observed in Granadino v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2015) 236 Cal.App.4th 411, 420, “The declaration simply concluded that additional information and testimony is still required in orde...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS BATES

Plaintiff American Express National Bank’s unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff has offered admissible evidence entitling it to judgment. CCP §437(p)(1). The Court enters judgment in the amount of $48,882.17. It awards no costs at this time. Costs must be sought through a statutory memorandum of costs. Plaintiff is ordered ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

SIDDIQI VS DHG INVESTMENTS, LLC

1) MOTION FOR CCP 128.7 SANCTIONS After considering all the papers, the Court denies Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions. The Motion does not present a sufficient foundation to support the imposition of sanctions. Many of the arguments would be more suitable for a demurrer, particularly in light of the original complaint being the focus of challenge. ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

MORSE VS ESTATE OF RICHARD NICHOLSON

The City of Newport Beach’s Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoenas for the Production of Documents and Things is GRANTED. Discovery as to the Newport Beach Police Department’s investigative files is stayed pending the ongoing criminal investigation. On or about November 6, 2019, plaintiffs served deposition subpoenas to the Newport Beach Police Dep...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

ASATOURIAN LAW, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION VS. ZAMORA

Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens Moving Party (MP): Third Party Armando Marmolejo Responding Party (RP): Plaintiff Asatourian Law, APC Ruling: The Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens brought by Third Party Armando Marmolejo is GRANTED, pursuant to C.C.P. §405.31 and C.C.P. §405.32. The lis pendens recorded against the property located at 10121 Kaimu Dr....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

DUMBRAVA VS. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

1. Motion for Terminating Sanctions 2. Application to File Portion of Documents Under Seal Moving Party: Defendant The Regents of the University of California Responding Party: N/A OSC re Dismissal. If the plaintiff fails to appear, the case will be dismissed. Ruling: Defendant The Regents of the University of California’s unopposed Applicati...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

THORESON VS. DI OVERNITE LLC

Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication CONTINUED TO 3/8/21...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

BELLA STONE, INC. VS. CHESSANI

Demurrer to Answer to Cross-Complaint Moving Party: Defendant & Cross-Complainant Joseph Chessani Responding Party: Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Bella Stones Ruling: Defendant & Cross-Complainant Joseph Chessani’s Demurrer to the Answer to the Cross-Complaint is SUSTAINED with fifteen (15) days leave to amend Timing: The Demurrer was timely fi...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB VS. ELLIOTT

Motion to Vacate Moving Party (MP): Plaintiff American Express Bank, FSB Responding Party (RP): There were no responses filed to the instant motion to vacate. Ruling: Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Enter Judgment is granted. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff American Express Bank, FSB and against Defendant Brian Elliot...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

LARSON VS. FREEDLINE

1. Demurrer to Cross-Complaint 2. Motion to Strike 3. Special Motion to Strike (SLAPP) Moving Party: Cross-Defendants Gregory Larson and Handy Randy Responding Party: None (would be Cross-Complainants Gary Freedline, Kyle Freedline-Scovis, and Justin Freedline through GAL Gary Freedline. Ruling Motion 1) Cross-Defendants’ Demurrer to the Cross-...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

GARCIA VS. ARTEAGA

1. Motion to Compel Deposition Moving Party: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Kevin Garcia Responding Party: Defendant/Cross-Complainant Martin Arteaga 2. Motion to Disqualify Attorney of Record Moving Party: Defendant/Cross-Complainant Martin Arteaga Responding Party: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Kevin Garcia Ruling Motion 1) Ruling: Plaintiff’s Mot...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

SANCHEZ V. FOUNTAIN VALLEY REGIONAL HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER

Motion for Continuance of Trial OFF CALENDAR – Notice of Withdrawal filed 12/23/2020...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

GARCIA V. CEDAR FAIR MANAGEMENT, INC.

1) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories 2) Motion to Compel Production CONTINUED TO 2/1/2021 AT 1:30 P.M....

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

KALENA KAILI-THOMAS, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR PATRICIA NORBERG V. NORBERG

Motion for Order to Stay Proceedings Defendant Mary Norberg, individually and as trustee of the John and Mary Norberg Family Trust (“Defendant”), asks this Court to stay or dismiss this action pending resolution of a related probate action, In the Matter of: The John and Mary Norberg Family Trust dated March 30, 2015, Orange County Superior Court, ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

ABEBE V. SP PLUS CORPORATION

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record The Motion of Gordon, Rees, Skully, Mansukhani LLP, by Tamar Karaguezian, counsel of record for defendant Rafael Martinez, for an order relieving it as counsel for Defendant will be granted if, prior to the hearing, moving counsel files a valid proof of service showing timely service on Defendant. Otherw...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

K V. SADDLEBACK VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

1) Motion to Compel Deposition (Oral or Written) 2) Motion to Compel Production Defendant First Christian Church of Mission Viejo (the “Church”) seeks orders granting leave to take a subsequent deposition of Lois K. and compelling Lois K. to answer deposition questions and produce documents, along with an order imposing monetary sanctions. “A...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

IRVINE BAPTIST CHURCH V. IRVINE BAPTIST CHURCH REVIVAL COMMITTEE

1) Motion for Sanctions 2) Motion for Sanctions 3) Motion for Sanctions 4) Motion for Sanctions 5) Motion for Sanctions The Motions by Plaintiff Irvine Baptist Church for sanctions against Defendants Fred Kyung Kim, Irvine Baptist Church Revival Committee, David Kwon aka Nam Hyuk Kwon, Young Jo Shin, and Eric Songho Lee are denied for fai...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

MONTEMAYOR VS. YELLOW CAB OF GREATER OC

Plaintiff Magdalena Montemayor filed a voluntary dismissal of her action with prejudice. (See ROA #101; CCP § 581(b)(1), (c).) Accordingly, Defendant Soriano’s Motions to Compel against Plaintiff Magdalena Montemayor are deemed MOOT. Defendant Soriano’s Motions to Compel responses from Plaintiff Glorificador Montemayor are GRANTED. Plaintiff Glor...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

KNAUERHAZE VS. CITY OF WESTMINSTER

The Sur-reply has been received and considered. The Court issues the following rulings on the individual categories in the Motion: 1. All investigations of Ornelas conducted by the City before he was hired as Police Chief; The moving declaration ¶ 5 does not provide a sufficient showing of good cause and materiality to justify this request. T...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

JAMIE VS HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. The Motion fails to comply with C.R.C. 3.1324, as it does not identify the allegations in the FAC which are proposed to be deleted and which are proposed to be added, by page, paragraph, and line number. The Motion also fails to attach any supporting declaration from counsel...

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

JOYCE VS. H. BRONSON BASSIR, DDS, INC.

PLT Rose Joyce Motion - Other (Pursuant to the Appellate Court's Remittitur and Opinion on case G057169) As an initial matter, the Court notes plaintiff Rose Joyce (“Plaintiff”) did not state the legal authority in support of her requested relief in either the notice of motion or memorandum. Code Civ. Proc., § 1010 (“Notices must be in writing, a...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

SPEIER VS. THE ADVANTAGE FUND, LLC

Respondent The Discovery Fund, LLC; Respondent The Advantage Fund, LLC; Respondent The Victory Fund, LLC; Respondent The Freedom Fund, LLC Motion for Attorney Fees Respondents The Advantage Fund, LLC, The Discovery Fund, LLC, The Freedom Fund, LLC, and The Victory Fund, LLC (collectively, “Respondents”) seek attorneys’ fees in the amount of $164,21...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

DECUIR VS. ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY COMPANY

Status Conference ***CONTINUED TO 2/11/2021***...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

3.

Salgado vs. Main International Group Corporation...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

RODRIGUEZ VS. R.J. NOBLE COMPANY

Plaintiff Michael Rocha's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement The Court has reviewed the supplemental briefing filed in response to the December 4, 2020 minute order. The motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement is GRANTED. The Court also approves the current versions of the class notice, opt-out form and di...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

1.

Vigueras vs. Red Robin International Inc....

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

7.

Plaintiffs: Perez and the Class Motion for Approval of Class Settlement Continued to 2/11/2021 at 2:00 p.m. in Department CX103....

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

HERNANDEZ VS. QUALITY CUSTOM DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC.

Plaintiffs Jonathan Hernandez, Absalon Rameriz, and Angel Contreras-Teo's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

ALLEN VS. DIEBOLD GLOBAL FINANCE CORPORATION

Defendant Solon’s motion for leave to file cross-complaint. Motion moot. Relief requested was granted ex parte and cross-complaint has already been filed. Moving party to give notice....

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

BUSBY FAMILY, LLC V. ZERVOS

Defendants’ motion for attorney fees. Motion granted. (See Civ. Code § 171.7.) The court exercised its discretion and considered Plaintiffs’ untimely filed Opposition brief. (See Calif. Rules Court, rule 3.1300, subd. (d); Hobson v. Raychem Corp. (1999) 73 Cal.App.4th 614 [overruled on other grounds in Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, Inc. (19...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

OLSON, ET AL. V. CHEN, ET AL.

Defendant Deying Chen’s unopposed motions to compel Plaintiffs Mark Olson's and Tawnie Olson’s responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and request for production of documents are granted. A propounding party may move for an order compelling responses to interrogatories at any time “[i]f a party to whom interrogatories are dire...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

LARA V. BOOT BARN, INC., ET AL.

No tentative ruling....

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

RAHGOSHAY VS. WOSOUGHKIA

Plaintiff/cross-defendant Ragoshay’s demurrer to cross-complaint by Wosoughia. Demurrer sustained with 10 days leave to amend based on failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (CCP 430.10(e).) The first cause of action alleges an oral agreement for the sale of property, which is barred by the Statute of Frauds. (Cross-co...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

AMERICREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., VS. RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES SOLUTIONS, INC.

Plaintiff’s application for writ of possession. No opposition. Application denied, without prejudice. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 512.010.) Plaintiff failed to make the required evidentiary showing. A plaintiff moving for a prejudgment writ of possession must submit admissible evidence of: (1) A right to possession of the personal property to be sei...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

WANG VS. ELAM

1. Defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint. Demurrer sustained in part with leave to amend and overruled in part. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10, subd. (e).). The demurrers to the First Cause of Action are OVERRULED as to Defendant Michael Victor Elam, MD, and SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to Defendants Newport Center Outpatient Surgery...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

ALLEN V. TALLEY, LLP, ET AL.

The court grants Defendants Talley LLP, Talley & Company, Inc., Andrew A. Talley, Anthony T. Abercrombie, Todd T. Tillman, and Talley Law Group, LLP’s motion to compel further responses to requests for production of documents, set one, nos. 7, 9, 10, 12, 14-20, 22-27, 29, 30, 33-35, 37-49, 51-53, 55-57, 59, 61, 64-66, 68, 69, 71, 72, 85, 94, 95, 96...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

HERNANDEZ VS. QUALITY CUSTOM DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC.

Plaintiffs Jonathan Hernandez, Absalon Rameriz, and Angel Contreras-Teo's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement is CONTINUED to March 5, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. in Department CX104 to permit the parties to respond to the following items of concern. Any supplemental bri...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

OZUNA VS. CMRE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Plaintiff Krista Ozuna's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement is CONTINUED to March 5, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. in Department CX104 to permit the parties to respond to the following items of concern. Any supplemental briefing shall be filed on or before February 2...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

5.

Lake Forest Community Association vs. Pacific Aquascape International, Inc...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

8.

ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan vs. Vista Surgical Center Inc....

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

6.

Motion for Approval of Class Settlement Continued to 2/11/2021 at 2:00 p.m. in Department CX103....

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

DOE VS. IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Defendant Irvine Unified School District’s Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint is granted without leave to amend. Both sides’ Requests for Judicial Notice are granted. The District contends that governmental immunity under Gov. Code §818 for punitive damages, or for “other damages imposed primarily for the sake of example and by wa...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

VERSAILLES INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. V. CATANZARITE, ET AL.

Defendants Kenneth J. Catanzarite and Catanzarite Law Corporation's unopposed petition to confirm the contractual arbitration award against Plaintiff Versailles Investments, LLC, is granted. A petition to confirm an arbitration award must be filed within four years from the date of service of a signed copy of the arbitration award upon the petiti...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

ILLNITSKAYA V. ASSENT MORTGAGE, LLC, ET AL.

Hearing on demurrers and motions to strike complaint off-calendar. Demurrers and motions to strike rendered moot by 1/7/2021 filing of first amended answers by moving Defendants....

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

LAKE VS. DISCOUNT COURIER SERVICES, INC.

Plaintiff Adam Lake's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

OZUNA VS. CMRE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Plaintiff Krista Ozuna's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement is CONTINUED to March 5, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. in Department CX104 to permit the parties to respond to the following items of concern. Any supplemental briefing shall be filed on or before February 2...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

GRANT VS. CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY

1)Defendant Chapman University's Demurrer to Plaintiffs Findlay Grant and Desmond Jackson's First Amended Complaint 2)Defendant Chapman University's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs Findlay Grant and Desmond Jackson's First Amended Complaint DEMURRER The Court rules as follows with respect to Defendant Chapman University’s demurrer to the fi...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

2.

Salinas vs. Brasstech, Inc., a California Corporation...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

PITRE VS. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

Defendant Walmart Inc.'s Motion for Summary Adjudication Defendant Walmart, Inc. moves for summary adjudication of the following issues: Whether plaintiffs lack standing to sue. With respect to the first and second causes of action, whether plaintiffs are within the “zone of interests” of those permitted to sue. Whether plaintiff Cassandra Walters’...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

KENNEDY VS. ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL COMPANY, LLC

Defendant Alliance Residential’s motion for attorney fees. Motion granted. Moving Party is awarded a total of $58,000.00 which consists of the requested $14,080.00 spent defendant Sabag’s cross-complaint, the $18,920.00 for time spent enforcing the subcontract indemnity/defense/attorney fees and a portion of the time spent on defending against pl...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

RODRIGUEZ VS. R.J. NOBLE COMPANY

Plaintiff Michael Rocha's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement The Court has reviewed the supplemental briefing filed in response to the December 4, 2020 minute order. The motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement is GRANTED. The Court also approves the current versions of the class notice, opt-out form and di...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

GARCIA VS. GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

Plaintiff Fergus Murphy's Motion for Approval of Private Attorneys General Act (CAL. LAB. Code 2698, Et Seq.) Settlement Afreement and Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs, General Release Payment, and Settlement Administration Fee The Court has received and now reviewed the supplemental briefing (in the form of a stipulation—ROA 584) from the Murp...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

CHAN V. HAROUTOONIAN, ET AL.

Plaintiff Pui Fung Chan’s motion to vacate or continue the current March 1, 2021 trial date is granted in part. Trial dates are firm and all parties and their counsel must regard the date set for trial as certain. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1332(a).) When a party seeks a continuance of the trial date, whether by noticed motion or ex parte appli...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

VRIELING VS. VETERINARY MEDICAL AND SURGICAL GROUP

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment/adjudication. Motion denied. (CCP 437c.) Summary judgment is denied, as moving parties have not shown that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that they are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. (CCP 437c(c).) Moving parties’ request for summary adjudication is DENIED, due to moving...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

AKT FRANCHISE, LLC VS. SUN

1. Defendant’s motion to quash service of summons. Motion granted. Plaintiffs have not met their burden of proving these Moving Party defendants have sufficient contacts with the California to support personal jurisdiction. Aquila, Inc. v. Superior Court (2007) 148 Cal. App. 4th 556, 570. The “‘minimum contacts’ analysis looks to the defendan...

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 100     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.